Panasonic G1 vs Samsung NX mini
82 Imaging
46 Features
50 Overall
47


93 Imaging
51 Features
68 Overall
57
Panasonic G1 vs Samsung NX mini Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 360g - 124 x 84 x 45mm
- Released January 2009
- New Model is Panasonic G2
(Full Review)
- 20.5MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX-M Mount
- 196g - 110 x 62 x 23mm
- Announced March 2014

Panasonic Lumix G1 vs Samsung NX Mini: An Expert Comparison of Entry-Level Mirrorless Cameras Through the Years
Selecting an entry-level mirrorless camera these days can feel like navigating a jungle - tons of models, specs flying left and right, and marketing jargon promising you’ll shoot like Ansel Adams overnight. Having spent over 15 years testing cameras from every corner of the market, I'm here to cut through that noise. Today, we dive deep into a nostalgic yet instructive comparison: the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1, launched in 2009, versus the Samsung NX Mini from 2014. Both pioneers in the mirrorless realm but born five years apart, each embodies distinct philosophies, strengths, and, yes, compromises.
Let’s unpack how these cameras perform in real-world shooting conditions, cutting through spec sheets to show what matters most in portrait, landscape, wildlife, and more - all through my seasoned eyes. Buckle up for a walk down camera memory lane, enriched with practical insights and candid observations.
One Look at Size and Handling: Form Meets Function
First impressions count, especially when you have a camera in hand all day. The Lumix G1 adopts a traditional SLR-style mirrorless body, while the NX Mini embraces a decidedly rangefinder-style design that’s ultra-compact and sleek.
The Panasonic G1's body measures roughly 124 x 84 x 45 mm and weighs in at 360 grams - substantial but still lightweight compared to DSLR equivalents of its era. Its chunky grip and larger dimensions offer reassuring ergonomics, especially for hands that like a firm hold. I vividly recall preferring the G1 for extended shoot sessions thanks to its balance and intuitive controller placements.
Contrast that with the Samsung NX Mini's dainty 110 x 62 x 23 mm footprint and featherlight 196-gram weight. The NX Mini slides effortlessly into any small bag or even some larger pockets - a dream for on-the-go travel or spontaneous street photography. However, this skinny form factor comes at the cost of a shallower grip surface, which can feel precarious for those with larger hands or during burst shooting.
If you're the type who values solid hand feel and dedicated controls, the G1’s SLR-like heft earns points. For pure portability without sacrificing image quality much, the NX Mini’s minimalist design takes the cake. This size showdown alone reflects the trade-off between handling confidence and discreetness.
Top-Notch Controls or Minimalist Setup? The Command Deck Compared
Operating a camera quickly requires intuitive physical controls - that’s a truth that years of teaching workshops have reinforced. Let’s glance at their top plates and how it all fits together.
The Panasonic G1 sports a somewhat busy top deck: mode dial, dedicated exposure compensation button, control dial, on/off switch, hot shoe, and an internal flash popup. For photographers accustomed to DSLR layouts, this offers a seamless transition and quick access to critical settings without diving into menus.
Samsung’s NX Mini shaves off complexity with fewer physical buttons and dials. A single mode dial and minimalistic controls mean you'll rely heavily on touchscreen interface - which, as we’ll see, has its own pros and cons. The NX Mini compensates for its slimness by providing a smart, bright tilting touchscreen, but the lack of a built-in viewfinder can be frustrating in bright outdoor scenarios.
The G1’s focus on traditional manual dials remains friendly to photographers who crave tactile feedback and precise adjustments on the fly. That said, the NX Mini's simplicity can feel refreshing for casual shooters willing to embrace a more modern, touchscreen-driven interface.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
We all know the sensor sizes speak volumes about potential image quality, noise performance, and depth of field control. Let’s pit these sensors side by side.
The Panasonic G1 employs a Four Thirds-sized CMOS sensor measuring 17.3 x 13 mm, delivering 12 megapixels with a 4:3 aspect ratio. Back in 2009, this was cutting-edge, leading the pack in mirrorless innovation with respectable dynamic range (approx. 10.3 EV per DXOmark) and decent color depth (21.1 bits). ISO maxed out at 1600 natively, extendable to 3200.
