Panasonic Lumix FZ35 vs GF7: A Hands-On Comparison of Two Distinct Eras in Panasonic Cameras

Choosing the right camera can be tricky, especially when you’re looking at two models like the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 (aka Lumix DMC-FZ38) from 2010 and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF7 from 2015. They represent different design paradigms, sensor sizes, and target users - one’s a versatile superzoom bridge camera, the other a compact entry-level mirrorless. Having put both through real-world shooting and technical analysis, I’m here to break down their strengths, weaknesses, and suitability across a variety of photography styles and user needs.

Let’s dive in, starting with how these cameras compare physically and ergonomically, then moving into sensor tech, autofocus systems, image quality, and more across all major photography disciplines you might care about.

First Impressions Matter: Size, Build, and Controls

You’ll notice immediately that these two cameras are designed with different priorities in mind. The Panasonic FZ35 is a bridge camera - big enough to handle long zoom ranges but still more portable than a full DSLR. The GF7, a rangefinder-style mirrorless, is compact and stylish with interchangeable lenses.

Panasonic FZ35 weighs around 397g and measures approximately 118x76x89mm. The bulk reflects its built-in 18x optical zoom lens stretching from 27mm to 486mm equivalent, giving it great versatility in one package. The body mimics an SLR form factor, offering a decent grip and physical controls that feel solid, though not quite up to pro standards.

Panasonic GF7 is considerably lighter and smaller at 266g and 107x65x33mm. It emphasizes portability - nifty for travel or street shooters who want minimal bulk. The GF7 feels more modern thanks to a sleeker design, though without the heft some advanced users prefer for stability. It’s also mirrorless, which means interchangeable lenses - a huge creative advantage.

Looking down from the top, the FZ35’s controls are intuitive for a bridge camera: dedicated dials for aperture, shutter speed, and mode selection, plus physical buttons for quick access. Conversely, the GF7 opts for a cleaner, minimalist layout with fewer physical controls, leaning heavily on touchscreen interaction. It’s user-friendly, but if you’re accustomed to tactile dials, it might feel a bit limiting.

To sum up: if you want a one-body-does-all, grab-and-go with lots of zoom, FZ35’s size and grip work well. For compactness and lens versatility, the GF7’s mirrorless design wins.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Now to what really defines a camera’s photo potential: the sensor. It’s no surprise these two differ greatly in this department.

The Panasonic FZ35 sports a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor measuring 6.08x4.56mm, with a total sensor area of approximately 27.7 mm², and 12-megapixel resolution (4000x3000 pixels). CCD sensors of this size were commonplace in superzooms a decade ago - good for detailed images at moderate ISO but generally limited by noise at high ISO and dynamic range.

In contrast, the Panasonic GF7 features a much larger Four Thirds sensor measuring 17.3x13mm (about 224.9 mm²), more than 8x the size of the FZ35’s sensor, with 16 megapixels (4592x3448 pixels). This CMOS sensor opens the door for significantly better low-light performance, dynamic range, and color depth plus more flexibility in depth of field control.

From my testing, low-light shots from the GF7 maintain cleaner detail and color fidelity at ISO 1600 and beyond, with less muddy noise than the FZ35, which feels best kept at ISO 100-400. The dynamic range advantage makes the GF7 a better landscape and portrait camera, capturing subtle tonal gradations that the FZ35's small sensor simply cannot reproduce.

LCD and Viewfinder: How You See Your Image Matters

Viewing your scene and reviewing shots is also a key part of the shooting experience.

The Panasonic FZ35’s fixed 2.7-inch, 230k-dot screen provides basic live view functionality. The colors and brightness are adequate for sunny days but fall short in fine detail and responsiveness; no touchscreen capabilities limit interaction speed.

The GF7 upgrades to a 3-inch tilting LCD panel with a 1040k-dot resolution, which not only offers a larger, brighter and more detailed display but also touchscreen control. This tilting feature is great for high or low angle shooting and selfies (even though neither camera design is explicitly selfie-friendly). The touchscreen simplifies focusing and menu navigation, making the GF7 feel agile and modern.

Of note, neither camera has an electronic viewfinder (EVF on the GF7; an electronic viewfinder but unspecified resolution on the FZ35), so you’re mainly relying on rear LCD composition, which can be a limitation in strong sunlight.

Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking in Practice

Let’s talk focus systems, crucial for everything from wildlife to sports shooting.

The FZ35 uses a contrast-detection autofocus system, capable of face detection but limited to single AF modes without continuous tracking or eye detection. It’s adequate for casual or static subjects but can struggle to keep moving targets sharp, particularly with the long zoom extended.

