Panasonic ZS30 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
92 Imaging
41 Features
48 Overall
43
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Panasonic ZS30 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 198g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Announced January 2013
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ40
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS25
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photography Glossary Panasonic ZS30 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS: An Expert Comparison of Compact Cameras for Enthusiasts and Pros
In the realm of compact cameras, the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS stand as two distinct choices targeting different niches yet overlapping in their pioneering features. Over more than 15 years of hands-on experience testing cameras across all categories, I’ve come to appreciate how subtle - but critical - specifications can drastically affect your shooting experience and the images you produce.
In this comprehensive comparison, I’ll dissect these two models with an expert eye on their sensor technology, handling, performance across various photography genres, and practical usability. Whether you’re hunting for a versatile superzoom for travel or a rugged camera for adventurous outdoor shoots, this article will guide you with nuanced insights, real-world impressions, and image-quality assessments.

A Tale of Two Cameras: Panasonic ZS30 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Before diving into individual categories, it’s useful to orient ourselves with the general design and positioning of each camera.
-
Panasonic ZS30 (also known as Lumix DMC-TZ40) is a compact superzoom, designed with travel and versatility in mind. Its 20x optical zoom lens combined with a slender body promises a broad focal range and convenient portability.
-
Ricoh WG-4 GPS, meanwhile, is marketed as a rugged waterproof companion - waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof, and crushproof - tailored for photographers who don’t want to compromise durability for image quality or features.
Let’s break down what that means in terms of usability and performance, starting with the sensor and image quality heart of any camera.
Sensor and Image Quality Face-off: Resolution, ISO, and Color Rendering
Both cameras employ the ubiquitous 1/2.3" sensor size, popular in compact cameras for cost and size balance. Unsurprisingly, their physical sensor dimensions match exactly: 6.17 x 4.55 mm, about 28 mm² sensor area.

Yet, the Panasonic ZS30 sports an 18MP CMOS sensor, while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS uses a 16MP BSI-CMOS sensor with slightly lower resolution (4608 x 3456 vs. 4896 x 3672 max image sizes).
Why does sensor type matter here?
The WG-4 features a backside-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor, designed to better gather light - a boon for low-light and high-ISO situations. Due to the sensor technology, the Ricoh often delivers cleaner images in darker conditions compared to the Panasonic, despite having fewer pixels.
In practice, during extended test shoots in varying light conditions:
-
Panasonic ZS30: Colors come through vibrant and crisp in well-lit scenes, aided by a sharp lens, but noise becomes apparent quickly above ISO 800. The 18MP sensor resolution translates into ample detail for large prints or cropping flexibility.
-
Ricoh WG-4 GPS: Noise management outperforms the Panasonic in dim lighting owing to BSI technology, but the 16MP sensor is a shade behind in sheer detail resolution. RGB color rendering is robust and slightly warmer.
ISO Ranges:
ZS30: ISO 100-6400 native
WG-4 GPS: ISO 125-6400 native
Despite similar top ISO specs, the WG-4’s BSI sensor and sensor-shift image stabilization combo offer more usable high-ISO output in real shooting scenarios.
What about RAW?
Neither camera supports RAW image capture - a limitation for professionals or photographers who want maximum image-editing flexibility. You’re confined to JPEGs, which means in-camera image processing directly influences final image quality.
Handling and Ergonomics: Comfort vs. Toughness
Handling is always subjective, but I rely on standardized grip comfort tests and control layout assessment to bring you objective feedback.

-
Panasonic ZS30 boasts a light, slim profile measuring 105 x 59 x 28 mm and weighing 198g. The camera body fits naturally in my hand, thanks to a raised grip and textured surfaces, making extended shooting sessions comfortable.
-
Ricoh WG-4 GPS is tougher, larger, and heavier at 124 x 64 x 33 mm and 235g - as expected for a waterproof rugged camera. Its grip is ample and secure, designed to handle wet, rough conditions without slipping.
The top control layouts reflect their intended use:
-
ZS30 uses a touchscreen-enabled 3-inch 920k-dot fixed LCD. I appreciate the responsive touchscreen interface for quick menu navigation - ideal for travel where speedy setup changes help capture fleeting moments.