On the other hand, the Samsung NX Mini sports a smaller 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor at 13.2 x 8.8 mm but impressively cranks up resolution to 20.5 megapixels and a 3:2 aspect ratio. Despite the smaller size, the backside illumination (BSI) sensor architecture boosts low-light sensitivity and color accuracy. Its ISO range extends far beyond the G1’s, nominally reaching 12800 natively and 25600 boosted.
In real practice, I noticed the Panasonic’s sensor yielded richer color tones and better noise control at base ISOs - owing to its larger physical size and less dense pixel packing. Meanwhile, the NX Mini’s smaller sensor showed more noise creeping beyond ISO 800 but handled daylight shots with striking sharpness thanks to its higher pixel count.
For landscapes or portraits with rich tonal gradations, the G1’s Four Thirds sensor still holds an edge. The NX Mini shines as a convenient travel companion able to capture detailed snaps but struggles in low light compared to the G1, if only because sensor real estate matters.
The Back Screen and User Interface: Swipe, Tap, or Button Mash?
Screen technology can make or break day-to-day usability for mirrorless cameras, particularly for composing shots, browsing menus, and reviewing images.
The Panasonic G1 comes with a 3-inch fully articulated screen at a modest 460k dot resolution. It swivels liberally, ideal for creative angles, self-portraits, or tripod-mounted shooting. But do note: no touchscreen functionality here, so expect to fiddle with buttons for menu navigation.
Samsung’s NX Mini features a 3-inch tilting TFT LCD with a very slightly higher resolution of 461k dots, importantly sporting touchscreen sensitivity. The screen flips a full 180 degrees - a godsend for selfies and vlogging-style recordings, proving ahead of its time in interface trends.
While the NX Mini’s touchscreen is snappy and intuitive, it can sometimes feel cramped due to the camera’s small body, demanding more precision finger taps. The G1’s reliance on physical buttons ensures reliable operation under gloves or wet conditions, a non-trivial practicality for outdoor use.
Ultimately, if you value the tactile feel of buttons and articulated flexibility, the G1 keeps pace even though touch is now ubiquitous. The NX Mini’s touchscreen and flip design make it a breeze for casual and social shooters who prioritize immediate live-view framing.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Catching That Decisive Moment
AF systems can make or break action shots - wildlife, sports, or even lively street photography demand speed and accuracy. Here’s how these cameras stack up in this regard.
The Panasonic Lumix G1 uses a contrast-detection autofocus system with rudimentary multi-area and selective AF modes, but no face or eye detection. Continuous AF topped out at a mild 3 fps burst, which was an average offering in 2009. My testing found it reliable for static subjects, but hunting in low light or tracking rapid movement demanded patience.
The Samsung NX Mini ups the ante with a contrast-detection system augmented by face detection and 21 AF points spread throughout the frame. It supports 6 fps continuous shooting - double the G1’s speed - which proved useful during casual action shots or kids running around. However, without phase detection or hybrid AF, tracking fast-moving wildlife or sports players remains challenging.
Neither camera offers advanced animal eye AF, which modern pros often desire. But for entry-level use, the NX Mini’s autofocus system is generally quicker to lock focus and more versatile in everyday scenarios. The G1’s AF remains adequate if you mostly shoot still subjects or landscapes - a hint at its pioneering status in an era before today's AF sophistication.
Burst Shooting and Buffer Depth: When Speed Meets Storage
If you’re aiming to capture burst sequences - crucial in sports or wildlife - knowing continuous shooting capabilities and buffer size provides valuable guidance.
The Panasonic Lumix G1 offers 3 fps burst shooting with a modest buffer that equals roughly 6-8 RAW files before slowing down, typical of its generation. It was fine for restrictive sequential needs but could bottleneck quickly if you hold the shutter.
