Panasonic Lumix FZ60 vs G5: A Detailed Hands-On Comparison for Photographers

When Panasonic launched the Lumix DMC-FZ60 and the Lumix DMC-G5 back in 2012, they targeted very different segments of the enthusiast market. The FZ60 is a superzoom bridge camera with an enormous fixed lens, aimed at casual shooters wanting reach without the complexity of interchangeable optics. The G5, on the other hand, is an entry-level mirrorless system camera designed for more serious photo enthusiasts craving flexibility, sensor quality, and better controls.

Over my 15+ years testing cameras, I’ve had the opportunity to use both extensively in various real-world scenarios. In this comparison, I’ll break down where each camera shines (and where it trips), drawing on technical specs, firsthand image quality evaluations, and overall handling impressions. By the end, you’ll know which Panasonic model aligns best with your photographic goals and style.

Let’s dive right in.

First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics, and Build Quality

One of the most obvious differences at first touch is the physical size and feel of the two cameras. The FZ60 is a classic bridge camera - chunky with a prominent handgrip, built to feel like an SLR but packing a fixed superzoom lens. The G5 is a compact mirrorless with a smaller, sleeker body designed around the Micro Four Thirds lens system.

The FZ60 measures roughly 120 x 81 x 92 mm and weighs about 493 grams, whereas the G5 is more compact and lighter at 120 x 83 x 71 mm and 396 grams. Despite similar widths, that extra thickness and heft of the FZ60 come primarily from its integrated 25-600mm equivalent zoom lens, a mammoth 24x focal range.

Handling-wise, the FZ60 feels substantial and secure thanks to a rubberized grip and plenty of physical dials, though some buttons feel a bit small and plasticky to my hands. The G5’s body is more minimalist but boasts a comfortable grip and a more refined finish, along with higher-quality materials overall.

The bridge design of the FZ60 affords quick access to zoom and exposure controls, which beginners will appreciate, but it can start to feel slightly cumbersome after long shoots. The G5’s mirrorless layout offers traditional DSLR-style ergonomics with customizable buttons and a clever control wheel, ideal for experienced shooters wanting manual control without bulk.

If portability and comfort matter - say you shoot street or travel photography - the G5’s frame and lighter footprint will suit you better. The FZ60 is more a grab-and-go wildlife or telephoto tool in that sense.

Control Layout and Interface: Intuitive or Intimidating?

The top plate and control schema reveal each camera’s design philosophy quite clearly.

The FZ60 sports a mode dial with standard PASM and scene modes, but strangely no dedicated top LCD panel, so you’ll often need to view settings through the EVF or rear screen. Its rear is relatively minimal, lacking touchscreen capability, and button layout is somewhat cramped, especially the small zoom toggle.

In contrast, the G5 has a more advanced control setup with a fully articulated touch-enabled LCD screen, a separate exposure compensation dial (very handy for quick adjustments), and a multi-function control wheel. It also features a higher-resolution electronic viewfinder (EVF), which I found extremely useful for composing shots outdoors, especially in bright conditions where the FZ60’s lower-res EVF can feel pixelated.

If you prefer tactile dials and straightforward menus without touchscreen distractions, you might lean toward the FZ60. But if you value customizable controls and feedback, the G5 shines here.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Small Sensor Superzoom vs Mirrorless Powerhouse

At the heart of any camera comparison is its image quality - how well does the sensor capture your vision?

The FZ60 features a 1/2.3-inch CMOS sensor (6.08 x 4.56 mm, 27.7 mm² area) with 16MP resolution. This sensor size is typical for bridge cameras with fixed superzoom lenses but is considerably smaller than most interchangeable lens cameras. The small sensor means more noise at higher ISOs and less dynamic range, but compensates with its extreme focal length coverage.

The G5 boasts a much larger Four Thirds 16MP CMOS sensor (17.3 x 13 mm, 225 mm²). This bigger sensor delivers superior image quality, especially in low light, with better color depth and dynamic range - as evidenced by DxOmark scores showing 21.4 bits color depth and 11.6 EV dynamic range (the FZ60 lacks official DxO testing but small-sensor cameras consistently lag significantly).

I’ve run side-by-side tests of both - in daylight, the G5 captures richer colors with cleaner shadows and greater detail retention. At ISO 3200, the G5’s images are clean enough for large prints; the FZ60 struggles with noticeable grain and color desaturation.

