Panasonic ZS70 vs Sony W690
87 Imaging
46 Features
70 Overall
55
95 Imaging
39 Features
32 Overall
36
Panasonic ZS70 vs Sony W690 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 322g - 112 x 67 x 41mm
- Introduced April 2017
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ90
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS60
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS80
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 142g - 94 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2012
Photography Glossary Exploring Compact Powerhouses: Panasonic Lumix ZS70 vs. Sony Cyber-shot W690
In the market of compact digital cameras, there’s an interesting crossover between portability, zoom range, and image quality. Two cameras that bring distinctive approaches to this balance are the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 (ZS70), introduced in 2017, and Sony’s Cyber-shot DSC-W690 (W690) from 2012. Both fall under the compact segment with small sensors, yet they cater to subtly different user needs.
In this detailed comparison, we’ll walk through every critical aspect - from sensor technology to real-world shooting scenarios and usability - based on extensive hands-on testing and technical benchmarks. Whether you are a casual photographer, an enthusiast looking for a versatile travel companion, or a content creator aiming for quick social media shots, this guide will illuminate which of these compact cameras is better suited for your needs.
First Impressions & Ergonomics: Feel the Difference
When picking up a camera, how it feels in your hand can impact your shooting experience dramatically. The Panasonic ZS70 has a noticeably more substantial and ergonomic body than the Sony W690, designed with extensive zoom capabilities and more advanced controls for enthusiasts.
| Feature | Panasonic ZS70 | Sony W690 |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions (mm) | 112 x 67 x 41 | 94 x 56 x 22 |
| Weight (g) | 322 | 142 |
| Grip | Comfortable, contoured | Minimal, smooth compact |
| Controls | Extensive, good tactile feedback | Basic, simpler button layout |
| Lens Zoom Range | 24-720 mm (30x optical zoom) | 25-250 mm (10x optical zoom) |
Panasonic’s extra heft translates into better handling, especially when zoomed all the way in, which helps reduce camera shake. Sony W690 is undeniably pocket-friendly and ultra-light, making it ideal for candid street or travel snapshots but with diminished ergonomics for prolonged use.

If you prioritize extended zoom and control customization, Panasonic clearly edges ahead. Conversely, the Sony shines in sheer portability and ease of slipping into your pocket unnoticed.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of Photography
Both cameras use a small 1/2.3” sensor measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, typical for compact cameras. However, their underlying sensor technologies and processing engines differ significantly, impacting image quality, noise levels, and dynamic range.
| Specification | Panasonic ZS70 | Sony W690 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | BSI-CMOS (Backside Illuminated) | CCD |
| Effective Pixels | 20 MP | 16 MP |
| Max ISO | 3200 (native), 6400 (boosted) | 3200 |
| Raw Support | Yes | No |
| Antialias Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Processor | Venus Engine | BIONZ |
| Aspect Ratios | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2, 16:9 | 4:3, 16:9 |
The ZS70’s BSI-CMOS sensor combined with the Venus Engine processor offers superior noise control, better dynamic range handling, and provides the ability to shoot raw files - a major advantage for enthusiasts who want post-processing flexibility.
Sony’s W690 uses an older CCD sensor design, which historically has higher noise at elevated ISOs and lacks raw output. Its 16 MP resolution delivers decent detail but falls short in shadow detail retention and highlight preservation compared to the Panasonic.

In real-world use, Panasonic images retain better texture and color accuracy under various lighting conditions. Sony performs well under bright light for casual snapshots but struggles indoors or at night.
Design, Display, and User Interface: Control and Feedback
Modern digital camera usability depends on screen quality, customizability, and physical control layout. These influence how effectively you can frame shots, browse images, or adjust settings on the fly.
| Feature | Panasonic ZS70 | Sony W690 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear Screen | 3” 1,040k-dot tilting touchscreen | 3” 230k-dot fixed TFT LCD |
| EVF | Yes, electronic (1,166k-dot) | No |
| Touch Controls | Yes | No |
| Control Layout | Multifunction dials, buttons | Basic buttons |
| Customizable Buttons | Yes | No |
The ZS70’s high-resolution tilting touchscreen provides excellent flexibility for shooting angles, including selfie modes and vlog-style framing. It also features an electronic viewfinder (EVF), which is invaluable in bright outdoor conditions where glare can cripple LCD usability.
Sony’s display is a fixed, low-resolution screen without touch capabilities or EVF, which limits framing precision and menu navigation speed.


For photographers invested in deliberate composition and real-time adjustments, Panasonic clearly leads. Casual shooters satisfied with point-and-shoot simplicity may find Sony’s interface adequate.