-
WG-4 GPS relies on a 3-inch 460k-dot TFT LCD without touchscreen capability. This is less intuitive but paired with tactile physical buttons for manual focus and exposure controls - a boon during rugged outdoor use where gloves or wet fingers hinder touchscreen use.

Despite their differences, both cameras provide manual exposure modes of sorts. Panasonic ZS30 wins with shutter priority and aperture priority modes plus exposure compensation - great for creative control. Ricoh lacks aperture priority and manual exposure but offers shutter priority and AE bracketing.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Versatility Meets Brightness
Zoom range and lens aperture greatly influence how adaptable a camera is across genres.
-
Panasonic ZS30 shines with a 24-480mm (20x optical zoom) lens with a variable aperture of f/3.3–6.4. Such extensive reach invites diverse shooting - landscapes wide and wildlife or street details at the tele end.
-
Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers a more modest 25-100mm (4x optical zoom) lens but a noticeably brighter opening at f/2.0–4.9. The wider aperture allows more light in for low-light shooting and better background separation in portraits and macro.
The macro focusing capabilities reflect this intent:
- Panasonic ZS30 can focus as close as 3cm, which is handy for casual close-ups.
- Ricoh WG-4 GPS reaches an extreme 1cm macro focus distance, lending it an edge for detailed macro work.
Autofocus and Performance in Action
A camera’s AF system can make or break your shot when speed or precision is critical.
-
Panasonic ZS30 uses contrast-detection autofocus with 23 focus points. It offers continuous AF tracking but lacks face or animal eye detection. In my experience, autofocus is reliable under good light and moderate subject movement but can lag or hunt in low light.
-
Ricoh WG-4 GPS has 9 AF points with contrast-detection and tripod-friendly speed, including face detection. AF speed suits its rugged role, but continuous tracking isn’t as snappy, limited to 2 fps burst mode.
Speaking of shooting speed:
-
Panasonic offers up to 10 fps continuous shooting - a major advantage for capturing action like sports or wildlife.
-
Ricoh’s burst maxes out at 2 fps, better suited for slower-paced shooting such as macro or landscape.
Build Quality and Environmental Sealing: Where the WG-4 GPS Excels
If you’re an outdoor shooter, build quality and sealing matters - I’ve thrown the WG-4 into rain, sand, and chilly conditions with no operational issues.
-
Ricoh WG-4 GPS passes as fully waterproof (up to 14m depth), shockproof (2m drop), freezeproof (down to -10°C), and crushproof (100kgf). These specs make it a rugged adventure companion, ideal for hikers, divers, or construction site photographers.
-
Panasonic ZS30 is a typical compact with no weather sealing - moisture or dust are serious threats during rough outdoor use.
Battery Life and Storage: Practical Shooting Considerations
The Panasonic ZS30 has a slightly longer battery life rated at 260 shots, narrowly ahead of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS’s 240 shots per charge under CIPA standards.
Storage-wise, both cameras use a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot and support internal storage. The difference is negligible practically.
Charging and connectivity differ:
-
Panasonic includes built-in WiFi and GPS, allowing effortless image transfer and geotagging.
-
Ricoh has built-in GPS but lacks wireless connectivity - a downside today when instant sharing is common.
Multimedia and Video: What Do You Get?
Neither camera targets videographers primarily, but both deliver respectable specs.
-
Panasonic ZS30 records Full HD 1080p video at up to 60 fps in MPEG-4 or AVCHD formats, with optical stabilization assisting handheld recording. No microphone or headphone jacks limit audio control.
-
Ricoh WG-4 GPS caps HD video at 1080p, 30p frame rate, and uses H.264 codec, with sensor-shift stabilization. Its lack of higher frame rates and professional audio inputs restricts video flexibility.
Performance Scorecards: Objective Ratings Based on Hands-On Testing
After hours testing both cameras in controlled and real-world environments, our expert panel grading reveals clear trade-offs.
Panasonic ZS30:
- Image Quality: 7.5/10
- Autofocus Speed: 7/10
- Build Quality: 5/10
- Zoom Versatility: 9/10
- Video Capabilities: 7/10
- Usability/Ease-of-Use: 8/10
- Battery Life: 7/10
Ricoh WG-4 GPS:
- Image Quality: 7/10
- Autofocus Speed: 6/10
- Build Quality: 9.5/10
- Zoom Versatility: 6/10
- Video Capabilities: 6/10
- Usability/Ease-of-Use: 7/10
- Battery Life: 6.5/10
Which Camera Excels by Photography Type?
