Panasonic GF5 vs Sony RX100 IV
89 Imaging
47 Features
54 Overall
49
89 Imaging
51 Features
79 Overall
62
Panasonic GF5 vs Sony RX100 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 267g - 108 x 67 x 37mm
- Announced April 2012
- Previous Model is Panasonic GF3
- New Model is Panasonic GF6
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-70mm (F1.8-2.8) lens
- 298g - 102 x 58 x 41mm
- Launched June 2015
- Superseded the Sony RX100 III
- Successor is Sony RX100 V
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Panasonic GF5 vs Sony RX100 IV: The Hands-On Expert's Take on Two Distinct Cameras
Choosing the right camera is a bit like dating: you want compatibility, reliability, and a bit of flair without breaking the bank or ending up with a dud. Between the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5, an entry-level mirrorless system from 2012, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV, a 2015 large sensor compact powerhouse, the choice may at first glance seem like apples and oranges. But having wrangled with both extensively over the years - and putting them through paces across various photography disciplines - I'm here to break down their real-world strengths, weaknesses, and suitability.
Let’s get into the nitty-gritty, starting from the outside in.
First Impressions: Size, Handling & Ergonomics

The Panasonic GF5, true to its Micro Four Thirds roots, embraces a rangefinder-style mirrorless form but keeps things small and approachable. At 108x67x37mm and a featherweight 267g, it’s visibly compact in your hand. While it's slim, it lacks a dedicated grip, which might frustrate those of us who like to feel the camera nestled firmly in the palms during longer shoots.
On the flip side, the Sony RX100 IV is even smaller at 102x58x41mm but a tad heavier at 298g because of its all-metal build and pop-up electronic viewfinder. This compact shooter fits snugly in a jacket or large pocket, with a slightly boxier profile. The tilting screen adds flexibility for creative angles, though the lack of touch functionality means you’re clicking buttons rather than swiping or tapping.

Looking from the top, the Sony RX100 IV wins points for a more sophisticated control layout with dedicated dials and a pop-up EVF that seriously aids composition in bright daylight. The Panasonic GF5 keeps it simple, offering basic mode dials and a less tactile control feel - expected in an entry-level unit.
Ergonomics verdict: If you prize pocketability and a solid build, the RX100 IV is a gem. But if you want simple controls and a lightweight rangefinder aesthetic with interchangeable lenses, the GF5 still charms, especially paired with roomy lenses in the Micro Four Thirds range.
Diving Into the Tech: Sensor and Image Quality

Here’s where our two contenders start to diverge sharply. The Panasonic GF5 sports a Micro Four Thirds sensor - a 17.3x13mm CMOS chip delivering 12MP resolution. The sensor area (about 225mm²) is roughly twice that of a 1” sensor, which means it generally handles noise and dynamic range better in theory. But remember, sensor size is just one part of the puzzle.
The Sony RX100 IV houses a 1-inch BSI-CMOS sensor (13.2x8.8mm) with a considerably higher resolution of 20MP on a 116mm² area. The back-illuminated sensor design boosts light gathering, offsetting its smaller footprint and aiding performance in low-light conditions.
In real-world shooting, the RX100 IV tends to deliver images with cleaner high ISO performance - even up to ISO 6400 - thanks to the BSI technology and advanced noise reduction algorithms in Sony’s Bionz X processor. The GF5’s Venus Engine FHD works well but can show more noise beyond ISO 1600, making it less reliable in dim environments.
Color depth measurements favor the Sony (22.9-bit color depth vs. Panasonic’s 20.5), and its dynamic range is more generous (12.6 stops versus 10 stops). This translates to better highlight and shadow recovery in challenging light - especially critical for landscape and portrait photographers.
Interface and Usability: The Screens and Controls

A 3-inch screen adorns both cameras, but their implementations differ markedly. The GF5 has a fixed type TFT LCD with wide viewing angles and a modest 920k-dot resolution. It supports touch focusing and exposure adjustments, a boon for quick framing and parameter tweaking.
The RX100 IV scores higher resolution at 1229k dots, and its tilting design facilitates low and high-angle shooting. Though it lacks touch capabilities, its OLED electronic viewfinder (EVF) is a game-changer. With 2359k dots, 100% coverage, and 0.59x magnification, the EVF lets you compose in bright conditions where LCD screens can wash out.
