Panasonic FZ80 vs Pentax Q
63 Imaging
44 Features
62 Overall
51


93 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Panasonic FZ80 vs Pentax Q Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 616g - 130 x 94 x 119mm
- Introduced January 2017
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FZ82
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 180g - 98 x 57 x 31mm
- Launched June 2011
- Updated by Pentax Q10

Panasonic FZ80 vs Pentax Q: Hands-On Superzoom and Mirrorless Showdown for Photography Enthusiasts
As someone who has tested thousands of cameras over the past 15 years - ranging from pro-level bodies to quirky sensor-experiments - I’ve come to appreciate that every camera is a tool designed with particular priorities in mind. When it comes to choosing a camera, especially in an era brimming with models, understanding nuanced real-world performance beyond just specs is critical. Today I dive deep into an intriguing matchup between two very different but interesting cameras: the Panasonic Lumix FZ80 (also known as the FZ82) and the Pentax Q mirrorless system.
While both also reflect their respective eras and use cases, this comparison aims to help you understand where each camera shines or falls short across diverse photography genres. I’ll be pulling apart sensor tech, autofocus, ergonomics, lens flexibility, and practical shooting outcomes - from portraits to landscapes, wildlife to street photography. And of course, I’ll openly share my testing experiences and favorite use scenarios to guide your next investment.
Let’s jump in with a quick visual on their physical differences to set the stage.
Right away, this size comparison highlights two very distinct design philosophies.
First Impressions: Bridge Camera Bulk vs. Petite Mirrorless Design
The Panasonic FZ80 is a classic bridge camera - bulky, robust, and packed with a fixed 60x zoom lens. It weighs 616g and feels unapologetically substantial in hand. The pronounced grip, generous control placement, and large barrel lens all communicate its superzoom ambitions.
In contrast, the Pentax Q is tiny - almost pocketable - at only 180g. This ultra-compact mirrorless demands smaller lenses but rewards you with exceptional portability. Its rangefinder styling exudes retro charm but feels minimalistic, especially with no electronic viewfinder available.
The FZ80’s complex top deck with dedicated dials contrasts with the Q’s minimalist approach.
From a usability angle, the FZ80’s dedicated buttons and a customizable control wheel feel intuitive even under brisk, outdoor shooting. The Pentax Q’s controls are pared down, which may suit street photographers seeking discretion but could limit swift manual adjustments.
Sensor and Image Quality: Resolving Real-World Differences
Both cameras employ a 1/2.3-inch sensor size with nearly identical physical dimensions (6.17 x 4.55 mm), but the imagery they produce reveals their technological generation gaps.
Despite the same sensor size, resolution and performance highlight their era and target market contrasts.
-
Panasonic FZ80: Features an 18MP BSI-CMOS sensor paired with Panasonic’s Venus Engine processor. BSI technology enhances light-gathering efficiency, critical in small sensors. This results in relatively clean images up to ISO 800, with usable output at ISO 1600 and, depending on the scene, up to ISO 3200. The 18MP resolution also benefits landscape and cropping potential.
-
Pentax Q: An older generation 12MP CMOS sensor gives it less resolution, and image quality overall is softer, with higher noise levels beyond ISO 400 due to less advanced sensor design. The DxOMark overall score of 47 reflects modest color depth and dynamic range.
I shot side-by-side in natural and controlled light - on well-lit scenes like parks and portraits, the FZ80’s images were markedly sharper with richer color fidelity. The Pentax Q’s photos exhibited a warm, vintage-like character but with loss in detail and noticeable noise creeping in at moderate ISO.
Viewing and Interface: LCD and Viewfinder Usability
User interface can make or break your experience during a long shoot.
The FZ80’s 3” 1040k-dot touchscreen provides flexibility that the Pentax Q’s lower-res 460k-dot fixed screen lacks.
The Panasonic sports a bright LCD touchscreen offering versatile live view controls and quick access to settings - a real boon for novices and hybrid photo/video workflows. The electronic viewfinder (EVF) has decent resolution and 100% coverage, which greatly improves framing precision in sunlight or fast-moving subjects.
The Pentax Q, lacking any EVF, relies solely on its smaller screen. Shooting in broad daylight becomes challenging without some form of shading. The screen is fixed (no tilt or touch), reducing compositional flexibility and user-friendliness.
Autofocus and Speed: Tracking Motion and Locking Focus
Autofocus (AF) systems play a pivotal role in real-world shooting across genres - whether capturing a fleeting street moment or a sprinting athlete.
