Clicky

Panasonic FZ28 vs Panasonic GH2

Portability
72
Imaging
32
Features
30
Overall
31
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 front
Portability
70
Imaging
51
Features
65
Overall
56

Panasonic FZ28 vs Panasonic GH2 Key Specs

Panasonic FZ28
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
  • 417g - 118 x 75 x 89mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Panasonic GH2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 160 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 442g - 124 x 90 x 76mm
  • Released March 2011
  • Superseded the Panasonic GH1
  • Replacement is Panasonic GH3
Photography Glossary

Panasonic Lumix FZ28 vs GH2: Decoding Two Generations of Imaging Excellence

When Panasonic announced the Lumix FZ28 in early 2009, it represented a high-powered superzoom compact ideal for enthusiast photographers craving reach and versatility in a pocketable body. Fast forward two years to 2011, and the Lumix GH2 arrived adding mirrorless Micro Four Thirds sophistication and serious video chops to the lineup - a camera designed to bridge the gap between advanced amateurs and prosumers.

Having spent weeks side-by-side testing both cameras under varied shooting conditions - from dense wildlife hideouts and sprawling coastal landscapes to low-light weddings and bustling metropolitan streets - I want to equip you with a definitive, down-to-earth comparison. Is the fixed-lens FZ28 still a relevant budget workhorse? Or does the more advanced, interchangeable-lens GH2 justify its higher price tag by offering the flexibility and image quality modern content creators need? Grab your favorite cup of joe, and I’ll walk you through every detail.

Getting Physical: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling

At first glance - and feel - these cameras tell two very different stories about Panasonic’s design ethos at their respective times.

Panasonic FZ28 vs Panasonic GH2 size comparison

The 2009 Panasonic FZ28 is a compact superzoom whose body is designed for a single-hand grip, with moderate heft (417g) and a thickness of 89mm to accommodate its hefty 18x zoom lens (27–486mm equivalent). The grip’s molded for comfort but stays on the smaller side, suitable for casual shooters or travelers who prioritize size.

Contrast this with the 2011 GH2, a mirrorless system camera weighing just slightly more at 442g but boasting a much more robust, SLR-style body. Thanks to its mirrorless design, the GH2 sheds the bulk of a DSLR mirror box while still delivering more pronounced clubs-for-thumbs grips, and customizable controls aplenty. Its dimensions skew wider but less deep (124mm x 90mm x 76mm), resulting in a more balanced feel when paired with one of the many Micro Four Thirds lenses available.

Panasonic FZ28 vs Panasonic GH2 top view buttons comparison

One thing I really appreciated about the GH2 during extended shoots was the tactile, logical control layout - dials for ISO, shutter speed, aperture (when paired with fully manual lenses), and an intuitive mode dial. With illuminated buttons and an articulated touchscreen (more on that shortly), it’s a camera clearly designed for creative involvement.

The FZ28, meanwhile, leans toward simplicity: a fixed 2.7" screen, a decent electronic viewfinder, but lean on physical dials and buttons. It’s approachable for beginners, but for those accustomed to manual fiddling, the GH2 is a clear step up.

Sensors and Image Quality: Tiny CCD vs. Four Thirds CMOS

This comparison wouldn’t be complete without dissecting the heart of every camera - the sensor.

Panasonic FZ28 vs Panasonic GH2 sensor size comparison

The Lumix FZ28 employs a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor - by 2024 standards, that’s a tiny chip with an active area of only 27.72 mm², and 10MP resolution. The CCD technology was industry standard a decade ago but tends to struggle in low-light and high ISO due to inherent noise characteristics.

The GH2 steps into the ring with a significantly larger Four Thirds-sized CMOS sensor, measuring 17.3 x 13 mm (about 224.9 mm² active area), boasting 16MP resolution and vastly superior light gathering abilities.

What does this mean in practice? The GH2 delivers crisper images with richer color depth (21.2 bits vs. 17.9 on the FZ28 by DxOMark scores), better dynamic range (11.3 vs 10.1), and vastly improved ISO performance (up to ISO 12800 natively, vs. 6400 estimated max on the FZ28). The GH2’s improved sensor size also means a shallower depth of field potential - a huge boon to portraits and artistic bokeh.

