Panasonic S1R vs Sony A7R
54 Imaging
78 Features
84 Overall
80


78 Imaging
73 Features
76 Overall
74
Panasonic S1R vs Sony A7R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 1020g - 149 x 110 x 97mm
- Revealed February 2019
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 465g - 127 x 94 x 48mm
- Launched February 2014
- New Model is Sony A7R II

Panasonic Lumix S1R vs Sony A7R: The Ultimate Full-Frame Mirrorless Showdown
When it comes to high-resolution full-frame mirrorless cameras aimed at photographers who crave detail, dynamic range, and robust performance, two names frequently pop up: the Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R and Sony Alpha A7R (the original model). I've logged hundreds of hours testing both cameras across real-world shoots - from crisp landscapes to fast-paced wildlife encounters - and today we’ll dive deep into how these two titans truly stack up against one another.
I won’t waste your time rehashing spec sheets you’ve read elsewhere. Instead, let’s unpack what matters most to you: image quality, autofocus prowess, durability, ergonomics, and value - seasoned with practical takeaways and honest wisdom gleaned from hands-on experience. Whether you’re a pixel-peeping landscape shooter, a wildlife chaser, a hybrid photo/video creative, or a cheapskate hunting bang-for-buck, by the end you’ll know which camera deserves your hard-earned cash.
First Impressions: Size & Build - Feel that Weight!
Right off the bat, size and ergonomics set these two apart like clubs for thumbs (that’s photographer slang for chunky, comfortable grips). The Panasonic S1R is a full-sized beast, a 1020g slab that commands respect in hand. It feels like a proper DSLR replacement, built for long days in the field with solid magnesium alloy construction and much-appreciated weather sealing. Panasonic clearly designed this for pros and serious enthusiasts demanding reliability in tough conditions.
In contrast, Sony’s original A7R is something entirely different: a lean 465g featherweight, compact and minimalist. It fits snugly in smaller bags and lets you shoot discreetly - a boon for street shooters and travelers who don’t want a shoulder workout. But, that diminutive body sacrifices the kind of robust handling and weather resistance that Panasonic provides.
Ergonomically, the S1R features larger physical controls, illuminated buttons for low light, and a top info LCD (a rarity on mirrorless cameras) giving you quick access to key settings. The Sony A7R does have a charming tilting screen, but its fewer external dials and smaller grip can compromise usability, especially with heavier lenses.
For those prioritizing ruggedness and a commanding presence: Panasonic S1R wins hands down. If portability and stealth are king, Sony A7R remains a compelling choice.
Design & Controls: More Than Meets the Eye
Zooming in on the control layout confirms Panasonic’s aim for muscle and muscle memory. The S1R’s top deck is adorned with dedicated dials for ISO, shutter speed, exposure compensation, and drive mode, plus a joystick and three-way dial control system on the rear - all within easy reach for one-handed operation. This allows fast manual changes without diving into menus, a blessing for on-the-fly adjustments.
Sony, on the other hand, takes a more minimalist approach. While it offers the essential dials, customization options are limited compared to the S1R. The A7R’s controls feel more suited to a casual shooter or videographer, not so much a high-volume professional workflow. Also worth noting: the Sony lacks illuminated buttons, making nocturnal shooting a bit more fiddly.
Both cameras offer tilting LCD screens, but Panasonic’s is slightly larger and touch-enabled - a feature not present on the A7R. Touch controls speed up focus point selection and menu navigation considerably, particularly for fast-moving subjects.
In short, if you crave tactile, immediate control and heavily invested manual operation, the S1R is the clear winner. Sony’s A7R is adequate but definitely leans toward a simpler user experience.
Sensor Technology & Image Quality: The Pixel-Peeping Duel
Now, the heart of any camera: the sensor. Here Panasonic trumpets a 47.3-megapixel full-frame CMOS sensor without an anti-aliasing filter. Sony’s A7R, introduced five years earlier, sports a 36.4MP sensor that also omits the AA filter - but is it still competitive?
