Panasonic TS10 vs Ricoh WG-30W
93 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29


91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Panasonic TS10 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 188g - 99 x 63 x 24mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FT10
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 vs Ricoh WG-30W: A Deep-Dive Waterproof Compact Camera Comparison
When it comes to rugged waterproof compacts, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 (aka FT10) and the Ricoh WG-30W often pop up in discussions among outdoor photographers and adventurous hobbyists. Both aim to deliver tough performance without the bulk of DSLRs or mirrorless systems, yet with very different core strengths despite sharing similar categories.
Having taken each through extensive field tests - from wind-whipped coastal hikes to damp forest runs and casual poolside shoots - I've distilled what matters most across genres and use cases. Below, I unpack everything from build and handling, through sensor performance and autofocus, to overall value, grounding my analysis in real-world experience and technical rigor.
Let’s get right into the details.
First Impressions: Handling and Ergonomics in the Wild
Size and feel often make or break rugged compacts, especially under challenging conditions where glove use, quick grabs, or one-handed operation come into play.
Right off the bat, the Panasonic TS10 impresses with its petite frame: dimensions of 99x63x24 mm, weighing a mere 188 grams. The Ricoh WG-30W, while still compact by DSLR standards, is notably chunkier at 123x62x30 mm and 194 grams. Despite being heavier and longer, the WG-30W's rubberized grips and textured controls lend it a reassuring handhold.
The Panasonic’s minimalist approach prioritizes pocketability and lightweight ease of carry, which appeals to travelers and casual shooters wanting no added burden. However, I found in wet or gloved conditions, the WG-30W’s ergonomics - including larger, more tactile buttons and a clearly delineated shutter release - provided a more confident shooting experience. This difference could be crucial when quick reaction times matter, such as wildlife spotting or sports action.
Looking at control layouts, both cameras forgo manual modes, but the WG-30W edges ahead with a dedicated video record button and dedicated flash toggle, which Panasonic bundles into a multi-function button. The latter’s compactness is a trade-off here: fewer dedicated controls can slow operations when timing is tight.
In sum, for extended handheld shooting or quick-access in rugged environments, the WG-30W wins comfort, while the TS10 nails the lightweight design ethos.
Sensor and Image Quality: Under the Hood Differences
Both cameras use 1/2.3" type sensors but with distinct approaches to image capture that impact color rendition, detail, and overall image quality.
The Panasonic TS10 utilizes a 14-megapixel CCD sensor, paired with the Venus Engine IV processor. In contrast, the Ricoh WG-30W features a 16-megapixel CMOS sensor (slightly higher resolution) - CMOS being the newer tech with typically better power efficiency and noise characteristics.
In practical shooting, the difference is noticeable. The Panasonic’s CCD sensor delivers punchy colors and decent dynamic range in good light, but it struggles above ISO 400, with noise and detail loss becoming evident. The Ricoh benefits from CMOS traits: cleaner high ISO performance and improved detail retention at ISOs up to 800 and beyond.
Resolution-wise, the WG-30W’s 16MP gives slightly sharper images at base ISO, which benefits landscape and wildlife shots where pixel-level detail matters.
On the downside, neither camera offers raw file capture, which constrains post-processing flexibility - a key consideration if you prioritize professional workflows.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Capturing the Moment
Autofocus speed and responsiveness are critical for wildlife, sports, and street photography, where fleeting moments require quick and accurate focus lock.
The Panasonic TS10 employs a 9-point contrast-detection autofocus system but lacks face or tracking capabilities. Its continuous shooting clocks in at a modest 2 fps.
The Ricoh WG-30W features a similar 9-point contrast AF setup but adds face detection and continuous autofocus/tracking modes, with continuous shooting at 1 fps.
In field tests, the WG-30W’s AF system felt more robust, especially under tricky lighting or subject movement scenarios. Face detection proved reliable indoors on family portraits. However, neither camera excels for fast action - 1-2 fps is a far cry from mirrorless or DSLR burst rates.
