Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90dc9/90dc94a541028ea772791a0c7d7016eaa915f96a" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front"
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Announced August 2012
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-C3
- Newer Model is Sony NEX-3N
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony NEX-F3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The XZ-2 iHS was released 5 months after the NEX-F3 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the NEX-F3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony NEX-F3
XZ-2 iHS | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
NEX-F3 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony NEX-F3
XZ-2 iHS | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | ![]() | August 2012 | Similar generation |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 920k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with physical dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-F3 has dimensions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony NEX-F3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the NEX-F3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93489/93489c59cb9bad2406f3595c92262335cf751cb9" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and NEX-F3 is 85 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0f9b/a0f9bfaf1e5d40a3c4e1cffa1c9954368600fc11" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The image below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and NEX-F3.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The XZ-2 iHS due to its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Sony NEX-F3 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7b7f/b7b7f3c3230fcd8339c89ba50ce0d68c7e94d1e7" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f92d/5f92d572b63cde91b9bde190c5b6a2bd4030d2ff" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2012-08-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 16000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 920k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 314 gr (0.69 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 49 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | 216 | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | 470 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $450 | $470 |