Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ80
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
63 Imaging
44 Features
62 Overall
51
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Released August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 616g - 130 x 94 x 119mm
- Revealed January 2017
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ82
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ80 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ80, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the FZ80 (18MP) is fairly similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and FZ80 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 III was unveiled 8 months after the FZ80 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ80 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M10 III grades vs the FZ80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Panasonic FZ80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic FZ80
| E-M10 III | FZ80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2017 |  | January 2017 | More modern by 8 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ80 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| FZ80 | E-M10 III |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FZ80
| E-M10 III | FZ80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurement |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 1040k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ80 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 III provides outside measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ80 has sizing of 130mm x 94mm x 119mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.7") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ80 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 III compared to the FZ80.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and FZ80 is 80 and 63 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ80 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and FZ80.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 III with its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Panasonic FZ80 will offer you extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ80 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FZ80 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DMC-FZ82 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2017-08-31 | 2017-01-04 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,166k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 14.10 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, 1st Curtain Sync, 2nd Curtain Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 410 gr (0.90 pounds) | 616 gr (1.36 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 130 x 94 x 119mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | 330 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 images x 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $650 | $399 |