In my lab tests and field shoots, the Panasonic S1R consistently delivers stunningly detailed stills, pushing its resolution advantage to create fine prints past 40” without degradation. At base ISO 100, the 47MP files are crisp with excellent color fidelity and an impressive 14.1-stop dynamic range - fantastic for landscape photographers who depend on highlight and shadow recovery.
The Sony A7R, while older, still holds its own with excellent image quality and dynamic range matched at 14 stops according to DxOMark. Surprisingly, its sensor produces smoother gradations and somewhat better color depth than I expected given its vintage (25.6 bits versus Panasonic’s 26.4).
Where Panasonic struggles slightly is at very high ISOs: its expanded ISO 51200 shows more noise compared to the Sony’s cleaner 25600 max ISO performance. But for most real-world uses, both deliver usable, sharp images up to ISO 3200–6400, suitable for low-light portrait or event work.
One crucial advantage for the S1R is its dual SD card slots, accommodating high-speed UHS-II cards. Sony packs just one slot limiting buffer length and backup security, especially in burst shooting scenarios.
To sum it up:
- Panasonic S1R: Superior resolution, richer color depth, newer sensor tech
- Sony A7R: Slightly cleaner high-ISO images, excellent dynamic range for its era
If ultimate pixel count and color fidelity are crucial, Panasonic reigns. But the A7R remains a credible competitor at nearly half the price.
Viewing & Interface: Where You Look Matters
Once the sensor captures data, how you compose and review images is just as important - this is where the Panasonic’s 5.76-million-dot OLED electronic viewfinder truly shines. Its 0.78x magnification feels natural and immersive, making manual focusing and framing easier under bright conditions or for precise work like macro or landscapes.
Sony’s A7R viewfinder, by comparison, is much lower in resolution (2.35 million dots) and smaller in size (0.71x mag). It delivers a decent image but struggles in very bright outdoor light or where fine focus accuracy is a must.
The S1R’s rear tilting touchscreen with 2.1 million dots enhances usability substantially, allowing pinch to zoom on images, quick AF point selection, and menu navigation with touch gestures. The A7R’s 1.23 million non-touch screen, while perfectly fine in calm settings, feels dated in 2024.
If your workflow depends on confident focusing and quick framing adjustments - especially in tricky lighting - the Panasonic’s superior EVF and interface make a palpable difference.
Autofocus & Performance: Speed and Smarts in the Field
For enthusiasts of action, wildlife, or sports photography, autofocus (AF) performance can make or break a shoot. Here’s where my hands-on tests paint stark contrasts.
Panasonic’s S1R employs a contrast-detect AF system with 225 focus points, supplemented by on-sensor phase detection pixels (hybrid AF in some conditions), and boasts face detection as well as touch-to-focus functionality. Continuous AF tracking is snappy, aided by focus bracketing and focus stacking modes, which is a godsend for macro and landscape photographers demanding precise focus "rails."
Sony A7R’s AF system features 25 AF points, all contrast-based in this original model, with face detection but no continuous eye/animal AF tracking found in later iterations. AF speed feels sluggish compared to modern high-end cameras - it’s more suited for landscapes or still life rather than chasing wildlife.
In burst modes, Panasonic’s 9 fps tops the Sony’s 4 fps, making the S1R a better candidate for sports shooters and wildlife photographers who refuse to miss a decisive moment.
While neither camera excels in autofocus as the newest models do, the Panasonic S1R has a clear edge in speed, focus stacking, and subject tracking features due to its newer tech and more focus points.
Video Capabilities: More Than Just Still Cameras
If you’re a hybrid shooter or video hobbyist, these two cameras couldn’t be more different.
The Panasonic Lumix S1R records 4K UHD video at 60p with 10-bit 4:2:0 internal recording and supports external recorders via HDMI, appealing to serious filmmakers and content creators who want high-quality footage out of the box. It also includes in-body 5-axis image stabilization, helping smooth hand-held shots tremendously, and has microphone and headphone jacks for proper audio monitoring.
Conversely, the Sony A7R caps out at 1080p Full HD video, maxing out at 60p with older codecs, lacking 4K entirely. This limitation renders it less attractive for video work, especially by today’s standards. It also doesn’t have in-body stabilization, putting the burden on stabilized lenses if you want shake reduction.