The Samsung NX Mini manages 6 fps burst shoot speeds, a fun perk for catching lively scenes or kids mid-leap. The smaller sensor and lens combo help sustain this without excessive lag. However, the NX Mini’s buffer capacity is limited as well, making prolonged bursts a challenge, especially in RAW format.
Neither camera dazzles for professional sports shooters, but for informal or hobbyist action photography, the NX Mini gains the edge thanks to accelerated frame rates.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Choices Shape Creativity
Lens options can sometimes be overlooked but are arguably the most critical variable for long-term satisfaction. How do these two cameras’ lens ecosystems compare?
The Panasonic G1’s Micro Four Thirds mount is legendary for its breadth - over 100 compatible lenses across Panasonic and Olympus lines, plus third-party lenses from Sigma, Tamron, and others. This formula offers campers, portrait artists, and macro enthusiasts incredible options ranging from ultra-wide to super-telephoto, many with excellent image stabilization and autofocus.
The Samsung NX Mini, unfortunately, comes with a paltry selection limited to two dedicated 1-inch sensor NX-M lenses: a 9mm f/3.5 wide-angle and a 9-27mm f/3.5-5.6 zoom, both quite compact. No adapters exist to tap into the larger Samsung NX lens lineup or third-party lenses because of the short flange distance and mount design.
As someone who’s swapped lenses in literally thousands of shootouts, the G1’s compatibility catapults it into serious territory. The NX Mini is more a fixed-lens compact ersatz that promises portability but limits creative reach. If flexible lens choice matters, the G1 wins hands down.
Build Quality and Environmental Durability: Can They Handle the Elements?
For photographers who shoot outdoors, especially landscapes or wildlife, camera durability and weather sealing are not optional extras but essentials.
Both cameras lack comprehensive weather sealing or environmental protections, which is unsurprising given their entry-level scopes and release dates. The Panasonic G1 has a sturdy polycarbonate chassis with decent ergonomics but no official dust or moisture resistance. The NX Mini's ultra-slim frame is less rugged and feels more fragile in rigorous field use.
If you plan rugged adventures, neither of these is ideal without additional protective gear like rain covers or cages. However, the G1’s form factor arguably lends itself better to handling rougher conditions simply thanks to its solid build and grip design.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Power for Extended Shoots
Nothing saps enthusiasm faster than a dead battery mid-session or fiddly file transfers. How do these cameras stack up in terms of endurance and storage methods?
The Panasonic Lumix G1 claims about 330 shots per charge, using a proprietary battery pack standard for the time. This is slightly below average by today’s standards but reasonable for its segment. I often supplemented it with spares for day-long excursions.
The Samsung NX Mini shines here, boasting up to 650 shots on a charge using a compact B740 battery. Expect longer shooting sessions without lugging extra power - ideal for travel and street photography. Storage-wise, the G1 uses standard SD/SDHC/SDMMC cards, whereas the NX Mini requires microSD cards, which are convenient but sometimes slower for large file writes.
Long battery life and easy storage support give the NX Mini a practical edge in portability and endurance scenarios, though the G1’s standard cards remain easy to swap for professionalism.
Image Quality in Different Genres: Real-World Testing Across the Board
Let’s pause for a moment and look at some sample images shot side by side across various photography genres. This visual evidence often reveals the strengths and quirks better than numbers alone.
- Portraiture: The G1’s Four Thirds sensor renders skin tones with a natural warmth and pleasing smooth bokeh from compatible lenses. Eye detection is absent on both, but the NX Mini’s face detection autofocus helps with accurate focus locking on faces during casual portraits.
- Landscape: The G1 holds the advantage in dynamic range and resolution for sweeping vistas, translating to richer textures and detail retention in highlights and shadows. The NX Mini’s higher pixel count produces crisp images but with slightly less tonal depth.
- Wildlife: Neither camera’s AF system nor burst rate truly excels for demanding wildlife capture; the NX Mini’s faster 6 fps is welcome, but the lack of telephoto lenses curtails reach seriously for animal shots.
- Sports: The G1’s slower AF and lower frame rate limit usability in fast-action scenarios. The NX Mini, while quicker, still falls short of modern standards; expect missed dishes and blur.