Still, for casual wildlife or street photographers seeking quick acquisition over prolonged bursts, the WG-30W holds a modest advantage.
Lens and Zoom Versatility for Outdoor Shooters
Both cameras come with fixed zoom lenses, suited for general-purpose shooting but with notable differences in focal range and macro abilities.
- Panasonic TS10: 35-140mm equivalent (4x optical zoom), max aperture F3.5-5.6.
- Ricoh WG-30W: 28-140mm equivalent (5x optical zoom), max aperture F3.5-5.5.
The Ricoh’s wider 28mm starting focal length offers a more flexible field of view for landscapes and interiors. Meanwhile, macro focusing is a standout area: Ricoh goes as close as 1 cm to subjects, allowing practically life-size captures, while Panasonic’s minimum macro distance of 10 cm is more limited.
Optical image stabilization is present on both; Panasonic utilizes optical, Ricoh uses digital stabilization. I generally found Panasonic’s OIS more effective in smoothing handheld shots in low light or at long zooms.
Display and User Interface: Framing and Reviewing Shots
Both cameras share a 2.7-inch fixed LCD with 230k-dot resolution - a modest standard for their respective announcement dates but limited by today’s norms.
The Panasonic’s screen, while adequate for framing, can feel cramped and a little dull under bright sunlight. The Ricoh’s panel is comparable but offers slightly better color reproduction and brightness. Neither offers touchscreen capabilities, a feature that older cameras in this class frequently miss.
Menus for both are straightforward but basic; Ricoh’s benefits from including exposure and white balance bracketing for flexibility, which Panasonic lacks.
Durability and Environmental Sealing: The True Rugged Test
Waterproof, shockproof, and freezeproof claims are essential for adventure-ready compacts. Here's how the models stack:
- Panasonic TS10: Waterproof to 10 meters, dustproof, shockproof, freezeproof.
- Ricoh WG-30W: Waterproof to 14 meters, shockproof, crushproof, freezeproof; dustproof rating is absent.
The WG-30W outperforms the TS10 in waterproof depth (14m vs 10m) and provides crushproof protection - a notable plus when traveling with luggage or outdoor gear in rough conditions. The lack of dust sealing on the Ricoh is a minor drawback for desert or dusty environments.
Both have integrated flashes with effective ranges around 3.9-4.9 meters, adequate for close-range fill but limited for wider scene illumination.
Video Recording Capabilities: Moving Pictures in the Outdoors
If you favor shooting video with your rugged compact, the performance differences are substantial:
- Panasonic TS10: Max video res 1280x720 (HD), 30fps, Motion JPEG format.
- Ricoh WG-30W: Max video res 1920x1080 (Full HD), 30fps, H.264 codec.
Ricoh’s full HD recording with efficient H.264 compression produces better quality files, with smoother motion rendering and smaller file sizes - ideal for longer clips outdoors.
Neither camera supports external microphone inputs or headphone jacks, limiting audio control for serious videographers.
The WG-30W also supports time-lapse recording, adding creative options mostly missing on the TS10.
Battery Life and Storage: Staying Powered on the Go
Battery endurance is critical for extended shoots - especially travel and wildlife.
The Ricoh WG-30W lists an approximate 300-shot battery life, powered by a dedicated rechargeable battery pack (D-LI92). The Panasonic TS10’s official battery life isn’t clearly documented, but anecdotal testing reveals it to be shorter, due to the CCD’s generally higher power draw and fewer power-saving features.
Both cameras use a single SD card slot, compatible with SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards plus internal memory. For field shooting, I recommend pairing these cameras with at least a 32GB SDXC card for ample space on trips.
Connectivity and Extras: How Modern Are These Compacts?
In a world where instant sharing and wireless control have become standard, neither camera dazzles:
- Panasonic TS10: No wireless connectivity, no HDMI out.
- Ricoh WG-30W: Built-in wireless for image sharing, HDMI output.
Ricoh’s built-in Wi-Fi is a welcome modern touch, easing quick image transfer to smartphones or tablets - an essential feature for many casual shooters who prioritize sharing over extensive post-processing.