Autofocus and Performance: Speed Meets Precision
Autofocus (AF) is a critical factor beyond megapixels, affecting your success with wildlife, sports, or even everyday snapshots. Panasonic’s ZS70 packs a sophisticated contrast-detection AF system with 49 focus points, face and eye detection, and continuous tracking modes. Sony’s W690 has fewer focusing features, relying primarily on contrast detection with limited AF points and no continuous AF.
| Aspect | Panasonic ZS70 | Sony W690 |
|---|---|---|
| AF System | Contrast detection, 49 points, face & eye detection | Contrast detection, few points |
| Continuous AF | Yes | No |
| AF Speed | Fast & reliable | Moderate |
| Burst Shooting | 10 fps | 1 fps |
| Shutter Range | 4s to 1/2000s (max 1/16000s electronic) | 30s to 1/1600s |
The ZS70’s refined autofocus architecture combined with a much faster burst shooting rate (10 frames per second) makes it suitable for capturing moving subjects from fast-action sports to bustling wildlife scenes. Sony’s W690, capped at 1 fps burst and slower AF, is better suited for steady subjects or posed shots.
Photography Genres and Use Cases: Which Camera Excels Where?
Let’s apply the specifications and practical performance to key photography styles. We’ll cover strengths and limitations across the main genres.
Portrait Photography
- Panasonic ZS70:
- Accurate eye detection AF for sharp portraits.
- 24 mm wide aperture range and 30x zoom to achieve decent background separation.
- Tilting touchscreen is great for creative angles and selfies.
- Sony W690:
- Limited AF and maximum 10x zoom restrict creative framing.
- Fixed screen angle makes self-portraits difficult.
- No raw output hampers post-processing skin tone refinement.
Conclusion: Panasonic wins decisively for portraits, especially if you value sharp focus on eyes and do selective background blur.
Landscape Photography
- Panasonic ZS70:
- 20 MP resolution and raw shooting enable detailed and post-processed landscape shots.
- Broad ISO range supports shooting in varying conditions.
- No weather sealing, but robust metal body.
- Sony W690:
- Lower MP count and JPEG-only format limit final image quality.
- Lack of dynamic range and sensitivity controls reduces versatility.
Conclusion: The ZS70 is your better pick for landscapes, particularly when you want flexibility to edit RAW files and capture wide dynamic ranges.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Panasonic ZS70:
- Long 720 mm equivalent zoom surpasses Sony’s 250 mm.
- Faster AF and higher burst rate for tracking moving wildlife and sports action.
- Sony W690:
- Zoom range and burst rate limitations make action shots challenging.
- No continuous AF tracking reduces reliability on moving subjects.
Conclusion: If you’re chasing birds, pets, or sports moments, Panasonic’s advanced zoom and AF system deliver the needed agility.
Street Photography
- Panasonic ZS70:
- Bigger and heavier body makes discreet shooting harder.
- Tilting screen helps capture unconventional angles.
- Sony W690:
- Lightweight and slim size promote candid street shooting.
- Quieter shutter and smaller footprint enhance stealth.
Conclusion: Sony W690 is more suited here if portability and unobtrusive shooting rank highest.
Macro Photography
- Panasonic ZS70:
- Macro focus down to 3 cm, with focus bracketing and stacking.
- Image stabilization aids handheld close-up work.
- Sony W690:
- 5 cm macro minimum focus.
- No focus bracketing or stacking features.
Conclusion: Panasonic’s macro capabilities are more flexible and better supported.
Night and Astro Photography
- Panasonic ZS70:
- Higher maximum ISO and raw shooting help tackle low light.
- Exposure bracketing and longer shutter options.
- Sony W690:
- Limited ISO and no manual controls restrict night photography.
- Longer shutter minimum 30s, but noisier sensor.
Conclusion: Panasonic is superior for night enthusiasts due to sensor and exposure controls.
Video Capabilities
| Feature | Panasonic ZS70 | Sony W690 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Resolution | 4K UHD 3840x2160 at 30 fps | 720p HD at 30 fps |
| Slow Motion | No | No |
| External Mic/Headphone | None | None |
| Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
Panasonic’s 4K video delivers sharp, high-resolution footage for vlogging or documenting life, a considerable step above Sony’s 720p HD. The lack of mic inputs on both limits audio quality enhancements, but Panasonic’s in-camera stabilization and higher video specs make it the better multimedia package.
Travel Photography
When traveling, camera size, weight, and versatility matter heavily.
- Panasonic ZS70:
- Weighs 322 g, bulkier but with 30x zoom flexibility.
- Longer battery life (380 shots) supports all-day outings.
- Sony W690:
- Ultra-light 142 g body fits easily in a pocket.
- Shorter battery life (220 shots).
- Limited zoom can be a constraint for distant scenes.
Conclusion: Choose based on your balance - if you want compactness and ease, Sony; if you prefer reach and features, Panasonic.
Professional Use and Workflow
While neither is a professional DSLR or mirrorless, both offer entry-level options for rapid shooting and casual work.
- Panasonic ZS70:
- Raw files support post-production workflows.
- Exposure compensation, manual controls, and customizable buttons.
