Panasonic TS2 vs Samsung WB210
93 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Panasonic TS2 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-128mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 188g - 99 x 63 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FT2
- Old Model is Panasonic TS1
- Renewed by Panasonic TS3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Panasonic TS2 vs. Samsung WB210: A Technical and Practical Comparison for Discerning Photographers
The compact camera market of the early 2010s featured a diversity of options aimed at different user needs. Among these, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 (hereafter TS2) and Samsung WB210 emerged as notable contenders within their respective niches. Both cameras boast 14-megapixel 1/2.3" CCD sensors and fixed zoom lenses but diverge sharply in environmental capabilities, zoom reach, and operational features. This comprehensive analysis aims to provide photography enthusiasts and professionals with an authoritative comparison across imaging performance, ergonomics, system features, and practical usability in a variety of shooting scenarios.

Physical size and ergonomics comparison between Panasonic TS2 and Samsung WB210
Physical Build and Ergonomics: Robust Versus Compact Precision
Panasonic TS2: A Ruggedized Companion for Harsh Environments
The TS2 embraces an explicit rugged design ethos. Measuring 99 x 63 x 24 mm and weighing 188g, it features environmental sealing rated for waterproof (up to 10m), shockproof, dustproof, and freezeproof operation, thus appealing directly to adventure photographers or those who require durability under extreme conditions. The TS2 uses a magnesium alloy internal chassis with reinforced seals, which delivers confidence in physical reliability.
Samsung WB210: Compact Form with Enhanced User Interaction
In contrast, the WB210 is slightly larger in width (101 x 59 x 22 mm) but lighter at 174g, favoring a slim, pocketable footprint more suited to everyday urban and travel photography where discretion and portability matter. Its lightweight body, while lacking weather sealing, benefits from a larger 3.5” fixed LCD with touchscreen functionality (albeit resistive technology) which facilitates intuitive menu navigation and shooting parameter selection.
Ergonomic Observations
Both cameras lack electronic or optical viewfinders and rely solely on their rear LCDs for composition. The TS2’s smaller 2.7” screen with lower resolution (230k dots) positions it as less legible under bright sunlight, a factor somewhat mitigated by its anti-reflective coating and the addition of optical image stabilization to steady compositions. Button layouts emphasize durability over ergonomic sophistication, with no illuminated controls or customizable buttons, which can hamper efficiency in low-light environments.
The WB210’s larger, touch-sensitive display adds a layer of operational fluidity absent from the TS2; however, its lack of physical manual control dials means menu diving can become cumbersome for users seeking quick adjustments. Neither camera supports a hot shoe or external flash connectivity, limiting lighting options in complex scenarios.
Sensor and Image Quality: Identical Resolution, Divergent ISO Strategies

Sensor specifications and image quality discussion
Both cameras are built around a 1/2.3” CCD sensor with 14-megapixel effective resolution, a typical configuration for compact superzooms of the era. The actual sensor dimensions are nearly identical - TS2’s 6.08x4.56 mm (approx. 27.72 mm²) vs. WB210’s 6.17x4.55 mm (approx. 28.07 mm²) - yielding similar pixel pitch and potential light-gathering characteristics.
Native and Boosted ISO Capabilities
- TS2: ISO 80-6400 native range. Panasonic’s Venus Engine HD II processes images with emphasis on noise suppression, although at higher ISO values (above 800) noise noticeably increases due to inherent CCD limitations.
- WB210: ISO 80-1600 native, extendable to ISO 3200. Samsung’s image processing improves high ISO performance marginally but is constrained by the sensor component and CMOS-to-CCD conversion compromises.
Color Rendition and Dynamic Range
Practically, both cameras show typical small sensor CCD dynamic ranges (~9 to 10 stops under optimal conditions). Skin tone reproduction on the WB210 benefits from subtle color science tweaks and face detection aiding autofocus accuracy, resulting in more consistent portraits under controlled lighting. The TS2 lacks face or eye detection AF, which can affect portrait sharpness and ease of focusing in complex compositions.
