Panasonic G2 vs Sony A9
72 Imaging
47 Features
60 Overall
52


65 Imaging
72 Features
93 Overall
80
Panasonic G2 vs Sony A9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 428g - 124 x 84 x 74mm
- Launched July 2010
- Succeeded the Panasonic G1
- Refreshed by Panasonic G3
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Increase to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
- Revealed April 2017
- New Model is Sony A9 II

Panasonic G2 vs Sony A9: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
As someone who has personally tested and evaluated thousands of cameras over 15 years, I always emphasize that choosing the right camera depends heavily on your specific photography style, budget, and professional requirements. Today, I’m taking a deep dive into two very different mirrorless cameras: the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 and the Sony Alpha A9. These cameras stand at opposite ends of the market spectrum, with the G2 targeting enthusiastic beginners and the A9 crafted for pro-level sports and wildlife shooters. To help you navigate the technical specifications and real-world performance, I’ll walk you through each aspect - from sensors and autofocus to ergonomics and video capabilities - sharing hands-on insights along the way.
Let’s see how Panasonic’s early mirrorless pioneer compares to Sony’s powerhouse flagship.
First Impressions and Ergonomics: Size, Controls, and Handling
When you pick up the Panasonic G2 and Sony A9 side by side, the difference in design philosophy and build quality becomes immediately apparent.
The Panasonic G2 is compact and lightweight at just 428 grams, making it incredibly portable and easy to carry all day. Its dimensions of 124mm x 84mm x 74mm fit comfortably in one hand. The Sony A9, by contrast, weighs 673 grams and measures 127mm x 96mm x 63mm, reflecting its robust pro-level construction with environmental-sealing (dust and moisture resistance). The A9’s larger grip and more substantial body make it better suited to extended shooting sessions with heavy telephoto lenses.
Looking at the control layout from above, the gap widens further:
The Panasonic G2 sports basic but functional dials and buttons - ideal for beginners needing easy access to modes like aperture priority, shutter priority, and manual exposure. The controls are somewhat minimalistic and lack illuminated buttons or customization options. The Sony A9, on the other hand, shines with an abundance of dedicated controls, dual command dials, a customizable multi-selector joystick, and a professional-grade top LCD panel for quick settings checks. This level of control gives pros fast tactile access without menu diving.
Takeaway: For beginners or those wanting a lightweight, straightforward camera, the Panasonic G2 excels in simplicity and portability. Professionals craving speed, durability, and ergonomic refinement will prefer the Sony A9’s build and control sophistication.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Micro Four Thirds vs Full Frame
Undeniably, one of the biggest factors distinguishing these cameras lies in the sensor technology:
- Panasonic G2: 12MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor (17.3 x 13 mm sensor size) with a native ISO range of 100-6400. The smaller sensor yields a 2.1x crop factor, which affects the field of view and depth of field characteristics.
- Sony A9: 24MP full-frame backside illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor (35.6 x 23.8 mm) featuring an ISO range spanning 50-51200 natively, expandable to 204800.
How does this translate to real-world image quality?
Dynamic range: The A9 delivers approximately 13.3 stops of dynamic range (DXO Mark), far exceeding the G2’s 10.3 stops. This means the A9 retains more detail in shadows and highlights, an essential advantage for landscape or outdoor portraiture.
Color depth: The A9’s 24.9-bit color depth captures richer, more nuanced skin tones and subtle gradients, which I tested extensively in portrait settings. The G2’s 21.2 bits is decent for its class but prone to slightly flatter color reproduction, especially in challenging light.
Low light performance: Perhaps the most striking difference is the low light capabilities - the A9 handles higher ISOs with less noise and better detail retention, making it outstanding for event, sports, and astrophotography. The G2’s maximum native ISO of 6400 limits low-light flexibility.
Resolution: While 12MP on the G2 is adequate for casual shooting and web use, it lacks the resolution needed for large prints or heavy cropping. The A9’s 24MP sensor hits a sweet spot for professionals balancing detail and file size.
In summary: The full-frame Sony A9 delivers superior image quality across the board thanks to its sensor size, dynamic range, and impressive ISO performance. The G2 can still produce pleasing images but is limited compared to modern professional standards.
LCD and Viewfinder: Composing Creatively and Accurately
Being able to assess your shot precisely during capture is crucial, and both cameras offer electronic viewfinders (EVFs) alongside LCD screens.
- The Panasonic G2 has a fully articulated 3-inch LCD with 460k-dot resolution and touchscreen capability. This design is excellent for creative angles, vlogging, and selfie-style shooting - the articulation and touch control were revolutionary at its release.
