Panasonic FS15 vs Sony TX10: The Ultracompact Contenders Put to the Test

In the realm of ultracompact cameras - those pocket-sized companions designed to capture life’s moments without bulk - two models from different eras stand out for enthusiasts looking to balance convenience, image quality, and a splash of style: the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 (hereafter, FS15), released in early 2009, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX10 (TX10), arriving two years later in 2011 with a splash of rugged polish. Both are targeted squarely at casual shooters and travel buffs who want something more capable than their smartphone but sans the heft and complexity of DSLRs or mirrorless beasts.

Having spent hours running these two contenders through their paces, I’m here to share a thorough and candid comparison - covering everything from sensor tech to ergonomics, autofocus, video chops, and beyond. I’ll pepper the discussion with technical insights drawn from my long history testing cameras alongside up-close user impressions that reflect real-world experience. Whether you’re a casual snapper, a travel photographer, or just curious about the evolution of compact cameras, buckle up for an in-depth ride.

First, let’s get a sense of their physical differences because handling affects everything from how often you reach for your camera to how steady your shots turn out.

Pocket Powerhouses: Size and Handling

When evaluating ultracompacts, their ergonomic footprint can make or break daily use. Both these cameras are designed to slip into a pocket or tiny bag, but subtle size and design choices reveal different user intentions.

The Panasonic FS15 is a slender rectangle with modest dimensions (97x54x22mm) tipping the scales at about 136 grams. The Sony TX10 is slightly smaller and thinner (96x56x18mm, 133 grams), clinging to a more modern aesthetic with a smooth, almost flush front and touch-sensitive controls.

The FS15's build feels a little more traditionally “camera-like,” with distinct buttons placed for tactile feedback. In contrast, the TX10 embraces a minimalist, almost gadget-like vibe that appeals to those who want low profile and potentially rapid touchscreen navigation. It sports a larger 3-inch screen (vs. the FS15’s 2.7-inch) with significantly higher resolution, promising better framing and reviewing experiences.

We’ll deep dive into these screens shortly, but from a handling perspective, I appreciated the FS15’s button layout for quick adjustments without fumbling. The TX10’s reliance on touchscreen, while modern and sleek, felt finicky under mixed lighting conditions or when wearing gloves. Notably, neither has an electronic viewfinder - meaning you’re shooting by LCD alone, which can be challenging in bright sunlight.

On weight and bulk, they’re neck and neck, but the TX10’s slightly smaller footprint gives it a slight edge for street photographers or travelers prioritizing portability.

Design and Controls Up Close: A Matter of Intent

Moving beyond sheer size, the actual control scheme defines a camera’s usability.

On the top deck, the FS15 relies on standard physical buttons and a zoom toggle, embracing simplicity without a touchscreen in sight. The Sony TX10’s top controls are minimal, foregoing many dedicated buttons in favor of touchscreen control for settings like ISO and white balance.

The TX10’s touchscreen interface introduces a layer of convenience for users comfortable with modern smartphones but risks slowing down access to frequently toggled settings during fast-paced shooting.

Neither offers manual ISO or shutter priority modes, and both limit exposure control heavily - likely reflecting their point-and-shoot ambitions more than professional aspirations. Neither camera supports raw capture, which is a limitation for seasoned shooters craving post-processing latitude.

-

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: CCD vs. BSI CMOS

Now we hit the heart of any camera: its sensor and image quality.

The Panasonic FS15 utilizes a 12-megapixel 1/2.3” CCD sensor - a technology that was standard in compact cameras around 2009. The Sony TX10, two years newer, steps up with a 16-megapixel 1/2.3” back-illuminated CMOS sensor (BSI-CMOS), which generally promises better light-gathering efficiency and less noise at higher ISOs.

The difference in resolution is clear on paper, though for both cameras 12MP to 16MP in this sensor size range only marginally impacts real-world resolution - and pushing the pixel count higher on such small sensors can sometimes exacerbate noise.

The FS15’s CCD sensor tends to produce colors with a classic compact camera warmth but struggles more under low light. Its maximum ISO tops out at 1600 natively, with a boosted setting up to 6400 - not that I’d recommend shooting at those elevated settings given the noise.

The TX10’s BSI sensor enables cleaner images at ISO values up to 3200, offering better low-light performance and dynamic range. While neither camera is meant for serious low-light work, the TX10 extends the envelope considerably.

Both cameras have anti-aliasing filters, which slightly soften detail to avoid moiré but can diminish fine sharpness. A wise trade-off in most scenarios.

In field tests, the TX10 consistently yielded sharper, cleaner images with noticeably less chroma noise and better highlight retention in challenging lighting. Panasonic’s FS15 could still turn in respectable daylight shots but lost ground indoors or at dusk.

Shooting Experience: Focus, Speed, and Handling in Action

Autofocus performance is often the Achilles' heel for ultracompacts, so let’s see how these two fare.

The FS15 relies on contrast-detection autofocus across 11 focus points but lacks face or eye detection - features that started appearing around 2010. In practice, the FS15 focuses reasonably quickly under good lighting but occasionally hunts under dim conditions; its autofocus can feel plasticky rather than razor sharp.

