Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung HZ35W
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FX77
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Panasonic FX78 and Samsung HZ35W, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Panasonic and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the FX78 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe FX78 was manufactured 8 months after the HZ35W which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the FX78 scores against the HZ35W with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 and Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are available at Panasonic FX78 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Samsung HZ35W
FX78 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | June 2010 | Newer by 8 months | |
Screen size | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Panasonic FX78
HZ35W | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Panasonic FX78 and Samsung HZ35W
FX78 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Panasonic FX78 offers outside dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Panasonic FX78 and Samsung HZ35W in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the FX78 vs the HZ35W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the FX78 and HZ35W is 95 and 91 respectively.
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The image below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the FX78 and HZ35W.
As you can see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same exact resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of photos however you should really factor the release date of the cameras into account. The fresher FX78 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FX78 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | Samsung HZ35W |
Other name | Lumix DMC-FX77 | WB650 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2011-01-25 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine FHD | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.5-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 4.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 142 grams (0.31 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $210 | $300 |