Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d4bb/2d4bbdea34f86a266283ead8524ed8d47a03caf1" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72451/72451490aaef29c2492152393b6befa0666194fc" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL9 front Olympus PEN E-PL9 front"
85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2018
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL9, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M1 II was unveiled 16 months prior to the E-PL9 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1 II grades against the E-PL9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-PL9
E-M1 II | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus E-M1 II
E-PL9 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | September 2016 | More modern by 16 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Sharper display (+3k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL9
E-M1 II | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL9 has dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II versus the E-PL9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/483ff/483ff56412f0e3b803bc12e23b3af09642c66886" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and E-PL9 is 68 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/170a7/170a7f431aa8bf1b3d335ed217ea8be473171529" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and E-PL9.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M1 II to resolve greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30196/30196bc1f52e6320285e8a8c955b7393b18298b1" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2543/e2543ff767cfc15b5df44e2b3d80d8600055d66a" alt="Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2018-02-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 8.6 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 380g (0.84 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 350 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Two | One |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $599 |