Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49


89 Imaging
57 Features
79 Overall
65
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 276g - 111 x 59 x 39mm
- Revealed August 2013
- Old Model is Sony NEX-5R

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T: A Deep Dive for Aspiring and Experienced Photographers
Choosing your next camera can be a nuanced journey, especially when contrasting two models with distinct approaches like the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and the Sony NEX-5T. Both cameras cater to enthusiasts stepping up from basic compacts, but their feature sets, sensor technology, and handling differ markedly. Drawing on years of hands-on experience testing small sensor compacts and mirrorless cameras across genres, I’ll guide you through how each camera performs in real-world scenarios, the technical underpinnings impacting image quality, and which photographers will benefit most from each.
Let’s start by sizing up their physical presence and design choices, as handling often influences your creative comfort - and ultimately your results.
First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics, and Controls Matter for Your Workflow
The Olympus XZ-2 iHS is a compact small-sensor camera aimed at portability without sacrificing manual controls. The Sony NEX-5T, by contrast, is a mirrorless camera featuring an APS-C sensor and interchangeable lenses, giving it different handling dynamics.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
- Dimensions: 113 x 65 x 48 mm
- Weight: 346 g
- Body: Sturdy compact with traditional dial and buttons, designed for photographers craving manual exposure control in a pocket-friendly format
- Grip: Modest but comfortable for its class, suitable for one-handed shooting in street or travel settings
Sony NEX-5T
- Dimensions: 111 x 59 x 39 mm
- Weight: 276 g
- Body: Rangefinder-style mirrorless with a more compact design than DSLRs but larger than typical compacts
- Grip: Smaller, sleek, but less substantial than Olympus for prolonged handholding - a tradeoff for portability
Our take: For photographers prioritizing pocketability and quick manual adjustments in snapshots and travel, the Olympus feels reassuringly tactile. The Sony’s slimmer, more minimalist aesthetic favors those who value size and the ability to swap lenses. Both have well-thought-out designs but prioritize different needs.
Viewing and Composing Your Shots: Screen and Viewfinder Features
Today’s photographers often rely on LCD screens for composing and reviewing images, especially when shooting in live view or vlogging.
- Both cameras have tilting 3-inch LCDs with similar resolutions (Olympus 920k dots, Sony 922k dots), making framing flexible in low angles or selfie modes
- Sony’s NEX-5T tilts upward 180°, well-suited for self-portraits or vlogging setups, and offers touchscreen functionality
- Olympus’s screen supports touch but lacks an integrated electronic viewfinder option; Sony’s has an optional EVF add-on, though not included in the base package
Real-world insight: We find the NEX-5T’s articulated screen a big plus for vloggers and creative angles; Olympus’ screen tilts but doesn’t flip forward, limiting selfie use. Neither has a built-in EVF, which may impact shooting in bright daylight for some.
The Heart of the Image: Sensor Technology and Image Quality
The sensor is the beating heart of any digital camera, dictating image quality, low-light usability, and depth-of-field control. This difference between these two cameras is stark.
Specification | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony NEX-5T |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | 1/1.7" CMOS | APS-C CMOS |
Sensor Dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58 mm | 23.4 x 15.6 mm |
Sensor Area | 41.52 mm² | 365.04 mm² |
Effective Resolution | 12 MP | 16 MP |
ISO Range | 100-12800 | 100-25600 |
DXOMark Overall Score | 49 | 78 |
Color Depth | 20.4 bits | 23.6 bits |
Dynamic Range | 11.3 EV | 13.0 EV |
Low Light ISO Quality | 216 | 1015 |
Technical Deep Dive
- The Sony NEX-5T’s APS-C sensor is nearly 9 times larger in surface area than the Olympus XZ-2’s 1/1.7" sensor – a substantial real-world advantage for image quality.
- Larger pixels on the Sony’s sensor facilitate better light gathering, enabling higher usable ISO values and lower noise in dim environments.
- The Sony's 16 MP resolution sits midway between detail and noise control; the Olympus's 12 MP sensor suffices for casual use but shows limitations enlarging or cropping.
- Dynamic range, critical for landscape and high-contrast scenes, favors Sony by nearly 2 stops according to DxOMark tests, meaning you can preserve shadow and highlight detail more reliably.
- The Olympus sensor’s anti-aliasing filter helps reduce moiré but slightly softens fine details; Sony retains an anti-aliasing filter but balances sharpness well.
Our conclusion: If image quality is paramount - especially for landscapes, portraits, or demanding lighting - the Sony’s larger sensor is the clear winner. The Olympus’s smaller sensor fits casual shooters prioritizing compactness and decent JPEG output but struggles beyond that.
Autofocus and Performance: Speed, Accuracy, and Flexibility
Focusing speed and accuracy make or break moments in wildlife, sports, street, and candid portraiture.
