Panasonic FP1 vs Panasonic ZS5
95 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25


92 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Panasonic FP1 vs Panasonic ZS5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 214g - 103 x 60 x 32mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ8

Panasonic Lumix FP1 vs ZS5: Which Compact Zoom Camera Fits Your Photography Style?
In 2010, Panasonic released two compelling compact cameras aimed at enthusiasts balancing portability with versatile zoom: the ultra-slim Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 (FP1) and the more robust Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 (ZS5), also known as the TZ8 in some markets. While they share a brand and a similar 12MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor, these cameras target quite different user needs through distinct designs, zoom ranges, and feature sets. Having spent many hours shooting with both in varied conditions - from tight street corners to sprawling landscapes - I want to share a detailed comparative review that digs beneath the spec sheets. Whether you want a pocketable travel companion or a superzoom with advanced controls, this guide walks through real-world usability, image quality, autofocus, and overall value.
Let’s start by sizing up these two side by side.
First Impressions: Handling and Ergonomics
Compactness and comfort are king in everyday photography, and right from the start, these two cameras couldn’t feel more different in your hands.
The FP1 is an ultracompact marvel - measuring just 99x59x19mm and weighing 151g, it almost slips into a large pocket unnoticed. Its flat profile is sleek but makes for a delicate grip, especially for those of us with larger hands. You’ll appreciate its stealth in street photography or casual snapping, but I noticed the lack of dedicated grip zones made prolonged shooting a bit fiddly.
Contrast that with the ZS5, notably chunkier at 103x60x32mm and heavier at 214g. It’s still compact by DSLR or mirrorless standards, but the deeper body provides that reassuring heft and secure hold for extended sessions. The additional thickness accommodates a more complex superzoom lens and extra controls, which I’ll cover next.
Looking at the control layout reminds me why ergonomics matter beyond raw dimensions.
The FP1 sports a minimalist top plate, with few manual control options. Exposure modes are limited; no aperture or shutter priority, let alone manual exposure. The absence of manual focus and only single-shot AF means more reliance on automation.
On the flip side, the ZS5 ups the ante with dedicated dials enabling shutter and aperture priority shooting plus full manual exposure. The buttons are reasonably spaced given the body size, and there’s an exposure compensation dial that feels intuitive to twist as you shoot. This level of control underscores the ZS5’s appeal to more advanced amateurs who want their camera to behave more like a traditional point-and-shoot SLR hybrid.
If you’re someone who values portability above all, the FP1’s sleekness will charm you. But if you crave the tactile engagement of manual settings on a compact, the ZS5 fits the bill.
Behind the Lens: Zoom Range and Lens Performance
Zoom lens specs often make or break a compact camera’s usefulness, especially for travel and wildlife enthusiasts.
- Panasonic FP1: 35-140mm equivalent (4x zoom), max aperture f/3.5-5.9
- Panasonic ZS5: 25-300mm equivalent (12x zoom), max aperture f/3.3-4.9
That 12x zoom on the ZS5 is notably more versatile - ideal for landscapes wide and wildlife distant. On the other hand, the FP1’s 4x zoom covers average everyday focal lengths but doesn’t offer the reach for telephoto needs.
Macro enthusiasts will also appreciate the ZS5’s minimum focusing distance of 3cm compared to 10cm on the FP1. When I tested close-up snaps, the ZS5’s ability to focus so tightly yielded more detailed and engaging macro images.
Both incorporate optical image stabilization (OIS) to combat camera shake - helpful, especially at longer focal lengths or lower shutter speeds. However, the ZS5’s newer Venus Engine HD II processor and superior stabilization generally produce sharper handheld shots at telephoto lengths.
Lens sharpness-wise, both cameras deliver respectable image quality, but the ZS5 often edges out slightly due to better optics and processing. The wider aperture at the telephoto end also aids in subject isolation under modest light.
Sensor and Image Quality: Same Chip, Different Impact
Both cameras use the same 1/2.3" CCD sensor measuring about 6.08x4.56mm with 12 megapixels outputting 4000x3000 pixel images. On paper, this means similar base image resolution, but sensor alone rarely tells the full story.
CCD sensors of this era typically have less high-ISO performance than later CMOS sensors, showing more noise above ISO 400. Both cameras share a 6400 max ISO setting, but in practice, image degradation at ISOs above 800 is prominent.
