Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W230
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W230 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- 156g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W230 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W230, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the W230 (12MP) is very comparable but the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and W230 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe XZ-2 iHS was introduced 3 years later than the W230 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the XZ-2 iHS matches up against the W230 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W230 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus XZ-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery & Sony W230 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Sony W230
| XZ-2 iHS | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 47 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W230 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| W230 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and Sony W230
| XZ-2 iHS | W230 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W230 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS has outside measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the Sony W230 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
See the Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W230 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the XZ-2 iHS versus the W230.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-2 iHS and W230 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W230 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements merely by going through technical specs. The graphic below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the XZ-2 iHS and W230.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical MP but not the same sensor measurements. The XZ-2 iHS comes with the larger sensor which should make obtaining bokeh simpler. The younger XZ-2 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W230 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Sony W230 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W230 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-12-18 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 35 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 4cm |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 346 grams (0.76 lb) | 156 grams (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 340 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $450 | $180 |