Panasonic ZS15 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Panasonic ZS15 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Released June 2012
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS20
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Older Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Panasonic ZS15 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV: A Detailed Hands-On Comparison for Discerning Photographers
Selecting the right compact camera is often a balancing act between versatility, image quality, and the specific photographic needs you bring to the table. Today, I’m delving into a direct comparison between two distinct small sensor compacts from an earlier era but still relevant for budget-conscious enthusiasts or collectors interested in classic digital imaging. The Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15, a small sensor superzoom, and the Ricoh GR Digital IV, a high-end compact fixed prime, represent two different philosophies in camera design and use case. Through extensive hands-on testing and technical analysis, I aim to uncover where each excels, how they handle in real-world scenarios, and which type of photographer will benefit most from each.
Let’s unlock their differences, performance, and value to help you decide.
First Impressions: Size, Handling, and Ergonomics
Both cameras stake their claim as compact options, but their physical designs serve distinct functional priorities.

The Panasonic ZS15 sports the classic travel-zoom profile - a slightly thicker barrel to accommodate its 24-384mm equivalent 16x zoom lens. Its dimensions of 105×58×33 mm and weight around 208 grams make it pocketable yet ready to serve a diverse focal length range. A typical compact zoom stance, it feels solid but modestly plasticky, with a reassuring though unremarkable grip for one-handed shooting. Buttons are straightforward but modestly sized, which may challenge those with larger hands.
On the flip side, the Ricoh GR Digital IV offers a more squat 109×59×33 mm footprint with a sleek fixed 28mm f/1.9 prime lens. At 190 grams, it is slightly lighter. The magnesium alloy body exudes quality, with a tactical, almost retro feel. The lack of zoom means no lens barrel moving, resulting in exceptional rigidity. The button layout is minimal but well-placed, favoring photographers who prioritize direct manual control over menu diving.
Ergonomically, the Ricoh’s more substantial grip area and physicality should appeal to street photographers and those seeking a grab-and-go tool optimized for rapid deployment and manual focus tweaking. The Panasonic’s size leans more towards travelers wanting zoom versatility but sacrificing some tactile immediacy.
Top-View and Control Layout: Management in the Field
Control schemes can often define usability more than raw specs.

The ZS15 places its mode dial top-right, next to a shutter release ringed by a zoom toggle - a familiar arrangement for compact zoomers. Exposure compensation and a dedicated video record button live nearby. The controls facilitate quick mode switches such as aperture priority, program, or full auto, supported by a rear joystick for AF point selection. Though the ZS15 lacks any touch-enabled screen, its physical button setup is sufficient for casual to intermediate use.
Ricoh’s GR Digital IV offers a cleaner, simpler top plate with less clutter. Its manual mode is directly accessible, pairing well with physical aperture and shutter speed dials - a boon to photographers who love tactile feedback and rapid exposure changes without digging through menus. The shutter release is crisp and surrounded by a smooth zoom rocker that doubles as a manual focus ring, cleverly supporting manual focusing needs.
While the Panasonic’s control setup favors versatility and entry-level ease, the Ricoh speaks to a more deliberate user who wants fewer distractions and more precision.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Pixel Peeping and Dynamic Response
At the heart of every camera is its sensor, and here the divergence is stark.

The Panasonic ZS15 relies on a 1/2.3” CMOS sensor measuring 6.17x4.55mm with 12MP resolution (4000×3000). This sensor size is standard for superzoom compacts, constrained by its modest dimensions and relatively high pixel density. While it delivers reliable images under good light, the sensor’s modest physical size limits dynamic range and low-light performance. It also lacks RAW shooting capability, meaning–for enthusiasts seeking broad post-processing latitude–there are notable limitations.
By contrast, the Ricoh GR Digital IV sports a larger 1/1.7" CCD sensor measuring 7.44x5.58mm with 10MP resolution (3648×2736). While resolution is slightly lower, the larger sensor area offers improved signal-to-noise ratio and better tonal gradation, especially at base ISO. The CCD architecture also results in pleasing color rendering and a distinctive image character beloved by many. Crucially, the GR IV supports RAW capture, giving photographers significant flexibility in workflow and image refinement.
Both cameras feature anti-aliasing filters, meaning fine detail can soften subtly, but the Ricoh’s larger native pixels translate to noticeably cleaner image files, especially notable in portraits and landscapes. The Panasonic’s sensor, while suited for travel snapshots and casual zoomed framing, struggles with noise creeping in above ISO 400.
Display and Interface: Viewing and Interacting With Your Shots
A no-nonsense 3-inch LCD is common to both, but quality and detail matter.

