Pentax K-3 vs Pentax K-70: The Full-Frame Illusion – Which APS-C DSLR Suits You Best?

Choosing between the Pentax K-3 and the Pentax K-70 feels a bit like picking the right hiking boot - both solid, both well-reviewed, but tailored for subtly different trails and preferences. Having spent countless hours behind the viewfinder wearing many hats - enthusiast, pro, and camera tech nerd - I’m excited to dig into what makes these two DSLRs tick, and more importantly, which one deserves a spot in your camera bag.

Before we dive into specs and performance, let’s set the stage: both cameras sport APS-C sensors, the classic workhorses for so many photographers who want big image quality without the big price or size of full-frame. Pentax, a brand known for sturdy, weather-sealed bodies and keen optics, targets the K-3 more at advanced enthusiasts and semi-pros, while the K-70 stakes its claim as a versatile entry-level powerhouse.

Strap in for an unapologetically detailed, hands-on comparison across genres, technicalities, handling quirks, and real-world impact - all peppered with the candid insights only years of shutter-finger experience can deliver.

The Body and Ergonomics Showdown - Size Isn’t Just a Number

First impressions count, and in cameras, that often means picking one up and feeling if it fits your hands - and soul.

Looking at the physical dimensions: the Pentax K-3 is a mid-size SLR with a body size of 131x100x77 mm and tipping the scales at a solid 800 grams. It’s a bit chunkier but in that balanced, camera-like way that screams confidence. The K-70, meanwhile, sizes down slightly (126x93x74 mm) and is lighter at 688 grams. This weight difference might seem trivial on paper, but after a longish shoot, your forearm definitely notices.

The K-3’s build quality feels reassuringly robust with an outer chassis designed to withstand tough conditions. Pentax’s commitment to weather sealing is significant here - both cameras offer it, but the K-3's sealing promises a bit more confidence in challenging conditions, making it a stunt double for hardy shooting environments. I’ve given both a dusty trail and a light drizzle treatment with no hiccups, but there’s a palpable difference in the K-3’s tough-as-nails aura.

Moving controls: The handling is where the K-3’s mid-size body really shines. It’s a proper grip-and-go DSLR rather than a compact. The front and rear grips are deeply contoured, and the buttons have a satisfying tactile click - no mushy layouts here. The K-70’s controls are simpler, fewer, and a touch smaller. It’s clearly designed to be more approachable for entry-level photographers, but I sometimes found the buttons a little less accessible when wearing gloves or shooting quickly.

From the top, you’ll notice the K-3 has the coveted dedicated ISO dial (a feature cherished by professional workflows), alongside a traditional mode dial and a brilliant screen on the top plate showing exposure info. The K-70 omits the dedicated ISO dial in favor of a simpler mode dial and fewer physical controls - more menu diving, less tactile interaction. For quick adjustments in the field, the K-3 feels like it’s designed for people who demand fast, thoughtful control.

Peering Inside - Sensor and Image Quality

Okay, so size and feel matter, but the sensor is the heart of any camera. Both cameras come equipped with similar sized 23.5 x 15.6 mm APS-C CMOS sensors, boasting around 24 megapixels. But as always, specs tell only part of the story.

Technically, both omit the optical low-pass (anti-aliasing) filter - a nice plus, letting you squeeze maximum detail out of your lenses but also increasing a risk of moiré (which can be managed with careful shooting or software).

The K-3’s sensor is paired with the Prime III image processor, while the K-70 runs on the newer PRIME MII processor. Interesting, right? Theoretically, the K-70 should have some algorithmic advantages, but I found the difference in JPEG output fairly subtle. The K-3, with its advanced signal processing and the benefit of multiple years of firmware updates, tends to deliver slightly richer color depth (DxO’s measured color depth score of 23.7 bits speaks volumes here) and a dynamic range up to 13.4 EV stop equivalents - excellent for landscape and detail-heavy shooting.

While Pentax did not release official DxOMark scores for the K-70, the maximum ISO rating of 102,400 hints at a sensor claiming better high-ISO prowess than the K-3’s official max native ISO of 51,200. In real-world handheld low-light shooting, however, the K-3 held its own competently, with a useful baseline ISO range of 100-51200 and usable shots through ISO 1600-3200 with minimal noise.

Autofocus: The Need for Speed and Precision

Both cameras rely on phase-detection autofocus systems with supplementary contrast-detection in live view. However, the K-3 offers 27 phase-detect AF points with 25 cross-type sensors, while the K-70 drops down to 11 AF points, 9 of which are cross-type.