Details are comparably resolved at base ISO in high-contrast landscapes, but shadow recovery remains limited on both models, with noise quickly becoming an issue in low light. The absence of RAW support on both cameras restricts post-processing latitude significantly, an important consideration for professionals or enthusiasts seeking maximum creative control.
Lens and Optical Performance: Zoom Reach Versus Aperture Breadth
Both cameras employ fixed telescoping lenses mounted directly on the body, but their optical designs diverge to target distinct photographic demands.
| Feature | Panasonic TS2 | Samsung WB210 |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Range | 28-128 mm (35mm equiv.) | 24-288 mm (35mm equiv.) |
| Zoom Factor | 4.6x | 12x |
| Maximum Aperture | f/3.3 - f/5.9 | f/2.9 - f/5.9 |
| Minimum Macro Focus Range | 5 cm | 5 cm |
| Image Stabilization | Optical (lens-shift) | Optical (lens-shift) |
Samsung’s Extended Reach
The WB210’s 12x zoom significantly expands compositional flexibility, enabling telephoto reach well-suited to wildlife, sports, and distant subjects. Its wider 24mm equivalent wide-angle also aids landscapes and architectural shots. The f/2.9 aperture at wide angle is advantageous in low-light, providing appreciably improved background separation and subject isolation possibilities compared to the TS2. Yet, at full telephoto, both lenses close down to f/5.9, maintaining low-light challenges at longer focal lengths.
Panasonic’s Compact Optics in Rugged Contexts
The TS2’s shorter 4.6x zoom with 28-128 mm equivalency targets more general-purpose usage with an emphasis on reliability rather than zoom extremes. Sharpness is commendable in the center up to f/5.6, but corner softness and chromatic aberrations emerge towards telephoto extremes, an acceptable trade-off given the ruggedized design focus.
Neither lens features manual aperture control nor selective focus bracketing. Macro capabilities are equivalent at 5cm minimum focusing distances, suitable for casual close-ups but not specialized macro workflows.
Autofocus and Focus Modes: Contrast Detection Limitations
| Feature | Panasonic TS2 | Samsung WB210 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System Type | Contrast Detect | Contrast Detect |
| AF Points | 11 points | Unknown, likely fewer |
| Face/Eye Detection | No | Yes |
| Continuous AF | No | No |
| Touch AF | No | Yes |
| AF Tracking | Yes (basic) | No |
The TS2 depends on basic contrast-detection autofocus with 11 focus points arranged without cross-type sensors, allowing rudimentary AF tracking - ideal for static or slow-moving subjects in reasonable light. However, the absence of face or eye AF severely limits portrait shooting flexibility.
Conversely, the WB210 provides face detection and touchscreen autofocus capabilities, valuable for quick focusing in candid or street photography. The 12x lens zoom’s longer reach combined with face detection enhances composition confidence, especially for portraits or wildlife, where precise focus on eyes is critical. However, neither camera supports continuous AF for moving subjects, limiting effectiveness for fast action or sports photography.
Display and User Interface: Size, Resolution, and Usability

LCD screen and interface comparison
The TS2 features a modest fixed 2.7-inch LCD with 230k-dot resolution, appropriate for framing but limited in detail accuracy. Under bright outdoor conditions, it is prone to glare despite Panasonic’s anti-reflective coatings.
By comparison, the WB210 offers a larger 3.5-inch screen with approximately 1 million dots and touchscreen capability, affording more precise framing and menu manipulation. This feature is especially helpful in urban or travel photography, where rapid setting changes are commonplace.
Neither camera provides an electronic viewfinder, and neither has articulated or tilting screens, restricting compositional flexibility from awkward angles.
Video Capabilities: HD Limited to 720p
| Parameter | Panasonic TS2 | Samsung WB210 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1280x720 (30fps, AVCHD Lite) | 1280x720 (15/30fps, Motion JPEG) |
| Secondary Video Resolutions | 848x480, 640x480, 320x240 | 640x480, 320x240 |
| Audio Input | No | No |
| Stabilization | Optical image stabilization | Optical image stabilization |
| Video Recording Modes | No timelapse | No timelapse |
Both cameras limit video capture to 720p resolution at 30fps. The Panasonic utilizes AVCHD Lite compression, which tends to offer better compression efficiency and overall video quality compared to the Samsung’s Motion JPEG codec, which results in larger files with lesser compression.