The Sony TX10 sticks to contrast detection but with nine points and adds multi-area AF. It still neglects face detection and tracking, which feels dated by 2011 standards. However, thanks to a faster processor (the BIONZ engine), the TX10’s AF is perceptibly quicker and more consistent in challenging scenarios, such as macro shots or close-up portraits.

Continuous shooting speed is another practical consideration. The FS15 throws in a disappointing 2 fps burst rate, adequate for casual shots but sluggish against action. The TX10 leaps ahead with a 10 fps burst mode, which can be useful for capturing fleeting moments in street or travel photography, albeit with limited buffer depth.

Neither camera offers manual focus modes or exposure controls, so pushing creative boundaries is out of reach for serious users - but casual shooters will find the simplicity refreshing.

Macro and Close-up Capabilities: Detail with a Click

For photographers who enjoy getting close, macro capabilities matter.

The FS15’s macro focus distance starts at 5 cm, allowing respectable close-up shots of flowers or small objects. The TX10 improves on this significantly, boasting a 1 cm minimum focus distance - impressively close for an ultracompact. This lets you fill the frame with tiny details that the FS15 would struggle to capture crisply.

In my testing, the TX10 delivered more vibrant colors and better sharpness in macro shots, helped by its more precise and quicker autofocus system. Both benefit from optical image stabilization (OIS), which helps counteract hand shake at close focusing distances.

Screen and Interface: Seeing Your Shots Clearly

A humane LCD can make the difference between frustration and delight while composing or reviewing.

The Panasonic FS15’s 2.7-inch fixed LCD has a modest 230k-dot resolution - adequate but not inspiring. It’s not a touchscreen, making navigation slower, and colors can look washed out, especially outdoors.

The TX10 raises the bar with a 3.0-inch “XtraFine” LCD boasting 921k dots and capacitive touchscreen input. This screen dazzles with vibrant colors, sharp details, and wide viewing angles. It’s excellent for framing tricky shots and reviewing images in the field.

The touchscreen interface is generally responsive but can be awkward to use under glare-heavy conditions or in cold weather, where gloves are worn. You lose tactile feedback compared to physical buttons, but for those used to smartphones, it makes intuitive sense.

Video Performance: Small Cameras, Big Expectations?

Photography isn’t just about stills, and video shooters will wonder how these cameras compare.

The Panasonic FS15 offers rather pedestrian 848x480 and lower resolution video at 30fps in Motion JPEG format - a dated codec that eats storage quickly and yields lower quality footage.

Contrast that with the Sony TX10’s more capable 1080p video capture at 60fps (Full HD), plus 720p and VGA options, encoded in much more efficient and modern formats like AVCHD and MPEG-4. The TX10’s video output is unquestionably superior, delivering smoother, sharper footage, making it better suited for casual videography or travel diaries.

Neither camera has microphone or headphone ports, which limits audio control or monitoring. Both support optical image stabilization in video mode, which helps smooth handheld shots.

Durability and Environmental Sealing: Rugged vs. Sensitive

This is an underappreciated aspect of ultracompacts, especially for travelers or adventure shooters.

The Panasonic FS15 has no environmental sealing and is vulnerable to dust, moisture, and shocks - typical for a low-cost camera of its generation.

In contrast, the Sony TX10 boasts a significant set of physical protections: it is waterproof (up to 10 feet), dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof down to -10°C (14°F). This is a serious advantage for outdoor photographers, hikers, or beachgoers who want to shoot in the elements without worrying about damage.

The TX10’s rugged construction, while adding a little to the cost, provides peace of mind that justifies its price for many users.

Battery Life and Storage: Practical Considerations

Neither camera comes with blazing battery life; these ultracompacts tend to trade capacity for size.

The Panasonic FS15 uses an unspecified battery pack with uncertain longevity in real-world shooting, generally around 220 shots per charge - enough for casual use but requiring a spare for extended outings.

The Sony TX10 uses the rechargeable NP-BN1 battery, rated around 250-300 shots per charge, a slight improvement that aligns with modern compact standards. It also supports a wider variety of storage media compared to the FS15 - SD, SDHC, SDXC cards, plus Sony’s Memory Stick formats - offering flexibility for users with existing compatible cards.

Connectivity and Extras: How Smart are They?

In 2009 and even 2011, wireless features on ultracompacts were limited, but the TX10 embraces modest connectivity improvements.

Both cameras feature HDMI outputs and USB 2.0 for data transfer. However, the TX10 stands out by including Eye-Fi card compatibility, allowing wireless transfer of images via SD cards with Wi-Fi. It lacks Bluetooth or NFC features common in current generations, but it was relatively forward-thinking for its time.

Neither camera supports GPS, which is not unusual for their class but worth noting for geo-tagging enthusiasts.

Putting It All Together: Which Camera Wins Where?

Let’s examine these cameras’ overall capabilities to see who shines in the various photography disciplines - and check their scores.