What impacts final image quality more are their processors and software tuning. The ZS5's Venus Engine HD II offers better noise reduction without smudging fine detail excessively, while the FP1’s Venus Engine IV is respectable but less advanced.
Color reproduction is close, leaning slightly towards neutral tones on both, but the ZS5 surprises with better skin tone rendering and saturation - useful for portraits and nature alike.
As expected for cameras without RAW support, post-processing flexibility is limited; rely on in-camera JPEGs for most uses.
Autofocus Systems: Quiet but Varied Responsiveness
Focusing speed and accuracy can define or doom your photographic moments. Let’s see how these two perform.
- FP1 uses contrast-detection AF with 9 focus points and single-shot autofocus only.
- ZS5 upgrades to 11 points, adds continuous autofocus and tracking support, alongside face detection.
In real-world shooting, I found the FP1’s AF to be fairly reliable in good light but slower to lock focus. Tracking moving subjects or shooting in dim conditions is challenging due to the lack of continuous AF and live tracking.
The ZS5’s AF feels livelier and smarter, locking focus quicker and following subjects with fewer missed shots. Continuous AF and face detection are helpful for casual portraits and everyday snaps, although it’s not the fastest on the market compared to modern standards.
For sports, wildlife, or any fast action, neither camera excels given their modest burst speeds and AF technology, but the ZS5's AF capabilities reduce frustration notably compared to the FP1.
Displays and Interfaces: What You See Is What You Get
Both cameras rely on LCD screens with no electronic viewfinders (EVF). Let’s peek at their back screens.
Both sport 2.7-inch fixed, non-touch displays with 230k-dot resolution - basic even by 2010 standards. The FP1’s simpler menu system is easier for beginners but offers fewer settings choices. The ZS5’s interface, while similar in pixel count, provides quicker access to exposure bracketing, custom white balance, and manual exposure.
Neither camera's screen is particularly bright or contrasty, which can hamper composition in strong sunlight. That said, the ZS5’s slightly larger body supports marginally better button size and layout, making navigation less fiddly.
Importantly, neither includes an EVF - a dealbreaker for some, especially in bright outdoor conditions. You’ll get by with these LCDs if you’re willing to adapt.
Shooting Experience Across Photography Types
What can these cameras deliver to you depending on your photographic passions?
Portrait Photography
When it comes to portraits, the ZS5’s longer zoom combined with its face detection autofocus offers more flexibility framing subjects and capturing natural expressions. The better color rendition improves skin tones, which I noted in candid shots.
The FP1’s lens max aperture of f/3.5-5.9 limits background blur (bokeh) quality, so portraits tend to appear 'busier' - backgrounds less attractive. Also, no face detection and slower AF make nail-bitingly exact framing harder.
If portraits are a priority, the ZS5 feels more competent despite neither camera being dedicated portrait machines.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range and resolving power impress as crucial for landscapes. While both cameras share hardware, the ZS5’s updated processor extracts more tonal nuance, so shadows preserve better without heavy noise.
That 25mm equivalent ultra-wide end on the ZS5 suits dramatic compositions far better than the FP1’s 35mm minimum focal length. Weather sealing? Neither camera is weather sealed.
In controlled lighting, both deliver sharp, colorful landscapes to satisfy casual shooters.
Wildlife Photography
Here, the 12x zoom on the ZS5 is a clear advantage. Its 300mm reach and continuous AF system allow reasonable wildlife framing from a distance. Burst speed is low (2 fps on ZS5), so fast action gets missed.
The FP1’s 140mm max zoom and single AF severely restrict wildlife capabilities.
If wildlife is your jam and you want compactness, the ZS5 is the more sensible albeit still limited choice.
Sports Photography
Neither camera is really cut out for sports. Low burst rates (6 fps FP1 but with single AF only, 2 fps ZS5) and slow AF tracking mean you’ll miss many crucial moments.
The ZS5’s exposure priority modes help nail exposure in tricky lighting, though overall performance remains beginner-grade.
Street Photography
For street photographers craving discretion, the FP1’s slim, quiet build is ideal. The silent shooting speeds (up to 1/1600 shutter speed) and minimal intrusion suit snapshooting.
ZS5’s bulkier presence and less stealthy zoom lens make it more conspicuous.
Macro Photography
The ZS5 shines with a better macro focusing distance (3cm vs 10cm), producing more intimate detail shots. Optical stabilization helps achieve crisp photos handheld.
