Panasonic GX85 vs Pentax K-3
83 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62


59 Imaging
65 Features
85 Overall
73
Panasonic GX85 vs Pentax K-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 122 x 71 x 44mm
- Introduced April 2016
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 51200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 800g - 131 x 100 x 77mm
- Introduced April 2014
- Later Model is Pentax K-3 II

Panasonic GX85 vs Pentax K-3: A Hands-On Expert’s Deep Dive into Two Advanced Cameras
If you’re deep in the hunt for an advanced camera, trying to choose between two very different beasts - Panasonic’s Micro Four Thirds mirrorless GX85 and Pentax’s robust APS-C DSLR K-3 - you’ve come to the right place. Having spent over 15 years testing a wide swath of cameras, I’m here to unpack what really matters: real-world use, image quality, handling, and how these cameras hold up across disciplines from wildlife to portraiture and everything in between.
Both cameras occupy interesting niches but differ fundamentally in design philosophy, sensor tech, and user experience. So grab your coffee, and let’s get into the nitty-gritty.
Hands-On Feel and Ergonomics: Size Matters (and Sometimes It Doesn’t)
Right out of the gate, the Panasonic GX85 is a compact, rangefinder-style mirrorless camera that feels just right in your hands if you value portability. It's got a tidy footprint at 122x71x44 mm and weighs in at a modest 426 grams, making it a real joy to carry all day - ideal for travel and street shooters who want to stay light on their feet.
In contrast, the Pentax K-3 is proudly a mid-size DSLR, more of a workhorse at 131x100x77 mm and tipping the scales at 800 grams. It has that classic SLR heft, which some appreciate for balance - especially with heavier lenses - but it’s not one you’ll want to pack in a small bag for casual jaunts.
Ergonomically, the K-3 sports a pronounced grip and a robust button layout, perfect for sweaty hands in the field or cold gloves on a mountain trek. The GX85’s slimmer body is less imposing but still presents a sculpted grip that surprised me with its comfort for a camera this small.
The difference in weight and size really underlines their target shooters: the K-3 leans toward professionals or serious hobbyists who prize durability and control, whereas the GX85 is more about being nimble and accessible without sacrificing fundamental photographic tools.
Button Layout and Top-End Controls: Clubs for Your Thumbs or Minimalist Zen?
Controls are the frontline battlefield when shooting fast, and here the K-3’s traditional DSLR layout shines. It boasts a dedicated top LCD panel displaying key exposure info, a beloved feature for professionals used to quick glances rather than digging through menus. The K-3 offers direct control dials for shutter speed and aperture, and well-placed customizable buttons that make tweaking settings on the fly feel intuitive.
The Panasonic GX85 opts for a more minimal top layout without the traditional info panel, instead relying on its electronic viewfinder (EVF) and touch-enabled rear screen for adjustments. This makes the GX85 feel modern and clean but may leave DSLR fans missing tactile dials in crunch moments.
The GX85 incorporates a 3-inch tilting touchscreen, a big boon for video shooters and those who like composing from tricky angles, while the K-3’s 3.2-inch fixed screen lacks touch but delivers a crisp, bright display.
Both cameras offer full manual controls and exposure compensation with shutter/aperture priority modes, so power users won’t feel handicapped on either platform - but DXO Mark scores and field data hint that the K-3’s interface stays more faithful to classic camera ergonomics.
Sensor & Image Quality: Size, Resolution, and Real-World Impact
This is where the two cameras part ways in a fundamental way: sensor format and resolution.
-
The Pentax K-3 features a 24MP APS-C CMOS sensor (366.6 mm²) without an anti-aliasing (AA) filter, which enhances resolution and sharpness but risks moiré artifacts. The APS-C size affords more light-gathering ability compared to the Micro Four Thirds sensor, translating to better dynamic range, deeper color depth, and less noise at higher ISO settings.
-
The Panasonic GX85 houses a smaller 16MP Micro Four Thirds sensor (224.9 mm²), also AA filter-free - a feature some enthusiasts love for punchy sharpness. However, the smaller sensor area means it collects less light, which can impact image quality in challenging lighting.
