Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-12

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Olympus SZ-12 front
Portability
89
Imaging
37
Features
36
Overall
36

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Olympus SZ-12
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 226g - 106 x 69 x 40mm
  • Introduced January 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Overview

The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SZ-12, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and SZ-12 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and SZ-12 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-M1 II was unveiled 4 years after the SZ-12 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-12 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the SZ-12 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus SZ-12

 E-M1 II SZ-12 
IntroducedSeptember 2016January 2012Newer by 58 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k460kCrisper display (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-12 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 SZ-12 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SZ-12

 E-M1 II SZ-12 
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Olympus SZ-12 has specifications of 106mm x 69mm x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6") and a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SZ-12 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the SZ-12.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-12 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and SZ-12 is 68 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-12 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by checking out specs. The image underneath will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 II and SZ-12.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will provide greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The younger E-M1 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-12 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Olympus SZ-12
75
manual focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect autofocus
saves RAW formats
33
MP count good (14MP)
supports face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
Olympus SZ-12 as a Street photography camera
78
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
provides touch to focus
weather proof
lighter than average in class (574 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
60
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (226g)
no moving screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography highlights
Olympus SZ-12 Sports photography highlights
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
weather proof
comes with phase detect autofocus
bad battery (350 shots)
40
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
supports tracking focus
slow frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
low battery power (220 shots)
lacks phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography factors
Olympus SZ-12 Travel photography factors
72
lighter than average in class (574 grams)
weather proof
provides touch to focus
megapixel count good (20MP)
selfie friendly display
bad battery (350 shots)
65
lighter than competition in class (226 grams)
MP count good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
does not have Timelapse function
low battery power (220 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Landscape photography with Olympus SZ-12
76
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
does not have anti aliasing filter
great ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
2 card slots
bad battery (350 per charge)
40
relatively wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
low battery power (220 per charge)
does not have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging highlights
Olympus SZ-12 Vlogging highlights
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have microphone support
lighter than average in class (574 grams)
31
relatively wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (226 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus SZ-12 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus SZ-12
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIOlympus SZ-12
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Olympus SZ-12
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2016-09-19 2012-01-10
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 121 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,037k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1700s
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames per sec 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 226 grams (0.50 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 106 x 69 x 40mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots 220 shots
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Two Single
Retail price $1,700 $350