Panasonic ZS7 vs Sony RX10 II
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
58 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Panasonic ZS7 vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 218g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ10
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS8
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Introduced June 2015
- Succeeded the Sony RX10
- Updated by Sony RX10 III
Photography Glossary Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II: A Comprehensive Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
In the ever-evolving world of digital cameras, superzoom compacts and bridge cameras continue to capture the imagination of both casual shooters and seasoned photographers. Today, we take an in-depth journey comparing two distinctive models from different eras and categories - the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 (2011) and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II (2015). Both cater to, broadly speaking, enthusiasts and travel photographers but differ markedly in sensor size, imaging technologies, and price tier.
Having personally tested thousands of cameras over the years, I’m keen to help you cut through the spec sheets and marketing fluff. We’ll break down their performance across key photographic disciplines, dissect their technical underpinnings, and ultimately help you decide which is more suited to your needs - or if neither fits perfectly and a third option is warranted.
Let’s start with a side-by-side glance at physical factors and build.
Form Factor and Ergonomics: From Pocketable to Bridge-Style Handling

The Panasonic ZS7 belongs to the "small sensor superzoom" compact category. With dimensions just 103 x 60 x 33 mm and weighing a mere 218 grams, it’s an unobtrusive travel companion. Pocketable, lightweight, and designed for ease of carry, it works well for casual shooting and spontaneous street or travel photography. The fixed lens extends from 25mm equivalent wide-angle up to 300mm telephoto (12x zoom), impressively versatile given its diminutive stature.
Contrast that to the Sony RX10 II, a considerably larger specimen in the "large sensor superzoom" bridge camera category. This SLR-style body measures 129 x 88 x 102 mm and weighs 813 grams - nearly four times heavier. Certainly no pocket camera, it demands a dedicated camera bag or strap. Its ergonomics, however, reflect a semi-professional design philosophy: a pronounced grip, well-spaced buttons, and a substantial electronic viewfinder for compositional precision.

Looking at the top control layouts, the ZS7’s straightforward, compact design offers limited physical dials and buttons - functional but minimalistic. The RX10 II sports dedicated mode, control, and exposure compensation dials that experienced users will appreciate for quick adjustments. The presence of a tilting rear screen alongside an eye-level electronic viewfinder on the RX10 II offers compositional flexibility the ZS7 can’t match.
If portability is king, especially for travelers prioritizing weight and convenience, the ZS7 edges ahead. But if you prefer greater handling control and a professional feel, the RX10 II is definitely in another league. This size and ergonomic gap alone will influence your shooting approach.
Sensor and Image Quality: CCD vs BSI-CMOS - A Quantum Leap

Here lies arguably the most critical divergence in camera design philosophy. The Panasonic ZS7 is equipped with a 1/2.3-inch CCD sensor of 12 megapixels, with a physical sensor area of approximately 27.7 mm². This sensor size has long been the staple for compact point-and-shoots but comes with inherent limitations regarding noise performance, dynamic range, and resolution ceiling.
In stark contrast, Sony’s RX10 II features a substantially larger 1-inch (13.2 x 8.8 mm) BSI-CMOS sensor with 20 megapixels, encompassing over 116 mm² of surface area - more than four times the effective sensor area of the ZS7.
Why does this matter? Larger sensor size translates primarily into better light gathering capabilities, higher dynamic range, less noise at elevated ISOs, and overall superior image quality - all crucial factors for photographers demanding professional-grade results. The RX10 II’s BSI (backside illuminated) CMOS design enhances low-light performance further by optimizing the structure for improved photon efficiency.
From our lab tests and field experience, the RX10 II produces richer colors, finer detail rendition, and cleaner images up to ISO 3200 or even beyond, whereas the ZS7 struggles with noise creeping in at ISO 400-800 and a narrower dynamic range. Sony’s camera also supports RAW format capture, affording greater post-processing latitude; Panasonic’s ZS7 lacks RAW support altogether, which limits flexibility in editing workflows.
Simply put, for critical image quality needs - especially landscape, portraiture, or any scenario where tonal gradation and low noise matter - the RX10 II is the clear winner. The ZS7’s CCD sensor performs adequately for web-ready snapshots or casual prints but cannot contend with the RX10’s larger sensor prowess.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed, Precision, and Tracking
Superzoom cameras have to juggle complex autofocus (AF) challenges, especially at longer focal lengths or moving subjects. This is where the RX10 II’s more advanced system truly excels.
The ZS7 relies on a contrast-detection autofocus system with 11 focus points, only single AF mode, and lacks features like face detection or continuous autofocus. This means it’s suited for static subjects or slow action - continuous AF tracking is unavailable, leading to hunting or missed focus in fast-moving scenes.
The RX10 II features contrast-detection AF as well but elevates it with 25 focus points, continuous AF, face detection, and full AF tracking capabilities. Though no phase-detection pixels are embedded, Sony’s Bionz X processor handles AF with remarkable speed and accuracy for its class, driven by the relatively large sensor and lens optical design.
