Panasonic 3D1 vs Panasonic GF2

Here, we are reviewing the Panasonic 3D1 vs Panasonic GF2, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are manufactured by Panasonic. The image resolution of the 3D1 (12MP) and the GF2 (12MP) is fairly close but the 3D1 (1/2.3") and GF2 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The 3D1 was unveiled 9 months after the GF2 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Panasonic 3D1 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the 3D1 matches up vs the GF2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2. The full galleries are provided at Panasonic 3D1 Gallery & Panasonic GF2 Gallery.

When you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic 3D1 enjoys exterior dimensions of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Panasonic GF2 has dimensions of 113mm x 68mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") and a weight of 310 grams (0.68 lbs).

Examine the Panasonic 3D1 vs Panasonic GF2 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the 3D1 vs the GF2.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 3D1 and GF2 is 93 and 88 respectively.

Quite often, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The picture here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 3D1 and GF2.

Clearly, the two cameras come with the identical megapixel count but different sensor sizes. The 3D1 has the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF more challenging. The younger 3D1 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.