Panasonic FH5 vs Sony RX1R
96 Imaging
38 Features
31 Overall
35
79 Imaging
69 Features
58 Overall
64
Panasonic FH5 vs Sony RX1R Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 121g - 94 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FS18
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Launched June 2013
- Newer Model is Sony RX1R II
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 versus Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R: A Deep Dive Into Compact Camera Worlds
When two cameras this different land side by side on my desk, it’s a perfect opportunity to examine the spectrum of digital compact photography - from simple point-and-shoot to near-professional image quality. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R epitomize this range, with the former representing budget-friendly small sensor compacts and the latter a luxury full-frame fixed-lens marvel. After testing thousands of cameras over 15 years, I find such comparisons fascinating and useful for photographers considering their next step.
Let’s unpack their strengths and limitations, digging mindful into the technical guts and real-world usability. Whether you seek a casual travel buddy or a precision instrument for demanding shoots, this analysis will illuminate which camera suits your style.
Size, Handling, and Ergonomics: Form Meets Function
Size and feel matters - especially when you carry your camera for hours or seek discretion. Panasonic’s FH5 is a petite, straightforward point-and-shoot designed for quick grabs and lightweight convenience. Its dimensions of 94 x 54 x 19 mm and weight of just 121 grams mean it slips easily into a coat pocket or purse, inviting spontaneous shooting without intimidation. Ergonomically, it features simple, no-frills controls aimed at casual users rather than photography purists.
In contrast, Sony’s RX1R is a hefty beast compared to the FH5 - 113 x 65 x 70 mm and weighing almost 4 times as much at 482 grams. This full-frame compact camera borrows handling traits from DSLRs and mirrorless bodies, featuring a robust grip and substantial heft that instills confidence in stable shooting. The build feels solid albeit without official weather sealing.

The FH5’s minimal buttons and absence of a viewfinder lean toward ease at the expense of shooting versatility. The RX1R’s richer set of dials and customizable controls enable manual exposure adjustments on the fly - a boon for users craving artistry and precision.
All told, if you prize pocket portability and lightness, FH5 wins here. Want a small but serious photographic tool with tactile control and a durable feel? The RX1R commands respect in this category.
Top View and Control Layout: Intuitive or Overwhelming?
Let’s peek at the top plate to see where interaction starts. The Panasonic FH5 keeps hardware to a bare minimum - a shutter release button, zoom lever integrated with the shutter, and a power switch. This simplicity means fewer distractions for casual shooters but limited direct access to advanced settings like exposure compensation or manual mode toggling.
Sony’s RX1R sports a classic camera top array: a dedicated shutter button, mode dial for aperture-, shutter-, and manual exposure control, an exposure compensation dial, and a pop-up flash housing. These controls invite deliberate engagement and precision tweaking essential for professional workflows.

The RX1R’s layout rewards learning photographers with tactile shortcuts that help adapt quickly to shifting environments. The FH5 trades all that for straightforwardness - simple, yes, but limiting for anyone wishing to move beyond auto settings.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Core Divide
You do not need me to spell it out: sensor size is the most consequential factor in image quality. In this clash, the Panasonic FH5 opts for a small 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring 6.08 x 4.56 mm with 16 megapixels. The Sony RX1R, in contrast, boasts a full-frame 35.8 x 23.9 mm CMOS sensor packing 24 megapixels - over 30 times larger physical area.

Why does sensor size matter so much? Larger sensors capture more light, offering superior dynamic range to preserve detail in shadows and highlights; lower noise levels for cleaner pictures at high ISO; and greater flexibility for depth-of-field control and artistic bokeh. The FH5 is suitable for casual snapshots in good light but will flounder in challenging exposures and low-light conditions. The RX1R delivers clean, nuanced images even at ISO 3200 and beyond, lending itself to professional portraiture and landscape work where image fidelity is paramount.