The GF7 markedly improves with 23 focus points offering contrast-detection AF, plus multi-area, face detection, center weighted, selective, and crucially, continuous AF with tracking capabilities. While it lacks phase-detection autofocus (common in more recent mirrorless cameras), in practical use, the GF7’s autofocus is snappier and more reliable for moving subjects - especially when paired with fast lenses.

For wildlife and sports enthusiasts, the GF7’s AF system is clearly superior, though keep in mind the GF7’s burst shooting tops at 5.8 fps, compared to 2 fps on the FZ35. Neither are blazing fast by today’s standards, but GF7 handles action more competently.

Lens Ecosystem and Focal Versatility: Fixed Zoom vs Lenses Galore

One of the defining differences: the FZ35’s all-in-one fixed zoom lens compared to the GF7’s Micro Four Thirds interchangeable lens mount.

The FZ35’s built-in lens covers an 18x zoom range from 27mm wide to an impressive 486mm telephoto, with an aperture varying from F2.8 at the wide end to F4.4 at the telephoto. This is fantastic for travelers or wildlife shooters wanting a long reach without swapping gear. However, it can’t match specialized lenses in image quality or maximum aperture.

In contrast, the GF7 supports over 100 Micro Four Thirds lenses from Panasonic, Olympus, and third-party brands, offering everything from ultra-wide angles to super telephoto primes and fast lenses for portraits and low light. This flexibility lets you tailor your setup for any discipline, whether macro, sports, or studio.

If you cherish optical variety and highest possible image quality, the GF7 wins hands down. But if you want a single “do everything” package without fuss, the FZ35 is very compelling.

Shooting Experience Across Photography Genres

Now, how do these differences translate into actual photography use? Let’s break down genre-specific performance.

Panasonic FZ35 front Panasonic FZ35 screen back Panasonic GF7 front Panasonic GF7 screen back

Portrait Photography

Portraits require pleasing skin tones, natural bokeh, sharp focus on eyes, and suitable color reproduction.

• The GF7’s larger sensor delivers superior subject isolation and creamy bokeh with fast lenses (like a 25mm f/1.7). Its face detection and continuous AF help nail sharp eye focus.
• The FZ35’s small sensor limits background blur; bokeh looks busier and less natural. Face detection works but AF lag can be frustrating when the subject moves.

Verdict: For portraits, GF7 offers better artistic control and sharper results.

Landscape Photography

Landscape shooters demand high resolution, dynamic range, and weather-sealed bodies/optics.

• The GF7 offers higher resolution and notably improved dynamic range, helping capture clouds, shadows, and highlights without clipped details.
• The FZ35’s small sensor restricts dynamic range and fine detail, but the large zoom range is great for distant subjects.
• Neither camera has environmental sealing, so both require caution outdoors.

Verdict: GF7 is preferable for image quality; FZ35 serves when long telephoto reach trumps.

Wildlife Photography

Wildlife demands fast, accurate autofocus, long telephoto reach, and decent burst rates.

• The FZ35 offers an 18x zoom out of the box but slow AF and only 2 fps burst limit action shots.
• The GF7, with compatible tele lenses (e.g., 100-300mm f/4-5.6), provides better AF tracking and 5.8 fps shooting, although you have to invest in lenses.

Verdict: GF7 provides better AF speed and flexibility, but the FZ35’s zoom is a convenient trade-off for casual wildlife snapshots.

Sports Photography

Sports is hard on cameras: fast AF, high continuous shooting frame rates, and good performance in challenging light are essential.

• Neither camera is a dedicated sports shooter, but the GF7’s faster 5.8 fps burst and continuous AF put it ahead.
• The FZ35’s 2 fps and slower AF hinder chances of catching peak action.
• Both struggle in low light; the GF7’s better ISO performance is a plus.

Verdict: GF7 fares better for light sports use, but serious sports shooters should look elsewhere.

Street Photography

Here, discretion, portability, and quick responsiveness are key.

• The GF7’s compact size and tilting touchscreen facilitate candid shots.
• The FZ35 is bulkier and more obtrusive.
• Neither has built-in stabilization in body; the FZ35 offers optical stabilization inside the zoom lens, helpful for handheld shots.

Verdict: GF7’s discreetness and agility make it superior for street photography.

Macro Photography

Close-up focus distance, magnification, and stabilization are priorities.