In my experience testing fast-moving subjects like wildlife and sports, more AF points - especially cross-type - deliver better tracking and accuracy. The K-3’s autofocus choreography outperforms the K-70 by a noticeable margin when it comes to continuously tracking erratic subjects. Its ability to maintain focus on a flying bird or a sprinter flying past is more reassuring.

The 8 fps burst rate on the K-3 versus 6 fps on the K-70 also makes a difference in capturing fleeting moments - a small detail but important if you don't want to miss that decisive shot.

Both cameras boast face detection in live view, but neither have the more modern animal-eye AF that newer models tout. For portrait photographers focused on eye detection, the K-3 shows a more refined algorithm with slightly faster lock-on times and better accuracy in mixed lighting.

Viewing and Interface: How You See is What You Get

Pentax has stuck to a traditional optical pentaprism viewfinder for both cameras covering 100% frame coverage, with nearly identical magnifications (0.64x vs 0.63x). No fancy electronic viewfinders here, which is fine for purists who appreciate natural clarity and zero lag.

The LCD displays, however, are a point of divergence.

The K-3 sports a fixed 3.2-inch TFT LCD with 1,037k-dot resolution - the display is crisp with excellent color accuracy, perfect for reviewing detailed shots in the field. Meanwhile, the K-70 opts for a slightly smaller 3-inch screen at 921k-dot resolution but compensates with a fully articulating design. This variance influences usability, especially for macro, vlogging, or awkward angle shooting.

If you’re a photographer who frequently shoots from low or high viewpoints or wants a screen for selfie-style video, the K-70’s articulated screen is a major advantage despite the slightly lower pixel count.

The Lens Ecosystem and Mount Compatibility

Pentax users have a treasure trove of lenses to choose from. Both cameras share the KAF2 mount with access to 151 lenses (new and vintage), including Pentax’s well-regarded weather-resistant primes and zooms.

That old glass you find in a dusty thrift shop? Chances are, it will play nicely here with varying degrees of autofocus support and metering compatibility.

The K-3 has better firmware support for third-party lenses and advanced adapters, which is great if you’re a collector or experimenter. The K-70’s compatibility is solid but feels slightly less “professional-grade” in handling non-Pentax glass with autofocus reliability.

Real-World Performance Across Photography Genres

Enough tech talk - let's see how these cameras really behave across the photographic spectrum.

Portrait Photography

In skin tone rendition, the Pentax K-3 delivers natural, neutral colors with subtle warmth - ideal for capturing flattering skin textures. Its 27 cross-type AF points combined with a solid 100% coverage optical viewfinder enable precise focus on eyes, crucial for sharp portraits. Bokeh quality, driven by lens choice, also benefits from the camera’s no anti-aliasing filter.

The K-70, while competent, has fewer AF points and a slightly smaller viewfinder magnification, which might challenge precise manual framing. Its articulating screen helps in tough lighting when composing via live view.

Landscape Photography

Landscape shooters will appreciate the K-3’s broader dynamic range and higher color depth. Its sensor captures highlight and shadow details cleanly, giving you generous latitude during post-processing. Plus, that robust weather sealing means you won’t hesitate to shoot in fog, drizzle, or sandy winds.

The K-70 still holds its own well here, too, offering excellent resolution and sensor performance. However, its slightly lower maximum shutter speed (1/6000s vs 1/8000s on K-3) reduces flexibility in super bright conditions. For long exposures and detailed landscapes, the K-3 is my top pick.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

Here the K-3 shines with its 8 fps burst rate and well-dispersed 27 point autofocus system. This combo is crucial when tracking unpredictable wildlife or fast-paced sports action. The camera’s solid build and weather resistance add peace of mind outdoors.

The K-70 offers respectable 6 fps burst and basic AF, but it doesn’t have the same finesse in continuous tracking. For casual wildlife or amateur sports shooting, it’s perfectly fine, but serious fast action shooters will notice the difference.

Street Photography

Portability and discretion matter in street photography. The K-70 wins an edge here - its lighter weight and compactness make it less intimidating and easier to carry all day. The fully articulated screen is handy for shooting candid portraits from the hip.

The K-3, while not bulky per se, feels more “camera-shaped” and can attract more attention - less ideal for low-profile street work. Both cameras perform well in low light due to sensor stabilization.

Macro Photography

Both cameras offer sensor-shift stabilization, which is gold for macro work where vibrations spell doom. The articulating screen on the K-70 again stands out, letting you compose shots from unconventional angles close to the ground or other awkward spots.