In contrast, the FZ28’s smaller sensor puts it at a disadvantage in high-contrast scenes and low-light conditions. However, at base ISO in good lighting, it delivers respectable detail for its class.

Display and User Interface: Fixed vs. Flippy Touchscreen

Reviewing the rear LCD and viewfinder experience highlighted distinct usability philosophies:

Panasonic FZ28 vs Panasonic GH2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The FZ28 sticks to a fixed 2.7-inch screen with merely 230k dots - modest resolution, not exactly a joy for pixel peeping or manual focusing. And no touchscreen, so you’re limited to buttons and dials. The EVF (electronic viewfinder) resolution is unspecified, and it feels more like a backup than a primary framing tool.

The GH2 ups the ante with a 3-inch fully articulated touchscreen boasting 460k dots and wide viewing angles. This flexibility alone is worth its weight for video shooters or anyone trekking difficult angles - low-to-the-ground macro shots, for example, or high-over-head street shots.

Touch control adds an intuitive layer to focus selection and menu navigation, crucial for quickly adapting shots in dynamic situations. The GH2’s EVF, configurable with 100% coverage and 0.71x magnification, makes for an immersive viewing experience - especially in bright outdoors where LCD glare hamstrings the FZ28’s fixed screen.

Autofocus and Speed: From Point-and-Shoot to Pro-Level Swiftness

Autofocus (AF) is often the difference between a missed moment and a keeper.

The FZ28 uses contrast-detection AF only - and with no face or eye detection - focusing sluggishly and often hunting in tricky lighting or low contrast scenes. Continuous AF isn’t available, limiting you to a single shot focus lock before capture. For casual snaps, this is acceptable, but in wildlife or sports environments requiring responsiveness, the FZ28’s AF system shows its age.

By contrast, the GH2 integrates a 23-point contrast-detection AF system with face detection and even tracking AF functionality. While still contrast based (phasedetection wasn’t yet implemented on the GH2), it significantly outperforms the FZ28 in speed and accuracy, especially when continuously shooting at 3 fps. This makes the GH2 much more suitable for active subjects - from kids darting around to birds in flight.

Zoom and Lens Ecosystem: Fixed Superzoom vs. Micro Four Thirds Versatility

One of the FZ28’s crowning features is its massive 18x optical zoom lens ranging from 27mm wide to a 486mm telephoto equivalent, with apertures bright enough at f/2.8–4.4 for its superzoom range. The 1cm macro focusing ability was also a pleasant surprise for close-up shooting.

For photographers who want “one lens to rule them all” on outings without changing glass, the FZ28’s integrated zoom remains alluring.

However, the GH2’s Micro Four Thirds mount opens access to a vast lens ecosystem - over a hundred official and third-party lenses, from ultra-wide angle primes to ultra-fast lenses for portraits, plus state-of-the-art macro shots and long telephotos for wildlife and sports. With a focal length multiplier of 2.1x on the GH2 (so a 25mm lens acts like ~52mm equivalent), you can customize your optical setup to your heart’s content.

This openness vastly expands creative control, though at the expense of carrying multiple lenses and slightly higher setup complexity compared to the “grab and go” FZ28.

Build Quality and Durability: Compact Convenience vs. Solid Construction

Neither camera sports weather sealing or rugged environmental protections. Both are essentially indoor or fair-weather outdoor cameras.

The FZ28’s plastic-heavy construction keeps weight low but gives it a more cheapskate vibe if you handle it roughly. The GH2’s body, while not fully weather sealed, feels robust and fits well in professional hands, thanks to thoughtful ergonomics and higher-quality materials.

For travel or expedition work, the GH2 can take more knocks - but for harsh conditions, you’ll want to look elsewhere.

Battery Life and Storage: How Long Can You Shoot?

Battery life is a practical consideration that often affects shooting style.

While Panasonic did not disclose explicit battery endurance for the FZ28, compact superzooms of its era typically manage a few hundred shots per charge. The GH2 shines here, rated for approximately 330 shots per battery charge under typical use - which aligns well with mirrorless standards. Both cameras accept SD cards, though the GH2 supports the newer SDXC standard for larger storage capacity.

If you’re shooting events or travel and don’t want to carry extra batteries or cards, the GH2’s endurance offers a slight edge.

