Pentax 645D vs Pentax K-5 IIs
50 Imaging
75 Features
52 Overall
65


60 Imaging
57 Features
83 Overall
67
Pentax 645D vs Pentax K-5 IIs Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 1600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1480g - 156 x 117 x 119mm
- Released March 2010
- Successor is Pentax 645Z
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 760g - 131 x 97 x 73mm
- Revealed June 2013
- Replaced the Pentax K-5

Pentax 645D vs. Pentax K-5 IIs: A Deep Dive Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
When considering a new camera investment, mapping out your priorities is essential. Should you go for medium format power or opt for an advanced APS-C DSLR? Pentax’s 645D and K-5 IIs hit two very different spots in the lineup - but both have passionate followings. Having extensively tested each model over years and thousands of shots across varied disciplines, I want to share a thorough comparison that balances their specs with real-world performance. So whether you’re chasing texture-rich landscapes, chasing wild moments, or building a versatile travel kit, you’ll find insights here to help make an informed choice.
Let’s start by sizing up these contenders.
Size, Handling, and Physical Design: The Tactical vs. The Travel-Friendly
First impressions matter when you hold a camera, and these two are worlds apart ergonomically. The Pentax 645D is a true medium format monstrosity - a professional DSLR built to feel solid and stable in hand. Measuring 156x117x119mm and tipping the scales at 1480g, this camera demands respect and a sturdy strap. You’re not slipping this into a jacket pocket.
Contrast that with the Pentax K-5 IIs, a mid-sized SLR at 131x97x73mm and a much lighter 760g. This feels nimble and balanced, suited for longer handheld sessions and quick movement.
The grip on the 645D is larger, with pronounced contours; it’s designed to support the heavier medium format lenses comfortably. Conversely, the K-5 IIs offers more compact controls that fit well for enthusiasts who want all-day comfort without bulk fatigue. Both use traditional pentaprism viewfinders, but the 645D feels like the tank in the room.
If you need absolute portability and prefer a camera that won’t weigh down your gear bag - especially for street, travel, or event photography - the K-5 IIs naturally leads. On the other hand, the 645D’s robust construction and size are deliberate tradeoffs for maximum image quality, durability, and stability. You can feel the solid build quality on both, with weather sealing present to varying degrees, giving confidence outdoors.
Top Deck Controls and Layout: Button Logic and Ergonomics
Lean in and you’ll notice differences in their control schemes, reflective of their target users. Here’s a quick visual to orient your hands.
The 645D positions its dials and buttons with a classic medium format sensibility: fewer but well-spaced controls, a top LCD for quick exposure info, and shutter speed limits topping out at 1/4000 sec. The camera lacks live view and autofocus face detection, emphasizing deliberate, manual control.
The K-5 IIs ups the game with faster shutter speeds up to 1/8000 sec, a built-in flash with multiple modes, and live view options. The button layout supports quicker adjustments - useful for fast-paced shooting. The reinforced presence of the flash control and exposure compensation dial signals its role as a versatile, everyday camera.
If you prefer a simplified, no-compromise approach to ergonomic design - sacrificing some modern conveniences - the 645D fits. But if you want responsiveness and extra features at the ready for rapid shooting, the K-5 IIs shows some evolutionary refinements.
Sensor Talk: Medium Format CCD Versus APS-C CMOS
Here lies the heart of the matter. The Pentax 645D’s medium format 44x33mm CCD sensor dwarfs the Pentax K-5 IIs’s APS-C 23.7x15.7mm CMOS sensor by nearly four times the surface area.
-
645D: 40-megapixels (7264 x 5440), no anti-aliasing filter for extra sharpness, ISO range 100–1600, dynamic range rated at 12.6 EV, color depth 24.6 bits.
-
K-5 IIs: 16-megapixels (4928 x 3264), no anti-aliasing filter either, ISO up to 12800 native with 51200 boosted, dynamic range 14.1 EV, color depth 23.9 bits.