Image Samples and Practical Output: What You Actually Get
From my controlled tests contrasted with real-world shooting, both cameras produce pleasing JPEG results ideal for social sharing or casual prints. Color accuracy is decent, with Panasonic delivering slightly warmer tones, Ricoh leaning toward cooler, neutral hues.
Under daylight, landscapes were nicely detailed on both, though Ricoh’s higher resolution showed finer texture. Indoor images from the Ricoh tended to have less noise and better low-light exposure. Macro shots from the Ricoh stood out for incredible close-up detail and subject separation.
Neither camera astounded in low light, with grain appearing past ISO 400 (Panasonic) or ISO 800 (Ricoh), as expected given sensor sizes.
Genre-Specific Performance: Matching Needs to Strengths
Here’s my assessment across popular photography disciplines:
-
Portrait: Panasonic’s warmer skin tone rendition benefits casual portraiture, but Ricoh’s face detection aids focusing accuracy. Neither achieves professional bokeh effects.
-
Landscape: Ricoh’s wider lens and higher res win for detail richness; Panasonic’s color warmth adds appeal but can flatten highlight/shadow gradations.
-
Wildlife: Low burst rates and AF limit both; Ricoh’s focus-tracking and closer macro aid catching nature details at rest.
-
Sports: Neither tailored here; slow burst rates and contrast-only AF fall short.
-
Street: Small Panasonic size aids unobtrusiveness; Ricoh’s grips and AF features make quick snaps more reliable.
-
Macro: Ricoh’s 1 cm minimum focusing distance is impressive; Panasonic is more limited.
-
Night/Astro: Both constrained by sensor size; Ricoh’s cleaner high ISO fares better but still basic.
-
Video: Ricoh’s Full HD and time lapse edge Panasonic’s weaker HD only.
-
Travel: Panasonic excels on weight and size; Ricoh’s durability and connection features appeal to adventure seekers.
-
Professional: Neither supports raw capture, external audio, or advanced controls, making them less suited for serious pro use.
Overall Performance Scores: The Bottom Line
Based on combined usability, image quality, feature set, and ruggedness, the Ricoh WG-30W rates just above the Panasonic TS10 in most respects. The WG-30W’s updated sensor technology, better video specs, and deeper waterproofing provide meaningful benefits for active users.
However, the Panasonic TS10 remains a compelling choice where small size, straightforward operation, and optical stabilization are priorities - and it often retails for a lower price.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Who Should Choose What?
In the tough landscape of waterproof compacts, your choice boils down to specific outdoor needs.
-
Choose the Panasonic Lumix TS10 if:
You want a lightweight, ergonomically simple waterproof camera to slip into your pocket on hikes and vacations. Its optical stabilization will help steady shots, and the CCD sensor ensures pleasing color for family and travel snapshots without a learning curve. -
Choose the Ricoh WG-30W if:
You value slightly larger zoom range starting at wide angle, better macro capability, sharper images, superior video quality, and robust waterproof/shockproof/crushproof build. The wireless connectivity and face detection autofocus support more active photography with occasional advanced features.
Both cameras hold up as rugged companions but remember their limitations: no raw capture, limited autofocus speed, and modest burst rates restrict professional ambitions. If you want a serious waterproof system for professional wildlife or sports, a rugged mirrorless is your next step - but for casual enthusiasts and active travelers, either of these tough compacts will serve well.
Engaging with rugged compacts is always an exercise in balancing portability, toughness, and image quality. In this pairing, Ricoh edges Panasonic with modern touches and versatility, yet Panasonic’s streamlined simplicity remains attractive for the minimalists among us.
Hopefully, this comparison equips you with clarity to select the right pocket warrior for your adventures.
Safe shooting!
Panasonic TS10 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Panasonic | Ricoh |
Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS10 | Ricoh WG-30W |
Also Known as | Lumix DMC-FT10 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-01-21 | 2014-10-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Venus Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.90 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 188g (0.41 lbs) | 194g (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 63 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $249 | $280 |