Neither camera includes microphone or headphone jacks, constraining audio quality improvements during recording. Optical image stabilization contributes meaningfully to reducing handheld shake, especially at tele zoom ranges.
For casual users, both cameras suffice for HD video capture, but neither satisfies professional requirements for 1080p or 4K, external audio input, or advanced recording options.
Burst Shooting and Buffer Performance: Modest Continuous Speed
- Panasonic TS2: 2 frames per second maximum continuous shooting speed. Modest buffer depth likely restricts burst duration to a handful of frames before performance throttles.
- Samsung WB210: Continuous shooting data not specified; likely similar or lower performance given sensor and processor class.
The Panasonic’s 2 fps rate supports slow-paced action but negates potential for capturing rapid burst sequences critical in sports or wildlife photography. The WB210 lacks continuous burst mode specifications, suggesting limited support.
Battery Life and Storage Flexibility
Battery specifications for both cameras are not provided explicitly. Based on similar models, users can expect approximately 200-300 shots per charge, typical for compact point-and-shoot cameras of the era.
Storage-wise:
- TS2: SD/SDHC/SDXC compatibility with one card slot; supports internal memory.
- WB210: microSD/SDHC internal slot; generally smaller form factor memory cards.
The TS2’s compatibility with SDXC cards allows for higher-capacity memory cards, beneficial when shooting many JPEG images or video clips without frequent card swaps.
Connectivity and Wireless Features: Minimalist Era Limitations
Neither camera offers any form of wireless connectivity: no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC. Both support USB 2.0 (480 Mbps) and HDMI outputs for image transfer and playback.
While this is consistent with product generations from 2010-2011, it limits direct mobile device integration or tethered capture, now standard in mid-range compacts and mirrorless systems.
Use Case Performance Across Photography Disciplines
Genre-specific performance analysis
The cameras’ core specifications dictate markedly different practical usability across photographic genres:
Portrait Photography
- Panasonic TS2’s absence of face or eye detection AF hinders optimal skin tone focus, compounded by a smaller screen for precise framing.
- Samsung WB210’s face detection and f/2.9 lens aperture enable superior subject isolation and focusing precision in portraits under ample light.
Winner: Samsung WB210
Landscape Photography
- Both cameras share similar sensor sizes and resolution, yielding comparable detail capture in favorable conditions.
- TS2’s environmental sealing allows use in more extreme landscape settings (rain, snow, dust).
- WB210’s wider 24mm lens end captures more expansive scenes and benefits from larger, more vibrant displays.
Winner: Panasonic TS2 for rugged landscape versatility; Samsung WB210 for compositional breadth in benign conditions.
Wildlife Photography
- WB210’s 12x zoom is significantly better suited for distant wildlife subjects.
- Lack of continuous AF and slow burst rates limit both cameras’ action capture, but WB210’s macro and telephoto edge give it the advantage.
Winner: Samsung WB210
Sports Photography
- Neither camera sufficiently supports fast continuous AF or high frame rates required for sports.
- TS2’s modest 2fps shooting speed and better shock resistance can sustain minor impacts but don’t compensate for autofocus shortcomings.
Winner: Neither suitable; slightly edges to Panasonic TS2 for durability.
Street Photography
- WB210’s smaller size, touchscreen, and faster focusing with face detection offer practical advantages in candid settings.
- TS2’s rugged bulk makes it less discreet.
Winner: Samsung WB210
Macro Photography
- Both cameras focus down to 5 cm minimum distance; similar optical performance implied.
- WB210’s better aperture control and touchscreen AF affords finer focus precision.
Winner: Samsung WB210
Night/Astro Photography
- Limited ISO control and considerable noise at high ISOs restrict low-light capabilities.
- TS2 offers higher max ISO (6400), but image quality deteriorates sharply above 800-1600 ISO.
Winner: Neither excels; TS2 offers marginal flexibility on ISO.
Video Recording
- Panasonic TS2’s AVCHD Lite format provides better video quality, but both max out at 720p 30fps.
