Comparing the Panasonic Lumix FX48 and SZ10: Which Compact Suits Your Photography Style?

Choosing between compact cameras can be tricky - especially when they come from the same trusted brand and share similar sensor sizes but cater to subtly different use cases. Today, I’m diving deep into two Panasonic Lumix models, the FX48 and the SZ10, two small sensor compacts released six years apart, targeting casual photographers seeking portability and convenience - but with each carving its own niche.

Having put both through their paces in controlled studio tests and varied field scenarios, I’ll unpack their strengths, weaknesses, and real-world applicability across photography disciplines. Whether you’re a budding enthusiast, a dedicated travel photographer, or even someone wanting a handy second shooter, this comprehensive comparison should clarify which camera fits your needs best.

At a Glance: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics

First impressions count, and size plus handling strongly shape how comfortable and confident you’ll feel using a compact camera daily. Let’s start with a physical comparison:

The Panasonic FX48 is diminutive - just 95 x 53 x 22 mm, weighing a featherlight 150 grams. It fits snugly in any pocket, perfect for those who prioritize ultra-portability. The fixed 2.5-inch LCD with a modest 230k-dot resolution feels a bit dated, but it’s clear and viewable in typical daylight. The lack of any articulating or touchscreen functionality nudges you into a more traditional style of shooting.

Contrast this with the SZ10, which tips the scales at 177 grams and measures 99 x 60 x 30 mm - not huge, but noticeably bulkier. The bigger 3-inch LCD has double the resolution at 460k dots and tilts up and down, offering a more flexible shooting angle - great for awkward compositions or grabbing low-to-the-ground shots without crouching.

Checking the top control layouts (seen below), both cameras opt for a minimalist approach but take slightly different routes:

The FX48’s controls are tight but intuitive, with a simple mode dial and a small zoom toggle. It relies on fixed-function buttons without customization, reflecting its era’s design philosophy. Meanwhile, the SZ10 offers more spacing between controls and places emphasis on ease of use, especially in zoom operations, reflecting its superzoom lens capability.

For me, if you love a pocket-friendly, no-frills compact you can whip out instantly, the FX48 wins hands-down. But for those who want a bit more in control and flexibility without a significant bulk penalty, the SZ10 shines.

Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

I always turn to sensor specifications first because, above all, image quality determines satisfaction. Both Panasonic cameras share the same sensor size - a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor - but differ in resolution and some key image quality features.

The FX48 records 12 megapixels (4000 x 3000), while the newer SZ10 bumps that up to 16 megapixels (4608 x 3456). At first glance, the SZ10’s higher resolution might seem appealing, but more megapixels on a small sensor can sometimes adversely affect noise performance and pixel-level sharpness.

Both cameras maintain an optical low-pass filter (anti-alias filter), slightly softening images but preventing moiré patterns. The CCD technology they use isn’t quite as dynamic or noise-resilient as modern CMOS sensors, a tradeoff typical of compact cameras of their generation.

When put to the test, both performed well under ideal lighting, delivering crisp details suitable for web and casual prints. However, the SZ10's slightly higher resolution does give an edge in cropping flexibility and larger prints, albeit at the expense of marginally increased noise at higher ISO settings.

Speaking of ISO, the FX48 offers a broader native ISO range (80-3200), while the SZ10 limits native ISO to 100-1600 but includes boosted ISO up to 6400. However, noise at these upper ISO settings is quite pronounced for both, so low light performance is limited.

If your images will predominantly be made in daylight or well-lit conditions and your priority is compactness, the FX48 strikes a nice balance. For more cropping options and a bit sharper detail in challenging conditions, the SZ10 is worthwhile, just watch your ISO ceiling.

The Lens Battle: Zoom Versatility vs. Brightness

Arguably, any compact’s usefulness hinges on its lens. Both have fixed lenses but with very different focal ranges:

• FX48: 25-125 mm equivalent (5× zoom) at F2.8-5.9
• SZ10: 24-288 mm equivalent (12× zoom) at F3.1-6.3

The SZ10's vast telephoto reach nearly doubles the FX48’s maximum, making it far more capable for distant subjects like wildlife or events.

But aperture wise, the FX48 starts brighter at F2.8 on the wide end, allowing better low-light or indoor shooting and smoother background blur (“bokeh”) - advantages for portraits and artistic shots.

The SZ10's longer zoom is a boon if you prioritize versatility - especially landscapes stretching into telephoto views, or travel photography where packing multiple lenses isn’t an option. However, the narrow maximum aperture from F3.1 to F6.3 means less light hits the sensor, often forcing higher ISO or slower shutter speeds.

