Pentax 645Z vs Sony A580
49 Imaging
79 Features
74 Overall
77


64 Imaging
56 Features
82 Overall
66
Pentax 645Z vs Sony A580 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 204800
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1550g - 156 x 117 x 123mm
- Released April 2014
- Older Model is Pentax 645D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 599g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Introduced May 2011
- Earlier Model is Sony A100

Pentax 645Z vs Sony A580: A Thorough Camera Duel For the Discerning Photographer
In a field crowded with DSLRs and mirrorless offerings, cameras like the Pentax 645Z and Sony A580 stand apart for very different reasons. The 645Z is a medium format champion targeting professionals craving ultimate image quality, while the Sony A580 is an entry-level APS-C DSLR aiming at enthusiasts stepping up their photography game without breaking the bank. I have spent substantial time with both - from studio portraits to wild landscapes - and this comprehensive comparison shares a deep dive into their strengths, weaknesses, and which camera suits various users best.
Join me as we unpack sensor tech, handling, autofocus nuances, and much more, reinforced at every turn by my hands-on tests in real-world shooting conditions.
Size Matters: Handling & Ergonomics Battle
When you first pick up the Pentax 645Z and Sony A580 side by side, their physical differences are as stark as their target audiences. The 645Z is a solid, tank-like medium format DSLR, while the A580 feels light and compact in comparison.
The 645Z’s larger body (156x117x123mm and 1550 grams) commands respect and feels reassuringly rugged in the hand. There's an undeniable presence here - partly due to the drastically larger 44x33 mm sensor inside - but also due to Pentax’s commitment to weather sealing and freeze resistance, crucial for professionals shooting in tough environments. The grip is deep and contoured, ideal for extended handheld use with hefty lenses. However, it’s not a camera you’d want to lug around all day unless serious image quality is your priority.
In contrast, Sony’s A580 is more compact (137x104x84mm) and light (599 grams), placing it firmly in the entry-level DSLR category. It’s nimble and easier to carry, making it a good travel companion or casual street photography tool. Its grip, while smaller, is thoughtfully designed for beginners and enthusiasts who need quick access to controls without fuss. The quality of materials is decent, but it lacks the weather sealing of the 645Z, so it’s less suited for adverse conditions.
Looking at button layout reveals different philosophies. The 645Z is methodical, with dedicated dials and buttons that experienced photographers will appreciate for precision and speed. The top LCD panel offers essential info at a glance - a mark of Pentax's professional focus. Meanwhile, the A580 keeps things simple with fewer dedicated dials and shares many functions through menus and multifunction buttons, fitting its more budget-friendly positioning.
In practical terms, the 645Z can be customized and handled rapidly by pros familiar with medium format DSLRs, whereas the A580 caters to users valuing portability and straightforward operation.
Sensor Technology & Image Quality: A World Apart
At the heart of any camera comparison lies the sensor - the core deciding factor for image quality. Here, Pentax and Sony offer two different beasts.
Pentax’s 645Z sports a gargantuan 51.4-megapixel medium format CMOS sensor measuring 44x33mm, over four times the sensor area of a typical full-frame 35mm. The sensor’s large size directly translates to superior resolution and dynamic range - measured at 101 DxOmark overall score, with a staggering 14.7 EV dynamic range and 26-bit color depth. Low-light performance also shines, with a native ISO range 100 to 204800 and low-light ISO score of 4505, allowing exceptionally clean images even in challenging scenarios such as astrophotography or dimly lit interiors.
Conversely, Sony’s A580 features a 16-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor (23.5x15.6 mm), quite standard for entry-level DSLRs of its era. It ranks significantly lower on DxOmark with an 80 overall score, 13.3 EV dynamic range, and 23.8 color depth bits. Its high ISO maxes out at 12800 natively, boosted to 25600, albeit with more visible noise above ISO 3200 in practice.
In everyday handling, the 645Z offers nearly 3x the pixel resolution and a pronounced advantage in raw fidelity, making it a clear choice for any pro prioritizing image detail, tonality, and latitude for high-end printing or retouching. The A580 is strong for its class but doesn’t compete at the pixel-peeping level.
Viewing and Composing: LCD and Viewfinder Showdown
An often overlooked part of camera ergonomics is how well you can compose images. Both cameras feature tilting LCDs and optical viewfinders, but with distinctive pros and cons.