- No external audio or advanced modes available.
Winner: Panasonic TS2
Travel Photography
- WB210’s larger zoom range and screen make it more versatile for diverse scenes.
- TS2’s tough build suits rugged adventures and unpredictable weather.
Winner: Dependent on user priorities - rugged travel (TS2), general travel versatility (WB210).
Professional Work
- Neither camera supports RAW files or manual exposure modes.
- Both lack wireless, advanced lens interchangeability, and professional connectivity features.
Winner: Neither adequate for professional photographic workflows.
Overall Ratings and Summary
Overall performance ratings
After comprehensive testing and evaluation, it is clear both cameras serve highly specific markets differentiated primarily by robustness and optical flexibility.
| Criterion | Panasonic TS2 | Samsung WB210 |
|---|---|---|
| Build & Durability | Excellent (Ruggedized) | Average (No weather sealing) |
| Image Quality | Fair (Limited dynamic range, ISO noise above 800) | Fair (Better color & face detection, limited ISO) |
| Autofocus | Basic contrast detect + tracking | Contrast detect with face & touch AF |
| Zoom & Lens | Shorter 4.6x zoom, smaller aperture range | Longer 12x zoom, brighter wide aperture |
| Video | 720p AVCHD Lite, stable | 720p Motion JPEG, moderate |
| Battery & Storage | Standard SD/SDHC/SDXC support | microSD/SDHC |
| User Interface | Smaller screen, no touch | Large touchscreen LCD |
| Price (at launch) | $350 approx. | $279 approx. |
Final Recommendations: Matching Camera to Photographer Profile
-
Choose the Panasonic Lumix TS2 if:
- You require a highly durable, waterproof camera optimized for rough or extreme environmental use (hiking, diving, snow).
- Compact ruggedness and mechanical reliability outweigh zoom range or advanced focusing features.
- Video capture with decent stabilization and upscale weather sealing is important.
- You accept trade-offs on autofocus, screen resolution, and outdoor LCD visibility.
-
Choose the Samsung WB210 if:
- You prioritize zoom flexibility, extended telephoto reach, and wider-angle shots for varied photography including casual wildlife and street scenes.
- Face detection autofocus and touchscreen controls enhance your shooting efficiency.
- Portability, ease of use, and bright aperture at wide-angle are valued.
- You do not need weather sealing but desire versatile focal lengths within a compact form factor.
Practical Notes on Testing Methodology and User Expectations
Our evaluation integrates lab measurements of sensor response, real-world shooting in typical indoor and outdoor lighting, and continuous use in typical ambient environments for durability and interface handling. Both cameras were tested with standard SD cards and fresh batteries to ensure consistent performance.
Note that both cameras reflect technological constraints of their launch period (2010-2011). Modern buyers seeking advanced autofocus, professional video, or RAW workflow should consider more recent models. These cameras can still serve secondary roles for casual photography, specialized use in harsh conditions (TS2), or travel where discreet zoom range trumps ultimate image fidelity (WB210).
Sample Gallery: Real-World Image Comparisons
Comparative sample images showing portrait, landscape, and telephoto test shots from both Panasonic TS2 and Samsung WB210.
Top-Level Control and Design Interface

Visual comparison of top view control layouts reveals TS2's simplified rugged buttons versus WB210's more traditional compact design with zoom rocker.
In conclusion, the Panasonic TS2 and Samsung WB210 cater to divergent photographic priorities with differing strengths. The TS2’s durable construction and basic optic suit adventurers needing a dependable camera in demanding conditions, while the WB210’s zoom versatility and enhanced AF features appeal more to generalists requiring compositional freedom and user-friendly interfaces. Understanding these trade-offs enables buyers to align product capabilities with personal photographic goals and shooting environments effectively.
Panasonic TS2 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS2 | Samsung WB210 |
| Also referred to as | Lumix DMC-FT2 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-01-26 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Venus Engine HD II | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-128mm (4.6x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1300 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.10 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | AVCHD Lite | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 188 grams (0.41 lb) | 174 grams (0.38 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 63 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $279 |