One practical consideration: The FX48 has a close macro focus range of 5 cm, allowing crisp close-ups with excellent detail; the SZ10 doesn’t specify macro range, and in my experience, its minimum focusing distance is less forgiving, limiting extreme close-ups.

Depending on whether you prefer a brighter lens with limited zoom or a superzoom with less speed, your choice will shape your shooting opportunities.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: How Quickly Can You Capture the Moment?

Autofocus is critical, especially if you’re shooting fast-moving subjects or in spontaneous situations.

The FX48 employs contrast-detection autofocus with 11 focus points and face detection, a respectable setup for a camera of its time, but it lacks continuous AF, subject tracking, or animal eye AF. Its continuous shooting speed maxes out at a modest 2 frames per second (fps).

The SZ10, newer by six years, improves with nine focus points and supports continuous autofocus, allowing more fluid focus during burst shooting - albeit with a slightly slower 1.4 fps frame rate, which is curious but likely related to its higher resolution processing demands.

Both cameras have face detection for improved portrait focus accuracy, but neither boasts the advanced eye detection or AI-driven tracking we see in modern compacts.

If you’re aiming for street or travel photography where moments are fleeting, the FX48 can snap quickly enough, but won’t track a sprinting child or wildlife with much success. The SZ10’s continuous AF gives it a slight advantage for casual action but neither is built for professional sports or wildlife photography challenges.

Display and Interface: Composing and Reviewing Your Shots

Displaying your captured images clearly and navigating menus quickly are surprisingly important to day-to-day experience.

Here’s the back screen comparison again for clarity:

The FX48’s fixed 2.5-inch LCD with 230k dots delivers basic image review but can struggle under bright sunlight. Its non-touch interface means button navigation only - simple but less versatile.

In contrast, the SZ10 ups the ante with a brighter 3-inch screen offering 460k dots and tilting capability, making high or low angle shots easier - ideal for creative compositions.

Neither camera includes an electronic viewfinder, which may be a dealbreaker for photographers who prefer eye-level framing or shooting in very bright conditions.

From a user interface perspective, the SZ10 feels more modern and flexible, though neither offers customizable controls or touchscreen responsiveness.

Video Capabilities: Casual Clips or Serious Filmmaking?

In today’s hybrid photo-video world, video features can tip the scales.

The FX48 provides Motion JPEG video recording maxing out at 848 x 480 pixels at 30 fps - essentially standard definition by today’s terms, and quite limited.

Meanwhile, the SZ10 steps up to 720p HD video at 30 fps, which is still entry-level but at least now usable for basic sharing or vlogging in 2015 standards.

Neither camera has advanced video features like 4K recording, external microphone jacks, or image stabilization designed for video (optical image stabilization helps stills mostly).

If video is a core need, the SZ10’s HD recording, improved screen, and built-in stabilization make it the clear choice, but note you’re still limited to basic clips.

Build Quality and Durability

Both cameras target casual shooters and come without weather sealing or ruggedized protection. Panasonic doesn’t claim any dustproof or shockproof features, so treat both as delicate companions.

The SZ10 is slightly heavier and thicker, likely conferring a more solid grip but nothing near pro-level durability.

Battery Life and Storage

The SZ10 lists battery life around 200 shots per charge, which I found realistic. The FX48’s official battery life isn’t specified, but practically, it should be comparable or marginally better due to fewer pixels and simpler interface.

Both cameras use standard SD card slots with no dual storage, so back up images regularly.

Connectivity: Sharing Made Simpler?

Interestingly, the SZ10 includes built-in wireless connectivity, which the FX48 lacks entirely. This allows straightforward image transfer to smartphones or computers - a boon for social media shooters or travelers wanting quick sharing.

Neither offers Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS tracking. HDMI output is also missing on both, limiting tethered viewing.

The FX48’s USB 2.0 is basic and slow compared to modern standards.

Price and Value: What You Get for Your Money

At their release times, the FX48 carried a higher price tag of around $325 versus the SZ10’s $200 - likely reflecting technology improvements and market positioning.

Today, as used or clearance items, their prices vary, but the SZ10’s broader zoom and better screen make it appealing as a budget superzoom compact.

Real-World Performance Across Photography Styles

Having skimmed specs and features, let me outline how these cameras fare in the varied photography types enthusiasts care about most.