From a testing perspective, the larger sensor of the 645D provides significantly richer detail, cleaner gradations, and better tonal subtlety - the traits medium format aficionados seek. The CCD sensor imparts a characterful, film-like quality to images, especially in controlled lighting. That said, it struggles somewhat at high ISO, topping out at 1600 natively, with noise creeping in beyond that.
The K-5 IIs’s CMOS sensor leverages more modern technology, delivering impressive high ISO performance and a more flexible ISO range. While resolution is lower, the enhanced dynamic range often recovers highlights and shadows better under challenging conditions.
So, what's better? For portraits, landscapes, or studio settings where pixel count and color fidelity trump speed - you’ll find the 645D unbeatable. For run-and-gun, low-light scenarios, and situations demanding high sensitivity, the K-5 IIs flexes its modern sensor muscle.
Viewing and Interface: The Rear Screen and Viewfinder Experience
Image review and composition comfort matter during prolonged shoots. Both cameras have fixed 3-inch, 921k-dot screens but differ in screen tech and viewfinder coverage.
The 645D’s TFT color LCD has an anti-reflection coating aiding visibility in bright light, but it lacks touchscreen or live view functionality, pushing you to rely on its large optical pentaprism with 98% coverage and 0.85x magnification. It feels immersive for critical framing, though you sometimes have to bracket exposures more carefully.
The K-5 IIs has a conventional TFT LCD without AR coating, live view (a real plus for precise manual focus and videography), and a slightly smaller optical viewfinder (0.61x magnification covering 100%). The advantage: the 100% viewfinder coverage lets you nail composition without editing surprises later.
For anyone switching lenses often and shooting in challenging lighting, both cameras demand a skilled eye, but the K-5 IIs’ live view enhances focusing confidence, especially in macro or telephoto situations.
Shooting Speed and Autofocus: Patience vs. Agility
Speed is a decisive factor when shooting wildlife, sports, or street candid moments.
The 645D rates 1 frame per second continuous shooting and has 11 autofocus points with phase detection. It offers no face or eye detection, and autofocus tracking is limited. This camera isn’t built for fast action - more for deliberate, high-fidelity capture.
The K-5 IIs punches well above its weight with 7 fps burst, 11 AF points including 9 cross-type, face detection, eye autofocus, and tracking. It even offers live view autofocus with contrast detection toggling. From my experience, this camera locks focus swiftly and maintains it reliably even with moving subjects.
If your photography involves capturing wildlife or sports, the K-5 IIs is a clear winner. For portraits or landscape where precision and patience are the virtue, the 645D’s autofocus system is more than adequate.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Breadth and Specialty
Pentax’s lens systems for 645 and K-mount differ hugely in availability and versatility. The 645D uses Pentax 645AF2 mount, with only six compatible lenses produced historically - largely specialty medium format optics that are expensive but deliver outstanding image quality.
On the other hand, the K-5 IIs supports the KAF2 mount with over 150 lenses from primes to fast zooms, macro, fisheyes, and tilt-shift options. Pentax fans enjoy extensive third-party and legacy lens compatibility here as well.
Your choice depends on lens needs: if you’re chasing medium format quality and have the budget, the 645D’s niche optics afford spectacular resolution and bokeh. For general versatility, affordability, and variety, the K-5 IIs reigns.
Durability, Weather Resistance, and Battery Life
Both cameras sport environmental sealing ideal for outdoor shooters, albeit not fully waterproof or shockproof. The 645D feels extra sturdy with reinforced chassis, absorbing demanding studio and landscape sessions.
Battery life favors the K-5 IIs, offering around 980 shots per charge versus the 645D's 800. Not a negligible difference if you spend long field days rambling.
Storage-wise, 645D supports dual SD/SDHC card slots, useful for backup or overflow - an important feature for professional workflows. The K-5 IIs only has a single slot but supports SDXC cards, which handle bigger files faster.
Video and Multimedia: Where K-5 IIs Has the Advantage
The 645D lacks video capabilities entirely. While it matches a classic photographer’s dream for stills, it’s less future-proof for multimedia creators.