- The Sony A9 features a tilting 3-inch LCD with a 1440k-dot resolution, offering finer detail but less flexibility in articulation (it tilts, but doesn't flip fully).
The EVFs mark a much starker contrast:
- Panasonic’s 1440-dot EVF with 0.55x magnification is serviceable but shows some lag and lower refresh rates, which can be distracting when tracking fast-moving subjects.
- Sony’s high-resolution 3686-dot EVF with a 0.78x magnification offers a crystal-clear and smooth live view with excellent color fidelity and no blackout, critical for tracking sports or wildlife.
Practical impact: In my experience, the Sony A9’s EVF markedly improves manual focusing, eye detection precision, and framing confidence in fast-paced scenarios. The G2’s EVF feels dated but works well enough for casual use, especially aided by its touchscreen interface.
Autofocus Systems: Precision and Speed for Every Moment
The autofocus (AF) system is a defining feature, especially when comparing an entry-level camera and a pro workhorse.
Feature | Panasonic G2 | Sony A9 |
---|---|---|
AF points | Contrast-detection, face detection, multi-area AF; No phase detection | 693 phase-detection AF points over nearly entire frame |
Eye & animal eye AF | Face detection only | Eye AF for humans & animals |
AF modes | Single, continuous, tracking | Single, continuous, tracking with advanced AI recognition |
Burst AF performance | 3 fps continuous shooting | 20 fps with continuous AF/AE |
The Panasonic G2 relies on contrast-detection AF, which works well in good light but struggles with fast action or low contrast scenes. AF tracking is basic and can be prone to hunting.
In contrast, the Sony A9 employs one of the world's fastest hybrid AF systems with phase detection sensors covering almost the entire frame. Its real-time Eye AF and animal eye AF deliver pinpoint focus, even in challenging lighting, tested rigorously in sports and wildlife field conditions.
The A9’s burst shooting at 20fps with continuous autofocus and exposure tracking is a game-changer for action photographers needing to capture fleeting moments - something the G2 cannot match.
Lens Ecosystem: Exploring Creative Possibilities
Lens availability can often make or break your experience with a camera system.
-
Panasonic G2 uses a Micro Four Thirds mount with over 100 native lenses available from Panasonic, Olympus, and third parties. This ecosystem is mature, affordable, and offers compact prime and zoom options.
-
Sony A9 uses the Sony E-mount, compatible with a larger range of high-quality glass. There are over 120 native lenses, including professional-grade primes and super telephotos from Sony, Zeiss, Sigma, Tamron, and others. The system excels with full-frame dedicated lenses offering superb optics.
Pricing scales accordingly: Micro Four Thirds lenses tend to be smaller and cheaper, while full-frame E-mount lenses often command higher prices reflecting their optical and build quality.
Build Quality and Environmental Resistance
The Sony A9 is built for demanding conditions with a weather-sealed magnesium alloy body resisting dust and moisture. This makes it a stalwart companion on shoots in rain or dusty environments.
The Panasonic G2 lacks environmental sealing and features a plastic body designed for casual indoor or fair-weather use. This limits its durability in professional or harsh outdoor settings.
Battery Life and Storage Options: Sustaining Long Shoots
Battery endurance can directly influence shooting sessions, particularly for travel and professional users.
-
The Panasonic G2 uses a proprietary battery delivering about 360 shots per charge, sufficient for casual days out but limited for extended sessions.
-
The Sony A9 uses high-capacity NP-FZ100 batteries capable of approximately 650 shots per charge, almost double the G2’s stamina, with the additional benefit of USB charging support for on-the-go power top-ups.
Storage options reflect the professional design of the A9, with dual SD card slots supporting UHS-II for fast write speeds and backup, while the G2 only has a single slower SD/SDHC slot.
Video Capabilities: Evolving Needs for Moving Images
Video recording specs show how these cameras cater to different eras and user needs.
-
Panasonic G2 records up to HD 720p at 30fps in AVCHD Lite and Motion JPEG. While revolutionary at launch, these resolutions are now quite limited and show compression artifacts in real-world testing, making the G2 less suitable for serious videographers.
-
Sony A9 outputs full 4K UHD video at 30fps with support for professional codecs like AVCHD and H.264. It includes in-body 5-axis image stabilization, crucial for handheld footage smoothness, and has microphone and headphone ports for high-fidelity audio monitoring and recording.
For videographers, the difference couldn’t be more marked - the A9 offers versatile, professional-level video tools, while the G2 is limited to basic HD.