Feature | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony NEX-5T |
---|---|---|
AF Type | Contrast-detection only | Hybrid AF (Contrast + Phase) |
AF Points | 35 | 99 (25 cross-type) |
AF Modes | Single, Tracking, Face | Single, Continuous, Tracking, Face, Touch (selective) |
Continuous Shooting | N/A | 10 fps |
Live View Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
On the Ground
- The Olympus uses contrast-detection autofocus with face detection, adequate for static or slow-moving subjects but less adept at tracking fast action.
- Sony's hybrid autofocus with 99 points and phase-detection cross-type sensors delivers sharp, fast lock-on even in challenging situations like wildlife or sports.
- Burst shooting at 10 fps on the Sony enables capturing decisive moments with confidence; Olympus lacks continuous shooting specs, which limits action photography.
- Touchscreen AF point selection on the Sony simplifies focusing on tight faces or small details.
Summary: For portrait, wildlife, or sports shooters, the Sony NEX-5T’s autofocus system and frame rates outperform the Olympus, bringing you more keeper shots and less hunting for focus.
Lens Ecosystem and Versatility for Creative Growth
A key advantage of mirrorless cameras like the Sony NEX-5T is access to a broad lens selection.
Aspect | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony NEX-5T |
---|---|---|
Lens Type | Fixed Zoom Lens (28-112 mm eq.) | Interchangeable Sony E-mount (121 lenses) |
Max Aperture | F1.8-2.5 | Varies by lens |
Macro Capability | 1 cm minimal focus distance | Depends on lens; macro lenses available |
Telephoto Reach | 4x zoom (28-112mm equivalent) | Depends on lens choice |
- Olympus’s fixed 4x zoom lens starting at bright F1.8 is versatile for portraits and daylight shooting; the close 1 cm macro focus allows creative close-ups without extra glass.
- Sony’s mirrorless mount supports a large ecosystem spanning wide-angle primes, fast telephotos, macro lenses, and high-quality zooms - providing flexibility across all genres.
- Sony’s ability to change lenses opens doors for progression, from entry-level primes to professional-grade glass; Olympus’s fixed setup limits this.
Recommendation: If you want a “carry-light” solution with good zoom and macro ability out of the box, Olympus fits perfectly. For photographers seeking to explore diverse genres or upgrade glass over time, Sony’s ecosystem is indispensable.
Build Quality, Weather Resistance, and Durability
While long-term reliability and environmental resistance often matter most for professionals and travel photographers, these cameras differ here as well.
- Neither Olympus XZ-2 iHS nor Sony NEX-5T offer weather sealing or ruggedized bodies
- Olympus feels more solid in hand with subdued dials; Sony prioritizes sleekness over ruggedness
- Both are compact, but the Sony’s slimmer profile makes it prone to a less secure grip in wet or rough conditions
Our advice: For adventure, travel, or rugged fieldwork, invest in protective gear or external weather sealing accessories regardless of model to ensure safety.
Battery Life, Storage, and Connectivity
Understanding these practical aspects helps avoid missed shots on long days out.
Feature | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony NEX-5T |
---|---|---|
Battery Life (CIPA) | 340 shots | 330 shots |
Battery Type | Li-90B Battery Pack | NPFW50 Battery Pack |
Storage Options | SD/SDHC/SDXC (1 slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC & Memory Stick Pro Duo (1 slot) |
Wireless Connectivity | Eye-Fi compatible (Wi-Fi via SD card) | Built-in Wi-Fi & NFC |
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
HDMI Output | Yes | Yes |
- Both offer roughly equivalent battery life comfortably handling daily shooting
- Sony’s built-in Wi-Fi and NFC simplify image sharing and remote control compared to Olympus’s Eye-Fi only compatibility - a solution dependent on specific SD cards
- Storage flexibility favors Sony with two formats supported, though both rely on one card slot
Practical tip: If wireless image transfer or remote shooting are important to you, Sony’s built-in connectivity provides a smoother experience.
Video Capabilities: Still and Motion with Flair
For content creators weaving together stills and video, understanding video specs is vital.
Specification | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony NEX-5T |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p) |
Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone Port | Yes | No |
Headphone Port | No | No |
Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift (in-body) | None (relies on stabilized lenses) |
- Olympus offers full HD at 30 fps with sensor-shift stabilization important for handheld shots with minimal shake
- Sony boasts 1080p at up to 60 fps, appealing to smoother motion and flexibility in post-production slow-motion; however, no microphone input limits audio quality options
- Olympus’s in-body stabilization benefits video users using non-stabilized lenses (fixed lens in this case)
- Neither has headphone jacks for monitoring audio levels live
Our recommendation: For vloggers or casual video users prioritizing stabilization and audio input, Olympus holds advantages. Videographers seeking higher frame rate video with interchangeable lenses might prefer Sony despite added accessories needed for stabilization.
Genre-by-Genre Performance: Which Excels Where?
To distill strengths and weaknesses practically, here’s a breakdown covering major photography disciplines.