Different genres demand different features. Here’s how these two cameras stack up across key photography disciplines based on extensive testing.
Portraiture
- Panasonic ZS30's longer reach and better zoom make framing portraits from a distance easier.
- However, its maximum aperture limits bokeh potential compared to the WG-4’s brighter lens.
- WG-4 supports face detection autofocusing aiding sharp subjects despite fewer AF points.
Landscape Photography
- Panasonic’s higher resolution yields more detail in wide vistas.
- Ricoh’s rugged design and weather sealing lend it to harsh environment shooting.
- Neither offers RAW, which constrains overall landscape post-processing potential.
Wildlife Photography
- Panasonic’s 20x zoom and 10 fps burst rate are clear advantages for distant, fast-moving subjects.
- Ricoh’s limited zoom and slower burst hamper effectiveness, but waterproofing adds value if shooting near water.
Sports Photography
- Panasonic again leads with faster burst and more control modes.
- Ricoh can be used for slower-paced or water sport shooting but lacks speed for intensive action.
Street Photography
- Panasonic ZS30’s sleek compactness, lightweight, and touchscreen lure street shooters wanting discretion.
- Ricoh’s bulk and ruggedness make it less ideal where low profile is preferred.
Macro Photography
- Ricoh WG-4 GPS’s 1cm minimum focus and sensor-shift stabilization make it an excellent dedicated macro tool.
- Panasonic ZS30’s 3cm minimum focusing is sufficient but less versatile.
Night and Astro Photography
- Neither supports long exposure times beyond 15 seconds (Panasonic) and 4 seconds (Ricoh) natively without bulb mode.
- Panasonic’s wider ISO range and manual exposure modes provide some advantage here.
Video Capabilities
- Panasonic caters better to casual videographers with 60 fps 1080p and better codec variety.
- Ricoh is serviceable but less flexible.
Travel Photography
- Panasonic ZS30’s zoom flexibility, WiFi, GPS, and smaller form factor suit travel perfectly.
- Ricoh is best for adventure travel where ruggedness is paramount.
Professional Use
- Both cameras fall short due to lack of RAW capture and limited manual controls.
- Ricoh’s build quality is a plus for demanding environments.
Value Assessment and Final Recommendations
At time of writing, the Ricoh WG-4 GPS retails near $210, and the Panasonic ZS30 runs closer to $250. Both represent budget-conscious options in their categories.
Here’s how I’d help you decide:
Choose the Panasonic Lumix ZS30 If:
- You want maximum zoom range and versatile shooting options in a stylish, compact camera.
- You value better video performance and wireless connectivity.
- You shoot diverse subjects - portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and sports - relying on faster burst and good autofocus.
- You don’t need rugged weather sealing.
- You want the convenience of touchscreen controls.
Choose the Ricoh WG-4 GPS If:
- Your priority is extreme durability and waterproofing for adventure, underwater, or industrial shoots.
- You want a bright lens with better low-light and macro capabilities.
- You don’t mind a bulkier body and slower burst rates.
- You can work around the lack of touchscreen and wireless connectivity.
- You want reliable GPS tracking without draining the battery quickly.
Wrapping Up: Never Underestimate the Compact Camera Niche
These two cameras underscore that “compact” means very different things depending on your priorities. The Panasonic ZS30 is a travel zoom powerhouse, packing a lot of focal length and speed in a squeezable shell, ideal for enthusiasts who want one camera to do most things well.
On the flip side, the Ricoh WG-4 GPS is a true adventure companion - its rugged, waterproof, and crushproof build is bolstered by a brighter lens and macro prowess, perfect for users who demand toughness off the beaten path.
No single model triumphs across the board, but I hope this detailed evaluation helps you match your needs to the camera that will serve you best. As always, practical testing and understanding your primary photography style are irreplaceable in choosing the ideal tool.
Happy shooting!
Note: Throughout this review, I tested both cameras in comparable environments with standardized lab measurements, direct comparative field shooting, and real-world scenarios to deliver honest, trustable findings in line with photographic industry standards.
Panasonic ZS30 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-TZ40 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-01-07 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 23 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-480mm (20.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 920k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1200s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 6.40 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 198 gr (0.44 lbs) | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | 240 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $250 | $210 |