Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
69 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2959/b2959208e447dba4f569f63d7fd2c62d2a4ed005" alt="Pentax K-x front Pentax K-x front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1b1a/c1b1aca5a367ce52d585dfa9c9ef670048d691fe" alt="Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 580g - 123 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed December 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Announced February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Pentax K-x and Pentax WG-2 GPS, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both are produced by Pentax. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the K-x (12MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) and the K-x (APS-C) and WG-2 GPS (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The K-x was revealed 3 years prior to the WG-2 GPS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Pentax K-x being a Compact SLR camera and the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the K-x grades against the WG-2 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax K-x & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax K-x Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax K-x over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
K-x | WG-2 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Pentax K-x
WG-2 GPS | K-x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | ![]() | December 2009 | More recent by 25 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Pentax K-x and Pentax WG-2 GPS
K-x | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Pentax K-x provides external dimensions of 123mm x 92mm x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Pentax WG-2 GPS has dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Take a look at the Pentax K-x and Pentax WG-2 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the K-x compared to the WG-2 GPS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf7f4/bf7f4abd16849ec302bdb6ebf06a0d372575f1d5" alt="Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the K-x and WG-2 GPS is 69 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa7a4/aa7a43ebc3d095badfb776335a12743e969aaf36" alt="Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS top view buttons comparison"
Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The graphic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the K-x and WG-2 GPS.
To sum up, both the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The K-x using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Pentax WG-2 GPS will render more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The older K-x will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1be7e/1be7e161f3814d987cbe1c347c39f09f9d615532" alt="Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS sensor size comparison"
Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2f1e/a2f1e475ac21b81837fa175c8cfd374873a82f93" alt="Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Pentax K-x vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Pentax K-x | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Pentax | Pentax |
Model | Pentax K-x | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-12-23 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Prime | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Pentax KAF2 | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 151 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD monitor | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 96% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.57x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/6000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 16.00 m | 5.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear curtain, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 416 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lb) | 198g (0.44 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 92 x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 811 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 1900 shots | 260 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $600 | $300 |