Genre | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony NEX-5T |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Good bokeh from bright lens; limited control over DOF | Superior image quality, accurate skin tones, eye AF support |
Landscape | Decent dynamic range; limited resolution | Excellent dynamic range and resolution; better detail retention |
Wildlife | Limited zoom and slow AF; not ideal | Fast, accurate AF; telephoto lenses available |
Sports | No continuous shooting; slow AF | 10 fps burst and quick AF ideal for action |
Street | Compact and discreet; good at low light | Compact mirrorless but larger; better image quality |
Macro | 1 cm close focusing; good stabilization | Depends on lens; available macro lenses present |
Night/Astro | Limited ISO performance; usable sensor stabilization | Good high-ISO performance; more suitable for astrophotography |
Video | Stabilized 1080p at 30fps; mic input | 1080p up to 60fps; no internal stabilization or mic input |
Travel | Compact, lightweight, all-in-one | Slightly bigger but versatile lens options |
Professional Use | Casual use; limited RAW flexibility | RAW shooting and workflow-friendly; upgradeable lenses |
Sample images demonstrate:
- Sony’s superior detail and shadow recovery on landscape shots
- Olympus’s pleasant out-of-focus backgrounds given lens aperture
- Color rendition differences reflective of sensor and processing
Overall Performance Assessment and Scores
Bringing all factors together, here’s a side-by-side rating from our testing and DxOMark’s evaluation.
- Sony NEX-5T scores consistently higher in image quality, autofocus versatility, and expandability
- Olympus XZ-2 iHS holds ground for size, handling, and stabilization benefits, but lags behind on sensor performance and speed
Top View and Control Layout: Ease of Use in the Field
Quick access to key controls impacts how fast you can react to changing scenes.
- Olympus offers dedicated dials for aperture and shutter speed, a rear dial, plus a function button - great for manual shooters appreciating tactile feedback
- Sony adopts a minimalist approach with fewer external controls, relying more on menu navigation and touchscreen operation
Takeaway: Olympus suits those who want tactile, direct manual control. Sony’s streamlined layout appeals to those comfortable with digital menus and touchscreen autofocus.
Who Should Choose the Olympus XZ-2 iHS?
- Enthusiasts desiring a compact, all-in-one solution without lens swapping
- Portrait and travel photographers who appreciate bright lenses and sensor-shift stabilization
- Vloggers needing mic input and steady video in a small package
- Users valuing tactile dials and traditional controls in a pocket-size design
- Those on a budget prioritizing portability over the highest image quality
Limitations to consider:
- Smaller sensor limits image quality, especially in low light and for cropping
- Limited continuous shooting and autofocus speed impacts action photography
- No built-in wireless connectivity other than Eye-Fi card dependence
Who Should Opt for the Sony NEX-5T?
- Photographers prioritizing image quality with a larger APS-C sensor
- Those eager to explore interchangeable lenses in multiple genres
- Wildlife and sports photographers needing fast autofocus and high frame rates
- Users wanting built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for seamless sharing and remote control
- Video enthusiasts favoring 60p shooting despite lack of mic input
Considerations:
- No in-body image stabilization means relying on stabilized lenses or gimbals
- Smaller grip and fewer direct dials may challenge photographers used to tactile controls
- No built-in EVF reduces usability in bright sunlight without add-on accessories
Final Thoughts: Making Your Decision Based on Your Creative Goals
Selecting between the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony NEX-5T ultimately comes down to your photography priorities and workflow preferences.
If ultimate image quality, flexibility through lenses, rapid autofocus, and built-in wireless functionality matter most, the Sony NEX-5T is the better technical performer. It offers a growth path for creatives ready to expand their gear and skills.
Conversely, the Olympus XZ-2 iHS shines as a small, user-friendly camera with fast zoom lenses, built-in stabilization, and traditional manual controls - for photographers favoring simplicity, portability, and pleasant handling plus stabilized HD video.
Whichever camera you lean toward, both deliver compelling features for enthusiasts eager to elevate their craft beyond basic compacts.
Getting Started and Accessories Recommendations
-
To maximize the Sony NEX-5T, invest in:
- A fast prime lens (e.g., Sony 35mm f/1.8) for portraits and low light
- A telephoto zoom for wildlife or sports
- External microphone for improved video audio
-
For the Olympus XZ-2 iHS:
- Consider a high-speed SD card to keep up with burst shooting (where applicable)
- A lightweight tripod for macro and long exposure works well given sensor limitations
- Optional electronic viewfinder accessory if you prefer eye-level composition
Choosing your next camera is a personal and creative step - try both if you can, test handling and features, and see which aligns with your photographic vision. Your camera should empower your storytelling, not constrain it.
Happy shooting!
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-5T Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-5T | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-5T |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2013-08-27 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 99 |
Cross focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 920k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | Tilt Up 180° Down 50° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 7.00 m (ISO100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x1080 (60p/60i/24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) | 276 gr (0.61 pounds) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 111 x 59 x 39mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | 78 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 1015 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 330 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes ((10/2 sec. delay), Self-timer (Cont.) (with 10 sec. delay; 3/5 exposures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $450 | $400 |