Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/610d2/610d2f0194f11ebae752e41542b4ece0dd0a12f2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL3 front Olympus PEN E-PL3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88d49/88d491f346db87b2f72053243d7a55b3e85bdf50" alt="Olympus SH-50 front Olympus SH-50 front"
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL3 (12MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the E-PL3 (Four Thirds) and SH-50 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PL3 was revealed 15 months before the SH-50 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-PL3 scores versus the SH-50 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL3 & Olympus SH-50. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL3 Gallery & Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Olympus SH-50
E-PL3 | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus E-PL3
SH-50 | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | September 2011 | More recent by 15 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL3 and Olympus SH-50
E-PL3 | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL3 offers physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs) and the Olympus SH-50 has specifications of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-PL3 vs the SH-50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/257bd/257bdbdff8cd974407586787f9b88d107fc63e35" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL3 and SH-50 is 88 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bec3/7bec3702b22f292ff992654e8492beb180cb31bc" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL3 and SH-50.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL3 with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus SH-50 will render greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The older E-PL3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37d2c/37d2c9357cff003efba844f51e174b38c86de478" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d14/05d14f4d53ba5da1b9709eff6a65eae053227890" alt="Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL3 vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus SH-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | Olympus SH-50 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-09-20 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic VI | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | AVCHD, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 313 grams (0.69 pounds) | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 52 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.9 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 499 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $399 | $300 |