Technically, the RX1R’s omission of an anti-aliasing filter enhances sharpness at the pixel level, though it requires careful handling to avoid moiré patterns. Panasonic’s 16MP CCD sensor is satisfactory for web publishing and 4x6 prints but can’t challenge the RX1R for high-resolution enlargements or commercial use.
LCD Screen and Interface: Viewing and Reviewing Shots
For a camera destined to see the world through its LCD, the quality and responsiveness of the screen are crucial. The Panasonic FH5 sports a 2.7-inch fixed LCD with a modest resolution of 230k dots. The small size and lower pixel count mean less detail when reviewing images or navigating menus - sufficient for spontaneous use but uninspiring for composition finesse.
Sony’s RX1R features a larger 3-inch Xtra Fine TFT LCD with an impressive 1229k-dot resolution, enabling sharp, color-accurate previews crucial for evaluating focus and exposure on the spot.

Neither model includes touch input or articulating screens, which is unsurprising given their form factors and era. Both support live view, though the RX1R’s interface leans toward manual photographers, offering more granular controls on-screen. The FH5 remains straightforward and simple, better suited to newcomers.
Real-World Shooting: Portraits, Landscapes, and Creative Exploration
How do these cameras behave in various photographic disciplines? I’ve spent time shooting portraits, landscapes, macro, and night scenes with each to evaluate practical strengths.
Portrait Photography:
The RX1R shines with its bright fixed 35mm f/2 lens, delivering creamy bokeh and excellent subject isolation thanks to full-frame sensor depth-of-field control. Its 25 AF points with face detection promote confident focusing on eyes, and manual focus aids perfectionists. The FH5’s 28-112mm (35mm equiv.) zoom and F3.1-6.5 aperture range limits shallow depth-of-field effects. Autofocus is contrast-detection only, less reliable in low light.
Landscape Photography:
Larger sensor and higher resolution make RX1R the natural landscape choice. Coupled with excellent dynamic range and RAW support, it captures subtle gradations in sky and foliage detail. The FH5’s sensor struggles with blown highlights and noisy shadows, and lack of RAW means limited post-processing latitude. Both lack weather sealing, so care is needed in harsh environments.
Wildlife Photography:
Neither camera is designed for fast action or reach. The FH5 offers 4x zoom but slow optics and slow burst. RX1R’s prime 35mm focal length and 5fps burst rate offer little long-distance reach or speed. Wildlife shooters should look elsewhere. However, in close-ups or macro, the FH5’s 5cm macro mode lets you experiment with detail but image quality stays modest compared to dedicated macro gear.
Sports Photography:
Tracking fast-moving subjects requires advanced autofocus and high frame rates. The FH5’s contrast-detect AF and 4fps burst are basic; the RX1R improves with 5fps shooting but lacks continuous AF tracking. Both will feel limiting for sports pros.
Street Photography:
Here, FH5’s small size, lightweight body, and silent-ish operation favor quiet street shooting. Sony RX1R is bulkier but image quality and low light sensitivity deliver superior results when discretion can be negotiated.
Night and Astrophotography:
Noise performance and sensor size dominate. The RX1R’s expanded native ISO up to 25600 with relatively clean output beats the FH5’s maximum ISO 6400 with noisy results. Lack of built-in intervalometer or specialized astro modes on both means external intervention is needed for star trails or timelapses.
Video Capabilities: Modest Versus Practical
The FH5 shoots max 720p HD video at 30fps with Motion JPEG compression - functional for casual video but limited in quality, dynamic range, and editing flexibility. No external mic input constrains audio quality improvement.
The RX1R can shoot full HD 1080p at up to 60fps with advanced AVCHD or MP4 formats. It supports a microphone input for better audio capture, suitable for more serious videographers aiming for higher production value. Neither includes in-body stabilization (IHIS on FH5 is optical image stabilization but limited in video), meaning gimbals or steady hands are required to avoid shake.
Battery Life and Storage: How Long and What Fits?
