Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FH1/Panasonic-FH1-front.jpg)
![Ricoh PX front Ricoh PX front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-PX/Ricoh-PX-front.jpg)
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 163g - 98 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS10
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Panasonic and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the FH1 (12MP) and PX (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The FH1 was announced 19 months prior to the PX making the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the FH1 matches up versus the PX in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 & Ricoh PX. The whole galleries are provided at Panasonic FH1 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH1 over the Ricoh PX
FH1 | PX |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Panasonic FH1
PX | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 19 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus |
Common features in the Panasonic FH1 and Ricoh PX
FH1 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FH1 offers outer dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Ricoh PX has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the FH1 and the PX.
![Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX size comparison Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FH1-vs-Ricoh-PX-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the FH1 and PX is 95 and 95 respectively.
![Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FH1-vs-Ricoh-PX-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specs. The image underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FH1 and PX.
All in all, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh PX to produce extra detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged FH1 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
![Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FH1-vs-Ricoh-PX-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
![Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-FH1-vs-Ricoh-PX-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Panasonic FH1 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | Ricoh PX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | Ricoh PX |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-FS10 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3072 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.9-5.4 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.80 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 163 grams (0.36 lb) | 156 grams (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 55 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $150 | $329 |