Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b21bb/b21bb9e64609d6ff611ab5287732608d0fbd5fd6" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-5T front Sony Alpha NEX-5T front"
89 Imaging
58 Features
79 Overall
66
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Revealed August 2013
- Old Model is Sony NEX-5R
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony NEX-5T, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and NEX-5T (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and NEX-5T (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was launched 8 months earlier than the NEX-5T and they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-5T being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS grades vs the NEX-5T with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Alpha NEX-5T. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony NEX-5T Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony NEX-5T
XZ-2 iHS | NEX-5T |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5T over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
NEX-5T | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2013 | ![]() | December 2012 | More modern by 8 months |
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+2k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony NEX-5T
XZ-2 iHS | NEX-5T | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS features outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5T has specifications of 111mm x 59mm x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") and a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony NEX-5T in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-2 iHS compared to the NEX-5T.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aead0/aead0e5ab61bff81f1b2daab5729847b4ea15dd3" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the XZ-2 iHS and NEX-5T is 85 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96f48/96f4803efcdaa26f48a17034f4eb89604a452eee" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes simply by checking out specifications. The image here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the XZ-2 iHS and NEX-5T.
Plainly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Sony NEX-5T will produce extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0fe0/f0fe0f90544058439162746a97a98107bf19a609" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16e18/16e18ff7f45aa63bf10a0e0fa7e0d64ff30f261d" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-5T | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-5T |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2013-08-27 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 99 |
Cross focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | Tilt Up 180° Down 50° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 7.00 m (ISO100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x1080 (60p/60i/24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 276 gr (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 1015 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 330 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ((10/2 sec. delay), Self-timer (Cont.) (with 10 sec. delay; 3/5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $450 | $400 |