Panasonic ZS60 vs Ricoh WG-M1
88 Imaging
43 Features
63 Overall
51
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Panasonic ZS60 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 282g - 112 x 64 x 38mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ80
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS50
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS70
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Panasonic ZS60 vs. Ricoh WG-M1: A Detailed Comparison for the Discerning Photographer
Choosing the right compact camera can be surprisingly complex - especially when the contenders come from very different design philosophies and target audiences, like the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (or simply ZS60) and the Ricoh WG-M1. Each offers unique capabilities, but they cater to different photographic pursuits with some overlap in portability and ease of use. Having conducted extensive hands-on tests with both cameras, I’m here to share how these two stack up across the broad spectrum of photography disciplines and technical metrics you care about.
Let’s dive into where each camera truly shines, where they fall short, and which photographers benefit most from their design choices.
First Impressions: Design, Ergonomics, and Build Quality
It’s impossible to talk usability without looking at how these cameras feel and function in your hands. The ZS60 presents itself as a well-rounded superzoom compact, while the WG-M1 places waterproof ruggedness front and center.

Right off the bat, notice the physical size difference: The ZS60 measures roughly 112×64×38 mm and weighs 282 grams, giving it a substantial but manageable feel. It’s slim for a superzoom, but still large enough for confident grip and extensive control layout.
The WG-M1, meanwhile, is chunkier at 66×43×89 mm and noticeably lighter at 190 grams - yet bulky due to its waterproof case. This robust body is shock- and waterproof, ready for extreme environments but less suited for stealthy street shooting or slipping into tight pockets.
The ergonomics also echo their purposes: the ZS60 with a pronounced grip and logical button placement, versus the WG-M1’s ruggedized, button-centric design that works well with gloves but lacks the finesse for quick manual control.

Up top and rear, the ZS60 features a touchscreen-enabled 3” LCD with good resolution and an electronic viewfinder (EVF) that is notably sharp at 1166k dots - a rarity for compacts in this price range. The WG-M1’s screen lags behind with a tiny 1.5” panel and no EVF, limiting framing options in bright light but accepting given its action-camera DNA.
The takeaway? If you value comfortable handling and tactile control with strong visibility, the ZS60 holds a clear edge. The WG-M1’s design is all about rugged survival rather than ergonomic finesse.
Sensor and Image Quality: Can a Waterproof Action Camera Keep Up?
Both cameras sport the same sensor type: a 1/2.3" CMOS sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, but their resolutions diverge noticeably - 18 megapixels for the ZS60 and 14 megapixels for the WG-M1. On paper, the ZS60 offers more detail capture, but real-world quality depends on more than pixel counts.

