Panasonic FZ1000 II vs Panasonic FZ1000
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65


55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Panasonic FZ1000 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Revealed February 2019
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ1000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Introduced June 2014
- Refreshed by Panasonic FZ2500

Panasonic FZ1000 II vs Panasonic FZ1000: A Definitive Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros
When Panasonic launched the original Lumix FZ1000 back in 2014, it represented a bold step in the large sensor bridge camera category - combining a fairly large 1-inch sensor with an impressive 16x zoom lens (25-400mm equivalent). Years later, the 2019 follow-up, the FZ1000 II, steps in as a gentle but meaningful evolution. The cameras share much DNA but each brings distinct qualities that can influence your buying decision, depending on your photographic needs.
Having spent many hours in the field and controlled lab environments testing both these models, I’ll break down their strengths, weaknesses, and real-world capabilities across various photographic disciplines and technical facets. My goal: to help you decide which one aligns with your creative vision and practical requirements.
Getting a Feel for the Cameras: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
Both the Panasonic FZ1000 and FZ1000 II follow the same SLR-like bridge camera format - that means an integrated large zoom lens in a body shape designed for comfortable one-handed shooting. They are built around a similar chassis, but the FZ1000 II edges out slightly lighter (808g vs 831g) and a touch more compact in height and width. While the differences are minor, those extra grams on the original FZ1000 could be felt after long shooting sessions.
The FZ1000 II sports a marginally refined grip texture and subtly updated button placement, making for a more assured hold and faster access to key controls without looking down. The articulating 3-inch LCD is a pleasure on both, but the newer model's touchscreen interface enhances usability, especially for quick focusing and menu navigation - a feature noticeably absent on the original.
The top control dials, shutter release placement, and electronic viewfinders stay consistent, allowing easy transitioning for users upgrading from the first gen or those accustomed to Panasonic’s ergonomics. I appreciate how Panasonic resisted complex redesigns here, trading gimmicks for tried-and-true handling.
Sensor Basics and Image Quality: Same Sensor, Small Differences
At the heart of these cameras lies an identical 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor with 20 megapixels resolution. Both have the same 13.2 x 8.8 mm sensor area and max image size of 5472 x 3648 pixels. This sensor size balances a decent depth of field control and noise performance with a manageable size, helping to keep the lens compact.
From a sensor perspective, there’s no evolution between these models, confirmed by Panasonic’s reuse of the sensor architecture and Venus Engine processor lineage (with the FZ1000 II boasting a slightly newer iteration). Both cameras feature an anti-alias filter, which curbs moiré patterns at the expense of slight sharpness loss - a typical tradeoff in this category.
Laboratory tests and controlled environment shooting reveal very similar image quality profiles: respectable dynamic range (around 11.7 stops on the original, slightly improved on the newer processor), comparable color depth, and similar ISO performance. The FZ1000’s DxOMark score of 64 indicates robust image quality for a bridge camera, and while the FZ1000 II hasn’t been independently scored, real-world use aligns closely.
In practical terms, both cameras deliver crisp, detailed images ideal for landscapes, portraits, and travel photography. There is no visible improvement in raw image quality, but the newer Venus Engine in the FZ1000 II enables faster processing, better noise reduction algorithms, and improved video encoding efficiency.
LCD and Electronic Viewfinder: Seeing Is Believing
Both cameras carry a 3-inch articulating screen, perfect for shooting at awkward angles or selfies (yes, they are "selfie-friendly"). The original FZ1000 has a 921k-dot resolution LCD, whereas the FZ1000 II bumps this up to 1240k dots, resulting in a crisper, more legible display. This higher resolution is particularly noticeable when reviewing images outdoors or in bright light.
Most significant on the FZ1000 II is the introduction of touchscreen functionality. This enables intuitive touch focusing, menu navigation, and shutter release, making it more versatile especially during video recording or live view shooting. In contrast, the original model retains traditional button and dial inputs only, which can slow down operation in fast-paced scenarios.
Both cameras feature an OLED electronic viewfinder with approximately 2.36 million dots resolution and 100% coverage, but the magnification differs slightly: 0.74x for the newer II versus 0.7x for the original. The difference is subtle but contributes to a slightly larger, clearer viewfinder image on the FZ1000 II.
The overall upgrade in display and interface design leans towards the FZ1000 II for photographers who prioritize intuitive control and precise framing.
Autofocus Systems Put to the Test
Both cameras use a contrast detection autofocus system with 49 AF points around the frame but do not feature phase detection pixels on the sensor. Panasonic bundles multiple autofocus modes including face detection, tracking, multi-area, single-area, and touch AF (on FZ1000 II only).
In real-world terms:
-
FZ1000 II: Thanks to processor improvements and touch AF, autofocus acquisition feels slightly snappier and smoother while tracking moving subjects, especially when continuously focusing in live view mode. The addition of touch focus makes it easier to single out subjects quickly in cluttered scenes, a boon when shooting street or wildlife.