Portrait Photography

The FS15 struggles here with lack of face detection autofocus and lower resolution sensor. Skin tones, while warm, can feel flat in indoor settings. The TX10’s better sensor and quicker AF help produce sharper portraits with more detail. However, neither camera offers aperture priority or manual exposure to blur backgrounds artfully. Bokeh is minimal due to small sensors and narrow aperture ranges.

Winner: Sony TX10 for sharper portraits and closer macro focusing.

Landscape Photography

Landscape aficionados demand high dynamic range and resolution. The TX10 edges ahead with 16MP resolution and better sensor tech, but both cameras’ small sensors limit dynamic range and detail in shadows. Weather sealing on the TX10 is a huge plus here, allowing shooting in rain or dusty environments. Panasonic’s FS15 lacks any weatherproofing.

Winner: Sony TX10 for resolution and ruggedness.

Wildlife Photography

Neither camera is ideal for wildlife due to fixed lenses and limited telephoto reach. The FS15’s longer 29-145mm zoom could be handy in daylight. However, slow AF and 2 fps burst hold it back. The TX10’s 10 fps burst and quicker AF are compelling but with a shorter 25-100mm zoom, limiting framing options.

Winner: Tie, but both mediocre; TX10’s speed helps capture action better.

Sports Photography

Fast action needs burst speed and AF tracking, neither camera provides. However, TX10’s 10 fps burst is useful for brief sequences, though focus hunting remains frustrating. FS15's 2 fps burst is too slow.

Winner: Sony TX10 by virtue of frame rate.

Street Photography

Size, discretion, and speed are key. The TX10’s slimmer profile and touchscreen make it less obtrusive. However, the reliance on touchscreen controls may slow down quick candid shooting. FS15’s tactile buttons aid rapid operation but feel chunkier in your hand.

Image quality wise, TX10’s sensor and better ISO performance aid low light street shots.

Winner: Sony TX10 for discretion and image quality.

Macro Photography

TX10’s 1 cm macro focus distance is a powerhouse here, with precision focusing and sharpness. FS15’s 5 cm minimum focus range is respectable but less exciting.

Winner: Sony TX10 with superior macro capability.

Night / Astro Photography

Small sensors and lack of manual controls stymie both here, but TX10’s superior ISO performance and cleaner images help. Neither supports long exposure modes needed for star trails.

Winner: Sony TX10.

Video Capabilities

TX10 stomps FS15 with full HD 1080p at 60fps and modern codecs. FS15 is limited to low-res VGA videos.

Winner: Hands down, Sony TX10.

Travel Photography

TX10 balances ruggedness, image quality, video, and portability, making it more versatile for travel. FS15’s modest features work in fair weather and daylight but limit adventure options.

Winner: Sony TX10.

Professional Work

Neither camera targets professionals, lacking raw support, manual controls, or robust file handling. They’re best for casual use or backups.

Panasonic FS15 front Panasonic FS15 screen back Sony TX10 front Sony TX10 screen back

Above are sample images that illustrate the TX10’s finer detail and vivid colors versus the FS15’s softer, warmer tones. Image quality speaks for itself here.

Final Thoughts and Recommendations

Having put the Panasonic FS15 and Sony TX10 through meticulously vetted real-world and lab-inspired tests, my verdict boils down to this:

• The Panasonic FS15 offers simple, no-frills point-and-shoot functionality at an attractive budget price (~$180). Its longer zoom range and classic button layout will appeal to those who want straightforward photography with macro capabilities, mostly outdoors in good light. No video ambitions here, and ISO performance is limited.

• The Sony TX10, while pricier (~$310), justifies its cost with a notable sensor upgrade, superior video recording, rugged sealed body, and a vibrant touchscreen. For photographers who want to push their ultracompact to handle travel, occasional macro, or video, it delivers a much more versatile and satisfying package. I found myself reaching for the TX10 far more frequently as a daily shooter.

Looking at the genre-specific ratings above, you can see why I lean toward the TX10 across virtually every discipline - from landscapes and portraits to video and street photography.

Who Should Buy the FS15?

• Absolute beginners or budget-conscious buyers wanting basic snapshot capability.
• Those who prefer physical controls without touchscreen fuss.
• Casual daylight shooters who prioritize zoom length over ruggedness.

Who Should Buy the TX10?

• Travel and outdoor photographers needing environmental sealing.
• Users wanting high-quality 1080p video alongside still images.
• Enthusiasts valuing a sharp, vibrant LCD and intuitive touchscreen controls.
• Macro enthusiasts who want extreme close-up capabilities in a tiny body.

Summary Table

Closing Personal Note

I remember carrying the FS15 on an afternoon stroll years ago and appreciating its ease - but then on a weekend trip, reaching for the TX10 because of its ruggedness and video capabilities felt like liberation. They’re both relics now compared to today’s smartphone cameras or advanced compacts, yet each represents a fascinating step in ultracompact evolution.

If you find yourself favoring simplicity and budget, the FS15 remains a competent choice. But if you hanker for a compact camera that tries to do it all, from tide pools to train stations, the TX10 is well worth the modest premium.

Having tested thousands of cameras, I advise investing in the one that inspires frequent use - that’s the best way to elevate your photography.

Happy shooting!