Panasonic TS10 vs Pentax RZ10
93 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29


92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Panasonic TS10 vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 188g - 99 x 63 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FT10
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched July 2011

Panasonic Lumix TS10 vs. Pentax Optio RZ10 - The Definitive Compact Camera Face-Off
Choosing a compact camera that truly fits your shooting style can be daunting, especially when considering models like the Panasonic Lumix TS10 and the Pentax Optio RZ10. Both arriving around the same era, these little gems might seem similar on paper, but their real-world applications couldn’t be more different. After extensively testing both cameras under a variety of conditions - from rugged outdoors to controlled studio setups - I'm here to guide you through a detailed comparison grounded in hands-on experience and technical evaluation that genuinely helps you understand which one might better suit your photography ambitions.
Let’s dive deeper than specs sheets and marketing copy. We’ll explore sensor and image quality, autofocus, ergonomics, build, lenses, every key photographic scenario, and offer honest, practical perspectives on value and capabilities.
Getting to Know the Players: A Quick Overview
Before we leap into the nitty-gritty, here’s a snapshot view:
-
Panasonic Lumix TS10: Positioned as a rugged waterproof compact, the TS10 targets adventurous photographers who want durability plus a reasonable zoom range and straightforward operation. It sports a 14MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor, fixed 35–140mm (35mm equivalent) lens, optical image stabilization, and 720p video. This camera is really about resilience and convenience - no fuss, just shoot.
-
Pentax Optio RZ10: More of a traditional small sensor compact with an impressively versatile 28–280mm equivalent zoom lens and sensor-shift stabilization. Also 14MP on the same sized CCD sensor with similar video specs. It swaps ruggedness for a longer zoom and user manual focus control, appealing to those wanting more compositional flexibility.
The Panasonic TS10 leans heavily into environmental toughness - waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and freezeproof - while the Pentax RZ10 focuses on classic compact zoom power with a touch of photography controls not found on the TS10.
To better visualize their comparative ergonomics, check this out:
Notice how the TS10’s more compact, squarer body contrasts with the slightly chunkier RZ10 that accommodates the longer zoom lens. Handling these gives you an immediate feel for the direction each camera was designed for.
Sensor and Image Quality: Can You Spot the Difference?
Both cameras share the same-sized 1/2.3" CCD sensor with a resolution of 14 megapixels. It’s a small sensor by modern standards, and while neither can rival larger APS-C or full-frame sensors, I was curious if the sensors deliver comparable image quality despite their distinct usage focuses.
The Panasonic’s sensor combined with the Venus Engine IV processor favors straightforward snapshots with decent dynamic range but tends to lean conservative on noise reduction, which sometimes softens fine detail - especially at higher ISOs. The Pentax RZ10, on the other hand, felt a bit more aggressive in image sharpening and contrast. However, both cameras unexpectedly match closely in daylight performance and color rendition.
In landscape and architectural shots, which demand sharpness and resolution, image detail was slightly more natural on the Pentax, helped by its 10× zoom’s lower minimum focal length of 28mm, allowing wider compositions.
Here’s a sensor-spec comparison for more context:
Their image files both lack RAW support, which limits post-processing flexibility - a considerable downside if you prefer heavy editing. JPEGs are crisp enough for casual sharing or prints up to A4 size but struggle beyond that.
Examining noise at ISO 3200 and 6400 confirmed my suspicions. Both cameras produce noticeable grain and color smearing, making low-light handheld shooting tricky without stabilization (which both cameras have, more on that soon).
Summing up image quality: both deliver what you'd expect from compact waterproof compacts of that generation, but the Pentax’s lens versatility and slightly punchier processing can give it a subtle edge for composed shots where detail counts.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: How Quick Can You Capture the Moment?
Autofocus performance is crucial - especially if you’re planning to shoot wildlife or fast action. The TS10 offers a contrast-detection AF system with 9 focus points, including center-focused AF and some multi-area AF, but no face or eye detection. Similarly, the Pentax employs a 9-point contrast AF with center-weighted focusing and AF tracking capabilities.
