Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs YI M1
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
87 Imaging
59 Features
66 Overall
61
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs YI M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 350g - 114 x 64 x 34mm
- Released September 2016
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs YI M1 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus YI M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and YI. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and M1 (20MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") and M1 (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe XZ-2 iHS was announced 4 years prior to the M1 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the YI M1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the XZ-2 iHS scores against the M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs YI M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus XZ-2 iHS and YI M1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery and YI M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the YI M1
XZ-2 iHS | M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick YI M1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
M1 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | December 2012 | More modern by 45 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus XZ-2 iHS and YI M1
XZ-2 iHS | M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs YI M1 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus XZ-2 iHS comes with external dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs) whilst the YI M1 has proportions of 114mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 350 grams (0.77 lbs).
Check the Olympus XZ-2 iHS versus YI M1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the XZ-2 iHS and the M1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the XZ-2 iHS and M1 is 85 and 87 respectively.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs YI M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The image underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the XZ-2 iHS and M1.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The XZ-2 iHS using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the YI M1 will give extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged XZ-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs YI M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs YI M1 Specifications
Olympus XZ-2 iHS | YI M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | YI |
Model | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | YI M1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-12-18 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Red-Eye Slow |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 75 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 346 gr (0.76 lb) | 350 gr (0.77 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") | 114 x 64 x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 216 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photos | 450 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $450 | $320 |