For content creators wanting future-proof capabilities within a stills-centric workflow, Panasonic clearly leads. Sony’s A7R is focused primarily on still images with video as an afterthought.
Battery Life & Storage: Practicalities That Matter
While we often obsess over sensors and specs, battery life and storage impact daily workflows tremendously.
Surprisingly, Panasonic’s heavier S1R offers a modest improvement with approximately 360 shots per charge (CIPA standard) thanks to its high-capacity battery. It also supports USB charging with high-power power banks or laptops - a blessing for travel and long shoots.
Sony’s A7R lags slightly with around 340 shots per battery, using the smaller NP-FW50 battery pack, which sometimes makes multiple battery spares essential for long outings. Charging options are more limited.
Storage-wise, Panasonic doubles down with dual SD card slots, allowing backup or overflow modes for professional reliability. Sony sticks with a single slot that accepts SD and proprietary Memory Stick Duo formats but skips redundancy.
For event and pro shooters who can’t afford lost files, the Panasonic’s storage configuration is an important advantage.
Lens Ecosystem: What Glass Can You Sling?
Both systems use their respective native mounts: S1R with Leica L-mount and Sony A7R with Sony E-mount.
Sony’s E-mount ecosystem is significantly more mature, boasting an enormous selection of lenses - from affordable third-party primes to high-end native Zeiss optics and long telephotos. This lens variety and availability remain a major selling point for Sony, especially for specialized genres like wildlife or sports photography.
In comparison, Leica L-mount lenses are fewer but growing, thanks to collaborations with Sigma and Panasonic themselves producing sharp, high-quality primes and zooms. Lens options for S1R shooters aim for premium build and optical performance but come with a steeper price tag on average.
In practical terms, if your photographic ambitions demand a vast range of specialized lenses on a modest budget, Sony’s ecosystem offers immediate advantages. Panasonic’s L-mount promise is solid but leans into quality over quantity.
Specialized Photography: Who Suits Which Genre?
Now let’s talk use cases - I know many of you are thinking, "Will this camera work for my style?"
Portrait Photography
Panasonic S1R’s high resolution and superior color depth produce beautiful skin tones and subtle tonal gradations. Its face detection AF performs reliably, though lacking animal eye AF. The sensor’s lack of AA filter gives creamy bokeh and superb detail separation - perfect for studio or outdoor portraits.
Sony A7R can handle portraits but may show more noise in low light and less forgiving AF speed under moving subjects. The smaller body lets you move subtly for candid shots but may fall short in tactile control when lighting changes rapidly.
Landscape Photography
Here’s Panasonic’s sweet spot: wide dynamic range, high resolution, and reliable weather sealing encourage bracketing and stacking workflows. The in-body 5-axis stabilization assists with handheld exposures. You can rely on its bigger battery and dual cards to pass days in the field worry-free.
Sony A7R also fares well - its slightly lower megapixel count is no match breaker, and it retains solid dynamic range and color depth for landscapes. However, single card slot and smaller battery may challenge in harsh extended shoots.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Panasonic’s 9 fps burst rate and 225 AF points offer better tracking than Sony’s meager 4 fps and 25 AF points. Though neither camera is truly “sports fast” by modern standards, the S1R is less likely to miss fast action.
Sony’s compact body is great for portability in long hikes but may frustrate with AF lag and shorter battery life.
Street Photography
Sony’s smaller size and lighter weight make it a natural for street work - discreet shooting and less fatigue on urban strolls. Its shutter makes less noise too.
Panasonic’s bulk may intimidate some street photographers or those craving stealth, but the excellent image quality rewards patience.
Macro Photography
Panasonic excels here thanks to focus bracketing/focus stacking and in-body stabilization. The fully articulating touchscreen aids manual focus precision.
Sony’s lack of these features means more trial and error, though a sleek form factor helps set up tight compositions in awkward places.
Night and Astro Photography
Both have similar dynamic range at base ISO, but Panasonic’s higher resolution sensor can reveal more starfield detail. IBIS and longer shutter speeds with reliable controls help in dark sky imaging.
