Pentax 645Z vs Pentax RZ10
49 Imaging
80 Features
74 Overall
77


92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Pentax 645Z vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Launched April 2014
- Old Model is Pentax 645D
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Launched July 2011

The Pentax 645Z vs. Pentax RZ10: A Tale of Two Roots in Photography Excellence
Stepping into the world of Pentax cameras often means embracing steadfast reliability mixed with thoughtful design choices - ranging from medium format monster machines to pocket-sized point-and-shoots. Today, we’re putting side-by-side two Pentax stalwarts that couldn’t be more different in purpose, scale, and ambition: the Pentax 645Z, a heavyweight medium format DSLR aimed squarely at professionals and demanding enthusiasts, and the Pentax RZ10, a tiny but surprisingly capable small sensor compact that promises simplicity and pocketability.
I’ve tested thousands of cameras across genres for over 15 years, so I’m here to keep our feet on solid technical ground despite the obvious size and speed differential. From pixel quality to ergonomics, from autofocus nimbleness to battery stamina, and from rough-and-ready weather sealing to video chops - no stone will be left unturned. Buckle up as we explore how these two cameras really stack up in both specs and real-world mojo. Spoiler: Your choice depends wildly on what you want from your photographic tool.
A Size and Ergonomics Cliffhanger: Medium Format Bulk vs. Compact Convenience
Imagine dropping the Pentax 645Z and the RZ10 on your desk. The difference? Monumental.
First impressions? The 645Z is a hefty, almost tank-like chunk of precision. We’re looking at 156x117x123mm and a weight of 1550g. This camera demands respect - and a decent camera bag. It’s the kind of camera that whispers “studio and fieldwork serious business." Meanwhile, the RZ10 is a pocket friendly 97x61x33mm and a light 178g, the true definition of grab-and-go convenience.
Handling the 645Z, you get a sense of quality craftsmanship; it’s built like a fortress with magnesium alloy body, sealed for dust and moisture, and even freezeproof - a necessity if you shoot landscapes or commercial work in icy conditions. On the other hand, the RZ10 feels delicate and straightforward, more toy-like but undeniably practical for quick snaps or travel light days.
This epic size contrast obviously shapes usability: The Pentax 645Z is not something you snap candidly on city streets; the RZ10 will fit in a coat pocket, perfect for spontaneous moments.
Top Controls and Interface: Classic DSLR Roots Meet Compact Simplicity
These cameras don’t just differ in size but also in control layouts and menus.
The 645Z sports a traditional DSLR top plate, featuring dedicated dials for shutter speed, ISO (kudos for quick adjustments!), and exposure compensation - vital for professional workflow. The ergonomics favor those who shoot with one hand on the grip and the other tweaking settings, a necessity when lighting changes rapidly. Yet, its buttons are not illuminated, possibly inconvenient in low light.
Conversely, the RZ10 offers a minimalistic button set, reflecting its compact category. No external dials - just zoom toggles, a shutter release, and a power button. This level of simplicity suits casual shooters but frustrates any photographer who craves manual control or quick access to parameters beyond “point-and-shoot.”
Many users looking for intuitive, speedy control for demanding scenarios will instantly appreciate the 645Z’s interface. The RZ10, however, caters to ease and minimalism over precision.
Sensor Technology: The Heartbeat of Image Quality
Now we arrive at arguably the most telling difference: the sensors powering each camera.
The Pentax 645Z features a 44 x 33 mm medium format CMOS sensor delivering a whopping 51 megapixels (8256 x 6192 pixels). No mean feat for a 2014 entry, it’s heralded for exceptional image fidelity, superb dynamic range (around 14.7 EV), and deep color depth (26 bits per DxO measurements). The sensor size is approximately 52x larger than a typical full-frame 35mm sensor, and that sheer area strips away noise and grants an ethereal quality to portraits and landscapes alike.
