Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung WB800F
84 Imaging
37 Features
60 Overall
46
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 391g - 122 x 61 x 51mm
- Announced July 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Pentax MX-1 versus Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Pentax and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the MX-1 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the MX-1 (1/1.7") and WB800F (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe MX-1 was revealed 6 months after the WB800F so they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the MX-1 scores vs the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Pentax MX-1 & Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are viewable at Pentax MX-1 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax MX-1 over the Samsung WB800F
| MX-1 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Pentax MX-1
| WB800F | MX-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Pentax MX-1 and Samsung WB800F
| MX-1 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2013 |  | January 2013 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Pentax MX-1 comes with external dimensions of 122mm x 61mm x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") with a weight of 391 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Check out the Pentax MX-1 versus Samsung WB800F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the MX-1 and the WB800F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the MX-1 and WB800F is 84 and 92 respectively.
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes simply by looking at technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the MX-1 and WB800F.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The MX-1 with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB800F will give you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively.
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Pentax MX-1 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Pentax MX-1 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Pentax | Samsung |
| Model | Pentax MX-1 | Samsung WB800F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-07-01 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 4.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 920k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with AR coating | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Speed sync, Trailing Curtain sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 391 gr (0.86 lbs) | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 61 x 51mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 2.0") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 208 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-Li-106 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $400 | $300 |