Panasonic FZ200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Panasonic FZ200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Announced July 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
- Successor is Panasonic FZ300
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Revealed August 2012
Panasonic FZ200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Panasonic FZ200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals Panasonic and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the FZ200 (12MP) and Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe FZ200 was unveiled about the same time to the Galaxy Camera 3G which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer different body type with the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the FZ200 matches up versus the Galaxy Camera 3G in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Panasonic FZ200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The full galleries are provided at Panasonic FZ200 Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
FZ200 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 0k | Clearer screen (+460k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Panasonic FZ200
Galaxy Camera 3G | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 4.8" | 3" | Bigger screen (+1.8") | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Panasonic FZ200 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
FZ200 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2012 | August 2012 | Same age |
Panasonic FZ200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Panasonic FZ200 enjoys outer dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has proportions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") along with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Compare the Panasonic FZ200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the FZ200 and the Galaxy Camera 3G.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the FZ200 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 65 and 90 respectively.
Panasonic FZ200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the FZ200 and Galaxy Camera 3G.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to produce more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively.
Panasonic FZ200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Panasonic FZ200 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-07-18 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine VII FHD | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | - |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 23 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 4.8 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,312 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 13.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/4000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 588g (1.30 lbs) | 305g (0.67 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 37 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 19.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 114 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 540 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $499 | $606 |