By contrast, the RZ10’s sensor is a paltry 1/2.3" CCD measuring 6.08 x 4.56 mm and producing just 14 megapixels (4288 x 3216 pixels) - absolutely standard for compact cameras of its era. It carries an antialiasing filter (which smoothens moiré but slightly softens detail), while the 645Z opts to forgo this filter for razor-sharpness at the pixel level.
While the RZ10's sensor allows decent color rendition and quick operation, it’s clearly outmatched in resolution, noise handling, and dynamic range. ISO sensitivity caps at 6400 on the RZ10 versus a mind-boggling 204,800 on the 645Z (though practically users rarely push this max). For portraits, stunning landscapes, or professional work where image detail and quality matter down to the last pixel, the 645Z’s sensor is in a different galaxy altogether.
Display and User Experience: Viewing Your Masterpieces
Turning the cameras around, both offer LCD screens, but with very different user experience levels.
The Pentax 645Z uses a large 3.2-inch tilting LCD (a boon for waist-level or overhead shots) running at 1,037k dots for crisp detail. Although not a touchscreen - a lingering gap in camera ergonomics - it offers live view and an optical pentaprism viewfinder with 98% coverage and 0.85x magnification, suited to precise manual framing without electronic lag. The optical viewfinder’s natural look is a favorite for photographers who disdain the slight delay and battery consumption of EVFs.
On the other hand, the RZ10’s fixed 2.7-inch screen sports a lower 230k dot resolution with an anti-reflective coating but is fixed in place - no fancy tilting or touching here. Worse, there’s no viewfinder at all, OLED or optical, forcing you to frame entirely via the LCD, which can be tricky in bright daylight.
If you appreciate an ergonomic viewfinder to compose carefully or want the flexibility to shoot from awkward angles, the 645Z leads hands-down. The RZ10 suits casual compositions at eye-level but falters for more deliberate capturing.
Autofocus and Speed: Reactivity in the Field
A camera’s autofocus (AF) ability often makes or breaks its suitability for certain photography types, especially sports, wildlife, or any fast-action event.
The Pentax 645Z utilizes a robust 27-point autofocus system featuring phase detection (critical for speed) combined with contrast detection for live view. It offers face detection and multi-area AF, with continuous, single shot, and tracking modes. In my experience, it locks onto subjects reliably and tracks slow to moderate moving subjects very well - though 3 fps burst shooting isn’t exactly beastly for wildlife or sports, it’s more than adequate for studio sessions or landscapes.
The RZ10, equipped with only 9 contrast-detection autofocus points and lacking phase detection, is geared to basic usability. Its single-point autofocus is slower and less reliable, especially in lower light or for moving subjects. Continuous AF or tracking is limited, and the maximum shoot speed is just 1 fps, which is acceptable for still subjects but frustrating for action.
For anyone prioritizing wildlife or sports photography - and you want to chart aggressive movement - you’ll likely feel the limits of both, but the 645Z’s system can at least be partnered with exceptional lenses and steady support. The RZ10 is strictly casual.
Lens Ecosystem and Flexibility: The Glass that Makes or Breaks
The 645Z accepts the Pentax 645AF2 mount lenses. The medium format ecosystem isn’t as vast as Canon or Nikon’s system but includes a set of six professional-grade lenses ranging from fast primes to telephoto zooms crafted to exploit that lovely 51MP sensor. I’ve used the Pentax FA 645 75mm f/2.8 for portraits - the out-of-focus backgrounds have an exquisite, painterly quality owing to the sensor size and lens optics combined. You’re afforded extensive manual focus precision, with the huge viewfinder aiding critical sharpness checks.
On the flip side, the RZ10’s lens is fixed, spanning a 28-280mm equivalent zoom at f/3.2-5.9. That ten-times zoom range is handy for emergencies but sacrifices optical quality and aperture speed. There’s no option for external lenses, manual glass, or filters beyond clip-ons, making it a bit of a Swiss army knife for casual shooting but nothing to write home about if creative control is your game.