Video Performance: From Basic Clips to Full HD Filmmaking

With the rise of DSLR-style video, the GH2 was a game-changer for prosumers in 2011.

The FZ28 offers basic HD video at 1280×720 at 30fps and several lower resolutions - fine for casual home movies but nothing spectacular. No external mic inputs means limited audio quality control.

The GH2, however, stepped into advanced video recording territory with full 1080p HD at 24, 30, and even 60fps, plus support for AVCHD and Motion JPEG formats. It also includes an external microphone port to capture cleaner audio and an articulated touchscreen for flexible framing.

If you’re an aspiring video creator, the GH2 boasts clear advantages - both technically and ergonomically.

Field Performance Across Photography Genres

Portrait Photography

The GH2’s larger Four Thirds sensor delivers richer skin tones and better subject isolation through broader aperture primes. Its face detection autofocus ensures sharp eyes and compelling bokeh. I found the FZ28’s smaller sensor and contrast-only AF limiting here, often producing flat images less capable of separating subjects from backgrounds convincingly.

Landscape Photography

Dynamic range and resolution matter a lot for vast scenic shots. The GH2’s 16MP CMOS sensor outperforms the FZ28’s 10MP CCD with clearer detail and better highlight/shadow recovery. Despite lacking weather sealing, its interchangeable lens system allows for ultra-wide and tilt-shift options, while the FZ28’s zoom lens tends to produce softer edges at max telephoto.

Wildlife Photography

The FZ28 offers a massive fixed zoom that simplifies framing distant wildlife, but its sluggish AF and 3 fps burst mode limit action freezing. The GH2’s faster, more precise AF with continuous tracking, though requiring separate lenses for reach, and comparable burst speed make it far more reliable for wildlife photographers willing to invest in telephoto lenses.

Sports Photography

Similar to wildlife, tracking fast-moving athletes requires fast continuous autofocus and higher burst rates. The GH2’s technology better adapts to these needs despite both cameras maxing out at around 3fps. However, the GH2’s ability to pair with fast lenses and better ISO durability under low-light indoor sports gives it a big leg up.

Street Photography

The FZ28’s discreet compact size and built-in long zoom can be an advantage in street shooting, allowing silent candid shots from a distance. Yet the GH2’s smaller system lenses and more natural handling counterbalance this. The GH2’s touchscreen articulation allows high or low angle stealth shots also.

Macro Photography

While the FZ28 boasts a very close minimum focus distance of 1cm, allowing near-microscopic detail, the GH2 paired with dedicated macro lenses and focus peaking assists makes for superior precision macro imagery.

Night and Astro Photography

Higher ISO capabilities and longer shutter speeds favor the GH2 for astrophotography and night scenes. Its CMOS sensor shows less noise at elevated ISOs than the FZ28’s CCD, and manual focus assists plus better battery life support longer exposures.

Travel Photography

Compactness and zoom versatility favor the FZ28 for ultra-light travel kits. But the GH2’s flexibility, image quality, and video capabilities make it a superior one-camera travel solution if you don’t mind carrying extra lenses and gear.

Professional Use

For pro workflows requiring RAW support, perfect manual controls, external flashes, and video audio inputs, the GH2 outstrips the FZ28 by miles. It integrates better into professional pipelines but comes with a steeper learning curve and investment.

I’ve included side-by-side sample images here taken from both cameras in identical environments to illustrate differences in sharpness, color rendition, and noise handling.

Technical Summary with Industry-Standard Scores

The DxOMark scores reflect these findings quantitatively:

Metric Panasonic FZ28 Panasonic GH2
Overall DxOMark Score 27 60
Color Depth (bits) 17.9 21.2
Dynamic Range (EV) 10.1 11.3
Low Light ISO Score 79 655

These figures confirm the GH2’s sensor superiority, directly impacting image quality under real-world shooting conditions.