The difference in Sensor size largely explains the performance gap visible in DXO Mark’s scores: The K-3 comes in with an overall score of 80, while the GX85 stands at 71. This gap translates into tangible benefits like:
-
Dynamic Range: K-3 achieves 13.4 EV; GX85 clocks 12.6 EV. In landscapes or high-contrast scenes, the K-3 retains shadow and highlight detail more gracefully.
-
Low-Light Capability: The K-3 doubles the low-light ISO rating of the GX85 (1216 vs. 662), meaning less noise and cleaner files when shooting indoors or at night.
-
Color Depth: Subtle color gradations come through with more precision on the K-3, important for portrait and studio work.
But don’t discount the GX85 entirely: its sensor is sharp and reliable, and with in-camera 5-axis stabilization and advanced Venus Engine processing, it delivers excellent JPEGs and RAW files appropriate for social media, travel blogs, and casual professional use.
Autofocus Systems: Keeping Up With Fast Subjects
AF performance is a make-or-break in fields like wildlife, sports, and event photography.
Pentax K-3 uses a phase-detection system with 27 points, 25 of which are cross-type sensors - superb for tracking moving subjects and locking on quickly. The well-known “Prime III” processor handles AF calculations aggressively, enabling dependable continuous autofocus (AF-C) during bursts.
Panasonic GX85 relies on contrast-detection only, featuring 49 focus points but lacking phase-detection pixels. This contrast system benefits from advanced algorithms but generally falls short in speed and accuracy compared to hybrid systems, especially under low contrast or fast-motion scenarios.
In practice, the K-3 wins hands down at wildlife and sports work with quicker, more reliable AF tracking. The GX85 performs best with still or slower-moving subjects and leverages its silent electronic shutter for discreet street or event shooting.
Neither camera sports animal eye-detection AF, though the GX85’s face detection is smooth and useful for portraits. The Panasonic does have focus bracketing and focus stacking options, boosting its capabilities for macro and landscape shooters - a thoughtful feature absent from the K-3.
Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Ready for Battle or the Casual Stroll?
The Pentax K-3 stands out with magnesium alloy construction and comprehensive weather sealing - dustproof and splash-resistant - making it a top contender for outdoor professionals shooting in grimy or damp conditions. The K-3 screams “bring me rain and dust, I’m ready!”
The GX85, meanwhile, has a solid build but no environmental sealing. It’s best kept out of heavy rain or dusty trails unless you have additional protection (like rain covers). That said, its smaller size and lighter weight give it a portability advantage in travel or street shooting scenarios.
For landscape shooters who camp out in changeable weather, the K-3’s ruggedness is reassuring; casual shooters might value the GX85’s compact approach instead.
Handling and User Interface: Modern Touchscreen vs Classic DSLR Clubs for Thumbs
The GX85’s tilting touchscreen adds flexibility, particularly for composing at unusual angles or during video capture. The touch interface allows quick focus point selection and menu navigation - a big plus for users familiar with smartphones.
The K-3’s fixed, non-touch LCD feels dated by comparison but offers a bright, high-resolution display with straightforward controls and a top info panel giving you quick access to exposure and shooting data.
Real-world: I’ve found the GX85’s touchscreen more intuitive for casual shooting and video vloggers, while the K-3 caters better to pros who want direct, tactile control and a reliable feedback loop through the optical viewfinder (which many still prefer for lag-free viewing in bright light).
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: The Glass Game
The Pentax K-3 uses the KAF2 mount, with 151 lenses including excellent primes and pro-level telephotos - especially the line of high-quality Pentax FA Limited primes and weather-sealed lenses. Pentax’s famed screw-drive and newer autofocus lenses ensure adaptability for multiple shooting genres.
The Panasonic GX85 taps into the Micro Four Thirds system, boasting 107 lenses from Panasonic, Olympus, and third parties. The MFT ecosystem is broad and affordable, with many compact primes and zooms ideally matched to the camera’s small form factor.
