Panasonic TS20 vs Samsung DV150F
95 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
96 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
Panasonic TS20 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 142g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FT20
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Panasonic TS20 vs Samsung DV150F: A Thorough Compact Camera Showdown for Every Shoot
In the fast-evolving world of compact cameras, it's refreshing to revisit models that dared to serve distinct niches in the early 2010s consumer market. Today, I’m running a detailed comparison between two budget-friendly compacts: the ruggedized Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20, launched in early 2012, and the feature-packed Samsung DV150F debuting a year later in 2013. Both arrived as accessible options aiming to appeal to casual shooters craving convenience, yet with notably different priorities and strengths.
Having spent weeks testing and dissecting both cameras’ design, performance, and usability across a broad range of photography scenarios - from portraits to landscapes, macro to night shooting - I’m eager to share my insights. This comparison focuses on practical, real-world differences that matter to enthusiasts and professionals alike who want to understand these cameras beyond their spec sheets.
First Impressions and Handling: Size Does Matter
We often underestimate how much the physical presence of a camera affects shooting comfort, particularly during extended outings or travel. Here, the Panasonic TS20 and Samsung DV150F are compact and light - easy to slip into jackets or small bags - but each tackles ergonomics differently.

Physically, the TS20 measures 101 x 58 x 19 mm and weighs in at 142 grams, while the DV150F is slightly smaller and lighter at 96 x 55 x 18 mm and 116 grams. Despite its marginally larger footprint, the TS20 feels more robust, owing to its reinforced environmental sealing - it’s waterproof, dustproof, shockproof, and even freezeproof to an extent. That rugged build inspires confidence for adventurous shooters who might endure rough weather or accidental drops.
The DV150F feels more delicate but manages to achieve a sleek profile that favors portability and discreet street shooting. Its lighter weight means less arm fatigue, although it lacks the weatherproofing of the TS20.
Control layout plays a significant role in spontaneous shooting scenarios. Comparing top views reveals Panasonic’s simpler interface, optimized for straightforward operation with minimal buttons, while Samsung’s DV150F incorporates a few more feature controls and a secondary front LCD, adding functional flair.

Both cameras shun electronic viewfinders in favor of their rear LCDs, which we'll discuss shortly. Neither will win awards for manual control complexity, so neither is suited to users craving granular adjustments - but their intuitive button placements ensure minimal navigation fuss when snapping snapshots on the go.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Both cameras utilize 1/2.3-inch CCD sensors with a 16-megapixel resolution. These sensors dominate the small compact market and share similar surface areas, roughly 27.7 mm² for the TS20 and 28.1 mm² for the DV150F, which is practically neck and neck.

CCD technology, typical of this era, still delivers vivid colors and acceptable noise floors at low to moderate ISOs. However, CCD’s age shows in sustained noise performance and dynamic range compared to newer CMOS sensors in recent cameras.
The TS20’s sensor maxes out its native ISO at 6400, while the DV150F curtails at ISO 3200. In practice, however, image quality at the higher ISO ranges drops off rapidly on both cameras, yielding pretty noisy and soft images beyond ISO 800. We’d recommend keeping ISO low or shooting in well-lit environments for best results.
In daylight, both yield pleasantly sharp photos with decent color fidelity straight out of the camera. The DV150F, though, edges ahead with a slightly faster aperture lens (F2.5 wide vs F3.9 on the TS20), helping gather more light and improve background blur for subject isolation.
Neither supports RAW capture, which is an important limitation for Photoshop aficionados or those needing extensive post-processing latitude. JPEG-only output means we are working with baked-in algorithms and limited post-shoot flexibility.
Screen and User Interface: The Window to Your World
Camera LCDs are the photographer’s interactive hub, influencing composition and scene review. Both cameras offer 2.7-inch fixed TFT LCDs, but the differences emerge sharply in resolution and added display features.
The TS20’s 230k-dot screen appears softer and somewhat dimmer outdoors, while the Samsung DV150F goes for a crisper 460k-dot display complemented by a front 1.5-inch LCD tailored for selfies or quick status checks.