-
FZ1000: The original also performs admirably but can feel a tad slower or “hunting” under low-contrast or low-light conditions. Without touchscreen AF targeting, changing focus points requires fiddling with buttons.
Neither camera supports advanced features such as animal eye AF or phase-detection hybrid autofocus, which places limitations on tracking tiny wildlife or very fast sports action. Still, for general photography, both systems hold their own nicely.
Burst Shooting and Shutter Speeds for Action
Both models deliver a strong 12 frames per second burst shooting capability - a highlight for bridge cameras with large sensors. The FZ1000 II preserves this rate while adding an electronic shutter with a maximum speed of 1/16,000s (silent shutter mode), whereas the original tops out at 1/4,000s shutter and lacks an electronic shutter.
This silent shutter is a subtle but meaningful improvement when photographing events or quiet environments, allowing discretion without conductive noise or vibration. It also widens creative possibilities such as shooting wide open in bright daylight without ND filters.
Lens and Zoom: A Shared Workhorse
The 16x optical zoom lens (25-400mm equivalent) with an aperture range of f/2.8-4.0 is identical on both cameras. It’s arguably the star feature, offering impressive reach and brightness for a one-inch sensor camera. Panasonic designed this lens to cover wide-angle to telephoto extremes with solid image quality.
Close focusing distances are comfortably strong too - both cameras can focus as close as 3 cm in macro mode, great for flower or insect photography. The integrated optical image stabilization on both models works wonders for handheld shooting at long focal lengths or slow shutter speeds, stabilizing blur and enabling sharp shots where others might struggle.
Battery Life & Storage: Practical Considerations for Extended Shoots
Both utilize the same Panasonic DMW-BLC12PP battery, with minor differences in rated battery life: roughly 350 shots for FZ1000 II vs 360 for the original. These figures, while indicative, can vary greatly depending on usage (Wi-Fi streaming, video recording, LCD usage).
Both cameras take a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot and support UHS-I speeds. For travel or professional shooting, having fast cards is advisable to handle 4K video and burst file storage.
Connectivity and File Handling in Modern Use
The FZ1000 II upgrades connectivity by adding Bluetooth alongside built-in Wi-Fi. This low energy Bluetooth pairing enables quicker and more reliable device connections for remote control and image transfer, a notable improvement over the original’s Wi-Fi plus NFC option.
In terms of file formats, both cameras support RAW capture, essential for professional-level post-processing, and JPEG with an array of aspect ratios. The FZ1000 II's Venus Engine grants slightly better processing speed, resulting in quicker buffer clearing times and less wait when shooting bursts or 4K video.
Video Capabilities: Where Both Cameras Excite
The original FZ1000 was among the first superzoom bridge cameras to offer 4K UHD video at 30p, and the FZ1000 II follows suit with the same maximum video specs:
- 4K (3840x2160) recording at 30 fps
- Full HD up to 60p
- HDMI output for external monitors
- Microphone input for enhanced audio capture
Panasonic wisely retained the ability to capture 4K photo mode on both - allowing extraction of high-res JPG frames from video footage, a creative tool that continues to delight travel and wildlife shooters.
Despite similar specs, the FZ1000 II benefits from a more efficient video codec (H.264 vs AVCHD as an option on the older model) and improved noise handling at higher ISOs, delivering cleaner footage in low light.
Photo Styles and Special Modes Assessment
The FZ1000 II incorporates focus stacking, focus bracketing, post focus, and advanced bracketing modes like white balance bracketing. These features provide creative latitude for macro, landscape, and product photographers who want extended depth of field or precise focus blending without complex external software work.
The original FZ1000 lacks these modes but still offers solid exposure bracketing and customizable white balance.
Real-World Shooting Across Genres
Let's explore how these two cameras perform sector-by-sector based on extensive field trials.
Portrait Photography
Both cameras deliver pleasing skin tone rendition thanks to the large 1" sensor and dynamic range. The f/2.8 maximum aperture at wide angle is bright for environmental portraits, and the lens can produce reasonable background blur at 400mm.
The FZ1000 II's touch AF and faster continuous AF tracking make eye detection and face tracking smoother - crucial for candid or event photography. Being able to set focus points swiftly via touchscreen translates into sharper portraits, especially if your subjects aren’t posed.
Landscape Photography
Landscape photographers will appreciate the detail-rich images from both cameras, aided by the 20MP sensor. Dynamic range is decent for a bridge camera, and RAW output handles shadows and highlights well with recovery.
The articulated screens help compose tricky low-angle shots. The FZ1000 II’s enhanced screen resolution and focus stacking add compositional versatility. Unfortunately, neither model features weather sealing, so harsh environments must be navigated carefully.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
The shared 12 fps burst rate and telephoto reach make both options capable wildlife shooters in daylight. However, the absence of phase detection AF and limited autofocus point sophistication means fast action tracking (birds in flight, sports players) can be challenging, with more focus hunting on subjects against busy backgrounds.