-
Panasonic FZ80: Equipped with a 49-point contrast-detection AF system with face detection and continuous tracking, the FZ80 delivers reliable, snappy autofocus that locks on quickly in good light. The 10fps continuous shooting speed lets you capture fast action bursts, essential for wildlife and sports.
-
Pentax Q: Uses a 25-point contrast-detection AF system without face detection and only 2fps continuous mode. AF performance is slower and less accurate in lower light.
During my tests, the FZ80 adeptly tracked walking pets and birds, though it occasionally hunted in dense forest shade. The Pentax Q’s AF struggled to keep up beyond static subjects, which might frustrate wildlife or sports photographers relying on fast focus transitions.
Lenses and Optics: Fixed Superzoom Versus Interchangeable Compact Glass
A critical difference: the Panasonic FZ80’s fixed lens vs. the Pentax Q’s interchangeable system:
-
Panasonic FZ80’s fixed 20-1200mm (35mm equivalent) 60x zoom with constant F2.8-F5.9 aperture offers unmatched versatility from wide to extreme telephoto. While optically the lens exhibits some softness at max zoom and slight chromatic aberrations, overall it’s impressively sharp for such a range. Its closest focusing distance of 1cm allows surprisingly effective close-up shots.
-
Pentax Q features a unique but small Q-mount with eight lenses ranging from ultra-wide primes to telephoto zooms, all designed for its tiny sensor. Apertures vary, with some primes offering relatively bright F1.9 options, contributing to better bokeh and low light. However, the limited lens selection and small sensor size limit reach and depth-of-field control compared to larger mirrorless or DSLR systems.
The fixed zoom approach of the FZ80 suits travelers and birders desiring a ready-all-in-one. Meanwhile, Pentax Q’s modularity is playful, but the lens ecosystem feels niche and dated in 2024.
Shooting Across Photography Genres: Where Does Each Camera Fit?
Now for the heart of the matter: performance in typical user scenarios.
Portrait Photography
Capturing natural skin tones and eye-sharp portraits often requires accurate color rendering and shallow depth-of-field ability.
-
Panasonic FZ80: Its 18MP sensor delivers good detail with agreeable skin tones, but due to the small sensor and variable aperture, background blur (bokeh) is limited, particularly at longer focal lengths. However, face detection and AF tracking assist in keeping portraits crisp in casual use.
-
Pentax Q: The smaller sensor and 12MP resolution yield softer portraits, and bokeh remains modest even with prime lenses. Lack of face/eye detection autofocus hinders fast focus on eyes, impacting portrait sharpness in candid situations.
Neither camera is tailored for professional portraiture, but in casual portraits, I favored the FZ80’s color fidelity and autofocus reliability.
Landscape Photography
Here resolution, dynamic range, and weather sealing matter most.
The Panasonic’s 18MP BSI sensor, combined with raw capture and built-in lens stabilization, produces landscapes with decent detail and pleasing colors. The absence of weather sealing, however, calls for caution in wet or dusty conditions at outdoor shoots.
The Pentax Q’s 12MP sensor reveals limitations in dynamic range and overall sharpness, which constricts printing or cropping options. Also, no environmental sealing and the lack of a viewfinder make compositions under bright skies tricky.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
Requires precise autofocus tracking, fast burst rates, telephoto reach, and reliable image stabilization.
-
FZ80: Surpasses the Q thanks to its 60x zoom, 10fps shooting, and continuous autofocus with tracking. Optical image stabilization permits handheld telephoto shots with higher success.
-
Q: Short burst speed and limited reach restrict wildlife use. AF lag and absence of continuous tracking make fast subjects difficult to capture.
If you prioritize action and wildlife, the Panasonic is clearly the better fit.
Street Photography
Discreteness, portability, and quick responsiveness dominate here.
The Pentax Q’s small size and quiet operation make it more discreet and easier to carry. Its retro look can attract less unwanted attention. However, the slower AF and no EVF can impede quick candid shots.
The FZ80 is bulky but offers faster shooting and a viewfinder that aids in dynamic street compositions under bright light.
Macro and Close-Up
Because the FZ80 allows a 1cm macro focus distance and has a flexible zoom, it outperforms the Q in close-ups. The Q's lenses do not offer as close focusing capability or stabilization benefits.
Night and Astrophotography
Low-light noise handling and long exposure modalities are tested here.
- Neither camera is ideal for astrophotography due to the small sensors and limited high ISO performance.
- The FZ80 offers higher max ISO (3200 native) and some noise control thanks to BSI.
- The Q maxes at ISO 6400 but with significant noise from the dated sensor.