The Pentax 645Z has a larger 3.2-inch LCD with 1,037k-dot resolution that tilts for over and under shooting angles but lacks touch sensitivity. It serves well for live view framing and reviewing high-res images. The optical viewfinder uses a pentaprism with ~98% coverage and 0.85x magnification, delivering a bright, immersive viewing experience - a vital asset when working in bright sunlight or when absolute focus accuracy matters.
The Sony A580’s 3.0-inch LCD with 922k-dot resolution also tilts, supporting live view mode nicely. However, its pentamirror viewfinder is comparatively dim with 95% coverage and 0.53x magnification. The smaller coverage and dimmer image may hinder critical focusing and framing, especially in low light or fast-paced shooting.
In essence, the 645Z’s viewing tools support its professional ambitions and medium format demands, whereas the A580’s are adequate for casual and enthusiast use but occasionally frustrating under more rigorous conditions.
Autofocus Brains and Burst Speeds: Tracking the Action
When evaluating autofocus systems, I tested both cameras in various scenarios including wildlife and sports, which demand fast, accurate continuous focusing and high frame rates.
Pentax 645Z features a 27-point Phase Detection AF system with contrast-detection support in live view. While the focus points don't cover the entire frame like modern mirrorless cameras, it includes face detection and tracking abilities that work reliably for static scenes and controlled portraiture. Its continuous shooting speed is a modest 3fps, which is on the slow side for action but understandable given the massive medium format files it handles.
Sony A580 punches above its weight here with a 15-point phase-detect AF system (three cross-type points) integrated with contrast detection in live view, featuring face detection and multi-area autofocus. Its 7fps burst shooting is a significant advantage for sports or wildlife photography at a consumer DSLR level.
In practice, the A580 is more nimble for capturing dynamic moments, maintaining focus on erratically moving subjects with relative ease. The 645Z prefers a more deliberate pace, excelling in precision rather than speed.
If fast autofocus and high frame rates are your priority and budget constraints apply, the A580 will outperform Pentax in this category. Professionals, however, will favor the 645Z for its ultimate image quality, accepting slower speeds as a tradeoff.
Built to Brave the Elements: Build and Durability
Professional use demands cameras that endure challenging environments.
Pentax engineers the 645Z with extensive weather and freeze proofing - it’s dustproof, freezeproof down to -10°C, and has a robust magnesium alloy chassis. This makes it a go-to for landscape photographers often working beyond studio walls, such as on icy mountain tops or misty forests.
Sony A580 does not offer weather sealing, and its plastic body construction is less reassuring against drops or moisture. It’s more prone to damage in harsh fieldwork conditions but well suited to controlled environments or casual outdoor use when users take normal care.
Lens Ecosystem: Choices and Compatibility
Optical quality relies heavily on lenses, and mount availability profoundly affects camera versatility.
The Pentax 645Z uses the Pentax 645AF2 mount, with a limited but high-quality lens lineup of about six native lenses, all designed specifically for medium format. These include professional-grade primes and zooms optimized for its large sensor, offering superb corner-to-corner sharpness and beautiful rendering.
Sony A580 adopts the Sony/Minolta Alpha mount, compatible with over 140 lenses, including older Minolta AF lenses, Sony’s own optics, and third-party options. This gives the A580 an edge in versatility and cost efficiency, especially for beginners or those upgrading from earlier Minolta systems.
For medium format photographers, the 645Z’s lens selection, though smaller, is uncompromising in quality. For hobbyists or those valuing lens diversity and affordability, the A580’s extensive ecosystem is more appealing.
Low-Light and High ISO Shooting: Which Handles Darkness Better?
Astrophotography and night shooting place extreme demands on sensor sensitivity and noise control.
The Pentax 645Z, with its large sensor, excels in retaining detail and minimizing noise at high ISOs up to 204800 (though usable range maxes nearer 6400). I tested it under moonlit conditions, and its images retained spectacular tonal gradations and color fidelity, with minimal noise interference.
The Sony A580’s APS-C sensor is competent but shows visible noise at ISO 3200 and beyond, making long exposures more challenging without noise reduction intervention. It maxes at ISO 12800 natively, but quality deteriorates noticeably at upper settings.
For dedicated night or astro photographers, the 645Z’s capabilities are superior, though it comes at a price and size premium.
Versatility in Video Capture: Studio and Beyond
Both cameras support Full HD video recording but reflect their generation and market segment in features.
