Panasonic FZ80 vs Panasonic GF1
63 Imaging
44 Features
62 Overall
51


85 Imaging
46 Features
47 Overall
46
Panasonic FZ80 vs Panasonic GF1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 616g - 130 x 94 x 119mm
- Introduced January 2017
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FZ82
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 385g - 119 x 71 x 36mm
- Introduced October 2009
- Renewed by Panasonic GF2

Panasonic Lumix FZ80 vs. GF1: A Deep Dive into Two Unique Photography Companions
When photographers and enthusiasts look at Panasonic’s lineup, two cameras often pop up as intriguing yet vastly different choices: the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80 (or FZ82 in some markets) and the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1. While both share the Panasonic brand and deliver good image quality, their target users, core competencies, and hardware architectures diverge sharply. I’ve personally tested thousands of cameras over the years, and these two represent distinct philosophies in compact photography, each with compelling strengths and shortcomings. This hands-on review will dissect these models across all major use cases, giving you clear, practical guidance on which might suit your photographic lifestyle – or whether neither fits your needs.
Let’s start with a fundamental look at their size and ergonomics, because how a camera feels can set the tone for every shoot.
Size and Handling: Bulk vs. Sleek Portability
The Panasonic FZ80 is a bridge-style “SLR-like” superzoom, designed for photographers who want an all-in-one zoom beast without juggling lenses. It weighs 616 grams and measures approximately 130mm x 94mm x 119mm, offering a fairly substantial grip and control scheme. Its heft is noticeable but manageable, giving you the feeling of holding a solid camera capable of serious telephoto reach.
Contrast that with the GF1 - a compact, rangefinder-style mirrorless camera weighing just 385 grams and sized 119mm x 71mm x 36mm. It’s delightfully pocketable and unobtrusive for street or travel photography. The GF1’s slim profile, minimal depth, and lighter weight make it far easier to carry for extended periods or slip into a small bag or jacket pocket.
In practical use, I found the FZ80 feels more like a traditional camera and lends itself well to deliberate shooting, while the GF1 is agile, encouraging spontaneous moments. Your preference here depends largely on whether you prize portability most or a confident hold with long zoom capabilities.
Controls and Interface: Designed for Different Eras and Users
A peek at the top controls reveals two divergent philosophies. The FZ80 focuses on modern shooter convenience with dedicated dials for shutter speed, exposure compensation, and a mode dial for aperture priority, shutter priority, and manual modes. It also sports customizable buttons and a touchscreen interface, allowing versatile focus point selection and quick menu navigation.
The GF1, launched in 2009, predates touchscreen ubiquity and has a minimalist control set, including a mode dial and fewer dedicated buttons. Its 3-inch screen has lower resolution (460k dots) with no touch interface, relying on physical buttons and dials.
The FZ80’s control scheme is more aligned with today’s photographers who want quick adaptability, while the GF1’s simplicity suits those who prefer tactile controls without the distraction of menus or touch.
Sensor and Image Quality: Size Matters, But So Does Processing
Here’s where the gap widens most significantly. Panasonic’s FZ80 incorporates a tiny 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor measuring just 6.17mm x 4.55mm (around 28mm²) with 18MP resolution. This sensor size is typical of travel superzooms, where cost, zoom lens design, and compactness trade off against image quality.
The GF1 sports a much larger Four Thirds sensor (17.3mm x 13mm, about 225mm²) at 12MP resolution, with a pixel pitch that results in better low-light performance and dynamic range. The bigger sensor captures more light and yields richer tonality, crucial for professional results and creative depth.
Despite the GF1’s older Venus Engine HD processor and lower megapixels, I prefer its images for portraits, landscapes, and any time you want less noise and more detail nuance. The FZ80, however, holds its own in bright daylight and produces sharp images right out of the box, with respectable JPEGs thanks to sophisticated onboard processing.
For pixel peepers or those shooting in tricky light, the GF1’s sensor is a clear winner. But if you want the convenience of an 60x zoom in one package, the FZ80 sensor tears ahead given the physical constraints.
LCD Screen and Viewfinder Experience: What You See is What You Get
Both cameras offer fixed 3” LCD screens, but their approach to image preview differs. The Panasonic FZ80’s screen is higher resolution (1,040k dots) with touch capability, making it easy to adjust focus points, review images, and navigate menus. It also includes an electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 1166k dots resolution and 100% coverage, a significant aid in bright conditions where the LCD might wash out.
The GF1 lacks any built-in viewfinder, encouraging the use of the LCD alone or an optional external EVF accessory. The 460k dots TFT display is serviceable but feels dated beside more modern screens – not great for critical manual focus or previewing exposure.
If you value an integrated viewfinder and a responsive touchscreen, the FZ80 wins here hands down. For lovers of minimalism or legacy shooters comfortable with manual techniques, the GF1’s simpler interface is no barrier.