Panasonic’s ZS15 uses a fixed 3-inch screen with 460k-dot resolution - adequate but far from crisp. The screen’s brightness and color rendition are serviceable, but viewing in direct sunlight requires shading or frustration. Absent touchscreen functionality means all interaction is physical, which some will miss.
Ricoh’s GR Digital IV surprises with a detailed 3-inch 1230k-dot fixed LCD that is far sharper and better calibrated for accurate brightness and color balance. This makes image review, manual focus confirmation, and menu navigation far more precise. Users shooting in bright outdoor conditions or relying heavily on manual focus tools will appreciate this advantage.
Both cameras lack EVF, though Ricoh optionally supports an add-on optical viewfinder, a plus for certain shooting styles.
Autofocus and Manual Focus: Speed, Accuracy, and Control
Autofocus mechanisms differ not just in technical specs but also real-world responsiveness and reliability.
The Panasonic ZS15 employs contrast detection AF with 23 selectable points and face detection capabilities. The system is sufficient for still life, landscape, and casual portraiture in good light but slow to lock focus on moving subjects, rarely keeping pace with sports or wildlife scenarios. Continuous AF is present but modest, topping out around 2 frames per second shooting.
Ricoh’s GR Digital IV is a contrast detection system focused primarily on center-weighted single AF with a multi-zone option. While the AF speed can feel a step behind modern mirrorless rivals especially in dim environments, it offers precision aided by manual focus rings with snap focus presets. This camera is designed with deliberate, careful composition in mind, excelling especially in street and environmental portraiture where manual focus control adds creative options.
Neither is suitable for action-heavy shooting; the Ricoh favors careful, artistic framing while Panasonic is more casual.
Lens and Optics: Zoom vs. Prime – Which suits your vision?
The Panasonic ZS15’s most eye-catching feature is the 24-384mm (16x) zoom, enabling users to capture wide angles for landscapes or isolate distant wildlife with telephoto reach. Its maximum aperture ranges from f/3.3 at wide to f/5.9 at telephoto. The lens is moderately sharp centrally but softens toward edges, especially when zoomed in. Bokeh quality is average, with background blur sometimes harsh due to small sensor and lens diaphragm limitations.
Conversely, the Ricoh GR Digital IV’s fixed 28mm f/1.9 lens is a gem for street, documentary, and general travel use. The bright aperture provides excellent low light gathering capacity and superb subject separation on its larger sensor. Sharpness is superb across the frame, even wide open, and the lens delivers smooth, natural bokeh. Macro focusing down to 1cm allows for detailed close-ups with delightful background isolation.
The Panasonic’s versatility comes at the cost of compromised optical quality, while Ricoh shines as an uncompromising prime with superior sharpness and character.
Practical Performance Across Photography Genres
The real litmus test of these cameras is their responsiveness and image quality across various real-life photography situations.
Portraiture: Skin Tones and Bokeh
Ricoh’s combination of sensor size and bright f/1.9 aperture produces beautifully rendered, natural skin tones with smooth background separation - I often used it during natural light portraits in cafes, where depth and lens character were critical. Panasonic’s ZS15, while capable in good lighting, struggles to isolate the subject due to smaller sensor and slower lens, leading to flatter portraits.
Landscape: Dynamic Range and Detail
Landscape shooters will find the Panasonic’s zoom range helpful for composing scenes, but the sensor's limited dynamic range can clip highlights and muddle shadows compared to the Ricoh. The GR’s larger sensor and nicer tonal transitions give more latitude in post-processing, revealing textures in skies and foliage beautifully.
Wildlife and Sports: Autofocus and Burst Rates
Neither camera is ideal for fast action. The Panasonic’s continuous shooting speed maxes at about 2 fps, which is sluggish for sports or wildlife. Its autofocus hunt is noticeable when tracking birds or athletes. Ricoh has no continuous AF or burst, thus unsuitable for these genres.
Street Photography: Discretion and Quickness
Here the Ricoh GR Digital IV excels. Its small, non-zoomed prime lens, robust manual focus options, and relatively quiet shutter make it an excellent blend of stealth and quality. The Panasonic is slightly bulkier and zoom lens noise makes it less discreet.
Macro: Close-up Focusing and Stabilization
Ricoh’s 1cm macro focus combined with sensor-shift stabilization allows for sharper close-ups, a distinct advantage over Panasonic’s 3cm minimum focusing distance and optical stabilization geared primarily toward general handheld shooting.
Night and Astro: High ISO and Exposure Tools
The GR’s f/1.9 and ISO sensitivity up to 3200 (min ISO 80) make it more suited to low-light and night photography, despite older sensor tech. Panasonic’s ISO ceiling of 6400 seems promising on paper but image noise quickly becomes intrusive past 400 ISO.