For critical image quality needs - portraiture, landscape, commercial work - the G5 is the clear winner. The FZ60’s images are decent for Instagram or casual prints but don't satisfy professionals or enthusiasts demanding nuance and excellence.

LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Seeing Is Believing

The rear LCD and EVF are your primary windows into framing and reviewing your work.

The FZ60's screen is a fixed 3.0-inch TFT LCD with a 460K-dot resolution. While usable, the screen is not touch-sensitive, and color accuracy or viewing angles lag. The small, lower-res electronic viewfinder (202K dots) only partially compensates.

The G5 ups the ante with a 3.0-inch fully articulated touchscreen boasting 920K dots, along with a crisp 1.44M-dot EVF with 0.7x magnification. This combination offers greater compositional flexibility (especially with the rotating screen) and excellent on-the-go focusing and shooting convenience.

In practice, I often found the G5’s articulated touchscreen invaluable for shooting at awkward angles - macro, street, or video. The FZ60 felt more restrictive.

Autofocus System Performance: Speed and Accuracy Under Pressure

Focusing precision and speed can make or break your shot, especially with moving subjects.

The FZ60 relies on a contrast-detection AF system with 23 focus points and supports face detection. Continuous AF and tracking are available but somewhat slow, resulting in occasional hunting in low contrast or fast action situations.

The G5 also uses a contrast-detection AF (no phase detection), with 23 configurable points but adds touch-to-focus on the screen and more refined face detection. Its continuous AF is smoother, making it more reliable for tracking subjects, although not on par with high-end DSLRs.

My tests with moving subjects - sports, kids, pets - showed the G5 to be more consistent, with fewer missed shots and quicker lock-ons. The FZ60’s AF is sufficient for wildlife or telephoto shooting at a distance where speed matters less, but frustrating for fast-paced action.

Lens Ecosystem: Fixed Superzoom vs Interchangeable Versatility

A big tradeoff between these two cameras is the ability to change lenses.

The FZ60’s 25-600mm equivalent F2.8-5.2 lens gives enormous reach for telephoto enthusiasts, especially wildlife or travel shooters who want one lens coverage. But it’s fixed - no swapping or upgrades possible.

The G5’s Micro Four Thirds mount opens access to over 100 native lenses from Panasonic, Olympus, and third parties - ranging from wide-angle primes to Olympus’s excellent telephotos, specialty macro, fisheyes, and professional fast primes.

If you want optical versatility to shape your art across genres - from portrait to macro to landscapes - the G5 is far superior here. The FZ60’s all-in-one lens is excellent for those prioritizing simplicity and portability without fussing with lens changes.

Burst Shooting and Buffer: Catching the Moment

When photographing sports or wildlife, frame rates and buffer depth determine missed or captured moments.

The FZ60 offers a faster burst at 10 fps for up to about 10 shots (compressed JPEGs). This speed is impressive for a bridge camera - likely thanks to its smaller files from the smaller sensor.

The G5 shoots at a slower but respectable 6 fps with a deeper buffer, and supports continuous autofocus during bursts, improving sharpness of moving subjects.

In practical terms, if you want rapid-fire shooting for birds or sports, the FZ60’s higher fps could help, but the smaller sensor’s image quality and AF speed may hold you back. The G5’s overall balance offers better end results for movement tracking and shot quality.

Video Capabilities: Who Has the Edge for Moving Pictures?

Both cameras record Full HD video at 1080p up to 60 frames per second, offering smooth and detailed footage.

The FZ60 saves video in MPEG-4 or AVCHD formats, but lacks any external microphone input and image stabilization is optical only. The fixed lens limits creative framing.

The G5 also records 1080p video with similar frame rate options, supports AVCHD and MPEG-4, and includes in-body image stabilization with compatible lenses (though the camera itself does not stabilize). Video benefits significantly from the articulated touchscreen for manual focus and exposure control during recording.

Neither camera offers 4K or advanced video modes like focus peaking or log profiles, but for casual HD video the G5’s flexibility and lens options make it more appealing to hybrid shooters.

Battery Life and Storage: Getting Through the Day

Battery endurance can make or break a day out shooting.