The K-3’s superior AF point count may help with focusing precision when paired with a dedicated macro lens, but both systems require some patience at close distances compared to dedicated macro autofocus on higher-end models.

Night and Astro Photography

In astrophotography, sensor noise performance is king. The K-3’s proven track record with usable ISO up to ~1600 combined with the sensor’s dynamic range makes it the better bet under starry skies. Its max shutter speed up to 30 seconds and optional GPS add-ons help with long exposure tracking.

The K-70’s higher ISO ceiling is tempting, but noise performance at ISO above 3200 becomes intrusive - something I found testing faint star fields where color fidelity and low read noise truly matter.

Video Capabilities

Both cameras offer full HD (1080p) video up to 60i/fps and HDMI output granularity for external monitors. Audio-wise, both support an external microphone - a plus for improving sound quality - but only the K-3 provides a headphone jack for real-time sound monitoring, an often-overlooked feature that producers will appreciate.

Neither model offers 4K video (not surprising given their era), so serious videographers looking for crisp 4K capture will want to look elsewhere.

Travel Photography

Weighing the demands of variable conditions, the K-70, again, checks the “lighter, more compact” box, making it attractive for globetrotters packing light.

The K-3’s weather-sealed ruggedness is reassuring, but its larger size means more bulk in your bag. Both cameras’ excellent battery life (560 shots for K-3, 410 for K-70) ensures solid shooting stamina on the road, with the K-3’s dual card slots adding redundancy - a professional feature worth noting when you fail to back up daily.

Professional Use and Workflow

If you’re looking to integrate the camera into demanding studio or advanced field workflows, the K-3 is a clear winner. Its dual SD card slots (allowing overflow or backup), USB 3.0 interface supporting faster file transfers, and dedicated ISO dial cater to pros who want control and efficiency.

The K-70’s single SD slot and slower USB 2.0 port are compromises but understandable given its entry-level aspirations.

Pentax K 3 front Pentax K 3 screen back Pentax K 70 front Pentax K 70 screen back

Connectivity, Storage, and Battery

The K-70 features built-in Wi-Fi for image transfer and remote control - a godsend for social media sharers or photojournalists on deadline. The K-3 disappoints a little here with no wireless connectivity built-in; users must resort to optional GPS or external Wi-Fi adapters.

Storage-wise, K-3 boasts dual SD card slots supporting SD/SDHC/SDXC cards with failover options - a professional safeguard. The K-70 has a single, UHS-I compatible slot, decent but no safety net.

Battery-wise, the K-3’s D-LI90 packs more juice, with approximately 560 shots per full charge, while the K-70 manages around 410. Meaning longer shoots get easier on the K-3.

Price-to-Performance Ratio – What Does Your Buck Buy?

Let’s talk money. Both cameras hover around the same price point - roughly $639 for the K-3 body-only and just under $650 for the K-70 (often with a kit lens).

While the K-3 stretches the budget a little in terms of size and control, it packs more advanced features suited for serious photographers ready to invest in glass and workflow.

The K-70, with its approachable price and versatile feature set, punches above entry-level expectations and offers a remarkably well-rounded package for those just stepping into higher quality photography.

Breaking Down Genre-Specific Ratings

Here’s a quick glance at both cameras’ genre-specific strengths and weaknesses:

Final Thoughts: Which Pentax is Right for You?

After putting the Pentax K-3 and K-70 through their paces, my verdict balances appetite, budget, and shooting style.

• Choose the Pentax K-3 if:
  You’re a serious enthusiast or semi-pro desperate for control, durability, and advanced autofocus - especially if you shoot landscapes, wildlife, sports, or professional assignments. Its robust build, dual card slots, faster burst, and refined sensor performance reward you with greater versatility and confidence in demanding scenarios.

• Choose the Pentax K-70 if:
  You’re an enthusiast or beginner who values ease of use without sacrificing image quality. Its lighter, more compact frame, fully articulated screen, built-in Wi-Fi, and generous ISO range make it an excellent choice for travel, street photography, and casual video work. The K-70 bridges approachable ergonomics with Pentax’s signature weather sealing and sensor stabilization.

Both cameras uphold Pentax’s tradition of durability, image quality, and value. It’s less about which is better in a vacuum, and more about which suits your photographic personality and workflow best.

If you’re still craving a deeper dive or a specific test scenario, drop a line - I’ve probably tested these in that exact setting and would be excited to share my hands-on stories.

Happy shooting!

Article Images:

1. 
2. 
3. 
4. 
5. Pentax K 3 front Pentax K 3 screen back Pentax K 70 front Pentax K 70 screen back