Battery stamina is always a practical concern in the field. Surprisingly, both cameras deliver comparable battery life in the 260-270 shot range per charge - adequate for a day of casual shooting but requiring spares for extended outings.
Panasonic uses a proprietary rechargeable battery pack with SD card storage; Sony accommodates SD cards as well as Memory Stick formats, offering flexibility albeit with a single slot. Neither supports USB charging - expect to bring chargers on long trips.
Connectivity and Additional Features: Modern Considerations
The FH5 has no wireless connectivity - no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC. Its USB 2.0 interface is strictly for file transfer, lacking tethering support.
Sony’s RX1R supports Eye-Fi wireless card integration, enabling some wireless image transfer. It also includes HDMI output for external displays. These modest connectivity features reflect the camera’s professional leanings and greater price point.
Price-to-Performance: Investment Perspectives
The Panasonic FH5 retails near $170 - an affordable entry-level compact for casual users wanting snapshot ease without fuss. On the flipside, the RX1R demands a hefty $2800+ investment, targeting professionals and enthusiasts craving full-frame image quality in a small package.
While their price gap is striking, so is their performance gulf. The RX1R’s impeccable sensor, solid build, and manual controls justify the outlay for users prioritizing image quality and creative control. The FH5 remains an economical option for casual photographers or as an ultra-portable backup.
Specialized Genre Performance Breakdown
No camera fits all perfectly; let’s assign stars to specialties based on field testing:
| Genre | Panasonic FH5 | Sony RX1R |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★★★ |
| Landscape | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★★★ |
| Wildlife | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
| Sports | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
| Street | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
| Macro | ★★★☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Night/Astro | ★★☆☆☆ | ★★★★☆ |
| Video | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★☆☆ |
| Travel | ★★★★☆ | ★★☆☆☆ |
| Professional Work | ★☆☆☆☆ | ★★★★★ |
The RX1R’s superior sensor elevates it across nearly every photography genre, while the FH5’s compactness and simplicity cater to casual, travel-focused niche applications.
Final Thoughts: Matching Cameras to Photographers
Who should buy the Panasonic Lumix FH5?
Ideal for beginners, casual snapshooters, or travelers who want a pocket camera without fuss. Its fixed lens zoom suffices for everyday scenes, and stabilized optics help in handheld shots. Expect basic image quality and limited creative control, but enjoy affordability and ease.
Who should opt for the Sony RX1R?
Serious photographers and professionals who want the ultimate image quality from a large sensor in a compact form. Its fixed 35mm f/2 lens delivers stunning portraits and landscapes. Manual controls, RAW shooting, and superior low-light ability make it a powerful photographic tool. Be prepared to invest and carry its weight.
My Methodology and Testing Approach
In constructing this analysis, I conducted side-by-side field tests over diverse shooting situations, including outdoor portraits at golden hour, dynamic street scenes under mixed lighting, twilight landscapes, and controlled studio sessions. Raw files from the RX1R were developed in Adobe Lightroom to evaluate dynamic range and noise; JPEGs from the FH5 were scrutinized for detail retention given absent RAW capture.
Autofocus speeds measured with a fixed focus target in various lighting confirmed contrast-detection limitations on the FH5 versus the RX1R’s more refined AF system. Ergonomic assessments involved extended handheld shooting and menu navigation tests.
In conclusion: If your budget and creative aspirations are modest, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 is a trustworthy compact that simply works. For those who demand the apex of image quality and manual operation in a compact form, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R is a rare gem, worth every penny and gram.
Photography is personal - I hope this deep dive gives you the clarity needed to make your next camera choice confidently. Happy shooting!
Panasonic FH5 vs Sony RX1R Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Sony |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R |
| Also called as | Lumix DMC-FS18 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2013-06-26 |
| Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Venus Engine IV | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 855.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-6.5 | f/2.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.30 m | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Sync, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 482 grams (1.06 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 91 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2537 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | 270 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $169 | $2,798 |