Panasonic FZ28 vs Pentax K110D: Expert Comparison of Two 2000s-Era Cameras for Enthusiasts and Pros

When looking back over cameras released in the mid-to-late 2000s, two models often intrigue enthusiasts aiming for budget-friendly options blending useful features and solid image quality. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ28 and the Pentax K110D each occupy interesting niches yet represent very different approaches. Having spent extensive hands-on time with both cameras, from controlled lab tests to vibrant street scenes and natural landscapes, I’ll walk you through a detailed, practical comparison of these two cameras - unpacking sensor tech, autofocus, shooting versatility, handling, and more.

If you’re researching for your next camera acquisition or want to enrich your understanding of photographic gear evolution, this in-depth analysis will illuminate the strengths and limitations of both models. I’ll seamlessly blend technical insights with real-world impressions and hands-on tips, so you can decide which camera matches your creative ambitions and workflow needs.

First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling

From the outset, the physical differences are evident. The Panasonic FZ28 is a compact superzoom bridge camera boasting a fixed lens covering a broad range from 27mm wide to a striking 486mm telephoto equivalent (18× zoom). It measures a modest 118 x 75 x 89 mm and weighs a manageable 417 grams, making it notably smaller and lighter than the Pentax K110D DSLR, which tips the scales at 585 grams and measures 129 x 93 x 70 mm.

The Pentax K110D’s body uses Pentax’s classic compact SLR design, pairing well with a vast array of K-mount interchangeable lenses. While heavier and bigger, it allows for greater creative control with lens options ranging from wide standards to specialized telephoto or macro optics not possible on the fixed-lens FZ28.

I found the FZ28's grip comfortable for casual outings due to its manageable size and thumb rest, though the relatively deep lens barrel on zoom pulls added some front weight. The K110D’s size provides a reassuring heft that stabilizes the camera during handheld shooting, but it’s less pocket-friendly and demands additional lenses to cover different focal lengths.

Controls and User Interface: Balancing Simplicity and Functionality

The control layout on the FZ28 centers on ease of use typical of bridge cameras - dial-based exposure modes, dedicated zoom lever, and an electronic viewfinder for composing. Although it lacks certain advanced customization found on pro bodies, the menu system is straightforward and accessible, ideal for beginners or on-the-go shooters. However, the absence of touchscreen and illuminated buttons means limited ease for settings adjustments in darker environments.

Conversely, the K110D offers classic DSLR controls with dedicated dials for shutter speed and exposure compensation, plus a Pentamirror optical viewfinder with approximately 96% frame coverage and 0.57 magnification. This was a big plus for framing precision under bright conditions. The interface lacks live view and touch capabilities, which, while expected in a camera of its generation, may feel dated today.

The FZ28’s fixed 2.7-inch screen (230k pixels resolution) offers a slightly larger and higher-resolution display than the K110D’s 2.5-inch / 210k pixels screen. The K110D’s lack of live view and smaller screen contribute to a more traditional optical shooting experience, whereas the FZ28 embraces early attempts at electronic composition and review.

Sensor and Image Quality: Size and Resolution Trade-Offs

This section dives into where the real contrast begins. The Panasonic FZ28 utilizes a small 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor (measuring 6.08 x 4.56 mm), typical of superzoom compacts of the era, with a maximum resolution of approximately 10 megapixels (3648 x 2736 pixels). Its sensor area is just 27.72 square millimeters - minuscule compared to the Pentax K110D’s APS-C sized CCD sensor measuring 23.5 x 15.7 mm (sensor area 368.95 mm²), offering a 6-megapixel output at 3008 x 2008 pixels.

The Pentax’s APS-C sensor size gives it a significant physical advantage, manifesting in deeper dynamic range, better color fidelity, and noticeably improved noise control at higher ISO settings. Although the pixel count is slightly lower, the larger pixels catch more light, reducing grain in dim settings. The FZ28’s sensor delivers respectable daylight performance, but pushing beyond ISO 400 results in visible noise and softness.

Interestingly, the FZ28 features an antialiasing filter to avoid moiré patterns, while the Pentax also uses this filter but benefits from larger pixel pitch aiding sharpness retention. The Panasonic’s sensor permits ISO sensitivities from 100 to 6400, albeit extreme ISO settings are practically unusable. The K110D ranges from ISO 200 to 3200 natively, with better low light usability.

