Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
96 Imaging
38 Features
31 Overall
35


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS18
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009

Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Panasonic FH5 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Panasonic and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the FH5 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the FH5 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.

The FH5 was revealed 15 months after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have different body design with the Panasonic FH5 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the FH5 grades versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are available at Panasonic FH5 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH5 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
FH5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2011 | ![]() | November 2009 | More modern by 15 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Panasonic FH5
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | FH5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FH5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
FH5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Panasonic FH5 provides outer dimensions of 94mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
See the Panasonic FH5 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the FH5 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FH5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 96 and 77 respectively.

Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the FH5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can see, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The FH5 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Panasonic FH5 will offer you extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The fresher FH5 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Panasonic FH5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-FS18 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine IV | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-6.5 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 4.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.30 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 453 grams (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 images | 320 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $169 | $566 |