Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99d7a/99d7a0804ed60f6f44afcaa95ce459edbbe50dd6" alt="Olympus FE-5020 front Olympus FE-5020 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is X-935
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FE-5020 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-300 was announced 5 years prior to the FE-5020 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-300 grades versus the FE-5020 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Olympus FE-5020. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus FE-5020
E-300 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-300
FE-5020 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2009 | ![]() | January 2005 | Newer by 55 months |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus FE-5020
E-300 | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 features exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5020 has specifications of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
See the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 vs the FE-5020.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6a09/b6a09404041b2d2cfc7f78067f8cc7436bb2bd19" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FE-5020 is 67 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e63c6/e63c6fe69fd791c6a98afa89cd0007b1ae864257" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and FE-5020.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus FE-5020 will deliver greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53a4c/53a4cdf6e1678e836a53fa454b460e8bc807622e" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9538/f95384743e94622ae97627d468be39c5cb5b955b" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Olympus FE-5020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Olympus FE-5020 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | X-935 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2005-01-10 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/500s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624 grams (1.38 lbs) | 137 grams (0.30 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $800 | $160 |