In practical terms, the RX10 II sustains sharp focus on wildlife in flight, sports moments, or dynamic street scenes with considerably less frustration. The ZS7 can capture snapshots but can’t reliably track erratic movements or maintain focus in challenging high-speed contexts.
Regarding burst shooting, the ZS7 offers a spare 2 frames per second (fps), whereas the RX10 II leaps ahead with 14 fps continuous shooting - a huge benefit for sports photographers or anyone capturing decisive moments.
Lens and Aperture: Speed and Flexibility in the Glass
Beyond sensor differences, the fixed zoom lenses embody different philosophies.
Panasonic’s ZS7 offers a 25-300mm equivalent zoom with a maximum aperture range of f/3.3 to f/4.9. While the 12x zoom range is generous for casual shooting and distant subjects, its moderate maximum apertures limit background blur (bokeh quality) and low-light performance. Macro focusing down to 3 cm lets you get up close but image quality at the long end can suffer softness and chromatic aberrations.
The RX10 II sports a shorter 24-200mm zoom (8.3x) but compensates with a constant bright aperture of f/2.8 throughout the zoom range. This wider aperture provides several key advantages: brighter viewfinder and LCD previews, faster autofocus (due to more light hitting the sensor), significantly shallower depth of field for subject separation, and better low-light capabilities.
Especially for portraiture, the RX10 II’s f/2.8 lens creates deliciously smooth bokeh that isolates skin tones and eyes masterfully. The ZS7 cannot replicate this aesthetic convincingly.
Viewfinder and LCD Interfaces: Composing in the Moment

The subject of composing your shot is fundamental, and here the RX10 II’s electronic viewfinder (EVF) shines with its 2.35 million-dot resolution, 100% coverage, and 0.7x magnification - practically the experience of a mid-range mirrorless camera EVF. It reduces glare and stabilizes your framing under bright outdoor conditions or fast-paced shooting.
The ZS7 lacks a built-in viewfinder entirely, relying on a fixed 3-inch LCD screen with a modest 460k-dot resolution. The absence of a tilting or articulated screen on the ZS7 can stifle creativity in awkward angles (low or overhead shooting), which the RX10’s tilting 3-inch, 1.2 million-dot screen facilitates elegantly.
Both lack touchscreens, which is a minor drawback, though the RX10 II’s more responsive menus and physical controls somewhat mitigate that.
Handling Across Photography Genres: Where Each Camera Fits
Let’s look at genre-specific performance to see how these cameras fare in varied real-world scenarios.
Portrait Photography:
The RX10 II’s larger sensor combined with f/2.8 aperture allows enticing creamy bokeh and accurate skin tone reproduction - a boon for portraits. Face detection AF further enhances focus precision. The ZS7’s smaller sensor and f/3.3-f/4.9 apertures struggle to isolate subjects in the frame, often producing flat backgrounds and less flattering tones.
Landscape Photography:
Dynamic range and resolution favor the RX10 II, which handles shadows and highlights with more finesse and offers 20MP resolution for large prints. The ZS7 is serviceable for casual scenic shots but its noisier CCD sensor and lower resolution limit detail rendition, especially in tricky lighting. Also, note that the RX10 II has weather sealing, a decisive advantage for outdoor explorers - the ZS7 lacks any environmental protection.
Wildlife Photography:
Fast autofocus, high burst rates (14 fps), and reasonably long telephoto reach put the RX10 II miles ahead for action and wildlife shooters. The ZS7’s slower AF and limited 2 fps burst hinder capturing unpredictable animal behavior and fleeting moments.
Sports Photography:
Similarly, the RX10 II excels thanks to continuous AF tracking, quick autofocus acquisition, and rapid shooting speeds. The ZS7 is dense traffic and active sports-enthusiast friendly but much less optimal for serious sporting events.
Street Photography:
Here the ZS7’s compact size shines - discreet, light, and easy to carry. While image quality and AF speed are limited, the stealthy profile and extended zoom help capture candid moments unobtrusively. The RX10 II is more conspicuous but lends sharper images and better controls for expressive street projects.
Macro Photography:
Both cameras focus down to about 3 cm. However, the RX10 II’s greater sensor resolution and stabilization (optical image stabilization present on both) make it better for detailed close-ups with crisper textures and color accuracy.
Night / Astrophotography:
The RX10 II’s larger sensor and superior high ISO performance enable cleaner images under low light and a native ISO range up to 12,800 (with boosts to 25,600). The ZS7 maxes out at ISO 6400 with poorer noise control. Neither camera has specialized astrophotography modes, but the RX10 II’s shutter speed range and stabilization provide more flexibility.
Video Capabilities:
The ZS7 offers HD video at 720p/30fps in AVCHD Lite format, whereas the RX10 II records up to 4K UHD (3840 x 2160) at 30fps, alongside Full HD at 60fps with multiple codecs including XAVC S - a clear advantage for videographers. Moreover, the RX10 II supports external microphones and headphones, giving greater audio control, whereas the ZS7 has no audio ports. Both lack touchscreen interfaces or built-in ND filters.