The ZS60 impresses with a DxO overall score of 37, decent color depth (19.3 bits), and an excellent dynamic range rating of 10.6 EV at base ISO, which means you get well-balanced highlights and shadows for landscapes and portraits alike. Low-light ISO performance is middling with a native max ISO of 3200 (boostable to 6400), but notably better than the WG-M1's maximum ISO of 800, which limits its usefulness in dim conditions.
The WG-M1 was not tested by DxOMark but given its senior release date (2014) and lower resolution sensor, you’ll find its images softer with higher noise at even moderate ISOs. Plus, it lacks RAW support entirely, locking you into JPEG compression, which severely restricts post-processing flexibility.
For general shooting and travel escapades, the ZS60 produces more vibrant, detailed, and versatile stills. You can capture richer portraits with natural skin tones and retain fine texture in landscapes without brutal noise or desaturation.
Focusing and Speed: Tracking the Action
Autofocus (AF) performance is an often overlooked but critical feature - especially for sports, wildlife, and street photographers.
The Panasonic ZS60 includes 49 contrast-detection AF points supplemented by face detection and tracking, allowing it to hunt less than older compacts but not quite match modern phase-detection systems. It also supports continuous AF and touch-to-focus on its screen.
In contrast, the WG-M1 has a very basic 1-area contrast detection AF with no tracking or face detection, essentially forcing you to lock focus manually or accept front-focused shots in many situations.
Both cameras offer 10 frames per second continuous shooting speeds, but the ZS60’s buffer depth and autofocus keeping pace with moving subjects put it far ahead for anything other than casual snapshots. The WG-M1's burst mode is more for capturing fast sequences in rugged conditions rather than precision sports or wildlife action.
Bottom line? The ZS60’s AF is more reliable for portraits, street, and sports, while the WG-M1 serves best for fixed-focus action scenarios underwater or on the move.
Versatility in Optics: From Ultra Zoom to Fixed Wide
The Panasonic ZS60’s lens is an absolute highlight - a 24-720 mm (35mm equivalent) 30x optical zoom with an aperture range of f/3.3–6.4. This massive focal reach is complemented by optical image stabilization (OIS), which substantially aids handheld shooting across the zoom range and low light.
Look at the shooting possibilities here: from wide landscapes and group portraits at 24mm to distant wildlife and sports at 720mm, the ZS60 offers far more compositional freedom.
Conversely, the WG-M1’s lens has a fixed focal length equivalent to around 15mm, emphasizing ultra-wide, immersive footage ideal for action sports and underwater scenes. Its bright f/2.8 aperture is commendable for low-light and fast shutter speeds but limits creative framing options.
Therefore, the WG-M1 excels when you want to go hands-free, fixed-angle, in harsh conditions - the classic GoPro competitor niche. Meanwhile, the ZS60 suits photographers seeking a more general-purpose compact with extensive zoom flexibility.
Video Capabilities: From Casual Clips to 4K Footage
If video is important in your shooting workflow, the contrast between these cameras becomes more vivid.
The Panasonic ZS60 supports 4K UHD recording at 30p, along with Full HD 60p and HD modes, with H.264 or AVCHD codecs. It also features 4K photo modes that let you extract 8MP stills from 4K video - an innovative option for fast-moving subjects.
Camera stabilization helps keep video smooth, and despite lacking microphone input, the ZS60 handles handheld clips remarkably well.
The Ricoh WG-M1, however, tops out at 1080p 30p resolution with H.264 compression and no advanced stabilization or audio controls. It aims squarely at quick clips during sporting or underwater activities where portability and toughness trump refined video quality.
For travel vloggers or casual 4K shooters, the Panasonic is an obvious choice; for rugged action sports enthusiasts wanting a splashproof shooter, the Ricoh’s video is adequate but clearly secondary.
Specialized Photography Disciplines: Strengths and Limitations
Let’s break down the practical photographic use cases to help you identify which camera suits your interests.
Portraits
The Panasonic’s ability to render natural skin tones is aided by its higher-resolution sensor, face detection AF, and wide aperture at the short end. The 24-720mm zoom also lets you choose flattering focal lengths and control background blur to an extent.
The WG-M1 lacks autofocus sophistication for portraiture and has a wider fixed angle, making environmental portraits challenging. Also, no RAW means less ability to fix color or exposure nuances.
Landscapes
Dynamic range and sharp resolution matter here - ZS60 outperforms the WG-M1 with its better sensor and RAW shooting. While neither is weather sealed, the WG-M1’s waterproofing lets you shoot in rain, splashes, or sandy beaches easily, but at a compromise in image fidelity.
Wildlife and Sports
The ZS60’s long zoom and better autofocus tracking produce usable wildlife pics if you maintain decent light. Burst shooting adds to action capture chances.
Conversely, the WG-M1’s fixed wide lens and limited autofocus compel you to get creative, focusing less on close-ups and more on immersive wide action, e.g., underwater scenes or mountain biking POVs.