If lens variety, optics quality, and manual control rank high on your priorities, the 645Z is a rewarding platform. The RZ10 is a one-trick pony - versatile but ultimately limiting.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ready for Work Where Others Fear to Tread
Pentax has a strong history of weather-sealing, and the 645Z is no exception. It features body sealing rated for dustproofing, water resistance (though not waterproof), and freezeproofing. For pros shooting on location - be it misty coastlines or cold mountain summits - this robustness is a godsend. I’ve tested the 645Z in wet and cold conditions, and it never hiccuped or showed condensation problems.
The RZ10 offers minimal environmental protection - mild sealing presence but definitely no dustproof or freezeproof certification. This tiny camera is best kept out of challenging environments.
If rugged durability and confidence in harsh conditions matter, the 645Z is built to win.
Battery Life and Storage: Shoot All Day vs. Shoot a Few Hours
Battery stamina can’t be overlooked in any camera review. The 645Z’s D-LI90 battery delivers approximately 650 shots per charge, a robust figure reflecting efficiency in a big sensor DSLR. Dual SD card slots also support extensive shooting or instant backup - a critical feature for professionals in the field who cannot afford memory card failure.
By contrast, the RZ10’s D-LI92 battery reaches around 178 shots before a recharge is needed, and it only has a single slot with both SD/SDHC and internal memory available. This lags noticeably behind modern compact expectations and often necessitates carrying spares.
For all-day shooting or projects requiring reliable buffer space, the 645Z towers above here.
Video Capabilities: Medium Format Stays Classy, Compact Tries Simple
Both cameras offer video recording, though expectations should be tempered.
The Pentax 645Z records Full HD 1920x1080 video at 60i/50i/30p etc., encoded in MPEG-4/H.264 - adequate but not automotive 4K speed. It includes a mic input but lacks a headphone jack for monitoring audio, a slight disappointment for videographers. Optical stabilization isn’t present, so steady video demands careful handling or gimbals.
The RZ10 records only 720p video at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format, which is a bit ancient in compression terms - large files, limited quality. No external mic, no stabilization beyond sensor-shift image stabilization for stills (which doesn’t help video), and no HDMI output. This is chiefly a stills-first camera with token video.
If video is a priority, the 645Z’s footage quality, while not cinema-grade, will outperform the RZ10 by miles.
Photography Genre Suitability: Matching Each Camera to Its Domain
To help you visualize this better, here’s a breakdown of each camera’s forte in various photographic genres:
-
Portrait Photography: The 645Z’s medium format sensor, eye detection AF, and superb lens choices make skin tones buttery smooth and backgrounds melt with lovely bokeh. The RZ10’s small sensor and limited aperture range mean flat, less flattering portraits.
-
Landscape Photography: The 645Z is king here with stellar dynamic range, immense resolution, and weather sealing. The RZ10’s sensor and optics limit latitude, making it a casual sightseeing camera only.
-
Wildlife Photography: Neither is ideally suited for fast, action-heavy wildlife; the 645Z’s 3 fps and 27 focus points are workable, but sports-oriented DSLRs or mirrorless cameras serve better. The RZ10 lacks continuous AF or burst speed for chasing critters.
-
Sports Photography: Both fall short due to slow frame rates, but the 645Z can handle slower-paced sports or posed shots; the RZ10 is not recommended.
-
Street Photography: The RZ10’s discreet size and quick zoom give it a stealth edge; the 645Z’s bulk and noise limit candid potential.
-
Macro Photography: The RZ10 offers a close 1 cm focusing range and in-body stabilization, great for casual macro shoots. The 645Z requires specialized lenses; however, the sensor resolution enables exquisite focus stacking if paired with compatible glass.
-
Night/Astro Photography: The 645Z excels with high ISO performance (ISO 100–204,800) and long exposures; the RZ10’s sensor noise and limited exposure speed reduce usefulness in the dark.
-
Video: Neither is a videographer’s dream but the 645Z’s full HD is serviceable far beyond the RZ10’s limited 720p capability.
