Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-870
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-860 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-860 (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the TG-860 (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-860 was launched 2 years later than the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the TG-860 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-860 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-860 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | December 2012 | Fresher by 26 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-860
XZ-2 iHS | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-860 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
TG-860 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-860 enjoys exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-860 versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-860 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-860 and XZ-2 iHS is 91 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by seeing specifications. The visual below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-860 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-860 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-860 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger TG-860 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-860 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-02-06 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 224g (0.49 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 340 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $279 | $450 |