Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus FE-5020 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus FE-5020
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
  • Introduced July 2009
  • Alternate Name is X-935
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview

Lets look closer at the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FE-5020 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizing.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-300 was announced 5 years prior to the FE-5020 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-300 grades versus the FE-5020 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus FE-5020

 E-300 FE-5020 
Manually focus Very accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus E-300

 FE-5020 E-300 
IntroducedJuly 2009January 2005Newer by 55 months
Display dimension2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus FE-5020

 E-300 FE-5020 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 features exterior dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5020 has specifications of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).

See the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-300 vs the FE-5020.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and FE-5020 is 67 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-300 and FE-5020.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-300 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus FE-5020 will deliver greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography details
Olympus FE-5020 Portrait photography details
48
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
no liveview
low MP (8MP)
21
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography factors
Olympus FE-5020 Street photography factors
51
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
no image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
60
weather proof
lighter than others in class (137g)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-300
Sports photography with Olympus FE-5020
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
low MP (8 megapixels)
24
weather proof
low maximum shutter speed (1/500s)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography features
Olympus FE-5020 Travel photography features
45
built-in flash
no Timelapse mode
low MP (8MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
65
lighter than others in class (137 grams)
weather proof
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus FE-5020 Landscape photography highlights
43
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
screen is somewhat small (1.8 inch)
no liveview
no image stabilization
low MP (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
no Timelapse mode
31
quite wide (24mm)
weather proof
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-300
Vlogging with Olympus FE-5020
9
lack of video recording
28
quite wide (24mm)
lighter than others in class (137g)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
doesn't have external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus FE-5020
 Olympus E-300Olympus FE-5020
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-300 Olympus FE-5020
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-300 X-935
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2005-01-10 2009-07-22
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 3264 x 2448 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.3-5.8
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 134 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/500s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 4.10 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video file format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 grams (1.38 lbs) 137 grams (0.30 lbs)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) xD-Picture Card, microSD
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $800 $160