Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
Portability
85
Imaging
55
Features
78
Overall
64

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Released September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Announced February 2018
  • Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview

Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL9, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (Four Thirds).

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 II was unveiled 16 months prior to the E-PL9 making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1 II grades against the E-PL9 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-PL9

 E-M1 II E-PL9 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 E-PL9 E-M1 II 
AnnouncedFebruary 2018September 2016More modern by 16 months
Display resolution1040k1037kSharper display (+3k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL9

 E-M1 II E-PL9 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II has got exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL9 has dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M1 II versus Olympus E-PL9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 II versus the E-PL9.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and E-PL9 is 68 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes only by checking a spec sheet. The image underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and E-PL9.

As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M1 II to resolve greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography info
Olympus E-PL9 Portrait photography info
75
you can focus manually
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detection focus
exports RAW files
73
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography details
Olympus E-PL9 Street photography details
78
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
comes with focus by touch
environment sealing
lighter than competitors (574 grams)
very good high ISO (25,600)
84
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
features focus via touch
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-PL9 as a Sports photography camera
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shutter (1/32,000s)
high fps (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
environment sealing
comes with phase detect auto focus
not so great battery power (350 shots)
69
quiet mode (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-PL9 Travel photography highlights
72
lighter than competitors (574g)
environment sealing
comes with focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
not so great battery power (350 per charge)
77
has bluetooth
features focus via touch
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
display is not selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-PL9 Landscape photography highlights
76
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
has double storage slots
not so great battery power (350 shots)
80
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
megapixel count good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging factors
Olympus E-PL9 Vlogging factors
79
display is selfie friendly
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focus
great video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have external microphone port
lighter than competitors (574 grams)
35
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus E-PL9
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus PEN E-PL9
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus PEN E-PL9
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2016-09-19 2018-02-08
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 200 200
RAW photos
Min boosted ISO 64 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 121 121
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 107 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dots 1,040 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs 1/16000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames per sec 8.6 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 7.60 m (at ISO 200)
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574g (1.27 lb) 380g (0.84 lb)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images 350 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported)
Card slots Two One
Cost at launch $1,700 $599