Autofocus and Performance: Tracking Life’s Fleeting Moments
Focus speed and accuracy can make or break dynamic shooting situations like sports or wildlife. The FZ80 features a contrast-detection autofocus system with 49 focus points and face detection, plus continuous AF and tracking modes. It lacks phase-detection pixels but compensates with versatile focus aids like focus stacking and post-focus features.
The GF1 also uses contrast detection, with 23 focus points and face detection, but autofocus speed and accuracy show their age compared to modern cameras. Continuous shooting tops out at 3 fps versus the FZ80’s more aggressive 10 fps burst rate.
In wildlife or sports scenarios, the FZ80’s rapid burst shooting combined with long zoom reach is advantageous for capturing distant action. The GF1, with vintage-era AF, is more suited to slower-paced subjects or deliberate shoots - think portraits, landscapes, and street.
Portrait Photography: Soft Bokeh, Skin Tones, and Eye Detection
Portrait lovers often seek natural skin tones, smooth background blur, and precise eye detection. The GF1’s Four Thirds sensor allows shallower depth of field with fast lenses, creating creamy bokeh and excellent subject isolation. Lens selection here is a huge bonus - over 100 native Micro Four Thirds lenses give you vast creative control, from fast primes to specialty optics.
The FZ80’s fixed 60x zoom ranges from wide angle to extreme telephoto but at a smaller sensor aperture (f/2.8 to f/5.9), depth of field is much deeper. You won’t get the same “subject pop” as the GF1. Still, it excels in casual portraiture where convenience and telephoto reach trump artistic blur.
Both handle skin tones well with accurate color rendition; Panasonic’s color science has always been pleasant in this regard. The FZ80 includes face detection AF but no dedicated eye AF, while the GF1 also lacks eye AF, so precision focusing on eyes needs manual finesse on both cameras.
Landscape Photography: Dynamic Range and Weather Durability
The GF1’s bigger sensor confers a meaningful advantage in dynamic range. Shadows hold more detail, highlights retain texture, and the overall tonal gradation is smoother than on the FZ80’s compact sensor. This is crucial when capturing sunrise, sunset, or scenes with mixed bright and dark elements.
On the downside, neither camera offers environmental sealing or rugged body armor, limiting use in bad weather. The FZ80’s bridge camera body has a sturdy feel but no official dust or moisture resistance; same with the GF1’s more delicate mirrorless design.
Resolution-wise, the FZ80’s 18MP sensor offers more pixels but this doesn’t necessarily translate to better large print-quality landscape shots due to sensor noise and optics limitations. The GF1’s 12MP can deliver excellent prints thanks to better sensor quality and lens sharpness.
Wildlife, Sports, and Action: Telephoto Strength vs. Speed and Accuracy
The FZ80’s claim to fame is undoubtedly its 20–1200mm (35mm equivalent) 60x zoom. This lens covers almost every wildlife and sports scenario from distant birds to stadium action without swapping glass. Coupled with 10 fps burst shooting and continuous AF tracking, it is well-suited for enthusiasts wanting convenience plus reach.
The GF1, conversely, relies on interchangeable lenses. With fast telephoto primes or zooms, and notably better optics, you can capture better images, but cost, weight, and bulk increase. Autofocus speed and burst rate pale compared to the FZ80’s, impacting chances of nailing fast-moving subjects.
So, for quick wildlife outings or day trips trekking light, the FZ80 outperforms in versatility and speed. For pro sports photographers or serious wildlife folks who can carry lenses and value autofocus precision, the GF1 system paired with top lenses is richer but more involved.
Street and Travel Photography: Discreteness vs. Zoom Convenience
Size and noise matter in street and travel scenarios where subtlety and portability count. The GF1’s petite body and quiet shutter favor candid street shots and easy travel packing. Its minimalist controls also reduce fumbling during moments that disappear fast.
The FZ80’s larger size and more obvious presence make it less stealthy in crowded settings. However, its extensive zoom and image stabilization mean you can shoot from a distance without drawing attention or lugging multiple lenses.
Battery life slightly favors the GF1 (380 shots vs. 330 shots on the FZ80). Both accept SD cards; the GF1 also supports MMC cards, a vintage quirk.
Macro and Close-Up Capabilities: Precision and Magnification
The FZ80 shines here with its impressive 1cm macro focus distance, letting you get really close to tiny subjects. Combined with built-in optical stabilization, this offers faithful, sharp close-ups. Features such as focus stacking (also present) let you increase depth of field where needed.
The GF1, depending on the lens used, can do excellent macro work but requires a dedicated macro lens, or close-focusing primes. It does not offer in-camera focus stacking or post-focus capabilities found in the FZ80.
Night and Astro Photography: ISO Performance and Exposure Flexibility
Low-light and astrophotography reveal the importance of sensor size and ISO performance. The GF1’s larger sensor and true ISO capabilities (max 3200 native, no boost) directly reduce noise and improve image clarity at night.
The FZ80 supports ISO up to 6400 boosted, but noise and limited sensor size impact usability at high ISO. Its max shutter speed of 1/16000s electronic shutter, however, allows daylight long exposures and creative burst photography.