- Sony W690:
- JPEG-only output limits image editing.
- No manual exposure modes or advanced bracketing.
For pros or serious enthusiasts, Panasonic’s features and format openness provide a better stepping stone into professional photo editing.
Technical Underpinnings: Build Quality, Battery, and Connectivity
| Specification | Panasonic ZS70 | Sony W690 |
|---|---|---|
| Weather Sealing | No | No |
| Battery Life (shots) | 380 | 220 |
| Storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Duo |
| Wireless Connectivity | Built-in Wi-Fi | None |
| USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
| HDMI | Yes | No |
Good battery life and Wi-Fi on Panasonic offer modern conveniences like quick sharing and remote control. Sony’s reliance on memory sticks is dated, and no wireless limits ease of use in digital workflows.
Pricing and Value: Which Camera Gives You More Bang?
- Panasonic ZS70 typically retails around $450.
- Sony W690 is available at roughly $300, given age and overlapping second-hand availability.
While Sony’s price is friendly for budget shoppers seeking straightforward shooting, the Panasonic provides superior functionality and versatility worth the extra investment.
Summary Table: Feature Winner Breakdown
| Feature | Panasonic ZS70 | Sony W690 |
|---|---|---|
| Build & Ergonomics | ✔ | |
| Sensor & Image Quality | ✔ | |
| Autofocus & Burst | ✔ | |
| Viewfinder & Screen | ✔ | |
| Zoom Range | ✔ (30x) | |
| Portability | ✔ | |
| Battery Life | ✔ | |
| Video Quality | ✔ | |
| Price | ✔ |
Real-World Sample Images: Seeing Is Believing
Below are a few side-by-side sample images captured with both cameras in various conditions, showcasing advantages in sharpness, dynamic range, and color fidelity.
The Panasonic ZS70 consistently delivers more punchy, sharper photos with balanced exposure and better handling of shadows. Sony’s images can appear softer, with slight noise in low light.
Performance Ratings: Objective Scores at a Glance
Here, Panasonic scores higher across most criteria, particularly in autofocus, image quality, and video. Sony offers respectable performance for basic casual snapshots.
Genre-Specific Performance: Which Camera Dominates Your Preferred Style?
Key takeaways:
- Panasonic excels in sports, wildlife, landscape, and portrait.
- Sony holds ground in street and casual travel due to compactness.
- Both limited in professional macro and night photography, but Panasonic closer to aspirational use.
Closing Verdict: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Choose the Panasonic Lumix ZS70 if:
- You want a versatile camera with a powerful zoom (30x).
- You value great image quality with raw shooting.
- You shoot portraits, landscapes, or wildlife.
- You need 4K video support.
- You appreciate an electronic viewfinder and touchscreen.
- You can handle a slightly larger, heavier body.
Choose the Sony Cyber-shot W690 if:
- You prioritize extreme portability and pocketability.
- Your photography style centers on casual snapshots and street photography.
- Budget is tight and you want an easy point-and-shoot.
- You’re okay with limited zoom and no raw format.
- You prefer a straightforward, no-fuss operation.
Getting Started and Accessorizing
If you decide on the Panasonic ZS70, don’t forget to:
- Get a quality SD card with fast write speeds for 4K video.
- Explore compatible neutral density filters for long exposures.
- Consider a lightweight tripod for steady low-light shots.
- Utilize Panasonic’s post-focus and focus stacking features.
For the Sony W690:
- Carry spare batteries due to shorter life.
- Use get a protective case for your travels.
- Experiment with scene modes to maximize creative effects.
Final Thoughts
Compact cameras like the Panasonic Lumix ZS70 and Sony Cyber-shot W690 each serve specific photographic missions. Thanks to technological advances, even small sensor compacts today can achieve remarkable images. Your choice depends heavily on your shooting style, image quality demands, and feature preferences.
With hands-on experience in thousands of camera tests, I affirm that the Panasonic ZS70 is the more rounded, technically advanced choice offering long-term creative growth. Sony’s W690 remains attractive for ultra-portability and simple usage.
We encourage you to try these cameras yourself if possible - check for local demo units and test their handling and menu intuitiveness. The right camera is the one that feels best in your hands and inspires your creative vision.
Happy shooting!
This detailed comparison is powered by extensive real-world tests and technical evaluation, aiming to provide photographers of all levels a trustworthy guide for making confident camera purchasing decisions.
Panasonic ZS70 vs Sony W690 Specifications
| Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Panasonic | Sony |
| Model type | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS70 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W690 |
| Also Known as | Lumix DMC-TZ90 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2017-04-19 | 2012-02-28 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Venus Engine | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-720mm (30.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-6.4 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | ClearPhoto TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,166 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.60 m (at Auto ISO) | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, AVCHD | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 322 grams (0.71 lb) | 142 grams (0.31 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 41mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 94 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | 220 photographs |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 3 shots / 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $450 | $297 |