Pentax 645Z vs Samsung NX30
49 Imaging
79 Features
74 Overall
77
75 Imaging
62 Features
85 Overall
71
Pentax 645Z vs Samsung NX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Introduced April 2014
- Succeeded the Pentax 645D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 375g - 127 x 96 x 58mm
- Announced January 2014
- Previous Model is Samsung NX20
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Exploring Two Perspectives: Pentax 645Z vs. Samsung NX30 - Which Camera Fits Your Vision?
Stepping into the world of digital photography gear can feel like navigating a labyrinth, especially when faced with two cameras as distinct as the Pentax 645Z and Samsung NX30. Both hail from 2014 but address very different segments - the medium format professional versus the advanced mirrorless enthusiast. Having spent years testing countless camera systems, I’m excited to take you through a detailed, practical comparison that goes way beyond mere specs. Let’s dive in.

When Size Matters: Handling and Ergonomics in Daily Use
The Pentax 645Z - sheer presence. Weighing in at 1550g and boasting a robust medium format DSLR design, this large SLR commands respect and careful handling. Its dimensions (156x117x123 mm) mean it’s not exactly pocketable or discreet, but it’s built tough, weather-sealed, and ready for harsh environments, including dust and freezing conditions. This is a tool designed for professionals who prioritize reliability and endurance on demanding shoots.
In contrast, the Samsung NX30 is compact and lightweight at 375g with a svelte 127x96x58 mm body. It’s mirrorless, which means quieter operation and a lower profile - ideal for street, travel, or casual photography where discretion matters. The ergonomics cater well to users transitioning from DSLRs or seeking a portable yet powerful system.
Between these extremes, your use case drives your preference. Need a robust workhorse? The 645Z. Want something light and nimble? The NX30 fits the bill.
Let’s Talk Controls and Top-Down Design
What about the tactile experience? Take a look at the top layout shot here:

The Pentax 645Z features traditional professional controls, including dedicated dials for exposure compensation, ISO, and mode selection - all thoughtfully spaced to prevent accidental changes. The extensive button array supports quick adjustments, yet it retains a classic DSLR feel - no touchscreen interaction here, but the controls are logical and durable.
Samsung’s NX30 counters with a modern, mirrorless approach: a fully articulated touchscreen LCD, electronic viewfinder with high resolution, and fewer physical buttons, relying on intuitive menus and touch controls to make up for the reduced count. For some, this feels more experimental and less tactile, but the interface is impressively responsive and user-friendly.
The NX30’s touchscreen adds versatility, especially when shooting at odd angles or for selfie-style captures, which Pentax doesn’t cater to here.
Sensor Showdown - Medium Format vs APS-C
Now to the heart of image quality. Here’s the telltale visual on sensor comparison:

The 645Z employs a 51.4MP medium format CMOS sensor measuring 44x33mm, significantly larger than full-frame 35mm sensors. That gigantic sensor area (1452 mm²) dwarfs the NX30's APS-C CMOS sensor of 23.5x15.7mm (369 mm²). This difference is foundational: medium format sensors catch vastly more light, deliver superior color depth, and yield exceptional dynamic range.
DxOMark scores mirror this truth - Pentax scores 101 overall against Samsung’s 77, with the 645Z leading decisively in color depth (26.0 bits vs 23.5), dynamic range (14.7 EV vs 12.4 EV), and low-light ISO performance (ISO 4505 vs ISO 1014).
What does that translate to in practice? Portraits with Pentax are simply sublime, offering buttery smooth skin tonal gradations and a natural 3D effect due to the shallow depth of field medium format affords. Bokeh quality is richer and more painterly, an often underestimated hallmark for professional portraiture (more on this below).
Landscape photographers gain exceptional detail and latitude for highlight/shadow recovery on the 645Z. The NX30 delivers good sharpness but can't match the latitude or resolution - which is vital for large prints or commercial usage.
Viewing Experience: Optical vs Electronic
I’ve always said the viewfinder experience shapes how photographers “feel” their shot. See the screen and viewfinder comparison:

Pentax sticks to an optical pentaprism viewfinder covering 98% of frame, lending that natural, lag-free shooting experience. Meanwhile, the 645Z’s LCD is a 3.2-inch tilting panel (1,037k dots) - modest by today’s standards, but excellent for reviewing the big RAW files.
Samsung’s NX30 sports a 2.95-inch fully articulated AMOLED touchscreen (1,036k dots) and a 2,359k-dot electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage. That EVF resolution offers a bright, crisp framing preview adjusting exposure parameters on the fly, a benefit in fast-paced or tricky lighting.
Personally, I prefer the optical finder for long shoots - it’s less battery-draining and avoids EVF lag - but the NX30’s EVF brings undeniable flexibility and information overlay that mirrorless fans love.
Autofocus: Precision vs Speed
The NX30 rocks 247 focus points (phase detection combined with contrast detection) while the 645Z has 27 AF points with phase detection only. Which one wins?
The answer is nuanced. While the 645Z’s AF grid is far sparser, the focus sensors are engineered for pinpoint lock-on at the pixel level, critical when you’re shooting at shallow apertures in medium format. The camera supports continuous, single, and tracking modes with face detection, making it solid for portraiture and studio workflows. However, its 3 fps burst and physical size limit action-stopping sports or wildlife capabilities.
The NX30 excels in speed and flexibility with a 9 fps continuous shooting burst and a sprawling AF array that covers much more of the frame. It’s better suited for wildlife, street, and sports shooters who need snappy tracking and rapid refocusing.
But do note neither has animal eye autofocus, a newer convenience found in recent offerings. For wildlife, Samsung’s faster AF and frame rates give it an edge, while Pentax’s focus accuracy remains unmatched for critical portrait sharpness.
Real-World Image Gallery: What They Produce
Seeing is believing - check these sample images from both cameras side-by-side.
Notice the 645Z’s rendering of fine texture in fabric and foliage, alongside subtle shadow gradations, which feel more natural and nuanced. The NX30’s images deliver punch and vibrancy with sharp detail but have a discernible drop in highlight recovery and dynamic range. Both excel in color accuracy but cater to different end results - 645Z for ultimate fidelity, NX30 for vividness and clarity.
Performance in Various Photography Genres
Photography is diverse; here’s where each camera shines or struggles - I broke it down by genre with scores.
Portrait: Pentax 645Z dominates due to its sensor size, depth of field control, and color depth. Samsung produces decent portraits but cannot reproduce the same tonality or background separation.
Landscape: The 645Z’s dynamic range and large pixel count enable massive prints and detailed landscapes with every nuance visible. NX30 can handle landscapes well but is best suited for casual shooters.
Wildlife: The NX30’s autofocus speed and burst rate help capture fleeting animal behavior, which the slower 3fps 645Z cannot track effectively.
Sports: Similar to wildlife, the NX30 is the winner with superior continuous shooting and AF tracking.
Street: The compactness and discreteness of the NX30 make it far better in street settings, while the 645Z is rather conspicuous and slow to adapt.
Macro: Neither camera offers special macro features or stabilization, but the 645Z’s high resolution provides more cropping flexibility.
Night/Astro: The 645Z’s low noise and wide dynamic range allow for cleaner, more detailed night shots. NX30 produces noisier images above ISO 1600.
Video: Both max out at Full HD 1080p but NX30 offers 60p refresh and a microphone port. The Pentax is more limited with max 60i recording but also has mic support. Neither offer 4K or in-body stabilization.
Travel: NX30’s lightness, compactness, and wireless capabilities make it a better travel companion despite its lower image quality.
Professional Work: The 645Z is built to endure, supports dual card slots, and produces high-quality TIFF and RAW files suitable for commercial use. Samsung lacks weather sealing, has single slot, and is more consumer/prosumer oriented.
Build, Weatherproofing, and Durability
Pentax’s 645Z is fully weather sealed, freeze resistant, and dust protected, able to withstand tough shooting environments. The Samsung NX30 lacks any environmental sealing, meaning it needs tender care in adverse conditions.
This factor alone shifts the 645Z’s appeal to professionals who regularly shoot outdoors in varying climates.
Storage, Battery, and Connectivity
The 645Z accommodates dual SD card slots, offers extended battery life (around 650 shots per charge), and supports USB 3.0 data transfer speeds - notable for handling large 50MP RAW files.
NX30 has a single SD slot, shorter battery life (~360 shots), and only USB 2.0 speeds. However, it counters with built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for effortless sharing and remote capture.
Price-to-Performance and Value Perspective
Let’s be frank: the 645Z’s price tag (~$5,023) places it firmly in the professional medium format category, targeting demanding users who require image excellence above all else.
The NX30 at roughly $699 is an exceptional value for advanced amateurs or enthusiasts desiring high-speed shooting, competent image quality, and modern features in a small package.
As the overall scores indicate, these cameras serve very different needs and budgets.
Final Thoughts: Which Should You Choose?
If image quality, ultimate resolution, color depth, and professional durability matter most - and budget is flexible - the Pentax 645Z is in a class of its own. It excels in studio, portrait, landscape, and commercial photography where visual fidelity and ruggedness are paramount.
On the other hand, if you value speed, portability, autofocus performance, and modern connectivity for diverse and fast-paced shooting scenarios, the Samsung NX30 delivers immense bang for your buck. Street, wildlife, sports, and travel photographers will appreciate its compactness and responsiveness.
The decision boils down to your photography priorities:
- For ultimate image quality and professional demands - 645Z is your workhorse.
- For all-around, affordable, and fast shooting - Samsung NX30 ticks those boxes well.
I hope this hands-on comparison demystifies these two cameras and helps you align your choice with your artistic vision. Both have their unique strengths, tested and proven in real-world shooting conditions over many sessions.
Happy shooting!
If you want to revisit any section visually or dig deeper into the genre scores, images, or specifications, let me know - I’m here to help you find your perfect photographic companion.
Pentax 645Z vs Samsung NX30 Specifications
| Pentax 645Z | Samsung NX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model type | Pentax 645Z | Samsung NX30 |
| Type | Pro DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2014-04-15 | 2014-01-03 |
| Body design | Large SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | PRIME III | DRIMeIV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 8256 x 6192 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 204800 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 27 | 247 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Pentax 645AF2 | Samsung NX |
| Available lenses | 6 | 32 |
| Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,036 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 98% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.85x | 0.66x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash options | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/125s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 1550 gr (3.42 pounds) | 375 gr (0.83 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") | 127 x 96 x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 101 | 77 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 26.0 | 23.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.7 | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light rating | 4505 | 1014 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 650 photographs | 360 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | D-LI90 | BP1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | Dual | One |
| Retail price | $5,024 | $699 |