The FZ60 uses proprietary battery packs rated for about 450 shots per charge, better than average for a bridge with big zoom.

The G5’s battery lasts around 320 shots per charge, typical for mirrorless cameras which have more power-hungry electronics and larger sensors.

Both accept SD cards (SD/SDHC/SDXC), but neither supports dual card slots for professional redundancy.

If you’re on extended trips, the FZ60 might edge your needs for longer shooting before swapping batteries, but I always recommend carrying spares with either.

Durability and Weather Resistance: How Tough Are They?

Neither camera offers environmental sealing or weatherproofing, so neither is truly ready for harsh weather or rugged adventure out of the box. Both should be treated gently or paired with protective gear in rain or dust.

Summarizing Strengths and Weaknesses: Who Should Buy Which?

Here’s my breakdown of the key pros and cons:

Sample Images and Real-World Test Results

To give you a better sense of their output, I’ve compiled an image gallery showing the FZ60 and G5 handling various scenarios - portraits, landscapes, wildlife, macro, and low-light.

Panasonic FZ60 front Panasonic FZ60 screen back Panasonic G5 front Panasonic G5 screen back

Notice how the G5 delivers richer color fidelity, smoother skin tones in portraits, and impressive sharpness in landscapes. The FZ60’s long zoom reveals details from afar, though with somewhat softer rendering and more noise at high ISO.

Performance Ratings: How Do They Stack Up Overall?

Based on a combination of sensor-based metrics, handling, AF, and additional features, I’ve put together an overall scorecard.

Here, the G5’s advantages in sensor size, autofocus, and ergonomics push it ahead for enthusiasts and semi-pros. The FZ60 stands out mainly as an excellent grab-and-go telephoto solution.

Genre-Specific Analysis: Matching Cameras to Photography Styles

How do these cameras actually perform in specific disciplines?

Portrait Photography:
G5 handles skin tones more naturally with better bokeh control thanks to larger sensor and compatible fast lenses. FZ60’s long lens can isolate subjects but softness and noise are compromises.

Landscape:
G5 scores high on dynamic range and resolution. FZ60 struggles with shadow detail but offers wide focal reach.

Wildlife:
FZ60’s zoom is a major plus but slower AF hampers fast subjects. G5's better AF precision and optics win overall.

Sports:
G5 tracks faster, better focus, though modest burst rate. FZ60 faster burst but optical compromises.

Street:
G5’s smaller size and silent shutter modes better for discreet shooting.

Macro:
G5’s lens options and articulated screen give edge.

Night/Astro:
G5’s higher ISO, better noise control and exposure modes excel.

Video:
G5 wins for touchscreen, focus control.

Travel:
FZ60 is a one-lens travel workhorse but heavier; G5 lighter but more gear needed.

Professional Work:
G5 with raw, optics, controls best suited.

Final Recommendations

Choose Panasonic FZ60 if:

• You want a simple all-in-one camera with extreme zoom without changing lenses
• You shoot mostly in good light conditions and favor wildlife or travel with telephoto reach
• You value burst speed and optical image stabilization built-in
• Budget is tight (around $350 new or used)

Choose Panasonic G5 if:

• You want a versatile mirrorless system offering superior image quality and flexibility
• You demand interchangeable lenses to cover portraits, macro, landscape, and video
• You need stronger autofocus for action, higher resolution EVF, and touchscreen usability
• Your budget can stretch to around $700 for more advanced features

Wrapping Up: Which Panasonic Is Your Next Companion?

The FZ60 and G5 both cater to different photographers despite launching just days apart back in 2012. For the casual shooter or traveler looking for far reach in one handy package, the FZ60 is compelling. But for those prioritizing creative control, high image fidelity, and lens versatility, the G5 remains tough to beat, even a decade later.

In my experience testing thousands of cameras, I find that size and sensor quality typically lead the imaging outcome, so the larger sensor mirrorless G5 wins hands-down for most genres. But I’m also the guy who will gladly pick the FZ60 for a hiking trip where lugging multiple lenses is a no-go.

Hopefully, this deep dive helped clarify where each excels and where compromises exist. If you let me know your key shooting needs, I’m happy to weigh in further. Happy photographing!

If you enjoyed this head-to-head, check out my video review for live comparisons and sample footage. Your feedback helps me tailor future tests - keep the questions coming!

[End of article]