Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7fcc/b7fcccbf1c56bb0e8151822b3afff700e259a372" alt="Olympus E-500 front Olympus E-500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e15b/5e15bbd13d20cd8ec38f10fc405eeba9ee72db5a" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ front Olympus SP-620 UZ front"
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Released October 2005
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
- Replacement is Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Introduced January 2012
- Old Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-500 was revealed 7 years before the SP-620 UZ which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-500 scores versus the SP-620 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-500 and Olympus SP-620 UZ. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-500 Gallery and Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-500 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-500
SP-620 UZ | E-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2012 | ![]() | October 2005 | More modern by 75 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-500 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 comes with outer measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-620 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-500 versus the SP-620 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97ef9/97ef99ea79d289d4aba277fbbe479a6efe65be40" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and SP-620 UZ is 70 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e54d4/e54d4b3c7e7eec2bc087f58caf09721dfdf49620" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The pic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and SP-620 UZ.
To sum up, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-500 using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus SP-620 UZ will offer more detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45a5e/45a5e919e572a965e717c3857bec9988b653eca2" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/765fd/765fd44b277e551eef4d66535c284bcb1c8f0522" alt="Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-500 | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-500 | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
Also Known as | EVOLT E-500 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2005-10-21 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.45x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 479 grams (1.06 lb) | 435 grams (0.96 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $600 | $199 |