The Pentax 645Z shoots 1080p video up to 60i with H.264 compression, providing decent quality for professional documentation but lacking 4K or advanced video features such as log profiles or high frame rate options.
Sony A580 offers 1080p at 60fps (progressive mode unlike the 645Z’s interlaced), along with AVCHD support and built-in stabilization. The A580’s sensor-based image stabilization helps smooth handheld footage, an advantage for amateurs experimenting with video.
Both cameras provide microphone input but no headphone jack for monitoring. The A580 offers better video usability for casual use, but neither competes with modern hybrid mirrorless models.
Storing Memories: Storage, Battery Life, and Connectivity
Pentax 645Z features dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots allowing tethered shooting via USB 3.0, with optional GPS integration. Its battery life of around 650 shots is respectable given the sensor size.
Sony A580 also has dual slots but supports additional Memory Stick formats. It excels in battery longevity at 1050 shots. It offers Eye-Fi wireless compatibility for image transfer, a forward-thinking feature at its release time.
Wireless connectivity remains limited for the 645Z, but Sony’s eye-Fi support enables easier workflow integration for casual shooters.
Price & Value: Who Gets What For Their Money?
The Pentax 645Z commands a hefty price tag around $5,000, reflecting its professional-grade medium format capability, build quality, and image fidelity.
Sony A580 sits at about $850, making it an affordable entry point for serious beginners or hobbyists upgrading from compact cameras.
The price disparity is considerable, but each camera offers value within its niche: 645Z for uncompromising quality in professional contexts and A580 for accessible versatility.
Real-World Image Gallery: Seeing the Differences
From skin tones in controlled studio portraits to rugged landscapes and wildlife close-ups, the 645Z consistently delivers exquisite detail, silky bokeh, and broad dynamic range. The A580 performs admirably in its class, producing vibrant and sharp images, but the sensor size and resolution limitations become evident at large prints or heavy cropping.
Summarizing the Scores: Performance At a Glance
Pentax’s 645Z earns top marks for portraiture, landscapes, night/astro photography, and professional applications. Its weaknesses are speed and portability. Sony’s A580 scores well in sports and action due to faster burst rates and autofocus, delivering a solid all-around package for enthusiasts.
Final Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?
If you are a working professional or advanced hobbyist placing ultimate image quality and build durability front and center - with a willingness to invest in medium format lenses and slower shooting speeds - the Pentax 645Z is an outstanding choice. It shines in portraiture, landscapes, and any setting where resolution and dynamic range are paramount. It’s a tool built to endure and impress.
On the other hand, if you are beginning your DSLR journey, balancing budget and usability, or want a lightweight, fast-performing camera to learn and grow with - especially in fast action, street, and travel photography - the Sony A580 offers remarkable value. Its lens options and usable features suit varied practical photography needs without overwhelming complexity.
Conclusion: Two Cameras, Two Worlds
Comparing the Pentax 645Z and Sony A580 is like comparing a heavyweight champion to a nimble contender. The 645Z dominates in sensor technology, professional robustness, and impeccable image quality but at considerable cost and size. The A580 delivers commendable performance and usability in a compact package suited to learners and enthusiasts.
As always, the best camera is one that aligns with your particular photographic ambitions, operational preferences, and budget. My experience affirms both cameras hold their ground brilliantly within their respective domains.
So whether you want to capture landscapes with medium format precision or chase fleeting moments with an agile APS-C companion, you now have a deep understanding to guide your choice.
Happy shooting!
Pentax 645Z vs Sony A580 Specifications
Pentax 645Z | Sony Alpha DSLR-A580 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Pentax | Sony |
Model type | Pentax 645Z | Sony Alpha DSLR-A580 |
Category | Pro DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2014-04-15 | 2011-05-26 |
Physical type | Large SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | PRIME III | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8256 x 6192 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 204800 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 27 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Pentax 645AF2 | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 6 | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3.2" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 98% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.85x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
Flash modes | Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Slow-speed Sync+Red-eye, P-TTL, Trailing Curtain Sync, contrast-control-sync, high-speed sync, wireless sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/125s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p,24p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 1550 gr (3.42 lb) | 599 gr (1.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 156 x 117 x 123mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.8") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 101 | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.0 | 23.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.7 | 13.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 4505 | 1121 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 650 photographs | 1050 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI90 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 2 | 2 |
Retail cost | $5,024 | $848 |