Clicky

Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
42
Overall
40
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Announced February 2015
  • Newer Model is Olympus TG-870
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Released December 2012
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-860 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TG-860 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use totally different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The TG-860 was launched 2 years later than the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TG-860 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 TG-860 XZ-2 iHS 
ReleasedFebruary 2015December 2012Fresher by 26 months

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-860

 XZ-2 iHS TG-860 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Screen resolution920k460kCrisper screen (+460k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 TG-860 XZ-2 iHS 
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-860 enjoys exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Check the Olympus TG-860 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-860 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-860 and XZ-2 iHS is 91 and 85 respectively.

Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The visual below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-860 and XZ-2 iHS.

To sum up, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-860 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-860 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger TG-860 will have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus TG-860
Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
35
decent MP (16 megapixels)
offers face detect focusing
no manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
46
focusing manually
has face detect focus
delivers RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-860 Street photography details
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography details
69
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
environment proof
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
66
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
very small sensor (1/1.7")
more heavy than competitors (346g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-860 Sports photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography factors
48
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
great battery life (340 per charge)
MP count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-860 Travel photography advice
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography advice
71
environment proof
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (21mm)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
61
great battery life (340 per charge)
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
missing Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (346 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
does not offer selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-860 Landscape photography factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography factors
47
reasonably wide (21mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
environment proof
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
55
focusing manually
relatively wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
great battery life (340 per charge)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/1.7")
missing Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-860 Vlogging info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging info
33
reasonably wide (21mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
doesn't have mic support
36
relatively wide (28mm)
great maximum aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have microphone support
does not offer selfie friendly display
more heavy than competitors (346 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-860 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Type Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2015-02-06 2012-12-18
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Highest native ISO 6400 12800
Minimum native ISO 125 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points - 35
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 21-105mm (5.0x) 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.7 f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Type of display Tilting Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 460 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 7.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Yes None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 224g (0.49 lb) 346g (0.76 lb)
Dimensions 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 49
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.3
DXO Low light score not tested 216
Other
Battery life 300 pictures 340 pictures
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Retail price $279 $450