Pentax K-r vs Pentax Optio S1: A Tale of Two Cameras from 2011

In the landscape of early 2010s photography gear, two interesting choices from Pentax landed on my testing bench: the Pentax K-r, an entry-level DSLR with serious ambitions, and the much smaller Pentax Optio S1, a compact point-and-shoot aimed at casual shooters. Having spent days shooting with both - each sporting vastly different sensor sizes, user interfaces, and handling - I’m here to dive deep into what these cameras offer outside their spec sheets, and how they stack up across a myriad of photography styles.

Whether you’re a hobbyist debating between the simplicity of a compact and the manual controls of a DSLR, or a pro looking to understand legacy gear options, this detailed comparison blends technical measurements with real-world experience and honest critique. Buckle up for a 2,500-word ride through sensor tech, autofocus prowess, ergonomics, image quality, and everything in between - peppered with insights only accumulated through thousands of camera tests over a decade and a half.

When Size Matters: Handling and Ergonomics

First impressions matter, and the feel of a camera in hand influences how often you’ll actually use it. The Pentax K-r clearly asserts itself as the more serious tool here, with its classic compact SLR body - a far cry from the pocket-sized Pentax Optio S1.

The K-r’s dimensions of 125x97x68mm and a weight just shy of 600g provide a steady grip. Its molded grip and robust plastic finish feel solid - not quite weather-sealed, but built to handle enthusiast use. Controls are thoughtfully placed: shutter button, dials, and dedicated buttons foster a tactile shooting experience.

Compare that with the Optio S1’s slim and light 114x58x28mm frame weighing just 157g. It fits comfortably in a jacket pocket or purse, encouraging spontaneous shots. But the trade-off? Trade tactile buttons for touchscreen absence and minimal physical controls, making adjustments slower and less intuitive.

For those who value direct command over settings and a grip that invites prolonged shooting sessions, the K-r wins hands down here. On the other hand, the Optio S1’s sleek compactness is unbeatable for grab-and-go travel or casual day-to-day snapshots.

Looking down from above, the K-r's control layout reveals dedicated modes for aperture and shutter priority, exposure compensation, and live view toggles - features a serious user craves. The S1 strips all this down, leaning on automated modes typical of compact models, with limited custom exposure control.

Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter

Now, onto arguably the most crucial aspect - the sensor. The K-r boasts a 23.6x15.8mm APS-C CMOS sensor clocking in at 12 megapixels, while the Optio S1 makes do with a tiny 1/2.3” CCD sensor measuring just 6.17x4.55mm but squeezing out 14 megapixels nonetheless.

Sensor size influences dynamic range, noise handling, depth of field control, and ultimately, image quality. The K-r’s APS-C sensor area of nearly 373mm² dwarfs the S1’s paltry 28mm². This significant difference translates directly to superior performance by the K-r in challenging lighting and professional applications.

Delving deeper through DxO Mark’s tests, the K-r earns a solid overall score of 72, underpinned by an excellent dynamic range of 12.4 EV and a respectable color depth (22.9 bits). Its max ISO native value is 12,800, expandable to 25,600, offering usable flexibility in low-light scenarios.

The Optio S1 wasn't tested by DxO Mark, but small-sensor compacts from the era commonly struggled in high ISO, dynamic range, and color depth, especially noticeable beyond ISO 400.

In practice, during a rainy autumn day shoot, the K-r’s images maintained highlight retention and deep shadows without macabre color shifts, while the S1’s shots were prone to crushed shadows and early onset noise. For portraits, this means more pleasing skin tones and controlled contrast with the K-r.

Displays and Viewfinders: Composition and Review Experience

While sensors do the heavy lifting, the interface you use to compose and evaluate images matters immensely.

The K-r features a fixed 3-inch TFT LCD with 921k dots, showing bright, sharp live view images and menus. This resolution and size help critically review photos in the field. The S1 counters with a smaller 2.7-inch TFT LCD but only about 230k dots - noticeably less crisp, which can frustrate attempts at careful focus checks.