If portability is paramount, MFT glass tends to be lighter - perfect for travel and street. If ultimate image fidelity or specialty lenses like tilt-shift or ultra-fast primes are vital, Pentax’s lineup is better suited, though heavier.
Burst Shooting and Buffer Performance: Catching the Decisive Moment
Both cameras offer an 8 fps continuous shooting rate, respectable for their era.
The K-3’s buffer can handle full 14-bit RAW files for longer before slowing, a win if you shoot action or sports with extended bursts. The GX85’s buffer is adequate for moderate bursts but will fill up sooner with large RAW or 4K photo capture.
Speaking of 4K, the GX85’s 4K photo mode is versatile for capturing fast action in 8MP stills from video frames - a feature the K-3 lacks entirely.
Video Capabilities: Mirrorless Advantage Meets Classic DSLR
Video shooters should take note: The GX85 supports 4K UHD (3840x2160) at 30p and 24p, along with Full HD at higher frame rates. It features in-body 5-axis image stabilization, essential for handheld video. The lack of microphone and headphone jacks is limiting, but the camera’s video autofocus is smooth for casual use.
The K-3 provides Full HD up to 60i (interlaced) and 30p with H.264 encoding. It has both mic and headphone jacks, making it friendlier for pro-level audio monitoring. There’s no 4K, and no in-body stabilization means video requires lens IS or gimbals.
If video is a priority, especially 4K and stabilization, the GX85 is the smarter choice.
Battery Life and Storage Options: Long Hauls vs Lightweight Packs
The Pentax K-3 impresses with 560 shots per battery charge, almost double the GX85’s 290 shots. This is typical of DSLRs with optical viewfinders, consuming less power compared to mirrorless EVFs.
Storage-wise, K-3 provides dual SD card slots, allowing flexible backup or overflow - a feature pros appreciate for data security. GX85 uses a single SD card slot, which is a tradeoff for its compactness.
If you’re heading on long assignments without charging opportunities, the K-3’s bigger battery life and dual card slots might tip the balance.
Wireless Connectivity and Extras: Modern Conveniences
The Panasonic GX85 offers built-in Wi-Fi for easy image transfer and remote control via smartphone - popular features for on-the-go sharing and quick uploads.
The K-3 lacks built-in wireless but can gain GPS and Wi-Fi through optional accessories - something to factor into your budget and shooting style.
Putting It All Together: Genre-by-Genre Shooter Breakdown
Portrait Photography
Panasonic GX85 shines with great skin tone reproduction and excellent bokeh due to its range of fast native lenses - though the smaller sensor limits shallow depth-of-field effects somewhat.
Pentax K-3 delivers superior resolution and dynamic range, yielding detailed, nuanced portraits with better low-light flexibility. Its robust autofocus helps nail eye focus more consistently.
Winner: Pentax K-3 for professionals; GX85 for casual portraiture and travel.
Landscape Photography
K-3 excels again with wider dynamic range and greater resolution, plus weather sealing and ruggedness make it a go-to in tough terrain.
GX85’s focus stacking and lighter MFT gear suit it for adventurous shooters preferring agility over brute strength.
Winner: Pentax K-3 for ultimate quality; GX85 for portability.
Wildlife Photography
Fast autofocus and excellent burst buffering give K-3 a clear advantage. It also pairs well with pro telephoto Pentax lenses.
GX85’s AF struggles tracking fast wildlife, and the smaller sensor reduces detail and noise handling at distance.
Winner: Pentax K-3 without question.
Sports Photography
Similar to wildlife, the K-3’s burst speed, AF accuracy, and long battery life make it suitable for fast-paced action.
GX85’s continuous shooting is limited by buffer and AF speed.
Winner: Pentax K-3
Street Photography
Compactness and silent electronic shutter give GX85 the edge for street shooters wanting discretion and quick setup.
K-3’s bulk and shutter noise can be intrusive.
Winner: Panasonic GX85
Macro Photography
GX85 comes with focus bracketing and stacking - major pluses for macro shooters experimenting with extended DOF.
K-3 lacks these but wins on resolution and ruggedness if paired with quality macro lenses.