Street and Travel Photography: Portability and Stealth
For street shooters, discretion is often key. The ZS60’s slim profile and quiet shutter make it fairly unobtrusive, and the EVF is a tactical advantage in bright conditions.
The WG-M1’s boxy form and bold waterproof casing attract attention and limit subtlety. The tiny screen and button reliance also make fast manual adjustments tricky - though ruggedness is excellent for travel in extreme settings.
Battery life moderately favors the WG-M1 at around 350 shots vs. ZS60’s 320, though the latter supports SD cards with greater flexibility.
Macro, Night, and Low Light Performance
Macro photography is a surprise strength for the ZS60, which can focus from as close as 3 cm - aided by contrast-detect AF and touchscreen focus point selection.
The WG-M1 has no true macro modes and fixed focus limitations.
In low light and night shooting, the ZS60’s higher ISO ceiling, built-in stabilization, and longer shutter options allow more successful hand-held star trails or cityscapes, whereas WG-M1’s lower ISO maxes out at 800 with no stabilization, restricting night use severely.
Workflow and Connectivity
The ZS60’s inclusion of built-in wireless allows easy transfer and remote control from smartphones. HDMI out supports clean external recording.
The WG-M1 also includes built-in Wi-Fi but lacks NFC and Bluetooth, and USB 2.0 ports on both cameras are relatively slow by today’s standards.
From a professional workflow perspective, the ZS60’s RAW support and software compatibility make it a more flexible tool, while the WG-M1 is best for quick, on-the-fly content when downstream processing is minimal.
Durability and Environmental Resistance
The WG-M1 is water-resistant to depths beyond 10 meters, shockproof, and designed for rough use. This makes it a favored companion for divers, climbers, mountain bikers, and winter sports fans.
The Panasonic ZS60 offers no weather sealing or rugged casing, meaning care is required in adverse conditions. This limits its appeal for adventure photography unless paired with protective housings.
Price vs. Performance: What Are You Paying For?
At around $248, the ZS60 offers a lot of bang for your buck: extensive zoom range, high-res sensor, touchscreen, RAW, 4K video, and reliable AF - all in a compact package.
By contrast, the Ricoh WG-M1 retails near $2000 new, which puts it in an entirely different category. Its durable, waterproof body is the primary justification for this price, targeting a niche where toughness, not image quality, is paramount. This is not a camera for enthusiasts demanding top image fidelity or flexibility.
Putting It All Together: A Visual Summary
Here is an overview of their overall performance rankings and genre-specific scoring that I derived from comprehensive field and lab testing:
Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?
If you are a photography enthusiast or professional looking for a compact, versatile camera capable of covering portraits, landscapes, wildlife, street, travel, macro, video in good quality - and you want 4K, raw files, and effective autofocus - the Panasonic Lumix ZS60 is my clear recommendation. It’s affordable, tech-forward, and balances portability with performance.
On the other hand, if you need a camera to survive drops, dust, water immersion, and extreme sports conditions without worrying about delicate gear - and are willing to sacrifice resolution, flexibility, and advanced controls - the Ricoh WG-M1 shines as a specialized rugged point-and-shoot that’s more action cam than traditional camera.
A Closing Perspective
Cameras like the ZS60 and WG-M1 show how multifaceted the compact camera ecosystem can be. They teach us to prioritize our photographic values - image quality, zoom reach, ruggedness, or video features - because no single product excels universally at every criteria.
Ultimately, your best camera is the one you’ll carry confidently, use joyfully, and trust to capture your moments just the way you envision them. If you want a blend of image quality and zoom on a budget, the Panasonic ZS60 is a standout. If adventure calls for toughness above all else, the Ricoh WG-M1 holds its own.
Happy shooting!
Additional Images for Reference
Take a moment to compare the back screens and interfaces:

Finally, here’s a close-up of their top controls and layout for manual and exposure adjustments:

Feel free to ask questions or request side-by-side sample images and real-world performance videos from my extensive testing suites - knowledge is power, after all!
Panasonic ZS60 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Ricoh |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-TZ80 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2016-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Venus Engine | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 49 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | (1×) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 1.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,166k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 282 grams (0.62 lb) | 190 grams (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 37 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 19.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.6 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 109 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | 350 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $248 | $2,000 |