Neither camera offers a touchscreen, but that’s hardly surprising given their launch era.

Regarding viewfinders, the K-r’s optical pentamirror viewfinder covers approximately 96% of the frame at 0.57x magnification, providing a traditional SLR shooting experience absent in the S1, which lacks any viewfinder. For street photographers or those working in bright daylight, the K-r’s finder adds compositional confidence, while the S1’s reliance solely on the LCD can be a challenge.

Autofocus and Shooting Responsiveness: Keeping Your Subject Sharp

Smooth and accurate autofocus separates frustrating camera experiences from joyous shooting.

The K-r comes with 11 autofocus points, 9 of which are cross-type sensors. This setup extends decent coverage and sensitivity for subjects, especially in good light, with phase-detection AF in the viewfinder and contrast-detection in live view mode. Face detection is a bonus for portraits.

Conversely, the Optio S1 offers 9 AF points relying solely on contrast detection (no phase-detection), which means slower and more hesitant focus acquisition, especially under low light or fast-moving subjects.

I field-tested both cameras on a bustling city street and a local football match: the K-r maintained consistent focus tracking on moderately fast action at a continuous shooting speed of 6 fps, while the S1 trailed behind at a sluggish single shot per second, struggle to capture sharp images in all but the most static moments.

This aligns with their intended purpose: the K-r targeting enthusiast photographers keen on sports and wildlife captures, the S1 intended for snapshots with less demand on focus speed.

Lens Ecosystem and Versatility: Growth Potential

The K-r shines with its Pentax KAF2 lens mount, compatible with approximately 151 lenses ranging from wide angles to super-telephotos, primes to macros. This vast ecosystem allows photographers to tailor their setup to their needs or pocketbooks.

The Optio S1 comes with a fixed 28-140mm equivalent zoom lens (f/3.5-5.5), offering respectable reach for a compact but no option to change or upgrade optics.

Given my experience with interchangeable lens systems, the K-r’s adaptability makes it a longer-term investment. For macro work - where focusing accuracy and aperture control are vital - the K-r paired with a dedicated macro lens offers precise framing and bokeh control beyond the reach of the S1.

Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Ruggedness on the Job

Neither camera offers weather sealing or specialized durability features. The K-r's body is well-constructed but not splash or dust resistant, limiting harsh outdoor use without protection. The S1’s compact plastic body is even less robust, aimed at light, everyday use.

If you’re venturing into landscapes or wildlife photography in challenging environments, the K-r’s sturdier build coupled with weather-resistant lenses may suffice, but both fall short compared to modern weather-sealed models.

Battery Life and Storage: Shooting Sustainably

The Pentax K-r impresses with a battery life rated at approximately 470 shots per charge when using its dedicated Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Battery Pack (D-LI109) or alternatively 4 x AA batteries, offering flexibility for travel and field shooting. The power draw when using live view and flash is higher, but manageable.

By contrast, the Optio S1’s battery life clocks around 260 shots per charge on its proprietary D-LI92 pack. For casual shooters, this suffices, but extensive recording or continuous shooting (already limited by its 1 fps burst) may demand frequent recharging.

Both cameras use SD/SDHC cards, with the S1 also supporting SDXC and internal storage - a convenience for quick transfers and redundancy.

Video and Multimedia: Modest Offerings

Video recording options are similar - both max out at 1280x720 HD at 25 or 30 fps using motion JPEG format, a standard in 2011 but dated by today’s standards. Audio input ports for microphones or headphones are absent, limiting audio quality management.

Neither camera offers 4K or advanced video features like slow motion or high bitrate recording, so neither caters well to videographers.

Genre Performance: Matching Cameras to Photography Styles

Every type of photography places unique demands on gear. Here’s a distilled evaluation based on testing and technical specs:

Portrait Photography

The K-r’s APS-C sensor enables shallow depth of field and smooth, pleasing bokeh - the hallmarks of portraiture - with excellent skin tone accuracy helped by color depth and face-detection autofocus. The S1’s small sensor and fixed zoom lens struggle to deliver separation or subtle rendering.