Travel Photography:
The ZS7’s compact size, built-in GPS, and long 12x zoom are valuable travel features. It’s a grab-and-go camera for travelers prioritizing convenience. The RX10 II’s heavier weight and size might be a consideration for minimalist packers, but the improved image quality, versatility, and robust build (with weather sealing) frame it as a premium travel tool.
Professional Work:
For professionals, RAW support and superior dynamic range are vital. The RX10 II can integrate into workflows better thanks to its RAW files and advanced controls. It has environmental sealing lending some reliability in adverse conditions. The ZS7’s limited manual controls, lack of RAW, and absence of weather sealing make it less appropriate for critical assignments.
Technical Insights: Build Quality, Battery, and Connectivity
The RX10 II benefits from a magnesium alloy chassis with weather sealing, enhancing durability. The ZS7 uses a plastic, compact construction without environmental protections.
Battery life is another real-world factor. The RX10 II offers approximately 400 shots per charge (using Sony NP-FW50), suitable for long days shooting, whereas official ZS7 battery life figures are unspecified but typically less due to compact battery size. Heavy usage and video record will further impact stamina on both.
Connectivity options show the RX10 II’s more modern design with built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for wireless image transfer and remote control. The ZS7 has no wireless features - a notable omission as Wi-Fi increasingly facilitates quick sharing and tethering.
Storage-wise, both use SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but the Sony additionally supports Memory Stick formats, which may be a minor factor depending on your existing media.
Price and Value: Budget Considerations and Long-Term Investment
As of the latest data, the Panasonic ZS7 retails around $350 new (though largely discontinued, now found primarily used), targeting budget-conscious consumers needing versatility in a compact package.
The Sony RX10 II commands nearly triple that price point at around $998. It is a significant investment aimed at serious enthusiasts or professionals requiring image quality and robust features in a single all-in-one superzoom.
The question is whether the leap in sensor performance, AF speed, build quality, and video capability justifies the price difference.
From my extensive experience testing cameras, the RX10 II’s features and performance deliver a commendable value proposition for its price class - especially given its sensor size and professional credentials never commonly found in a bridge camera.
Meanwhile, the ZS7 remains appealing for casual shooters who value portability and zoom range over image fidelity and speed.
Summary of Comparative Scores and Genre Recommendations
The RX10 II leads across nearly every metric: sensor image quality, autofocus, burst rate, video specs, viewfinder quality, build, and connectivity.
The ZS7 slots in as an entry-level, compact superzoom camera with strengths in portability and budget-friendliness.
| Photography Type | Panasonic ZS7 | Sony RX10 II | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Fair | Excellent | RX10 II for professionals |
| Landscape | Good | Very Good | RX10 II for image quality |
| Wildlife | Limited | Very Good | RX10 II for action |
| Sports | Weak | Excellent | RX10 II for speed |
| Street | Good | Good | ZS7 for discreteness |
| Macro | Fair | Very Good | RX10 II for detail |
| Night/Astro | Weak | Good | RX10 II for low light |
| Video | Basic | Excellent | RX10 II for advanced video |
| Travel | Excellent | Good | ZS7 for compactness |
| Professional | No | Yes | RX10 II for demanding work |
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?
From a purely technical and performance standpoint, the Sony Cyber-shot RX10 II is a much more capable and versatile camera. Its large 1-inch sensor combined with f/2.8 lens, advanced autofocus system, rugged build, and high-quality video support make it suitable for a wide range of photography and video scenarios - from portraits and landscapes to wildlife and sports. It offers professional features rarely found outside pricier mirrorless or DSLR bodies.
The Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7, though dated and technologically modest, still offers compelling portability and broad zoom reach at a budget-friendly price. For no-fuss travel snapshots, casual street photography, or entry-level superzoom needs, it remains a trusty little tool.
Your choice hinges on priorities:
- Need lightweight, superzoom, and easy carry? Go Panasonic ZS7.
- Need superior image quality, faster autofocus, and pro features? Go Sony RX10 II.
The cameras represent different photography eras and philosophies - one favoring accessibility, the other engineering excellence. Both still earn their keep in the right hands.
I hope this detailed, side-by-side evaluation clarifies their strengths and shortcomings from personal testing experience and technical evaluation. If you are weighing these two cameras or similar models, consider how you shoot, what image quality standards you demand, and your budget constraints. After all, a camera is merely a tool - the best one is the one that helps you create the images you envision.
Happy shooting!
Panasonic ZS7 vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Panasonic | Sony |
| Model | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
| Otherwise known as | Lumix DMC-TZ10 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2015-06-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine HD II | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,229k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 14.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.30 m | 10.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | AVCHD Lite | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lb) | 813 gr (1.79 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 531 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 images |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $350 | $998 |