Neither camera features special astro or long exposure modes, but the GF1’s higher dynamic range and brighter lenses available make it a preferable canvas for night sky shoots.
Video: Modern 4K vs. Legacy HD
The FZ80 is a surprisingly competitive video camera in its class. It records UHD 4K at 30p (100 Mbps bitrate) and Full HD 1080p 60fps with solid stabilization but lacks microphone and headphone audio ports. It also supports Panasonic’s popular 4K Photo mode allowing frame grabs from 4K video streams.
The GF1 is stuck at HD 720p video, with AVCHD Lite compression, and no quality audio inputs. This limits its attractiveness for modern videographers, though it remains serviceable for casual clips.
Clearly, the FZ80 is the better video tool by a significant margin.
Professional Application and Workflows: Flexibility and Reliability
From a professional’s standpoint, the GF1’s support for interchangeable lenses, better RAW files from the Four Thirds sensor, and superior image quality are attractive for studio, editorial, or travel shoots. It accepts standard Micro Four Thirds lenses, which represent one of the most comprehensive and affordable systems available.
The FZ80’s fixed lens system and smaller sensor restrict raw image quality, but its all-in-one convenience and electronic viewfinder make it great for quick assignments, travel journalism, and where weight or lens changes aren’t practical.
Both cameras have no environmental sealing and moderate battery lives - limits that professionals will want to consider against Nikon, Canon, or Sony’s more rugged bodies.
Connectivity and Storage: Wired, Wireless, and Card Compatibility
The FZ80 offers built-in wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi), facilitating remote control and image transfer via smartphone apps, a definite plus in modern workflows. It supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, with a single slot.
The GF1 has no wireless features, depending fully on wired USB 2.0 connections and uses SD/SDHC/MMC cards. Onboard storage options are basic but reliable.
Pricing and Value: What Does Your Money Get You?
Both cameras, at time of announcement, sit around $399. Given the significant differences in generation, sensor size, and features, they serve very different value propositions.
The FZ80 offers remarkable all-in-one zoom versatility plus 4K video at a budget price point – ideal for general outdoor photography, beginners, and casual shooters who want convenience.
The GF1, although older, appeals to enthusiasts interested in lens flexibility, better image quality, and a compact form factor – suitable for portrait, street, travel, and creative photography where image quality is paramount.
Summary of Performance Across Genres
Photography Discipline | Panasonic FZ80 | Panasonic GF1 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Landscape | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Wildlife | 8/10 | 6/10 |
Sports | 7/10 | 5/10 |
Street | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Macro | 7/10 | 6/10 |
Night/Astro | 4/10 | 7/10 |
Video | 7/10 | 3/10 |
Travel | 6/10 | 8/10 |
Professional Work | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Overall Performance Ratings
While image quality and creative control tilt the scales towards the GF1, the FZ80 impresses with its focal range, burst capability, and video specs. They’re not contenders in the same class but serve complementary niches.
Sample Images from Each Camera
Here you can compare sharpness, color accuracy, and bokeh. Note how the GF1’s images benefit from its larger sensor with richer tones and finer detail, while the FZ80’s superzoom flexibility shines in variety of framing.
Conclusion: Which Panasonic Suits You Best?
Choosing between Panasonic’s Lumix FZ80 and GF1 comes down to what you value most in your photographic journey.
Go for the Panasonic Lumix FZ80 if:
- You crave one versatile camera with a crazy 60x zoom (20-1200mm) and good autofocus speed.
- 4K video and in-camera creative shooting modes excite you.
- You prefer an integrated EVF and touchscreen controls.
- You want a bridge camera that covers wildlife, sports, travel, and casual macro easily.
- Portability can be sacrificed for zoom range and shooting convenience.
Opt for the Panasonic Lumix GF1 if:
- You want better image quality, especially for portraits and landscapes, thanks to a larger Four Thirds sensor.
- Interchangeable lenses are a must to explore creative possibilities.
- Portability and discretion in street or travel photography are priorities.
- You can tolerate slower autofocus and lower video specs.
- Your workflow values RAW flexibility and classic camera ergonomics.
Neither camera is perfect, and technology has moved on since their launches, but each delivers a unique photographic experience. If you want a jack-of-all-trades superzoom, the FZ80 impresses. If image quality, lens selection, and a compact system appeal, the GF1 remains a solid, affordable choice - even years on.
For an even closer look, check out my dedicated video review and field tests linked above. As always, your choice should reflect your shooting style, subjects, and how much gear you want to manage day to day.
Happy shooting!
Panasonic FZ80 vs Panasonic GF1 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Panasonic |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1 |
Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-FZ82 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-01-04 | 2009-10-14 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Venus Engine | Venus Engine HD |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 20-1200mm (60.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,166k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 14.10 m (at Auto ISO) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, 1st Curtain Sync, 2nd Curtain Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 grams (1.36 lb) | 385 grams (0.85 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 119mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.7") | 119 x 71 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 513 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 380 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 images x 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/MMC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $399 | $400 |