• The FZ35’s macro focus as close as 1cm is impressive for a superzoom.
• The GF7 depends on lens choice; dedicated macro lenses exist, offering higher reproduction ratios and sharpness.
• Neither camera has image stabilization in the body, but the FZ35’s optical IS assists in handheld macro.

Verdict: For casual macro, FZ35’s built-in lens is handy; for serious macro work, GF7 with macro lenses shines.

Night and Astro Photography

High ISO performance, long exposures, and exposure modes are important.

• The GF7’s CMOS sensor excels here with ISO up to 25600 and shutter up to 1/16000 sec.
• The FZ35 maxes out at ISO 6400 and shutter 1/2000 sec.
• GF7 supports timelapse recording and exposure bracketing; FZ35 lacks these features.

Verdict: GF7 is significantly better suited to night and astrophotography.

Video Capabilities

Video specs sometimes sway hybrid shooters.

• The FZ35 offers 720p HD video at 30fps using AVCHD Lite or Motion JPEG.
• The GF7 provides full HD 1080p recording at 60fps with MPEG-4 and AVCHD formats.
• Neither offers external mic or headphone ports.

Verdict: GF7 is the clear winner for video quality and versatility.

Travel Photography

Travel photographers want versatility, light weight, long battery life, and ruggedness.

• The FZ35 is versatile with its 18x zoom but heavier.
• The GF7 is compact and lightweight.
• Battery life favors the GF7 (230 shots per charge) versus unspecified for the FZ35, but bridge cameras traditionally last longer due to fewer power demands.
• Neither offers weather sealing.

Verdict: For traveled-only ease, GF7’s weight and lens options are attractive; FZ35 favors zoom versatility.

Professional Work and Workflow Integration

• Both cameras save RAW and offer manual exposure control, appealing for professionals.
• The GF7’s more modern sensor and USB connectivity simplify integration into current workflows.
• The FZ35’s older interface and limited connectivity options may slow import.

Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability

Neither camera offers environmental sealing, dustproofing, or waterproofing, so neither is recommended for harsh weather shooting without extra protection. The FZ35 has a sturdier, heftier build that feels more robust, whereas the GF7 prioritizes sleekness over ruggedness.

Battery Life and Storage

The GF7 gives about 230 shots per charge, which is respectable but on the lower side compared to DSLRs. The FZ35’s battery life isn’t specified but generally long-lasting due to CCD's power profile and fewer power-hungry features.

Both store images on SD/SDHC cards; the GF7 supports SDXC, letting you use large memory cards.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

Connectivity is a big plus in today’s world.

• The GF7 includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for easy sharing and remote control.
• The FZ35 lacks wireless connectivity entirely.
• Both have HDMI and USB 2.0 ports.

For instant sharing or smartphone control, the GF7 shows its era’s advances.

Value Assessment and Pricing

At launch, the FZ35 retailed near $999, reflecting its unique superzoom appeal. The GF7 launched much cheaper at about $308 (body only), which adjusted for features and sensor size, offers excellent value as a beginner-friendly mirrorless.

If you’re on a tight budget but want versatile zoom convenience, used FZ35s can be found affordably today. For higher image quality and long-term flexibility, the GF7 remains a strong entry point in the Micro Four Thirds system.

To summarize performance numerically, the GF7 outperforms across most categories, reflecting technological improvements and sensor advantages, while the FZ35's niche zoom capability scores well in telephoto reach and macro.

Considering specific genres, the GF7 leads in portrait, landscape, sports, and night photography. The FZ35 maintains value in travel and casual wildlife photography as a convenient superzoom.

Final Thoughts: Which Panasonic Camera Should You Choose?

Here’s my straightforward take:

• Buy the Panasonic FZ35 if…
  You want a simple all-in-one superzoom bridge camera with a long focal range straight out of the box. Ideal for casual travel, wildlife snapshots, and macro with minimal fuss. You’re okay with slower autofocus and modest image quality.

• Buy the Panasonic GF7 if…
  You value interchangeable lenses, superior image quality, faster and smarter autofocus, and better video. Perfect for portraits, landscapes, street, night, and beginner enthusiasts ready to grow into a lens collection. Wireless connectivity and modern touchscreens are bonuses.

This comparison highlights how technology progressed in just five years and the diverging paths between fixed-lens superzooms and mirrorless systems. Both cameras have their place, but if I were starting anew today, the GF7’s combination of accessibility, image quality, and system flexibility makes it the more future-proof choice.

I hope this detailed comparison helps you make an informed choice tailored to your specific photography passion and budget! Feel free to reach out if you want me to expand on any use case or performance aspect.

Happy shooting!

end