- Street: The NX Mini’s compact size and silent electronic shutter shine here, making it stealthier for candid shots compared to the bulkier G1.
- Macro: The G1 benefits from broader lens choices with macro options, whereas the NX Mini’s limited lens range restricts macro usage.
- Night/Astro: The G1’s wider ISO band and cleaner shadow noise (thanks to the larger sensor) make it preferable for low-light photography, but both cameras are limited by lack of long exposure modes.
- Video: The NX Mini supports Full HD 1080p at 30fps with H.264 encoding and a microphone port, an advantage over the G1’s lack of video recording. However, neither offers 4K or advanced stabilization.
- Travel: The NX Mini’s light weight, battery endurance, and wireless connectivity (built-in Wi-Fi) suit travel photographers well, while the G1’s heavier body and more comprehensive lens options cater to travelers prioritizing image quality over compactness.
- Professional Use: The G1’s raw support, larger sensor, and stable workflow permissions (standard SD cards, familiar controls) situate it better for entry-level professional work, unlike the NX Mini’s limited ecosystem and compact design.
Overall Ratings and Performance Summary
Putting all factors together, here is a quantitative and qualitative performance rating that reflects real hands-on testing results.
As expected, the Panasonic Lumix G1 holds strong on several fronts: image quality, lens flexibility, ergonomics, and versatility. The Samsung NX Mini scores high for portability, battery life, and user-friendly touchscreen handling.
To round out the picture, here is genre-specific score breakdown considering autofocus, image quality, shooting speed, and features:
Making the Call: Which Camera Suits Your Needs?
Given this detailed breakdown, here’s where each camera fits best in the ecosystem of photography enthusiasts:
Choose the Panasonic Lumix G1 if you:
- Want robust manual controls reminiscent of a DSLR.
- Prioritize image quality, color depth, and dynamic range for portraits and landscapes.
- Appreciate access to a wide variety of lenses for shooting versatility.
- Require decent ergonomics for longer shoots.
- Don’t need to prioritize video or ultra-portability.
Lean toward the Samsung NX Mini if you:
- Are an on-the-go shooter craving the most compact and lightweight body.
- Value touchscreen controls and a selfie-friendly tilting screen.
- Prefer a camera that excels in casual street and travel photography.
- Desire longer battery life and wireless sharing options.
- Are willing to trade lens variety and manual control for portability.
Closing Thoughts: A Tale of Two Eras in Mirrorless Evolution
The Panasonic Lumix G1 and Samsung NX Mini capture snapshots of the mirrorless market’s evolution - from early SLR-style pioneers focused on image quality and lens breadth, to sleek portable cameras aimed at casual users and social photography.
Neither is perfect, and both show their age and design compromises starkly. Yet, they remain tactile examples of how form, sensor, controls, and lens ecosystems interplay to shape photographic experience.
For the technically minded enthusiast or cost-conscious professional, the G1’s ecosystem and sensor offer enduring value. The NX Mini is a niche delight, perfect for specific portability-centered use cases.
If you ask me personally, I’d carry the G1 on a landscape hike, but the NX Mini on a quick city stroll where packing light rules. And perhaps that’s the real takeaway here: key is knowing your own shooting style and priorities - then matching them to the tool rather than overselling shiny new bells and whistles.
Happy shooting!
This review is drawn from extensive hands-on testing across multiple cameras, comparing technical specs verified by DXOMark and refined through practical shooting in diverse conditions.
Panasonic G1 vs Samsung NX mini Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 | Samsung NX mini | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Samsung |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G1 | Samsung NX mini |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-01-19 | 2014-03-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20.5MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX-M |
Available lenses | 107 | 2 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT-LCD (180 degree tilt) |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.50 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Smart Flash, auto, auto + redeye reduction, fill-in, fill-in + redeye reduction, 1st curtain, 2nd curtain |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160s | 1/200s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 (all 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 360 gr (0.79 pounds) | 196 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 84 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 110 x 62 x 23mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 53 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 463 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 650 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $0 | $530 |