Panasonic FX48 front Panasonic FX48 screen back Panasonic SZ10 front Panasonic SZ10 screen back

Portrait Photography

The FX48’s brighter wide aperture (F2.8) and decent face detection allowed more pleasing skin tones and subtle background separation in my tests. Bokeh is modest but noticeable, helping subjects pop.

The SZ10, with narrower apertures, produces flatter backgrounds and less subject isolation. Face detection works but without eye detection or focus tracking, you’ll need steady hands.

If portraits are your passion, the FX48 makes a stronger case.

Landscape Photography

Resolution helps here. The SZ10’s 16MP files render slightly more detail and cropping options. The extensive 24-288 mm zoom extends flexibility from wide vistas to compressed telephoto landscapes.

Dynamic range on both is limited by small CCD sensors - expect blown highlights or noisy shadows challenging scenes. Neither is weather-sealed, so watch conditions.

If your landscapes demand maximum reach and flexible framing, SZ10 has edge; FX48 scores on simplicity and sharpness at base zoom.

Wildlife Photography

Neither camera was designed for dedicated wildlife work - but the SZ10’s 12× zoom is by far superior for distant subjects, though limited by slow burst rates and basic AF.

FX48 simply can’t compete here, but if your wildlife shots are casual (birds in a park), neither will deliver pro-grade focus tracking or frame rates.

Sports Photography

Both limited in burst speed and AF tracking. FX48’s 2 fps max is minimal, and SZ10’s 1.4 fps even less suited for fast action.

Consider mirrorless or DSLR alternatives if sports is a priority.

Street Photography

FX48’s small size and reasonably fast lens favor candid shooting and portability.

SZ10’s bulkier body and longer zoom might make it more conspicuous, but tilting screen aids low-angle shots discreetly.

Both have limited low-light AF, so street night scenes can be tricky.

Macro Photography

FX48’s close 5 cm focus gives creative macro potential for flowers or small objects.

SZ10 lacks a dedicated macro mode or close focusing advantage.

Macro shooters will prefer the FX48 here.

Night and Astrophotography

CCD sensors and limited ISO range restrict these cameras.

No long exposure modes or RAW support typical of astro shooters.

Occasional handheld low-light snapshots possible but neither is an astro star.

Video Work

As noted earlier, SZ10’s 720p gives acceptable casual video; FX48’s substandard resolution is hard to recommend.

Neither camera will satisfy pros or vloggers demanding sharp, stabilized footage.

Travel Photography

Lightweight FX48 benefits portability and quick shooting.

SZ10’s zoom versatility and wireless sharing cater well to travel’s unpredictability.

Personally, I’d choose SZ10 for extended trips needing diverse focal ranges.

Professional Usage

No RAW files and modest specifications limit professional use.

Both cameras suit casual secondary roles or emergency backups.

Summary of Strengths and Limitations

Final Recommendations: Who Should Consider Which Camera?

After spending weeks shooting with both cameras, here’s my distilled advice:

• Choose the Panasonic FX48 if:

  • You want the absolute smallest, lightest pocket companion.
  • Your photography leans toward portraits and casual street shots.
  • Lower ISO noise performance and brighter apertures matter.
  • Video and zoom reach are secondary concerns.
  • Macro close-ups are a regular creative outlet.
  • You can live without video over HD or wireless transfer.

• Choose the Panasonic SZ10 if:

  • Zoom versatility is key for landscapes, travel, or wildlife snapshots.
  • You want a better LCD with tilting flexibility.
  • Built-in Wi-Fi sharing appeals to your workflow.
  • Transferring images on the go matters.
  • Casual HD video recording is useful.
  • You can accommodate a slightly bigger and heavier body.
  • Continuous autofocus and a bit more resolution count.

Closing Thoughts: Is Either Compact Still Worth It?

Neither camera dares to compete with today’s mirrorless or even advanced smartphones on speed, connectivity, or image quality. Yet, each holds nostalgic charm and practical value for specific users.

The FX48 excels in raw simplicity meshed with a bright lens and manageable controls, making it a still-relevant choice for pocket photographers devoted to portraits or simple shooting.

The SZ10’s extended zoom and modern conveniences serve travelers and casual shooters eager to capture everything from wide angles to distant subjects without changing lenses.

I hope this detailed comparison helps you make a choice that suits your photographic aims and budgets. If you want me to test newer Panasonic compacts or mirrorless options that have emerged since, drop a comment. Meanwhile, happy shooting!

If you’d like to see high-res sample images and detailed performance charts, scroll back to the galleries embedded above. They reveal subtle differences only perceptible through pixel peeping and real-world use.

Thanks for reading - your next camera might just be one of these overlooked gems!