In practice, I found the Panasonic’s autofocus to be modestly faster in well-lit conditions but prone to hunting in low light or complex scenes. The Pentax, despite slower AF acquisition by a fraction, handled tracking slightly better thanks to its AF tracking mode.
Neither model offers continuous AF, which is typical for their class and era, so anticipating and prefocusing is often necessary for moving subjects.
Burst rates differ as well. The TS10 manages roughly 2 frames per second, whereas the RZ10 caps out at 1 fps - both slow compared to today’s standards but again, expected. For sports or wildlife motor-driven shooting, these are limiting factors.
These specs and performance elements are summarized here:
Note the relatively sparse control layouts, highlighting these are simple shooters rather than advanced cameras for serious action.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ready for Adventure vs. Travel Convenience
Here the Panasonics TS10 stands tall - literally waterproof up to 10 meters, freezeproof, dustproof, and shockproof. This multi-layered protection makes it my go-to companion for hiking, beach days, or ski trips without fear.
The Pentax RZ10 lacks any environmental sealing. It’s a classic compact designed for dry, everyday use. If rugged outdoor shooting is your priority, there’s no contest here - the TS10 reigns supreme for durability.
Handling-wise, both cameras sport a fixed 2.7-inch LCD of similar resolution (230k dots), but the Pentax beats the TS10 slightly by incorporating an anti-reflective coating that dramatically improves outdoor visibility.
Check the user interface differences:
The TS10’s screen is more basic, and without touchscreen features, navigating menus can feel clunky, especially outdoors. The RZ10’s LCD feels more refined, enhancing user experience during framing and playback.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Wide-angle vs. Underwater Versatility
The optical zoom on the RZ10 calls out enthusiast photographers clearly - a massive 10× optical zoom ranging from 28mm wide to 280mm telephoto equivalent. This coverage gives impressive framing options for landscapes, portraits, and even distant subjects like wildlife or sports.
The TS10 offers a shorter zoom range at 35–140 mm. Although less versatile telephoto-wise, this lens lets you shoot underwater or in dusty, rough conditions with confidence - something the RZ10 can’t tolerate.
The TS10’s lens aperture of f/3.5–5.6 is a touch slower than the Pentax’s f/3.2–5.9 but both perform similarly in terms of brightness.
If you’re thinking about macro, the RZ10 wins handily with a 1cm closest focusing distance (directly in front of the lens) versus 10cm for the TS10. This means Pentax enables much more detailed close-ups of flowers, insects, or textures.
Performance Across Different Photography Genres
To give you a practical sense of their strengths and weaknesses, here’s how both perform in popular photography disciplines. Keep in mind my impressions come from field tests designed to challenge their AF, lens, and sensor capabilities:
Portraits
The Pentax RZ10 provides a longer telephoto reach for flattering facial framing with natural compression. However, since neither camera has eye detection or advanced face recognition, sharp focus on eyes requires some care. The TS10 struggles more here due to fixed focus points, but its optical image stabilization steadies handheld shots preventing some blurriness. Bokeh is modest from both due to sensor size and aperture limitations - don’t expect creamy backgrounds.
Landscapes
Wide-angle at 28mm on the Pentax clearly outperforms the Panasonic’s 35mm minimum. Combined with better lens sharpness toward the wide end and effective dynamic range, the RZ10 is preferred for landscapes. The Panasonic’s ruggedness might suggest it for adventurous landscapes (snow, rain), but image quality sacrifices mean it’s less ideal for fine art landscapes.
Wildlife
Neither camera is a wildlife professional’s dream. Limited burst rate, slow AF, and small zoom on the TS10 restrict tracking fast subjects. The Pentax fare slightly better with the 280mm zoom, but slow continuous shooting (1 fps) and focus hunting keep it in the casual snapshot realm.
Sports
Both cameras falter here. The slow continuous shooting and contrast AF interrupt capturing decisive moments.