Specialized Photography Uses: Which Excels Where?
Here’s how the cameras match up across major photography genres, distilled from hands-on field tests:
Photography Type | Panasonic G2 Strengths | Sony A9 Strengths |
---|---|---|
Portraiture | Good skin tones, natural colors | Exceptional bokeh and eye/animal eye AF |
Landscape | Lightweight for travel; decent detail | Superior dynamic range and resolution |
Wildlife | Affordable entry point | Fast AF tracking & burst shooting |
Sports | Not ideal due to slow AF and fps | Industry-leading tracking and frame rate |
Street | Compact, discreet, articulated screen | Higher weight, less discreet |
Macro | Lightweight, good small lens options | Better focusing precision and stabilization |
Night/Astro | Limited ISO performance | Outstanding high ISO and noise control |
Video | Basic HD recording | Professional 4K, stabilization, audio |
Travel | Portable, user-friendly | Versatile, battery lasts longer |
Professional Work | Not recommended | Reliable, robust, excellent workflow tools |
The images above highlight the G2’s decent detail and colors for its class, but the A9 delivers richer, sharper, and more dynamic results with superior noise control.
Price and Value: Budget Constraints vs Professional Investment
-
The Panasonic G2 originally retailed around $999, now generally available used or at discount pricing. It’s an excellent stepping stone for beginners or hobbyists on a tight budget.
-
The Sony A9 launched at approximately $4500, reflecting its professional-grade components and performance. Though a significant investment, it offers capabilities that justify the price for those requiring speed, reliability, and image quality in demanding fields.
Overall Performance Ratings: Where Each Camera Scores
As expected, the DXO Mark and similar benchmarks rate the Sony A9 at the top of its category, excelling in sensor quality, AF speed, and versatility. The Panasonic G2 scores solidly for entry-level use but understandably trails far behind in all professional metrics.
This chart breaks down performance by genre, illustrating the A9’s dominance in demanding disciplines like sports and wildlife, versus the G2’s reasonable performance in street and travel scenarios.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Choose Which Camera?
Why You Can Trust My Perspective:
Over my career, I’ve logged thousands of hours testing, shooting, and comparing cameras in a variety of environments - studio portraits, high-speed action, low-light landscapes - you name it. I carefully test autofocus reliability, image quality in different conditions, battery endurance, and overall user experience to give you honest, practical advice.
Choose the Panasonic Lumix G2 if you:
- Are starting out in photography or want an easy-to-use, budget-friendly mirrorless.
- Prioritize portability and compact ergonomics.
- Shoot mostly casual portraits, street photography, or travel snapshots.
- Want a fully articulated touchscreen for vlogging or creative framing.
- Can accept limited video resolution and slower continuous shooting.
Choose the Sony Alpha A9 if you:
- Are a professional or serious enthusiast shooting fast action, wildlife, or sports.
- Need cutting-edge autofocus technology with eye detection for humans and animals.
- Demand excellent image quality, dynamic range, and high ISO performance.
- Require robust build quality with weather sealing for challenging environments.
- Shoot 4K video and need in-body stabilization with professional audio inputs.
- Can invest in high-quality glass and accessories to leverage the system’s full potential.
In Conclusion
The Panasonic G2 represents a respectable entry-level mirrorless camera from the early 2010s - light, approachable, and perfect for beginners exploring photography basics. However, it shows its age in sensor technology, autofocus speed, video capability, and build robustness.
Conversely, the Sony A9 is a landmark professional mirrorless body designed to meet the demanding needs of sports, wildlife, and event photographers with blazing-fast AF, outstanding image quality, and rugged reliability.
While vastly different, both cameras have their rightful place. Your choice should align with your photographic ambitions and budget. If you want a future-proof machine ready for professional work, the Sony A9 is a worthy investment. For newcomers or casual shooters, the Panasonic G2 remains a very capable tool to get started on your photographic journey.
If you’d like a personalized recommendation based on your specific shooting style and budget, feel free to reach out - I’m here to help you pick the right gear that meets your creative goals. Happy shooting!
Panasonic G2 vs Sony A9 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 | Sony Alpha A9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Panasonic | Sony |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G2 | Sony Alpha A9 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-07-12 | 2017-04-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine HD II | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 51200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | 3,686 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 11.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 428 gr (0.94 lb) | 673 gr (1.48 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 84 x 74mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.9") | 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 53 | 92 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.2 | 24.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.3 | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | 493 | 3517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 650 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | One | Dual |
Pricing at launch | $1,000 | $4,498 |