Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus SP-620 UZ front
Portability
78
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Released October 2005
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Replacement is Olympus E-510
Olympus SP-620 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
  • 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
  • Introduced January 2012
  • Old Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview

Following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-500 was revealed 7 years before the SP-620 UZ which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-500 scores versus the SP-620 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ

 E-500 SP-620 UZ 
Focus manually Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-500

 SP-620 UZ E-500 
IntroducedJanuary 2012October 2005More modern by 75 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k215kClearer display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus SP-620 UZ

 E-500 SP-620 UZ 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-500 comes with outer measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-620 UZ has dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") having a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-500 versus the SP-620 UZ.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-500 and SP-620 UZ is 70 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by going over specifications. The pic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and SP-620 UZ.

To sum up, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-500 using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus SP-620 UZ will offer more detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography details
Olympus SP-620 UZ Portrait photography details
49
focusing manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
does not have liveview
sensor resolution low (8MP)
34
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography features
Olympus SP-620 UZ Street photography features
57
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition (479 grams)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
50
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography features
Olympus SP-620 UZ Sports photography features
37
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
48
long zoom range (25-525mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Olympus SP-620 UZ
52
lighter than competition (479 grams)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
61
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
very long zoom (525mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography information
Olympus SP-620 UZ Landscape photography information
43
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
41
pretty wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-500
Vlogging with Olympus SP-620 UZ
9
lack of video recording
28
pretty wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
 Olympus E-500Olympus SP-620 UZ
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-500 Olympus SP-620 UZ
Also Known as EVOLT E-500 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2005-10-21 2012-01-10
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3264 x 2448 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 400 3200
Highest boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-525mm (21.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.1-5.8
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Highest video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479 grams (1.06 lb) 435 grams (0.96 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $600 $199