Street
Street shooters will appreciate the Panasonic TS10’s compact form and discreet operation over the Pentax’s slightly chunkier body. Its waterproof build additionally means you can get creative shots in rain or near water. Both manage low light poorly, but the TS10’s stabilizer helps at slower shutter speeds.
Macro
Pentax clearly leads with a closer minimum focusing distance and sensor-shift stabilization aiding sharp close-ups. The TS10’s 10cm minimum focus restricts macro potential.
Night & Astro
High ISO results from both cameras show marked noise and detail loss beyond ISO 400–800. Neither is optimized for night or astro photography. Lack of manual exposure modes or bulb mode hampers long exposures.
Video
Both offer HD 720p video at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format with no audio inputs, no 4K, and limited video features. Stabilization aids handheld shots. Pentax supports 15 fps variants for slow-motion but picture quality is modest overall.
Travel
If you want a camera for varied travel, the TS10’s weather sealing and shock resistance are compelling for durability. Battery life info isn’t listed for the Panasonic (common for waterproof compacts) - expect moderate endurance. The Pentax claims 178 shots per charge, typical for cameras of similar design.
Ergonomics, Connectivity, and Usability
Both cameras feature 2.7-inch fixed LCDs at 230k resolution and lack viewfinders, making eye-level shooting impossible. Panasonic’s control scheme is basic; no touch, no illuminated buttons. Pentax offers manual focus (a nice touch if you crave control) but no exposure modes beyond automatic. Neither supports advanced wireless connections other than Optional Eye-Fi card compatibility on the Pentax; no Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or NFC.
USB 2.0 connectivity is present on both, but no HDMI out.
Battery types vary: Panasonic details are lacking, but the Pentax uses a proprietary D-LI92 pack.
Reliability and Value
When assessing value, the TS10 commands about $249, and the Pentax RZ10 averages around $200. Given their similar sensor specs, the deciding factor boils down to intended use.
-
For rugged outdoor adventures, water sports, or hazardous environments - Panasonic Lumix TS10 is worth the premium. Its toughness outclasses the Pentax.
-
For everyday photography that benefits from wide to super-telephoto zoom, better macro, and a slightly better screen - Pentax Optio RZ10 offers more creative latitude for less money.
My overall ratings put these perspectives into numbers:
Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown
I further tackled their scores across genres to provide clearer guidance:
Notice where each camera shines and where compromises appear - an invaluable visual if you’re weighing priorities like landscape detail, macro definition, or street shooting portability.
What Would I Use Each For?
If I were preparing for a beach trip, kayaking, or snow hike where gear durability is king, the Panasonic TS10 goes in my pack without hesitation. Its waterproofing alone is priceless for worry-free shooting.
If I’m taking an urban stroll or family gathering where zoom flexibility and macro shots matter, the Pentax RZ10 is my choice. The manual focus is a pleasant surprise and its zoom breadth lets me capture wide group shots and tight details alike.
Wrapping Up: Which One Should You Choose?
Both cameras excel in modest yet different niches:
-
Choose Panasonic TS10 if rugged durability and basic all-weather shooting capability is your priority. It’s simple, tough, and works well for snapshots in harsh environments.
-
Choose Pentax RZ10 if you want more creative framing, macro capability, a marginally brighter and larger zoom lens, and a better screen, but don’t require waterproofing.
For enthusiasts or professionals seeking flexibility, neither camera will replace an advanced mirrorless or DSLR - but as a secondary compact for specific uses, they each offer practical value.
Either way, understanding your shooting priorities will serve you better than specs alone. Hopefully, this deep dive clarifies these two cameras’ distinct personalities and strengths to help you pick your compact companion wisely.
Happy shooting!
Panasonic TS10 vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Panasonic | Pentax |
Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
Also called | Lumix DMC-FT10 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-01-21 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Venus Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.90 m | 2.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 188 grams (0.41 lb) | 178 grams (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 63 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 178 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $249 | $200 |