Landscape Photography

Dynamic range (K-r: 12.4 EV) and resolution (12MP) combined with interchangeable lenses make the K-r preferable for landscapes. It captures subtle tonal transitions and details. The S1’s smaller sensor and limited lens control produce flatter results with lower shadow detail.

Wildlife Photography

Here the K-r’s faster burst rate (6 fps), advanced AF system, and lens compatibility allow better tracking of wildlife. The S1’s slow AF and single shot rate impede capturing elusive subjects.

Sports Photography

Similar to wildlife, the K-r’s continuous autofocus modes and tracking enable sports shooting at moderate levels, though cropping and high ISO noise may still pose challenges. The S1 is not suitable due to slow shooting speed and autofocus.

Street Photography

This is perhaps the one domain where the S1’s pocketability and discrete profile shine. The K-r is bulkier and more conspicuous - though its image quality and manual control are considerable advantages for deliberate street snaps.

Macro Photography

The K-r’s lens options and precise AF provide greater potential for macro work. The S1’s close focusing at 1cm is impressive in a fixed lens compact but limited in terms of aperture and control.

Night and Astro Photography

High ISO performance and long exposure capabilities favor the K-r (native ISO 200-12,800). The S1’s sensor struggles in low light, and max shutter speed of 1/1500s limits long exposure potential.

Video Capabilities

Both cameras offer modest HD recording without advanced video features.

Travel Photography

The S1’s low weight and size plus versatile zoom are travel-friendly. The K-r offers higher versatility and image quality with reasonable battery life but at a size cost.

Professional Work

The K-r supports RAW capture, manual controls, and interchangeable lenses for professional workflows; the S1 lacks RAW support and pro features.

Summing It Up: Scores and Final Thoughts

To put it bluntly, the Pentax K-r stands out as a genuine enthusiast camera, with competencies spanning crucial photographic disciplines. It delivers a rewarding blend of image quality, manual control, and expandability unseen in the Optio S1.

The S1 shines where portability and simplicity are paramount - think casual social photography or vacations where carrying a DSLR is a burden.

Pentax K r screen back Pentax S1 front Pentax S1 screen back

In this side-by-side image gallery from my recent testing, notice the K-r’s richer tonal gradations, lower noise, and sharper details versus the S1’s more compressed, softer output.

So, Who Should Buy the Pentax K-r?

• Photographers seeking a budget APS-C DSLR with dependable autofocus and lens options.
• Enthusiasts aiming for diverse genres including portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and macro.
• Users who value manual controls, RAW support, and better low light performance.
• Travel photographers willing to trade some portability for improved image quality.

And Who is the Pentax Optio S1 For?

• Casual shooters desiring a small, lightweight camera for point-and-shoot convenience.
• Travelers needing long zoom range without lens changing or bulk.
• Those willing to compromise on image quality for ease of use and instant sharing.
• Beginners who prefer highly automated shooting modes.

A Final Word on Pentax Legacy Gear

Both cameras represent Pentax’s attempt in 2011 to address vastly different market niches. The K-r holds up as a capable entry DSLR for enthusiasts and learners stepping up their craft. The S1, while technologically outmatched, remains a neat example of compact ease for casual users.

I always recommend prospective buyers consider shooting style, intended use, and future goals alongside budget. The K-r’s sturdier specs and control set justify the higher price tag (~$1100 new), though its age means used market deals may be more attractive. The S1 provides a no-fuss option under $200, though sacrifices image quality and flexibility.

Keep in mind that technology has moved forward significantly since 2011. However, for some, these remain affordable, dependable tools to explore photography fundamentals or casual shooting without overwhelming complexity.

Thank you for joining me on this detailed exploration! Hopefully, these insights guide you to a camera that fits your unique photography journey - whether it’s the dSLR depth of the Pentax K-r or the compact ease of the Pentax Optio S1.

Happy shooting!

End of Article