-
Travel Photography: The RZ10 is perfect for light travel - pocketable, versatile zoom, and easy operation. The 645Z is a full kit proposition, heavy and bulky, better suited to specific planned shoots.
-
Professional Work: The 645Z is built for professional reliability, supporting RAW, dual cards, and weather resistance. The RZ10 doesn’t speak that language.
Real-World Image Quality and Sample Gallery
The proof is in the pixels, as every photographer knows. See sample images comparing the 645Z and RZ10 in fine detail from various conditions, from daylight landscapes to studio portraits.
I’ve personally tested these cameras side-by-side where lighting conditions challenged each sensor. The 645Z’s shots remain crisp throughout the ISO range with impressive shadow detail, vibrant but natural colors, and almost zero noise until extreme settings. The RZ10’s images suffer from noise, lower detail, and struggles in backlit or shadowed areas.
If image quality ranks above all for you, no contest: the 645Z is the clear victor.
Overall Performance and Scoring
Here’s a synthesized view of their aggregate performance based on my hands-on experience and technical tests:
The Pentax 645Z ranks remarkably high across image quality, build, handling, and professional features - it earns a strong recommendation for serious photographers or studios willing to carry the weight for superior results. The RZ10 scores as an entry-level compact, strong in portability and ease but weak elsewhere.
Who’s Each Camera For? Clear, Tailored Recommendations
-
Pentax 645Z Recommended if:
- You are a professional or advanced enthusiast requiring top-tier medium format image quality.
- Portrait, landscape, or commercial photography is your core field.
- You shoot on location, need weather sealing, and rely on manual control with robust lenses.
- You have the budget (~$5000) and stamina for a heavy DSLR body.
- You appreciate RAW file flexibility and build for future-proof work.
-
Pentax RZ10 Recommended if:
- You want a simple, compact, all-in-one camera for casual shooting and travel.
- You prefer pocketability and extended zoom range over optical refinement.
- Budget constraints (~$200) dictate your purchase.
- Video and specialized controls aren’t priorities.
- You’re a beginner or want a straightforward point-and-shoot experience.
Final Thoughts: Not Just a Numbers Game but Fit-for-Purpose Tools
Choosing between the Pentax 645Z and the RZ10 is less about “better or worse” and more about what you seek in a camera’s role. They inhabit entirely different universes of photography.
The 645Z stands out as an unimpeachable medium format workhorse - for me, a camera I’d trust with important commissions, exhibitions, and high-stakes shoots where quality must not be sacrificed. Its shortcomings - modest continuous speed, no touchscreen - are minor in the grand scheme for its intended user base.
Meanwhile, the diminutive RZ10 is a nice little companion for snapshots, memory gathering, and anytime you don’t want the fuss of interchangeable lenses or heavy gear. The trade-offs in image quality, controls, and versatility are expected given its category.
If you gravitate toward museum-worthy prints, crystal-clear portraits, and landscapes that look breathtaking without endless post-processing, the 645Z is hard to beat for the price. If you just want a friend to capture your trip to the beach or a night out, the RZ10 delivers that without babysitting.
To sum it all up and put a bow on this camera face-off:
- Pentax 645Z: Large, luxurious, professional, image quality overlord.
- Pentax RZ10: Tiny, simple, convenient, casual snapshot buddy.
Both earn their place - choose wisely based on your photographic ambitions.
Have you had hands-on experience with either? What’s your take or what niche camera’s grabbed your heart? Drop a comment or ping me - love digging into the fascinating quirks of camera gear!
Pentax 645Z vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
Pentax 645Z | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Pentax |
Model | Pentax 645Z | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
Type | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-04-15 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | PRIME III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8256 x 6192 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 204800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 27 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Pentax 645AF2 | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 6 | - |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.2 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 98 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.85x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 2.80 m |
Flash options | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/125 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1550 grams (3.42 lb) | 178 grams (0.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 101 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4505 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | 178 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | D-LI90 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Cost at release | $5,024 | $200 |