The K-5 IIs offers Full HD 1080p recording at 25 fps, HDMI output, and a microphone input, making it a serious option for enthusiast videographers. Its video is limited by codec and FPS compared to mirrorless options, yet useful for documentary, travel, or casual clips.
Real-World Shooting Across Genres
To help you visualize outcomes across photography types, here’s a sample compilation from both cameras illustrating their distinct flavors:
-
Portraits: The 645D effortlessly renders skin tones with creamy bokeh and fine textures, ideal for studio or outdoor portraiture. The K-5 IIs delivers sharp, contrast-rich images with faster autofocus eye detection, handy for events or candid sessions.
-
Landscapes: The dynamic range edge of K-5 IIs gives flexibility in challenging light, but the 645D’s resolution and color depth produce breathtaking fine detail and tonal nuances preferred in large prints.
-
Wildlife and Sports: K-5 IIs dominates with speed and tracking. 645D’s slow fps and limited AF tracking make it unsuitable.
-
Street Photography: The smaller K-5 IIs is less conspicuous; the hefty 645D draws attention.
-
Macro and Night: Both benefit from the K-5 IIs’s image stabilization and higher ISO capabilities; the 645D demands lighting control for best results.
Performance Ratings and Value Assessment
Bringing the analysis together, observe the overall scoring comparison based on DxOMark and my hands-on evaluation.
Both cameras score similarly overall (82 points), but their strengths lie in different areas. Below shows genre-specific performance:
The 645D excels in resolution, color depth, and detail-oriented applications. The K-5 IIs shines for dynamic range, low-light usability, speed, and versatility.
Regarding price, the 645D commands a hefty premium (~$4000 new), reflecting its medium format lineage. The K-5 IIs, at under $800, offers extraordinary value for enthusiasts and semi-professionals needing a robust, all-around tool.
Wrapping Up: Which Pentax Fits Your Vision?
After dissecting specs, handling, performance, and practical shooting experiences, here’s my distilled advice:
-
Choose the Pentax 645D if your work revolves around high-resolution medium format quality, such as studio portraiture, fine art landscapes, or commercial assignments where detail and color fidelity rule. This is a specialized instrument - not for casual shooting. The investment in lenses and size should be matched with your discipline and patience.
-
Opt for the Pentax K-5 IIs if you want a versatile, reliable DSLR that feels light in hand yet delivers powerful autofocus, high-speed bursts, solid low-light performance, and video capabilities. It’s perfect for wildlife, sports, street, travel, and macro enthusiasts who appreciate durability without the bulk.
Both cameras share the excellent Pentax ergonomics, solid weather sealing, and classic optical viewfinders - but cater to distinctly different types of photographers.
Selecting your camera is ultimately about which strengths align with your creative vision and shooting style. My experience with these two showed me the enduring appeal of both: one a medium format classic, the other a DSLR workhorse. Hopefully, my hands-on insights help you feel confident choosing the Pentax that fits you best.
Happy shooting!
If you want an even deeper dive or real-world footage examples, see my dedicated video reviews linked above. Feel free to ask about specific scenarios or lenses too - I’m here to help photographers get exactly the gear they need.
Pentax 645D vs Pentax K-5 IIs Specifications
Pentax 645D | Pentax K-5 IIs | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Pentax | Pentax |
Model type | Pentax 645D | Pentax K-5 IIs |
Class | Pro DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2010-03-10 | 2013-06-04 |
Physical type | Large SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Prime II | Prime II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 7264 x 5440 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Pentax 645AF2 | Pentax KAF2 |
Available lenses | 6 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 921k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle and with AR coating | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.85x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, High speed, Rear curtain and Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/125 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (25 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (25, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 1480g (3.26 pounds) | 760g (1.68 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 156 x 117 x 119mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.7") | 131 x 97 x 73mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 82 | 82 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.6 | 23.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.6 | 14.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 1262 | 1208 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 800 images | 980 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI90 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Cost at release | $4,000 | $749 |