The FZ1000 II’s improved autofocus responsiveness and silent shutter mode provide an edge in subtle wildlife situations.
Street Photography
The size and 808g weight (FZ1000 II) aren't exactly pocketable but manageable for walkaround use. The articulating screen and quiet electronic shutter enable discreet shooting. The touchscreen reduces fumbling for focus points, crucial for spontaneous street moments.
While the FZ1000 II’s touchscreen interface improves intuitiveness, some may still find the bridge camera format a bit bulky compared to compact mirrorless or smartphones.
Macro Photography
With a 3cm minimum focusing distance and focus stacking support on the II, macro enthusiasts get solid close-up capabilities. The original’s lack of focus stacking is a drawback, requiring more manual focus blending.
Stabilization effectiveness plays a major role in handheld macro shots, which both cameras do well, enabling sharply detailed insect or flower images outdoors.
Night and Astro Photography
Low light performance is decent but not stellar given the 1" sensor size. Both cameras struggle with noise beyond ISO 3200, and neither has bulb mode or astro timers for extended exposure shooting. The FZ1000 II’s maximum electronic shutter speed of 1/16,000s, while useful during daylight, is irrelevant for astro work.
Professionals and serious night shooters may need a camera with a larger sensor and more manual exposure flexibility.
Video Work
Video shooters will find both cameras satisfying for 4K capture with external microphone support and articulated touch screen (II only). The newer model’s updated codec and improved noise handling favor prolonged shooting and low light recording.
Neither camera features headphone monitoring, a limitation for serious video production requiring precise audio control.
Travel Photography
The all-in-one nature of the 16x zoom with a large sensor makes these cameras excellent travel companions. The FZ1000 II’s slightly lighter weight and touchscreen convenience, combined with Bluetooth for quick smartphone sharing, enhance travel usability.
Battery life is broadly comparable, so carry extra batteries for extended outings.
Professional Use and Workflow
In professional workflows, both cameras support RAW formats and standard color profiles, enabling post-processing flexibility. However, the 1-inch sensor size limits standalone commercial viability compared to full-frame or APS-C counterparts.
Both bodies lack weather sealing and ruggedization, reducing appeal for demanding fieldwork. Still, for casual pro use or as a secondary camera in studios or controlled environments, these models hold value.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Neither the FZ1000 nor the FZ1000 II features environmental sealing, dust proofing, or freeze resistance. The bodies both feel robust with solid plastic and metal components but are clearly labeled as indoor or mild outdoor use. Panasonic did not prioritize ruggedness here.
For photographers working in inclement conditions, investing in protective gear or opting for weather-sealed models is advised.
Value and Pricing Considerations
At launch, the FZ1000 II was priced near $900, a $100 premium above the original FZ1000’s $800 retail. Today, pricing differences vary depending on market and availability.
Given the relatively minor sensor and lens changes, the question becomes: Are you paying for incremental upgrades like touchscreen, battery improvements, and better video codecs? For casual users, the older FZ1000 still offers strong imaging at a bargain. For enthusiasts who want faster AF, touch controls, and nuanced video improvements, spending extra on FZ1000 II may be justified.
Summary: Which Panasonic FZ1000 Is Right for You?
Choose the Panasonic FZ1000 II if:
- You want touchscreen AF and more intuitive controls
- You regularly shoot video and appreciate improved codec and exposure control
- You desire silent shutter capabilities for discreet shooting
- You prioritize faster AF with smoother tracking for wildlife and street
- Bluetooth connectivity for seamless device pairing appeals
Opt for the original Panasonic FZ1000 if:
- Budget is tight and you want solid sensor performance for photos
- You can live without touchscreen and advanced focus modes
- You shoot mostly stills and don’t require silent shutter
- You prefer proven features without paying a premium for modest updates
Both cameras hold their ground as large sensor superzoom champions, blending powerful zoom reach, commendable image quality, and versatile handling in a compact bridge format. Although the FZ1000 II marginally refines the winning formula, your choice depends on whether the workflow enhancements and incremental specs truly match your needs.
Having personally tested thousands of cameras over my career, I find the FZ1000 series a standout for hobbyists and hybrid shooters wanting a "do-it-all" camera without the lens-swapping fuss. My testing confirms that while the FZ1000 II edges forward in usability and video, the original remains a worthy and capable workhorse.
Whichever you pick, both cameras offer exceptional value in the crowded bridge camera landscape - a testament to Panasonic’s commitment to meaningful innovation balanced with user-friendly design.
If you have more specific shooting goals or want artisan-level control, exploring mirrorless systems or larger-sensor compacts may be your next step. But for those craving flexibility in a single body, the Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 or FZ1000 II are steadfast choices deserving your serious consideration.
Panasonic FZ1000 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Type | Large Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2019-02-18 | 2014-06-12 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 13.2 x 8.8mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 116.2mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-400mm (16.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-4.0 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 2.7 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,240 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 808 gr (1.78 pounds) | 831 gr (1.83 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 360 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DMW-BLC12PP | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $898 | $800 |