Winner: Panasonic GX85, with caveats.
Night/Astro Photography
Larger sensor, better ISO performance, and higher dynamic range make K-3 preferred for low light/astro photography.
GX85’s image stabilization and 16000 max electronic shutter speed allow some creative nocturnal shooting, but noise is more prominent.
Winner: Pentax K-3
Video Use
GX85’s 4K video and 5-axis stabilization clearly outperform K-3’s 1080p and no in-body stabilization.
Winner: Panasonic GX85
Travel Photography
GX85’s compactness, connectivity, and versatility keep it competitive for travelers balancing photo and video.
K-3’s weight and size add bulk, but excellent battery life and rugged build appeal to adventure travel.
Winner: Depends on travel style - compactness (GX85) vs durability (K-3).
Professional Work
Pentax K-3’s rugged build, robust controls, higher resolution, and dual card slots suit professional workflows better.
GX85 is capable but better positioned as an advanced enthusiast or hybrid shooter.
Winner: Pentax K-3
Final Pros and Cons Summary
Panasonic GX85:
Pros
- Compact, lightweight and portable
- 5-axis in-body image stabilization
- 4K video recording and 4K photo mode
- Tilting touchscreen with touch AF
- Focus bracketing and stacking
- Built-in Wi-Fi
- Silent electronic shutter
- Affordable for feature set
Cons
- Smaller Micro Four Thirds sensor limits low-light and dynamic range
- Contrast-detection AF slower for action
- Single card slot and shorter battery life
- No weather sealing
- No mic/headphone jacks
Pentax K-3:
Pros
- Large APS-C sensor with no AA filter for sharp images
- Superb dynamic range and low-light performance
- Weather-sealed, rugged magnesium alloy body
- Fast, accurate phase-detection AF with 27 points
- Dual SD card slots for backup
- Longer battery life
- Full manual controls with top LCD panel
- Mic and headphone jacks for video
- Wide, high-quality lens ecosystem
Cons
- Bulkier and heavier than mirrorless alternatives
- No 4K video support
- Fixed non-touch LCD
- Lacks focus bracketing and stacking
- No built-in Wi-Fi or Bluetooth
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
If you crave ultimate image quality, durability, and fast autofocus in a pro-grade DSLR with a full complement of controls, the Pentax K-3 remains an exceptional value even years after launch. It’s a tool for serious enthusiasts or professionals shooting landscapes, wildlife, sports, portraits, or studio work.
On the other hand, if you want a versatile, pocketable hybrid marvel with modern conveniences like 4K video, in-body stabilization, and touchscreen ease - perfect for travel, street, casual portraiture, and hybrid photo/video content - the Panasonic GX85 is a bargain-packed choice.
Final Thoughts from the Field
After test shooting both extensively, it’s clear neither camera is “better” overall - rather, they serve different purposes shaped by sensor size, body design, and feature priorities.
The Pentax K-3 has that satisfying DSLR heft and build, excels in tough conditions, and delivers stunning image quality with excellent handling. It’s my pick if you prize all-day shooting confidence and professional-grade results - especially in still photography.
The Panasonic GX85, meanwhile, is a fun and capable mirrorless camera with clever video features and portability most DSLRs can’t match - great for the enthusiast who shoots both photos and video and needs lightweight gear.
So ask yourself honestly: Are you a rugged field shooter chasing action and clarity? Or a nimble traveler/video hobbyist who values size and convenience? Your answer will guide you to the right camera.
Happy shooting - whichever camp you choose!
End of article.
Panasonic GX85 vs Pentax K-3 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 | Pentax K-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 | Pentax K-3 |
Also called as | Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II | - |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2016-04-05 | 2014-04-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine | Prime III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4592 x 3448 | 6016 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 27 |
Cross type focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,764 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off | Auto, on, off, red-eye, slow sync, slow sync + red-eye, trailing curtain sync, high speed, wireless, manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lbs) | 800g (1.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 71 x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 131 x 100 x 77mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 71 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.9 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.6 | 13.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 662 | 1216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | 560 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | 2 |
Launch pricing | $800 | $639 |