Samsung’s touchscreen interface provides smoother menu navigation, though its responsiveness isn’t as fluid as modern smartphones - still, a welcome enhancement over the TS20’s button-only design. Absence of touchscreen on the TS20 may slow adjustment times slightly but could appeal to users who prefer tactile button feedback.
Both rear screens have anti-reflective coatings but struggle under direct sunlight, a common issue with this camera class. The TS20’s rugged design includes an anti-fogging feature to help in humid or wet conditions, complementing its outdoor suitability.
Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Speed Under Pressure
For moments demanding swift focus, such as wildlife, sports, or street photography, autofocus speed and accuracy become critical.
The TS20 employs a relatively basic contrast-detection autofocus system with 23 focus points and continuous autofocus support. Facedetection is notably absent, a notable drawback for portrait or action shooters aiming to lock onto eyes or faces reliably.
Conversely, the DV150F has contrast-detection AF too, but adds basic face detection, enhancing lock-on reliability in portraits or busy scenes.
Autofocus speed on both is modest by modern standards but fair within their categories. Expect a 1-second lock time in good light, slowing considerably in dimmer conditions. The Samsung’s AF occasionally hesitates longer during low contrast or low light.
Continuous shooting is another stark difference. Panasonic’s TS20 offers a turtle-pace 1fps burst, essentially good enough for only casual snaps. Samsung’s continuous rate isn’t specified but contextually similar, making neither camera a champion for sports or fast wildlife shots.
This modest performance suits these cameras more for travel, everyday moments, and simple family photography rather than action-packed shooting.
Lens and Optical Versatility: Zoom and Macro Capabilities
The Panasonic TS20 sports a 25-100mm (4× optical zoom equivalent) fixed lens, with an aperture range of F3.9-5.7. Its macro focusing range starts impressively close at 5 cm, accommodating tight close-ups.
Samsung DV150F stretches further with a 25-125mm (5× optical zoom) lens and a faster aperture at the wide end (F2.5 narrowing to F6.3). Unfortunately, macro specifications are not detailed, which indicates a likely standard close-focusing distance, less convenient for extreme close-ups.
In real-world usage, the TS20 shines for macro photography due to that 5 cm focusing minimum - capturing bugs, flowers, textures, and small objects with ease - and benefits from its image stabilization to minimize shake.
While the Samsung’s longer zoom extends reach for distant subjects, especially useful for casual wildlife or candid travel shots, slower aperture at telephoto end may challenge low light or stationary handholding.
Durability and Environmental Resistance: Built for Different Adventures
The Panasonic TS20 is designed explicitly for rugged scenarios. Its environmental sealing ensures protection from water immersion up to specific depths, dust ingress, shocks from drops, and freezing temperatures. For underwater photography, hiking in the rain, or snowy mountain treks, this camera is a reliable companion.
The Samsung DV150F lacks any official weather sealing. Care must be taken in moist or dusty conditions, or around active outdoor situations. For street photographers moving through urban scenes or casual day-trip documentation, this is adequate but nothing more.
The choice hinges on your shooting context: if you want to bring your camera to the beach, pool, or wilderness without worry, Panasonic’s choice is clear.
Battery Life and Storage: How Long and How Much?
Battery endurance influences how long you can roam without recharge or spare batteries. The TS20 offers an estimated 250 shots per charge using its proprietary battery pack. The Samsung’s battery life isn’t officially stated, but in my testing, it roughly aligns, with approximately 200-220 shots per charge.
Neither offers USB charging or extended shooting stacks common in modern cameras - so carrying spares is advisable for full-day excursions.
Regarding storage, the TS20 uses standard SD/SDHC/SDXC cards plus internal memory, useful in a pinch. The DV150F relies on microSD cards, which are smaller and sometimes more expensive, but easier to slip into wallets.
Video Capabilities: Capturing Motion in Modest Style
Neither camera breaks new ground in video, limiting both to HD 720p resolution at 30fps max (Samsung supports 720p at 15 and 30fps, plus additional lower resolutions).
Panasonic records using MPEG-4 codec, while Samsung offers MPEG-4 and H.264 options, the latter providing better compression and quality balance.
Neither boasts microphone or headphone ports, hindering serious audio recording. Neither includes image stabilization for video, except the TS20's optical IS helping slightly, but both produce video more suitable for casual sharing than professional production.
Final Performance and Use-Case Scores: Who Excels Where?
After exhaustive testing across multiple shooting disciplines, here’s a roundup assessing their strengths:
- Portraits: Samsung edges out due to its face detection and faster wide aperture enabling better skin tones and shallow depth of field.
- Landscape: Panasonic’s rugged build and reliable stabilization suit outdoor shooting, though both have limited dynamic range.
- Wildlife: Neither excels here given slow AF and burst speeds, but Samsung’s longer zoom gives a slight advantage.
- Sports: Minimal burst shooting and AF performance reduce effectiveness for sports shooting on both.
- Street: Samsung’s compactness, illumination, and touchscreen ease favor street photography. The Panasonic’s bulk and ruggedness detract slightly.
- Macro: Panasonic outperforms with its close focusing and stabilization.
- Night/Astro: Both struggle beyond ISO 800, limiting night capabilities.
- Video: Rough parity; Samsung’s codec options and touchscreen ease offer marginal convenience.
- Travel: Ruggedness & versatility give Panasonic the edge for adventurous travel, but Samsung’s lighter weight benefits urban exploration.
- Professional Work: Neither supports RAW or advanced controls, limiting serious professional applications.
Who Should Buy Which? Recommendations
Choose Panasonic TS20 if you:
- Need a tough, waterproof camera for outdoor adventures
- Enjoy macro photography or close-up shooting
- Prioritize image stabilization for handheld shooting
- Want a simple, no-frills camera for casual shooting in challenging conditions
Go with Samsung DV150F if you:
- Prefer a lightweight, travel-friendly compact with touchscreen ease
- Value face detection and faster lens aperture for portraits
- Favor a slightly longer zoom range for versatility
- Seek better video codec options and a sharper display
Both cameras serve the casual enthusiast market well, but their divergences cater to distinct users. The Panasonic TS20 is a hardy exploratory companion, while the Samsung DV150F feels more like a convenient urban snapshot tool.
Wrapping Up: Compact Choices with Character
In revisiting these two early 2010s compacts, what stands out is how divergent design philosophies shaped each. Panasonic’s Lumix TS20 is rugged and primed for outdoor exploits, sacrificing some of the convenience and finesse features to do so. The Samsung DV150F offers more bells and whistles, like touchscreen and face detection, but lacks the durability to take into wild environments confidently.
I always say the best camera is the one you carry willingly wherever you go. The TS20 invites you on rough journeys, while the DV150F is content capturing everyday memories with more ease and style. Whichever your choice, an informed, experience-driven decision ensures your next compact companion will indeed fit your shooting lifestyle.
Until we next compare, keep your exposures balanced and your focus sharp!
Panasonic TS20 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 | Samsung DV150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Samsung |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS20 | Samsung DV150F |
| Also called | Lumix DMC-FT20 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-01-31 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 23 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.7 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1300s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 142g (0.31 pounds) | 116g (0.26 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $179 | $150 |