Clicky

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010

Portability
70
Imaging
42
Features
34
Overall
38
Olympus E-500 front
 
Olympus Stylus 5010 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
27
Overall
33

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010 Key Specs

Olympus E-500
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
  • Released October 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-500
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-510
Olympus 5010
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 126g - 95 x 56 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2010
  • Alternate Name is mju 5010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010 Overview

Following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact and they are both built by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-500 (8MP) and 5010 (14MP) and the E-500 (Four Thirds) and 5010 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-500 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the 5010 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 5010 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-500 scores versus the 5010 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus 5010

 E-500 5010 
Manual focus More exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus 5010 over the Olympus E-500

 5010 E-500 
AnnouncedJanuary 2010October 2005More modern by 51 months
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")
Display resolution230k215kSharper display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-500 and Olympus 5010

 E-500 5010 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch display Neither includes Touch display

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010 Physical Comparison

In case you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-500 features external measurements of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") having a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs) and the Olympus 5010 has measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-500 compared to the 5010.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-500 and 5010 is 70 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-500 and 5010.

As you have seen, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-500 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus 5010 will deliver extra detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged E-500 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-500 Portrait photography features
Olympus 5010 Portrait photography features
49
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
28
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-500 Street photography features
Olympus 5010 Street photography features
57
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (479g)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-500 Sports photography features
Olympus 5010 Sports photography features
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
39
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
includes tracking focus
low fps (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-500
Travel photography with Olympus 5010
52
lighter than competition in class (479g)
has built in flash
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
65
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
relatively wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-500 Landscape photography info
Olympus 5010 Landscape photography info
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
does not have liveview
no image stabilization
low megapixels (8MP)
low max ISO (400)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
38
relatively wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-500 Vlogging advice
Olympus 5010 Vlogging advice
9
no video shooting
29
relatively wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-500 vs Olympus 5010 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-500 and Olympus 5010
 Olympus E-500Olympus Stylus 5010
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-500 Olympus Stylus 5010
Also called EVOLT E-500 mju 5010
Category Advanced DSLR Ultracompact
Released 2005-10-21 2010-01-07
Body design Mid-size SLR Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus range - 7cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 215 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.45x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 13.00 m (at ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 479g (1.06 pounds) 126g (0.28 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $600 $150