FP1 can manage close-ups but less detailed and precise.
Night and Astro Photography
Limited sensor tech and max ISO of 6400 mean both cameras suffer at night.
Neither supports Bulb mode, and max shutter speeds are capped at 1/60s minimum, restricting long exposures. Image noise becomes a real barrier beyond ISO 800.
To my regret, neither is ideal for astrophotography or serious low-light.
Video Capabilities
Both record 720p HD video at 30 fps using Motion JPEG.
No external microphone input or headphone jack limits audio recording quality.
Optical image stabilization helps smooth handheld footage.
Neither offers 4k or advanced video codecs, so video work is casual at best.
Travel Photography
The FP1’s pocketability wins hands down for travelers wanting an unobtrusive companion.
The ZS5’s bigger zoom range and exposure controls enhance versatility for diverse scenes but at the cost of size and battery usage.
Both cameras rely on SD/SDHC/SDXC cards for storage - typical for their time.
Battery life specs aren’t well documented, but portability and size give the FP1 an edge in spares and replacements.
Professional and Workflow Considerations
Neither camera supports RAW file format, focusing heavily on JPEG outputs. This limits advanced post-processing flexibility, a must for professionals.
No weather sealing or ruggedness options restrict their use in harsh environments.
USB 2.0 connectivity is standard - no wireless or GPS features.
Durability and Build Quality
Neither offers weatherproof top-tier durability. Both are plastic-heavy for lightness. However, the ZS5’s thicker body imparts a greater feeling of sturdiness and resilience in daily use.
Connectivity and Additional Features
Unfortunately, both models lack wireless connectivity - no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC for instant sharing.
GPS is not present on either, which is a missed opportunity for travel tagging.
USB 2.0 port is available for image transfer, but no HDMI output limits use with external displays during shoots.
Putting It All Together: Objective Scores and Recommendations
Here’s a summarized visual I compiled from performance metric analyses comparing usability and image quality.
Further breaking down the cameras by photographic genre:
Sample Images from Both Cameras
Seeing is believing, so here are some unedited JPEG samples straight out of these cameras. You’ll notice the ZS5’s improved color fidelity and sharper telephoto reach.
Final Thoughts and Who Should Buy Which?
I’ve spent extensive time with the Panasonic FP1 and ZS5, and here’s how I’d advise depending on your priorities:
Choose Panasonic FP1 if you:
- Prioritize an ultra-slim, pocketable design for stealthy street or travel photography.
- Want a simple, point-and-shoot feel without manual exposure complexity.
- Shoot mostly in bright daylight conditions where AF speed and zoom reach are less critical.
- Are budget-conscious and want a lightweight secondary camera.
- Prefer compact minimalism over versatility.
Choose Panasonic ZS5 if you:
- Need extended zoom range (25-300mm) for wildlife, landscapes, or versatile travel shooting.
- Want more manual control (shutter/aperture priority, exposure compensation).
- Desire AF tracking and face detection for better subject acquisition.
- Plan macro shooting with finer detail.
- Don’t mind a thicker, grip-heavy body for improved handling.
- Are willing to invest a bit more for extra features and better image quality.
My Closing Recommendation
While both cameras were technologically competitive in their day, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 offers significantly more versatility and control that benefits a broader range of photographic styles. The FP1 stands out as a niche ultracompact for casual users not interested in manual settings or demanding zoom needs.
Please note that with their 2010 vintage and now limited compatibility with modern workflows (no RAW, slow interfaces, no wireless sharing), I recommend these cameras primarily to collectors, casual holiday snap shooters, or those seeking affordable compact backups rather than serious photographic investments.
For enthusiasts today, even entry-level mirrorless or advanced compacts with CMOS sensors and modern connectivity outperform these models overall. But if your heart is set on a Panasonic compact from this era, the ZS5’s balance of zoom, features, and image quality makes it the wiser long-term choice.
I hope this detailed comparison - rich in hands-on insight and practical evaluation - helps you navigate these two interesting Panasonic cameras. Should you seek further clarity on any features or want shooting tips with classic compacts like these, feel free to reach out.
Happy shooting!
Panasonic FP1 vs Panasonic ZS5 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS5 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ8 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-01-06 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine IV | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/1300s |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.90 m (Auto ISO) | 5.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 151g (0.33 lb) | 214g (0.47 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 103 x 60 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $153 | $300 |