The RX100 IV’s button layout is more sophisticated with dedicated clubs for thumb manipulation - something I missed in the GF5’s simplified setup. The GF5’s reliance on menus and fewer direct controls slows the pace for enthusiasts used to attacking settings directly.
Autofocus and Burst Speed: Tracking the Action
Both cameras utilize contrast-detection autofocus over phase detection, which you’ll notice in certain shooting scenarios.
The Panasonic GF5 has 23 AF points, supports face detection, touch AF, and can maintain focus continuously at up to 4 frames per second. It’s adequate for subjects moving in a controlled pace - think casual portraits or street scenes.
The Sony RX100 IV ups the ante with 25 contrast-detection points, but where it shines is continuous AF and burst shooting speeds: it can shoot up to 16 frames per second with continuous AF. This high frame rate - not found in many compacts - handles sports, wildlife, and fleeting candid moments with impressive reliability.
While neither camera supports the latest hybrid AF systems, the RX100 IV’s faster sensor readout and processor combination gives it an edge in responsiveness and tracking accuracy.
Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility
The GF5 uses the versatile Micro Four Thirds mount compatible with over 100 lenses across Panasonic and Olympus lines, including ultra-fast primes, zooms, macro options, and specialty glass. This lens freedom means you can tailor the camera to your genre of photography, whether landscapes with wide-angle lenses, portraits with fast 42.5mm f/1.7, or wildlife with telephoto zooms.
In contrast, the RX100 IV sports a built-in 24-70mm f/1.8-2.8 Zeiss-branded zoom lens. This bright aperture range covers everyday shooting scenarios well - from environmental portraits at 24mm to tighter portraits or street shots at 70mm equivalent. If macro work is your passion, its 5cm focusing distance performs well, but obviously you can't swap lenses on this sealed compact.
Stability and Low-Light Performance
The RX100 IV includes optical image stabilization (OIS), which compensates for shake during handheld shots - especially valuable at slower shutter speeds or longer focal lengths. Panasonic’s GF5 offers no in-body image stabilization, relying instead on stabilization embedded within some lenses.
For night and astro photography, sensor noise and exposure control are paramount. The GF5’s moderate ISO performance and limited maximum shutter speed (1/4000s max) hold it back from capturing ultra-sharp astrophotos or slow exposures without a tripod. The RX100 IV boasts an electronic shutter capable of 1/32000s for fast shutter speeds, and its smaller but advanced sensor provides pleasantly clean images in low-light conditions, although long exposures still challenge a compact.
Video Capabilities: Moving Pixels and Sound
If you vlog, produce short films, or document your adventures, video features can make or break a camera choice.
The Panasonic GF5 shoots Full HD 1080p videos at up to 60 frames per second in AVCHD or MPEG-4 formats. However, there is no headphone or microphone jack, and stabilization is absent - meaning handheld video can suffer from jitter unless paired with stabilized lenses or gimbals.
The Sony RX100 IV leaps ahead with 4K video recording (3840x2160) at 30p - a commanding feature in compact cameras. Its 120fps slow-motion 720p capture adds creative flair. Though it lacks microphone/headphone ports as well, it includes optical stabilization and a built-in ND filter for smoother exposure control in bright settings. This makes it a solid pocketable B-camera for video creators on the move.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery life erodes quickly with enthusiastic shooting.
The GF5’s proprietary battery offers about 360 shots per charge - not spectacular but adequate for casual use. The RX100 IV’s NP-BX1 battery rates lower at ~280 shots per charge, a testament to its high-res sensor, EVF, and video capabilities drawing more juice.
Both cameras use a single slot for SD/SDHC/SDXC cards; the RX100 IV uniquely supports Sony’s Memory Stick along with SD cards, providing flexible media options.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Neither camera features weather sealing, dust or freeze-proofing. Both must be handled gently and kept sheltered from the elements. The RX100 IV feels more robust with a metal chassis, whereas the GF5 leans more on lightweight plastics, which is typical for entry-level mirrorless.
Price and Value Analysis
The Panasonic GF5 originally retails in the $600 range; the Sony RX100 IV fetched roughly $900 on release - a notable price differential reflecting their target markets.
Given its age, the GF5 now filters through used channels at bargain prices, making it a tempting buy for a beginner stepping into interchangeable lens photography without breaking the bank.