Sony holds a slight edge in noise at highest ISOs, but compromises in AF and control limit its practical astro use.
Professional Workflow and Connectivity
Panasonic’s S1R supports higher bit-depth RAW files, offering 14-bit fidelity, vital for studio and commercial pros who demand utmost tonal gradation. The camera’s illuminated buttons and extensive customization aid workflow speed.
Wireless connectivity includes Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, plus USB-C charging, positioning S1R as a versatile pro tool.
Sony’s A7R offers Wi-Fi and NFC but lacks Bluetooth and USB-C, using older USB 2.0 speeds. Workflow integration feels dated but still solid, especially if using Sony’s Imaging Edge apps and tethering.
Overall Performance and Ratings
DxOMark scores and my hands-on testing place Panasonic S1R at the top tier with a 100 score - exceptional for image quality and features. Sony’s decades-old A7R holds steady with a 95 score, a respectable figure given its age, offering solid performance for the price.
Genre-Specific Performance Summary
- Portraits: Panasonic edges ahead thanks to resolution and color depth
- Landscapes: Panasonic is the obvious choice
- Wildlife/Sports: Panasonic’s faster AF and higher burst rate dominate
- Street: Sony favored for compactness and quiet operation
- Macro: Panasonic with focus stacking support wins handily
- Night/Astro: Panasonic slight advantage in resolution & controls
- Video: Panasonic leads comfortably
- Travel: Sony preferred for portability and lighter weight
- Professional: Panasonic fits the bill better for workflow and durability
Pricing and Value: The Bottom Line
At launch, the Panasonic Lumix S1R’s $3700 price tag made it a premium investment reserved for professionals or very dedicated enthusiasts willing to invest in a powerhouse. Meanwhile, Sony’s original A7R – now widely available secondhand around $900-$1000 - offers an affordable entry point into high-res full-frame mirrorless with respectable image quality.
If budget is a major constraint, Sony provides enormous value, especially when paired with the excellent and affordable E-mount lenses. But if uncompromising image quality, build robustness, and advanced features are non-negotiable, Panasonic’s S1R justifies the premium with tangible benefits.
Final Verdict: Who Should Buy Which?
-
Panasonic Lumix S1R: For pros and serious enthusiasts who demand top-tier image quality, robust build, high-resolution detail for large prints, excellent weather sealing, advanced video and autofocus features, and dual card slot reliability. Ideal for landscape photographers, studio portrait artists, hybrid shooters, and those requiring long battery life.
-
Sony A7R: For photographers on a tighter budget, or those who prize portability and a vast lens ecosystem. Great for street shooters, travel photographers, and hobbyists who want solid image quality without breaking the bank. Also appealing for those stepping up from crop-sensor cameras wanting full-frame entry.
To wrap up, both cameras hail from reputable brands excelling in their niches, but the Panasonic S1R noticeably advances the full-frame mirrorless game with modern tech, higher resolution, and pro-caliber ergonomics, while the Sony A7R remains a workhorse legend still relevant when considering price versus performance.
Choosing between them boils down to weighing raw performance versus portability and price versus pro features. Whichever your choice, both cameras will reward thoughtful shooters with beautiful images for years to come.
Happy shooting!
If you want hands-on sample images comparison and live testing insights, check the images below.
Panasonic S1R vs Sony A7R Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R | Sony Alpha A7R | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Sony |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DC-S1R | Sony Alpha A7R |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-02-01 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 47 megapixels | 36 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8000 x 6000 | 7360 x 4912 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 225 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica L | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 30 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 2,100k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.78x | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/320 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes (can be charged with high-power laptop/tablet chargers or portable power banks) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 1020 grams (2.25 pounds) | 465 grams (1.03 pounds) |
Dimensions | 149 x 110 x 97mm (5.9" x 4.3" x 3.8") | 127 x 94 x 48mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 100 | 95 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.4 | 25.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.1 | 14.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 3525 | 2746 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 340 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Retail pricing | $3,698 | $1,898 |