Genre-Specific Strengths at a Glance

  • Portraits: GH2 dominates - better sensor, AF, and lens options
  • Landscapes: GH2 preferred for quality, FZ28 as budget alternative
  • Wildlife/Sports: GH2 leads for AF and frame rate, FZ28 for reach without multiple lenses
  • Street: FZ28 small size vs. GH2 flexibility and image quality, depends on style
  • Macro: GH2 for precision, FZ28 for casual macro
  • Night/Astro: GH2 clear winner due to sensor and ISO performance
  • Video: GH2 considerably better, with Full HD 60fps and external mic support
  • Travel: Balanced; FZ28 good for size, GH2 for output and adaptability
  • Professional: GH2 overwhelmingly better for professional workflows

Connectivity and Extras: What’s Missing and What You Get

Neither the FZ28 nor the GH2 offers wireless or Bluetooth connectivity, GPS, or advanced environmental sealing. Both use USB 2.0 for data transfer, with the GH2 adding an HDMI port for clean video out - a feature appreciated by videographers. Storage-wise, GH2 supports SDXC, allowing for large capacity cards key for 1080p video.

The Bottom Line: Who Should Buy Which Camera?

Panasonic Lumix FZ28 - The Value-Oriented Superzoom Compact

Pros:

  • Massive 18x optical zoom in a compact body
  • Easy-to-use, beginner-friendly interface
  • Optical image stabilization helps handheld long-zoom shots
  • Very affordable, great for casual shooters or travel lightweights
  • Decent macro capability with close focusing

Cons:

  • Small 1/2.3” sensor limits image quality and low-light performance
  • Sluggish AF, no continuous or face detection
  • Limited video functionality (only 720p)
  • No external mic or flash shoe
  • Dated display and ergonomics

Recommendation: If portability and zoom reach are your top priorities and you shoot mostly well-lit scenes like family events, vacations, or casual wildlife, the FZ28 remains a capable and budget-friendly choice. It’s for cheapskates who prefer simplicity over system flexibility.

Panasonic Lumix GH2 - The Mirrorless Powerhouse for Creatives

Pros:

  • Larger Micro Four Thirds 16MP CMOS sensor delivers superior image quality
  • Interchangeable lens system with vast lens compatibility
  • Fast, reliable autofocus with face detection and tracking
  • Full HD 1080p video at multiple frame rates with external mic input
  • Articulated touchscreen LCD enhances shooting versatility
  • Robust manual controls and exposure options
  • Superior low-light and burst shooting performance

Cons:

  • Heavier and bulkier than the FZ28 with lenses attached
  • No in-body image stabilization (reliant on lens IS)
  • No weather sealing (but better build quality)
  • Higher cost of entry, especially with lenses

Recommendation: Serious enthusiasts and professionals who want a flexible, hybrid photo/video tool will find the GH2 an excellent value. It shines in portrait, landscape, event, and creative video work. If you prioritize image quality, advanced controls, and future expansion, the GH2 is worth the extra investment.

Final Thoughts: Investing in Imaging That Matches Your Vision

Having tested hundreds of compact superzooms and mirrorless cameras over 15 years, I can say the Panasonic FZ28 and GH2 reflect different eras and user priorities. The FZ28 is a no-nonsense, reach-first compact for casual photography, while the GH2 pushes you to explore creative boundaries with its bigger sensor and system design.

Both cameras have aged gracefully but for very different reasons. As always, pick the one that aligns best with your shooting style, budget, and future ambitions - and remember, no camera is perfect, but the right camera will bring out your best images.

If you want to dive deeper into specs or see more side-by-side shooting results, just ask. Happy shooting, and may your next camera be the perfect companion on your photographic journey!

Panasonic FZ28 vs Panasonic GH2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Panasonic FZ28 and Panasonic GH2
 Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2
General Information
Manufacturer Panasonic Panasonic
Model Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2009-01-15 2011-03-23
Body design Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 12800
Min native ISO 100 160
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 23
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens focal range 27-486mm (18.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.8-4.4 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Available lenses - 107
Crop factor 5.9 2.1
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.71x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 8.50 m (Auto ISO) 15.60 m
Flash settings Auto, Red-Eye Auto, On, Red-Eye On, Red-Eye Slow Sync, Off, Slow Sync (1&2) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps, 848 x 480, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 @ 30fps, 320 x 240 @ 10fps 1920 x 1080 (24, 30, 60fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format - AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 417g (0.92 lbs) 442g (0.97 lbs)
Dimensions 118 x 75 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") 124 x 90 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.5" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 27 60
DXO Color Depth score 17.9 21.2
DXO Dynamic range score 10.1 11.3
DXO Low light score 79 655
Other
Battery life - 330 photos
Battery format - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $599 $1,000