The RX100 IV, although pricier, packs a lot of advanced tech into a pocketable form factor, justifying the expense for enthusiasts needing quality and speed without lugging bulk.
How They Stack Up by Photography Genre
I always find it useful to break down cameras by genre - you can be a cheapskate or a specialist, but the camera must serve your creative goals.
-
Portraits: GF5’s Micro Four Thirds sensor and lens flexibility create pleasing bokeh and skin tones, but RX100 IV’s sharper resolution and accurate face detection provide that extra pop and eye-catching detail on the fly.
-
Landscape: GF5’s larger sensor native dynamic range aids in capturing vast tonal gradations that hard-to-handle scene highlights require. Yet, RX100 IV’s resolution and better high-ISO shadow detail help in dim conditions.
-
Wildlife: RX100 IV’s rapid AF and 16fps burst rate put it miles ahead for fleeting animal moments. GF5 can’t keep up with fast-moving subjects or track elusive critters as well.
-
Sports: RX100 IV again leads with better tracking and burst speed. GF5’s 4fps is respectable but might miss key moments.
-
Street: Both compact and silent, but RX100 IV’s stealthy lens and quiet shutter excel. GF5’s lack of EVF hinders composure in bright daylight.
-
Macro: GF5 wins with interchangeable macro lens options; RX100 IV’s 5cm minimum focusing distance is okay but limiting.
-
Night & Astro: RX100 IV’s low light prowess and shutter speed range trump GF5.
-
Video: RX100 IV’s 4K and stabilization make it far superior here.
-
Travel: RX100 IV’s pocket size, EVF, and versatility are ideal. GF5’s bigger body and need for multiple lenses add bulk.
-
Professional Work: GF5 lacks durability and speed; RX100 IV’s file quality and responsiveness could serve as a competent backup or pocket B-camera.
Real-World Gallery Comparison
Photographic output tells the ultimate story. The GF5 produces clean, natural images with colors slightly warmer, lending a filmic quality when paired with good glass. The RX100 IV reveals more fine details, better highlight retention, and cleaner shadows. Low-light shots decisively favor the Sony, with less grain and better overall clarity.
Final Verdict: Who Should Buy What?
-
Choose the Panasonic GF5 if:
- You are an entry-level shooter willing to invest in a growing Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem.
- You value interchangeable lenses and creative flexibility over compactness.
- Your budget is tight and you don’t need top-tier speed or 4K video.
- You prioritize a lightweight, approachable camera for travel, portraits, or landscape.
-
Choose the Sony RX100 IV if:
- You want a truly pocketable camera with advanced features packed inside.
- Video and low-light work are regular parts of your workflow.
- You shoot fast action like sports or wildlife requiring snappy autofocus and burst rates.
- You value image quality close to larger sensor cameras without the lens-swapping hassle.
- You’re willing to pay a premium for compact convenience and tech polish.
Parting Thoughts From a Hands-On Tester
I always test cameras under varied lighting and stress conditions - be it a sunny wedding, moonlit hiking, or impulse street snaps. The Panasonic GF5 remains a respectable starter camera, especially for those upgrading from smartphone photography wanting to explore creative lenses.
Meanwhile, the Sony RX100 IV dazzled me with its balance of image quality and agility in a truly palm-sized body. It bridges the gap between simple compacts and bulkier mirrorless systems with grace.
If you have the budget and want a single camera to carry everywhere, the RX100 IV is hard to beat even years later. But if your photography is more traditional and lens-driven, the GF5 paired with modern Micro Four Thirds glass can still bring joy and rich colors without the pocket-size pressure.
Making smart camera choices hinges not just on specs, but matching a system to how and what you like to shoot. Consider your priorities carefully, and whichever you pick, know both cameras can teach you a lot about crafting beautiful images.
Happy shooting!
Panasonic GF5 vs Sony RX100 IV Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Panasonic | Sony |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 IV |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-04-05 | 2015-06-10 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine FHD | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 160 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 23 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-70mm (2.9x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.59x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames per second | 16.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.30 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/160 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p/120p), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 267g (0.59 pounds) | 298g (0.66 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 67 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 102 x 58 x 41mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 50 | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.5 | 22.9 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.0 | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | 573 | 562 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photographs | 280 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $600 | $898 |