- Neither offer bulb mode or advanced astro features, limiting long-exposure astrophotography.
Video Capabilities
- FZ80 supports 4K capture at 30p at 100Mbps, a real plus for hybrid shooters craving ultra-high-definition video. However, no microphone input limits audio control.
- Pentax Q supports only 1080p at 30fps video, lacking video-focused features altogether.
If video is a priority, the FZ80 hands down wins.
Travel Photography
Travel demands a blend of size, versatility, battery life, and reliability.
- The FZ80’s larger size and weight are trade-offs for its all-in-one lens and better image quality.
- The Q’s compactness is alluring, but shorter battery life and limited lens ecosystem may require more accessories.
Battery life favors the FZ80 with 330 shots per charge versus the Q’s 230.
Professional Use and Workflow
Neither camera targets professional workflows. Raw shooting is supported by both, but only the FZ80 delivers reasonably high-res images suitable for client work.
Again, no weather sealing on either might be a limiting factor for professional outdoor use.
Build Quality, Ergonomics, and Controls
Build is plasticky on the Pentax Q, befitting its entry-level mirrorless nature. The Panasonic FZ80 has a more substantial, ergonomic build, with a pronounced grip and intuitive control dials.
The FZ80’s grip and size feel tailored for all-day shooting comfort.
Connectivity and Storage Features
- The FZ80 offers built-in Wi-Fi for image transfer and remote shooting, useful for wildlife or group photography.
- The Q lacks wireless connectivity, a significant limitation in today’s sharing-centric photo culture.
Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards in a single slot and USB 2.0 data transfer and have HDMI outputs.
Price and Value Assessment
- As of 2024, Panasonic FZ80 prices hover near $400, representing impressive value with its extensive zoom and 4K video.
- Pentax Q tends toward $695 secondhand, reflecting its dated tech and niche market appeal.
Given the specs and real-world performance, the FZ80 offers a more satisfying package for most users.
Putting It All Together: Visual Summary of Scores
Evaluations based on sensor, autofocus, handling, video, and versatility
The FZ80 dominates wildlife, sports, and video niches; the Q offers compactness advantages for street photography.
Side by side image crops reveal the FZ80’s superior detail and dynamic range in daylight.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
In my extensive hands-on testing, the Panasonic Lumix FZ80 clearly emerges as the more versatile, user-friendly, and future-proof camera between the two. Its massive 60x zoom, competent autofocus, 4K video capability, and relatively advanced sensor technology make it a powerhouse for travel, wildlife, casual videography, and general photography needs. I regularly found myself trusting its autofocus to lock on fast subjects, despite the fixed lens constraint.
Conversely, the Pentax Q is an intriguing but niche option that will primarily appeal to collectors, those seeking the smallest mirrorless footprint, or hobbyists who enjoy experimenting with interchangeable compact lenses. Its image quality and shooting speed limitations - coupled with no EVF and dated sensor design - place it firmly as a specialty camera rather than an everyday shooter.
Who should consider the Panasonic FZ80?
- Travelers seeking a one-camera solution covering wide angles through super-telephoto reach
- Wildlife and sports enthusiasts needing fast bursts and effective AF tracking
- Hybrid shooters wanting straightforward 4K video without investing in additional gear
- Casual photographers needing solid image quality with pocketability secondary
Who might find the Pentax Q appealing?
- Street photographers prioritizing discretion and minimal carry weight
- Collectors or brand loyalists intrigued by Pentax’s unique Q-mount system
- Experimenters keen on compact primes with creative shooting styles and quirky manual control
My recommendation: Unless you have a specific interest in the Q system or require ultra-compact gear regardless of image compromises, the Panasonic FZ80 delivers more satisfying results and flexibility for an enthusiast or entry-level user in 2024.
If you’re contemplating either of these on the used market or as budget pickups, this hands-on comparison should guide your expectations honestly. Photography is all about using the right tool for your creative vision - these cameras serve very different visions but each has a story worth telling.
Happy shooting! And feel free to reach out with further questions - I’m always eager to share insights from years behind the lens.
Panasonic FZ80 vs Pentax Q Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80 | Pentax Q | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ80 | Pentax Q |
Also called | Lumix DMC-FZ82 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-01-04 | 2011-06-23 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Venus Engine | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
Lens focal range | 20-1200mm (60.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,166k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 14.10 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, 1st Curtain Sync, 2nd Curtain Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Trailing-curtain sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 28 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | 180g (0.40 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 119mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.7") | 98 x 57 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 47 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 189 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 230 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 images x 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $399 | $695 |