Looking at DxO Mark data (although the K110D was not officially tested), the FZ28 clocks a modest overall score of 27 points, with a color depth of 17.9 bits and a dynamic range of 10.1 stops. My experience confirms these metrics: the FZ28 sensor struggles in complex lighting but excels in sunny outdoor scenes and versatile focal length use. The K110D’s sensor is well-regarded for its time and remains capable for portrait, landscape, and everyday shooting demanding good tonal gradation and moderate resolution.

Viewing and Composition: Electronic vs Optical Techniques

I appreciate the FZ28’s electronic viewfinder (EVF) integrated into the body, which is rare for compact superzooms from 2009. While not high resolution, it enables framing and exposure preview under bright outdoor conditions without relying solely on the LCD, which can wash out in daylight. The fixed 2.7-inch rear LCD supports live preview with focus peaking absent and no touchscreen functionality.

By contrast, the Pentax K110D offers an optical pentamirror viewfinder delivering a clear, direct-through-the-lens experience. Composing in an optical viewfinder is often preferred by traditionalists, especially for sports and wildlife where lag-free sight lines are critical. Unfortunately, the lack of live view can make focusing less versatile, especially in tricky macro or low-light scenarios.

For quick image review, both cameras’ LCDs feel a bit small by contemporary standards, but the FZ28’s marginally larger screen is easier to examine for critical focus checks. The interface menus on both are uncluttered, but I found the FZ28's to be more intuitive overall for beginners.

Panasonic FZ28 front Panasonic FZ28 screen back Pentax K110D screen back

Image Output: Real World Image Samples Across Genres

Having shot diverse scenes with both cameras, I can confirm they serve different photographic needs. The FZ28 excels in travel and street photography where its massive zoom range lets you capture everything from wide cityscapes to distant details without swapping lenses. Its macro mode down to 1cm focus distance is excellent for close-ups on flowers and small objects.

Portraits from the K110D, especially with a fast prime lens, show much better subject separation and creamy bokeh due to its larger sensor and interchangeable lens options. Its color reproduction is more faithful and dynamic, particularly in skin tones. The built-in flash is basic on both, but Pentax’s option for external flashes delivers more professional lighting control.

Landscape images benefit greatly from the K110D’s improved dynamic range and resolution, producing crisp, detailed images with subtle shadow and highlight retention. On the other hand, the FZ28’s smaller sensor struggles to deliver the same tonal depth but shines in vibrancy and practical framing.

Because of the FZ28’s CCD sensor limitations, noise becomes prominent at ISO above 400, limiting low light and night use. The K110D produces cleaner images up to ISO 800, suitable for indoor or evening shooting with professional lenses.

Autofocus System: Speed, Accuracy, and Usability

Autofocus on these cameras reflects their design priorities. The FZ28 relies on contrast-detection autofocus with single AF only - no continuous autofocus or tracking. This system’s simplicity works well for static or slow-moving subjects, but it’s not ideal for fast action like sports or wildlife. Focusing is reliable within good lighting but slower and prone to hunting in dim conditions.

Meanwhile, the Pentax K110D uses an 11-point phase-detection autofocus system with selectable multi-area AF or single-point AF modes. This provides better speed and accuracy, including continuous AF during burst shooting at 3 fps. Though rudimentary compared to modern systems, it is capable and versatile for portraits, events, and tracking slow-moving subjects.

Neither camera supports face or eye detection autofocus, a technology that emerged later. The K110D's system is undoubtedly more advanced and better suited for users who prioritize sharpness and focus control across varied scenarios.

Performance Totals: Shooting Speed, Buffer, and Responsiveness

Both cameras offer similar maximum continuous shooting speeds - 3 frames per second. However, the buffer size differs. The K110D accommodates more RAW frames before slowing due to its simpler 6MP files, making it suitable for moderate burst work. The FZ28’s 10MP files are larger, but buffer limitations mean shorter runs before buffer clearing causes delays.

Shutter speed ranges are fairly comparable, with the K110D offering up to 1/4000 sec max speed, which can freeze fast motion better than the FZ28’s 1/2000 sec limit. The latter does offer an extended minimum shutter of 60 seconds for long exposures.

Operational speed-wise, the Pentax feels snappier in startup and shot-to-shot timings, likely because of DSLR philosophy, whereas the FZ28’s processing leaves slight lag but manages well for casual and travel use.