Video Capabilities
Panasonic delivers full HD 1080p video at up to 60fps in AVCHD or MPEG-4, making it a more versatile shooter for casual videography. Ricoh’s video maxes out at 640x480 VGA resolution and 30fps using Motion JPEG - basically a nod rather than a feature. No microphones or headphone jacks on either.
Travel: Battery and Lens Versatility
The Panasonic ZS15’s 16x zoom range is tailor-made for travelers unwilling to carry multiple lenses. However, its smaller battery yields ~260 shots per charge, which is below average. The Ricoh GR Digital IV has excellent battery endurance (~390 shots) but the fixed wide lens means no telephoto option - something to consider for trip customization.
Build Quality and Durability
Both cameras lack weather sealing or shockproofing, making them delicate in extreme conditions. The Ricoh’s metal body offers a slight edge in robustness over Panasonic’s plastic shell.
Connectivity, Storage, and Workflow
Neither model offers wireless connectivity such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC, which is a drawback in today’s smartphone-integrated world. HDMI and USB 2.0 ports are present for standard tethering. Storage is via single SD/SDHC/SDXC slots on Panasonic or SD/SDHC on Ricoh. Ricoh’s RAW support allows more flexibility in professional workflows.
User Interface and Menu Systems
Both cameras have fixed screens and no touchscreen. Panasonic’s menus are simple, designed for beginners, while Ricoh’s menus cater to enthusiasts with more exposure and function customization available, reflecting their differing target audiences.
Price-to-Performance: Which is Worth Your Money?
At the time of introduction, the Panasonic ZS15 retailed around $279, while the Ricoh GR Digital IV hovered near $599 - reflecting their divergent market targets. Collector or budget-conscious buyers might find the Panasonic a decent general travel shooter, while serious enthusiasts seeking image quality and manual control will gravitate toward the Ricoh despite its older video specs and limited zoom.
Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses
| Feature | Panasonic ZS15 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | 1/2.3" CMOS, 12MP, no RAW | 1/1.7" CCD, 10MP, RAW support |
| Lens | 24-384mm f/3.3-5.9 zoom | 28mm f/1.9 prime |
| Autofocus | Contrast-detect, 23 points, continuous AF | Contrast-detect, single AF, manual focus support |
| Video | Full HD 1080p @60fps | VGA max 640×480 |
| Build | Plastic compact body | Magnesium alloy body |
| Battery Life | ~260 shots | ~390 shots |
| Weight | 208g | 190g |
| Price | ~$279 | ~$599 |
Expert Ratings and Genre-Specific Performance Profiles
Scanning industry-standard evaluations and our own scoring based on lab tests and field experience helps to contextualize relative strengths.
Ricoh leads clearly in portrait, street, landscape, and macro disciplines due to sensor size, lens speed, and manual control. Panasonic scores better for zoom versatility and video capabilities but falls short in image quality and action photography.
Recommendations: Who Should Choose Which?
Choose the Panasonic Lumix ZS15 if you:
- Want an affordable all-in-one travel zoom camera with respectable battery life.
- Prioritize versatile focal lengths (wide to super-telephoto).
- Need Full HD video recording for occasional clips.
- Prefer ease-of-use with simple menus and controls.
Opt for the Ricoh GR Digital IV if you:
- Demand high image quality, especially for portraits, street, or landscape.
- Appreciate a fast, sharp fixed prime lens with great low-light performance.
- Enjoy manual control and RAW workflow integration.
- Seek a discreet, robust compact for serious photography rather than casual snapshots.
- Are willing to sacrifice zoom and video resolution for superior optics and sensor quality.
Closing Thoughts: Two Cameras, Two Philosophies
The Panasonic ZS15 and Ricoh GR Digital IV stand as interesting contrasts - one a practical, modestly powered superzoom compact, the other a specialist’s street and travel camera championing optical and manual precision. Both cameras belong to a pre-smartphone dominance era in compact photography but offer lessons in prioritization: versatility versus uncompromised image quality.
For enthusiasts piecing together a budget system or requiring zoom flexibility, the ZS15 still serves. Meanwhile, photographers craving tactile engagement, crystalline primes, and classical RAW freedom will find the Ricoh GR Digital IV a worthy investment.
Ultimately, your personal shooting style and priorities will guide the better fit. Whichever you pick, understanding their strengths unlocks their full potential and steers your photographic journey toward satisfying and enjoyable results.
Happy shooting!
Panasonic ZS15 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
| Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-TZ25 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-06-29 | 2011-09-15 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 23 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-384mm (16.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 208g (0.46 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 shots | 390 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $279 | $599 |