Lens Selection: Fixed Zoom vs Pentax K-Mount Flexibility

Lens ecosystem often drives camera choice. The FZ28’s lens is a fixed 27-486mm equivalent zoom with bright f/2.8 to f/4.4 variations, delivering a versatile all-in-one range without lens swapping. This zoom range is excellent for travel and wildlife reach, but the lack of interchangeable lenses limits creative expression.

Pentax K110D’s advantage lies in the vast Pentax K-mount ecosystem, boasting over 150 compatible lenses from ultra-wide to super-telephoto and fast primes for portraits or macro work. This modularity invites experimentation and long-term growth, vital for progressing photographers.

Specialized Photography Disciplines: Strengths and Weaknesses

Let’s break down how each camera suits particular photography genres:

• Portraits:
  K110D’s APS-C sensor and interchangeable lens options provide better skin tones, subject isolation, and creative control. The FZ28’s smaller sensor and fixed zoom limit bokeh prowess, but macro and mid-telephoto zooms still work for casual portraits.

• Landscape:
  K110D wins on dynamic range and resolution for detailed landscapes; the FZ28 lags here but convenience and zoom allow interesting framing diversity.

• Wildlife and Sports:
  FZ28’s 18× zoom lets you reach distant subjects but sluggish contrast AF hampers action shooting. K110D has better phase-detect AF and faster shutter speeds but requires suitable telephoto lenses to match zoom.

• Street Photography:
  FZ28’s smaller size and zoom flexibility make it less intrusive, facilitating candid shots. K110D bulk and lens changes draw more attention.

• Macro:
  FZ28 offers an impressive 1cm macro mode with optical stabilization; K110D needs specialized macros but autofocus is more precise.

• Night & Astro:
  K110D’s larger sensor better handles low-light noise; FZ28 IS helps but limited ISO and sensor size restrict quality.

• Video:
  FZ28 supports 720p video at 30fps, basic but functional for casual clips; K110D has no video functionality.

• Travel:
  FZ28 shines with one versatile lens and lightweight body; K110D offers flexibility but at the cost of size and lens hauling.

• Professional Work:
  Pentax with RAW support and better customization is more suited for serious workflows; FZ28 is an entry-level enthusiast tool.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance Considerations

Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged body protection. The Pentax’s DSLR build feels more robust in hand, with metal chassis elements, whereas the FZ28 is all plastic construction. For field use where elements are factors, extra care or protective gear are advisable with both systems.

Battery Life and Storage

Battery details are sparse, but the FZ28 uses a proprietary lithium-ion battery (exact model varies), while the K110D operates on four AA batteries, which is convenient in remote locations for quick replacements. Both have single SD/SDHC card slots, with FZ28 also providing internal memory for emergencies.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Neither boasts wireless connectivity, Bluetooth, or GPS. USB 2.0 is standard for file transfer on both, though the absence of HDMI or microphone inputs means neither truly supports modern media workflows.

Final Verdict and Recommendations

From my extensive testing and evaluation:

• Choose the Panasonic FZ28 if:
  You value convenience, all-in-one zoom flexibility, light weight, and video capability in a compact package. It’s ideal for travel, casual wildlife, and street photographers who want an affordable, straightforward zoom camera with decent image quality under favorable light. Macro enthusiasts will appreciate the close focusing range and stabilization. Its limitation is low light, slower AF, and smaller sensor.

• Choose the Pentax K110D if:
  You prioritize interchangeable lenses, image quality, and traditional DSLR ergonomics. Perfect for learners stepping into interchangeable lens photography on a budget, with the ability to grow lens collections. It’s better suited for portraits, landscapes, and moderate-speed action where better autofocus and a larger sensor produce superior results. Downsides include lack of video, no live view, and bulkier size.

Photography equipment choices always involve trade-offs dictated by your shooting styles and goals. Both cameras remain interesting in today’s market for budget-conscious buyers or collectors wanting insight into photographic heritage. While neither can fully compete with modern mirrorless marvels, understanding their capabilities and limits empowers you to make informed decisions grounded in real-life shooting experience.

Happy shooting, and may your camera choice inspire many colorful, sharp, and lasting images.

-- END --

If you want a personalized consultation on camera gear or sample files to evaluate, feel free to reach out. My recommendations are always grounded in hands-on testing and practical usage.